Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy and Elections

Democratic Congress to Voters: What Election Problems?

By Art Levine, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2008.


A Democratic-majority Congress is unlikely to pass needed election reforms.
Advertisement

Will Congress be able to overcome the specter of Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004 haunting our election system in time for the 2008 vote? That question takes on new importance because of the Supreme Court decision last week upholding Indiana's draconian photo ID law, which is likely to increase support for a host of GOP-led initiatives designed to limit voting and combat the mythical epidemic of "voter fraud."

In recent weeks, a flurry of hearings has given the impression that the Democratic-led Congress is starting to crack down on assorted vote suppression schemes -- from voter "caging" to unchecked purges of voting rolls -- that have been encouraged by the Bush Justice Department. And progressives, as shown by a unique $350 million voter mobilization campaign launched in mid-March by a coalition of liberal and labor groups, including both the AFL-CIO and the non-partisan ACORN, appear finally ready to overcome these voting rights barriers by adding millions of voters to back their causes or candidates. At long last, it might seem, the federal government could be moving to allow fair voting and full participation -- essential to any election victories for progressives this year.

Appearances, unfortunately, can be deceiving. Despite a series of House and Senate hearings probing voter restrictions based on the myth of voter fraud and mostly GOP dirty tricks, it now seems virtually certain that not a single piece of major election reform legislation will pass Congress in time for the November, 2008 elections. "The outlook is somewhat bleak," concedes Tanya Clay House, the public policy director of People for The American Way (PFAW).

The likely voting crisis was given new urgency not only by the Supreme Court ruling but by serious election problems that have surfaced in Pennsylvania and other primary states as well. Admittedly, few, if any, Republican-dominated states, such as Missouri, are likely to pass any new photo ID laws in time for November. But a chilling new report in mid-April by the Election Protection coalition, released by the National Campaign for Fair Elections, found everything from machine breakdowns to vote-suppressing deceptive practices in the primary season before the April 22 Pennsylvania primary. Election Protection, Voter Action and Common Cause reported finding machine breakdowns, harassment and voter registration foul-ups in their monitoring of the Pennsylvania primary two weeks ago. Voter Action even filed an unsuccessful lawsuit to force the Philadelphia election board to provide emergency paper ballots to voters who were turned away after machines broke down.

Just don't expect any help from the federal government to solve such problems. Few election reform advocates on Capitol Hill or in national advocacy groups openly admit that their legislative reform agenda is dead for this year. But some reformers in such key battleground states as Pennsylvania and Ohio are "preparing for the worst," as Pennsylvania PFAW coordinator Celeste Taylor puts it. For Pennsylvania voters, some will likely face being purged from rolls because of database errors while most will be voting on paperless electronic machines that don't allow for reliable recounts.

"The election system isn't ready for a potentially historic election," especially with the expected huge turnout, observes Jonah Goldman, the director of the National Campaign for Fair Elections. "There's a potential for chaos any place there's a close election," he says. "And there are certain operatives who could care less [about election laws] and will do whatever it takes to get their candidates elected -- and I'm not sure the Justice Department is going to do anything about it."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, election reform, congress

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Maybe DIEbold is starting to financially control the Democratic Party from the ankle on up.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 5, 2008 6:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like the rest of Corporate America now changing their Big Money donations from R to D, I wouldn't be surprised to see the vote-rigging companies doing the same. Then again, the Democrats didn't even touch that issue in the last two years let alone 8. Besides, why did they allow the Bush gang to manipulate the election throughout all of 2000?

As a matter of fact, my cousin who lives in San Francisco reported to me that for a Democrat or Republican to get on the ballot, all that's needed at 60 signatures. For all others, it's something like 10,000. And this is the policy that both parties in CA strongly supported. I'm sure the same thing happened in TX or Ron Paul would have been a Libertarian in Congress rather than being forced to run as a Republican as he acknowledged.

And then you wonder why folks like myself are switching to the Nader camp. I used to be a strong Democrat and I even overlooked the pandering to the GOP the Democrats did in the 1990s although it wasn't as bad as the 1980s but in those decades I admit that I was too young to pay attention since I had to deal with maintaining what little job security was left as well as sacrificing my income on higher education in grad school which actually helped me thereafter in life. But after these past 8 years of watching the Democrats cave in to Bush on EVERYTHING even when there was BIG TIME support of them not to, all I can say is "I'VE FUCKING HAD IT WITH THE DEMOCRATS. RALPH NADER IS CORRECT WHEN HE SAYS THAT THERE'S NOT A DIME'S WORTH OF A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS !!!!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's Wrong?
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 5, 2008 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should the congressional Democrats tamper with the system that put them into office? Their very presence in Congress proves that God's in His Heaven and all's right with the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just one more step toward the eventually merger of the Democrats with the GOP
Posted by: Rune on May 5, 2008 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats have been supporting the Republicans' policies, they are taking money from GOP donors and lobbyists, so why shouldn't the Democrats start using the Republican's tactics, too? They wanna be real Republicans when they grow up. This is just another rite of passage for them.

Equally troubling, a variety of bills aimed at halting some of the most egregious abuses and fixing unreliable electronic voting machines have essentially stalled in Congress -- primarily due to Republican opposition in the Senate in an election year. "It's a difficult environment to pass any legislation," one knowledgeable Senate staffer admits. "The challenge is being able to frame the debate so it's not fraud [the GOP concern] vs. access [the Democratic concern], so that we find some policies that are seen as just good public administration practices."

Oh, come on, it was none other than Dennis Kucinich who recently teamed up with fellow Democrat Nick Rahall to join the Republicans in killing the Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008. This is no longer a matter of a few closeted conservatives in the Democratic party going along with GOP plans to undermine every last right of mostly Democratic citizens. Now, even the supposed darlings of what passes for the left are jumping in on the unseemly action, too.

So, why is it that those who have not had their right to vote taken from them are still voting for these clowns? Or, more importantly, is there a point when people can get past their sports team-like loyalty to the party in blue and start being loyal to themselves when they vote? I am getting the idea that the answer is no.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Electoral Reforms blocked under Dems
Posted by: Geolager on May 5, 2008 10:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats like to think of themselves as the great saviors of this nation, but year after year and election after election, they ignore the fraud and abuse and disenfranchisement that commonly occurs in our electoral system. They themselves have been the primary oppressors of third party participation. When third party presidential nominees call for recounts in elections it has been the Dems who have blocked those moves all the while yodeling their favorite mantra, Spoiler!"

You just can't have any faith that anything will change should they regain the WH and the Congress.
I am willing to bet $ on this with my friends.

If you want someone to do something about this meanwhile- vote Green.
This is an integral part of our message and our push for truly participatory democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MI Primary Was Stolen For Hillary By MI leading DEMS
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 6, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I voted in that Rigged MI Primary- for Kucinich.
Heres how it worked Here (probably in FL too,- But other tactics have been used Too in other States)
first Cause all other Dem candidates to not be on the Ballot by not following the Rules
Tehn get the Media to chant the mantra "Clinton is the ONLY Dem on the Ballot"- some media actually added "Leading or Upper Tier".
Next claim it's OK to have various versions of th Ballot. Having some in Alphabetical Order, others with Kucinich (I have yet to hear of ballots with Dodd, Gravel or Uncommitted in the Top spot) But that is Irrelevant once they are Fed into Pre Programmed SCAMtrons which would read every top spot Vote as a Clinton vote since Hers would be the first in Alphabetical Order.
Come On why is it Democratically necesary to 'Scamble the names', It cost more for Print runs due to lower numbers per verison, and then EACH SCAMtron Must Be Uniquely Programmed for the Paricular District it will be used in .Considering the Restriction palced on Election offficials to actual Test the system for accuracy- only the manufacturer cna make these REQUIRED changes. Then consider the Cost to the Tax Payers for this 'Special Printing and Pre programming' and someone(s) either Raped the taxpayers for Corp Profits or Rigged the Outcome.
Really MI with it's metropolitain cities and Union blood lines voted 55% for Hillary? WE DID NOT!They kneecapped the other contenders, They Surpressed the voters with "only Dem ' Rhetoric, they fixed the ballots & machines.
The Dem 'leaders' in this State are going to get Bitch Slapped right out of Office and into Prison For their part in this Election Fraud!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Non-Partisan ACORN?? Who are you kidding?
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on May 6, 2008 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Acorn has been caught red handed dealing in VOTER FRAUD. 12 States so far! The Voter ID decision just voted on in the Supreme Court is exactly what is needed to stop ACORN employees. Who have been accused of submitting bogus voter registration cards and forging signatures on ballot initiatives?
Acorn has been busted for voter fraud in;

New Mexico
Florida
Colorado
Minnesota
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin
Virginia
Missouri
Ohio
Texas
Washington State
Arkansas
Michigan
North Carolina

One busted Ex-Acorn employee admitted that laws like the Voter Id just upheld from the Supreme Court would stop voter fraud. Acorn and Obama wrote briefs to the Supreme Court opposing the Voter Id law but what we know Acorn just wants to continue with their voter fraud business as usual but I wonder why Obama would have a problem with a simple check to verify the voters legitimacy?


I feel if your anti Voter ID your pro Voter Fraud. ID's are cheap or free and easy to optain. If you want beer or a pack of cigs you will get an ID. If you want to vote you can get an ID.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rule of force
Posted by: jstepp590 on May 6, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any type of government is supported through force. Whether that force is through the ballot or the bullet it is the same.

The rule of the vote replaced the rule of the bullet, as it should. I really hope these short sighted agressively ambitious dimwits in Washington realize that if they invalidate the votes of the people then they will eventually face the rule of the bullet.

In case they didn't notice, our constitution specifically says that when our government becomes so corrupt that it no longer meets the needs of the people then we the citizens have the right to replace it. I really hope they paid enough attention in political science class to truly understand what that means.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The constitution says no such thing. Posted by: JimmyVaughan
As long as the bushie thugs
Posted by: willymack on May 6, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are a force, you can bet whatever they do will be illegal and anti-American. If they're not brought up on multiple charges, convicted, and imprisoned, then, it'll be business as usual, and as usual ordinary citizens will get the shaft.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outstanding article
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on May 8, 2008 2:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you. I may write a diary at Daily Kos using this information. Only one criticism-- it's a bit too negative. The fact is that positive inroads have been made on various fronts, for example in the election of Secs. of States in CA and OH that are rejecting touch screens and reforming the other abuses at the state level. Congress' record is dismal, and from this article it would appear to be due in part to the cowardly and stupid old school view of many Dems that taking on their opposition will force them to play defense and ew that would be so hard, hard work, when the abuses of their opponents are so gigantic as to make their cowardly stupidity massively absurd. I do think, though, that the influence of up and coming legislators, secs. of state, and new candidates who are hip to the problems and want to solve them will get us some traction soon. Problem is, we need reform now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]