Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy and Elections

Inside Guantánamo with Detainee 061

By Mariah Blake, Mother Jones. Posted April 2, 2008.


The Pentagon knew that Murat Kurnaz was an innocent man at Guantánamo Bay, but they kept him there for five years anyway. This is his story.
Advertisement

IT WAS LATE September 2002, and construction crews were just finishing work on the main prison camp at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, when three German intelligence agents arrived on the island aboard a U.S. military plane.

The reason for their visit was sensitive. The Pentagon was still arguing that those held at Guantánamo were "the worst of the worst" and "the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the Earth," but behind closed doors CIA officials were coming to the conclusion that a number of detainees had no links to terrorism, and were working on a list of prisoners to be set free.

One of the detainees being considered for release was Murat Kurnaz, a German-born Turkish citizen who had been pulled off a bus in Pakistan the year before and turned over to U.S. forces. Since then, American security agencies hadn't turned up any evidence that he belonged to a terrorist group or posed a threat to the United States. But before clearing his release, the CIA wanted the Germans to interrogate him and offer their stamp of approval.

After they arrived, the agents were led out to a trailer near the dusty sprawl of cell blocks known as Camp Delta. Inside, the air conditioner was on full blast, and Kurnaz, a stocky young man with blunt features and a thick red beard, was seated on one side of a long table, his hands and feet shackled to a ring in the floor. The men took turns questioning him--about the nightclubs he frequented in his wilder years, about his reasons for embracing Islam, about his journey to Pakistan and the heavy boots he bought before leaving--while a hidden camera rolled in the background.

All told, they spent 12 hours with him over two days, concluding by the end that he simply found himself "in the wrong place at the wrong time" and "had nothing to do with terrorism and al-Qaida," according to German intelligence reports.

They discussed their findings with CIA and Pentagon officials, then boarded a plane back to Germany. During a stopover in Washington, D.C., one of the agents visited the local branch of Germany's foreign intelligence service, the BND, and reported back to headquarters via a secure phone line, saying: "USA considers Murat Kurnaz's innocence to be proven. He should be released in approximately six to eight weeks." A few days later, a Pentagon release form for the detainee was printed and awaiting signature.

"At that point, the picture was clear," says Lothar Jachmann, a retired spy who headed the intelligence-gathering operation on Kurnaz for Germany's domestic intelligence agency, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, and was briefed on the Guantánamo visit by one of the agents. "We had nothing on him, and we had gotten feedback that the Americans had nothing on him either. The plan was to let him go."

But Kurnaz was not set free. Instead, he spent another four years languishing at Guantánamo, where he was repeatedly designated an "enemy combatant," despite evidence showing he had no known links to terrorist groups.

Lawyers for Guantánamo detainees often argue that their clients are being held based on thin intelligence, but Kurnaz's case is the first where the record clearly shows that evidence of innocence was ignored to justify his continued detention. His story, pieced together from intelligence reports, newly declassified Pentagon documents, and secret testimony before the German Parliament -- much of it never before reported in the United States -- offers a rare window into the workings of the secretive system used to hold and try terrorism suspects.

MURAT KUNRNAZ, the son of Turkish immigrants, was born and raised in Bremen, a rainy north German port city, where he lived with his family in a simple brick row house. His father, Metin, worked the assembly line at a Mercedes Benz plant, while his mother, Rabiye, stayed home with him and his two younger brothers. On Fridays he and his father attended the neighborhood Kuba Mosque, a storefront sanctuary with a barbershop, bookstore, and cavernous teahouse where old men in crocheted skullcaps huddle around plastic tables.

Mosque-goers remember Kurnaz as a shy, quiet boy who didn't take much interest in religion. "He was a normal Muslim Turk, who prayed once in a while, but was not very observant," says Nurtekin Tepe, a local bus driver, who has known Kurnaz since he was a child. Instead, Kurnaz spent his time watching Bruce Lee movies, dreaming about motorbikes (he hoped to get one and drive it 110 miles per hour on the autobahn), and lifting weights, often with his neighbor, Selcuk Bilgin, who had many of the same interests, though he was six years older.

This began to change in the fall of 2000. Kurnaz, then 18, was working as a nightclub bouncer; Bilgin had a dead-end job at a supermarket. Some of their friends had started getting in trouble with the law. Feeling there must be something more to life, both men began to take a deeper interest in Islam. Before long, they had cut pork from their diets, grown their beards long, and started attending a new mosque, Abu Bakr, which was located in a dingy, fluorescent-lit office building near Bremen's main train station and preached a strict brand of Sunni Islam.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: guantánamo, murat kurnaz, al-qaida, afghanistan, war on terror

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Dieter Schmied
Posted by: dieterschmied on Apr 2, 2008 1:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The link to the timeline did not work:


http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008
/03/murat-kurnaz-Guant%C3%A1namo-timeline.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dieter Schmied Posted by: luckypuck
Kurnaz
Posted by: modeler on Apr 2, 2008 1:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched his interview on 60 Minutes this past Sunday. Listening to his story and reading it here anew leads me to the conclusion that Bush, Cheney and their neocon zionofascist gang deserve more than anyone else to spend the rest of their lives in conditions similar to those of the detainees in Gitmo. They are the worst terrorists the world has ever seen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Kurnaz Posted by: donl51
» RE: Kurnaz Posted by: luzmejor
do you think this could happen to Y-O-U?
Posted by: jwpa13 on Apr 2, 2008 4:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only answer is, Y-E-S.

Who will stop these asholes?
CLINTON? OBAMA?

OH yeah, it must be MCCAIN.

Don't bet you life on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somethings never change
Posted by: donl51 on Apr 2, 2008 5:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Location to location,w/this country especially mainly because I live in it. The system as a whole is broken, the way its become in Guantamino is of course worse still because you really don't know who you're dealing with, however when you know for certain your prisoner is innocent and keep him locked up anyway , this act makes you guilty, I'm no lawyer so the terms I don't know, but to me Kidnapping sounds appropriate!, Bush and co, are the wardens,etc. responsible for what goes on at that prison, to me that says they are guilty, and so are those in charge beneath them right down to the bottom rung, and the reason I'm saying this is the Nuremberg trials where all responsible were guilty!...I am not against a system, and prison for captured war criminals and or spies, places like these are needed for the security of your country ,especially in times like these but so are some form of human right, like a lawyer or even advisor for a prisoner are needed, our worst criminals here in our country are allowed this, and what exactly is Gitmo.?? POW? Mil.Civil/ what? nobody seems to know and that's partly why I feel the entire Judicicial system of this country is broken.....or corrupt!!.........if I were in his shoes if ever released I'd probably become what I was held for''innocent'' all those years! just to get back at our arrogance!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bobby Decker
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Apr 3, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" IS THAT JIM MORRISON ? "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 4, 2008 2:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pursue the Bush administration beyond January 20 until they are brought to justice.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Idiot Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: Idiot Posted by: redstar1970
JUDICIAL, NOT MILITARY CONFLICT
Posted by: soowee on Apr 4, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right after 9/11/01, the Bush Admin. declared the proper response would be exclusively military, and that there would be no need to observe the judicially mandated path of "due process" for whomever had perp'd the deaths at the World Trade Center, etc.

This end-run around the 3d branch of government was a deliberately calculated ploy on the part of the Bush Admin. and its Just-Us Dept. to enable summary Executive-Branch military shenanigans--there is not even a congressional declaration of war supporting the utter nonsense going on in Eye-rak.

The US Constitution is now meaningless, thanks to a complacent Supreme Court dominated by wrong-wing fascist Catholics.

All of this evasion of due process seemed to suit the nodding heads in America at the time. Mencken's "booboisee" were perfectly happy to bomb the "towel-heads" or imprison them without any due process.

Now, with the travesties occurring at Gitmo and elsewhere, the renderings, secret flights, etc., the chickens are coming home to roost. With the complicity of most Americans, innocent people have been routinely imprisoned without charge, trial or verdict, and torture has been the norm, all under the brave auspices of the "Stars and Stripes" (forever).

Was Jeremiah Wright, Jr. so wrong to suggest that Americans (most of us, anyway) deserve whatever bad may happen?

George Bush vetoed the anti-waterboarding legislation because "they hate us for our freedom," he says. So, if we have no freedom to hate, then they can't hate us!!

Simple.

We will be purely lucky if nothing else bad happens to any of us domestically. We deprive others of their liberty at our own peril. We reap what we sow.

Simple solutions for simple minds.

Americans (most of us) really are dumb as dogshit.

H. W. Ellerson
PO Box 90
Hadensville, VA 23067
(804) 457-4243

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dark Ages
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 4, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kurnaz's case isn't the only one where detainees are kept and tortured by the US, even though the US KNOWS these detainees are innocent.
The VAST majority of "war on terrrr" detainees, it has been estimated by the US MILITARY, are completely innocent.

Yet what gets me is that, even after the 60 Minutes story aired, many Americans still think that indefinite detention without proper trial and TORTURE are okay for all such detainees because, hey, they are "terrorists".
68% of Americans, in a poll taken last year, actually support torture done against these "terrorists".
And habeas corpus is a luxury for American citizens only. (But soon, even we may be denied that -- at least if the Bush administration has its way.)

And you think the Supreme Court will help? Not if the ULTRA-conservative majority on the Court has any say. The best good people can hope for there is a 5-4 decision against habeas corpus, I am certain.

These are the Dark Ages for America. And I fear we have long ago passed the point of no-return.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Winning Hearts and Minds All Over the World...
Posted by: arieden on Apr 4, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this any way to run a country, a foreign policy, a war, anything?
But as long as someone is locked up and tortured for 9/11 (even if innocent) the American public feels better.
That's what Jesus would do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best and worst of times.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 4, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Born in 1935, I witnessed the best of times in America. Sadly those days are gone -- lost forever because of Herr Busch and his fascist, goose-stepping bully boys.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, ARDENT Obama supporter, and author of George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, published in 2004.

To read a sample chapter and learn about the only smoking-gun proof of White House corruption ever found on the Web, visit www.PhonyFighterPilot.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mother jones gets the details
Posted by: whealeydj on Apr 4, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to a blatant case of arbitrary detention without trial that characterizes authriantaian and totalitarian regimes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]