Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democracy and Elections

Dept. of Veterans Affairs Changes Policy on Helping Wounded Soldiers Register to Vote

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted May 1, 2008.


The VA bows to public and political pressure, but soldiers still must ask for help.
Advertisement

The Department of Veterans Affairs has issued new rules allowing former soldiers living at VA facilities to ask for help with registering to vote and voting -- a decision that could increase participation in the 2008 election by wounded Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans.

The new rules, to be published on government websites this week, reverses a years-long policy where the VA opposed helping patients and others living on VA campuses -- notably homeless veterans -- with voter registration and voting, saying to do so would be a partisan activity.

"It is VHA policy to assist patients who seek to exercise their right to register and vote," said the new policy, issued by the Veterans Health Administration as Directive 2008-023. "This policy establishes a uniform approach to assembling and providing information on voter registration and voting to veterans who request it."

Under the directive, VA facilities "must ensure" there is a "written, published policy on voter assistance" that allows patients to leave the facility to register and vote, subject to their physician's approval; provides help for registering and voting by absentee ballot; and informs patients that voting assistance is available. It states, "This also needs to be done when the patient is admitted to the facility."

The directive says any VA "personnel (including volunteers)" must review and sign a "Political Activities Fact Sheet" provided by the Office of General Counsel. It also says "any request by an outside organization to hold a voter registration drive on VA property" will be reviewed by the VA's attorneys, but it does not state how quickly the agency must respond to registration drive requests.

Advocates for veterans' voting rights praised the new VA policy.

"VA's new directive is progress," said Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, whose mission has long included advocating for former soldiers' voting rights. "They changed from actively opposing it to passively supporting it."

"I think is an enormous first step," said Scott Rafferty, a Washington-based attorney who has been fighting the VA in court over the issue since 2004. "Until today, VA policy prohibited staff members from assisting disabled vets who needed help to obtain and fill out voter registration forms. This changes that. That's the good news."

Both Sullivan and Rafferty said the policy's impact would lay in its implementation.

For example, merely posting the new policy in small-print type in the corner of hospital wards and not asking vets if they wanted to register would not change much, Rafferty said, who said the directive did not indicate if the VA would offer the opportunity to register to vote to millions of elderly veterans who come to VA facilities for annual checkups and to renew their prescriptions.

"They also need to reach out to the veterans who live in shelters on VA property who may not be patients," Rafferty said, "and they need to tell veterans who move to VA campuses that they will be purged (from voter rolls) unless they correct their voter registration forms."

Sullivan said his organization would be watching to see how quickly the VA's attorneys would process requests from third-party groups for conducting voter registration drives at VA facilities.

"Veterans for Common Sense plans to follow VA's actions closely in order to make sure that VA's lawyers expeditiously review requests for voter registration drives," he said. "We also hope VA will establish a single national policy so that there is consistent implementation at the local level."

The VA announcement also comes as top election officials in several states, notably California, were poised to ask the VA to designate itself as a voter registration agency, like motor vehicle departments, under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). Those requests come on top of persistent pressure from Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and John Kerry, D-Mass., to assist wounded veterans to register to vote.

The two senators, who had written to Secretary of Veterans Affairs James B. Peake in March -- only to receive a response later in the month stating that there would be no change in policy -- also praised the new VA policy in a statement issued late Wednesday.

"The VA directive seems to be a dramatic turnaround in granting veterans the access to voter registration that they rightfully deserve," Sen. Feinstein said. "This directive would require that all VA facilities develop comprehensive voter registration plans to assist veterans in voting. Given the sacrifices that these men and women have made, providing easy access to voter registration services is the very least we can do."

"I am hopeful that this apparent reversal will be one large step forward in the fight to protect the right of America's veterans to vote," Sen. Kerry said. "We will continue to monitor this situation motivated by one and only one principle: Those who fight for democracy overseas shouldn't have to fight for democracy here at home."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: veterans, va, veterans affairs

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election" (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Amazing!
Posted by: HughScott on May 1, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A micro-concession in the Republican-driven vote suppession campaign.

What's next? Free photo ID cards?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Duty Honor Country, My Ass..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 1, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over and over we see that for the Pentagon Duty Honor and Country is a load of crap..!

You only have to judge them by their deeds and not their meaningless words..

If the public and the Media don't expose their failings in the interest of our troops embarrass them and open them to ridicule and condemnation they do nothing to remedy any of these outrageous abominations our troops are subject to..

2,740 sexual assaults upon female soldiers this year alone, poisonous water from KBR the gang rape corporation..

Walter Reed now the inhuman conditions of our army barracks..

The Ready Reserve being a never ending commitment until 55..years of age..calling up Grandmothers..and the Stop Loss..!

It's become a huge disgrace one thing after another wounded heroes denied the right to Register to vote how "F"-ing American is that..?

Duty Honor Country My Ass..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In case you were wondering what the veterans and soldiers think about the war:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 1, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zogby Conducts First Poll of Iraq Troops, 2006

A new poll to be released today shows that U.S. soldiers overwhelmingly want out of Iraq -- and soon. The poll is the first of U.S. troops currently serving in Iraq, according to John Zogby, the pollster. Conducted by Zogby International and LeMoyne College, it asked 944 service members, "How long should U.S. troops stay in Iraq?"

Only 23 percent backed Mr. Bush's position that they should stay as long as necessary. In contrast, 72 percent said that U.S. troops should be pulled out within one year. Of those, 29 percent said they should withdraw "immediately."

Le Moyne College/Zogby Poll shows just one in five troops want to heed Bush call to stay “as long as they are needed.”

While 58% say mission is clear, 42% say U.S. role is hazy.
Plurality believes Iraqi insurgents are mostly homegrown.

Almost 90% think war is retaliation for Saddam’s role in 9/11, most don’t blame Iraqi public for insurgent attacks.

Majority of troops oppose use of harsh prisoner interrogation.

Plurality of troops pleased with their armor and equipment.

While 89% of reserves and 82% of those in the National Guard said the
U.S. should leave Iraq within a year, 58% of Marines think so.

7 in 10 of those in the regular Army thought the U.S. should leave Iraq in the next year. . .


No one is asking the troops what they think any more - I imagine Petraeus put out an absolute ban on soldiers being polled, right after he finished confiscating every camera and cell phone in the U.S. military. After a brief search, that was the ONLY poll of US troops that I could find. There are no polls at all of what disabled Iraqi veterans think about the war.

However, I doubt they'd be voting Republican.

Meanwhile, polling of the American public continues, resulting in headlines like this charmer:
Support for war effort highest since 2006, By DAVID PAUL KUHN | 3/12/08

According to late February polling conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 53 percent of Americans — a slim majority — now believe “the U.S. will ultimately succeed in achieving its goals” in Iraq. That figure is up from 42 percent in September 2007.

Funny - the article doesn't spell out what those "goals" are, does it? What are the goals? Capture and control of the oilfieds, right? Several things are needed - a puppet dictator, a oppressive secret police force like the ones in Saudi Arabia and Iran, a compliant Parliament that will sign over the rights to the oil - still a long ways to go there.

No one appears to be too concerned with what the soldiers in Iraq think about this any more. No one is commissioning any polls of wounded Iraq veterans. I wonder why that is?

Similarly, after that Zogby poll came out, eight months later the WP ran this article, not based on any polls, just on "the reporter's sources": Soldiers in Iraq Say Pullout Would Have Devastating Results, By Josh White, Washington Post Staff Writer, Monday, November 6, 2006

As election season grows uglier and more distorted than ever, expect the bullshit to start piling up at record rates - but if you actually want to support a group that works to end the war, there is no better choice than Iraq Veterans Against the War

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Veterans Affairs my bloody ass!
Posted by: Nightstallion on May 2, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a Viet Nam Era Veteran. I asked for help. None has ever been forth coming.

I know at least eight veterans names who also have never recieved help of any kind. Of that eight five are still living and none of the five ever recieved aid.

Only one of these was because he didn't know he was eligible and therefore never did an will not now ask! He has a fatal disease called personal Pride and agent orange poising.

If I were placed into a position where I was in an office asking some haughty supercillious nudnic for help it is my sincere belief that I would strangle the S.O.B. before I left the office. Justice has to start somewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]