Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy and Elections

Instead of Standing By Their Men, Political Wives Should Show Them the Door

By Katha Pollitt, The Nation. Posted March 18, 2008.


The post-scandal humiliated wife standing next to her politician husband is a trend that needs to die.
wspitzer112
Advertisement

Just once I'd like to see a male politician caught in a sex scandal stand up there at the press conference all by himself. You want to be an alpha male with extra helpings of testosterone and appetites that cannot be denied? Fine, but if you get caught, Be. A. Man. Don't drag your wife in front of the cameras to prove how strong your marriage is. Practice saying these words: "No, darling, I could never live with myself if I let you humiliate your self in public to help my career. I know people always want to blame the wife, but this is all my fault. Besides, I don't want our children to think marriage means wives have to put up with their husband's crap--that's what prostitutes are for! No, wait..."

Silda Wall Spitzer looked so sad and stricken standing next to her husband, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, as he issued a brief statement apologizing to his "family" and "the public" -- in effect acknowledging the truth of revelations that he was Client 9, who had paid a prostitution ring called the Emperors Club VIP for (very expensive) sex. Has nothing changed since 1969, when poor Joan Kennedy faced reporters with Ted after Chappaquiddick? In just the past decade we've had, among others, Suzanne Craig, Wendy Vitter, Dina McGreevey and, of course, Hillary Clinton. I'm not saying the wife has to divorce her ethically challenged spouse, although, come to think of it, that would make a change. But just once I'd like to see her skip the press conference and fly off to Paris instead. And then I'd like to see a political husband stand by his wife when she's caught, oh, I don't know, giving a no-show job to her tennis instructor. Except that particular shoe never does end up on the masculine foot, does it? Because female politicians don't go to whorehouses, or troll for sex in public toilets, or give a top job to their completely unqualified lesbian girlfriend while pretending to have the perfect white-bread family. They are too busy finding clothes that are businesslike but not mannish, and feminine but not sexy, which takes pretty much all day. But if the roles were reversed, do you think her husband would stand up there, bravely, nobly, silently, as Cuckold 1? No, he'd be in the corner bar -- or down at his lawyer's.

People may use words like stoic and dignified to describe the stand-by-your-man act, but really what they're thinking is either doormat or enabler. (Dr. Laura Schlessinger, on the Today show, to a startled Meredith Vieira: "When the wife does not focus in on the needs and the feelings sexually, personally, to make him feel like a man, to make him feel like a success, to make him feel like her hero, he's very susceptible to the charm of some other woman making him feel what he needs. And these days, women don't spend a lot of time thinking about how they can give their men what they need." This of Silda Spitzer, who gave up her career to facilitate her husband's political ambitions! If the New York Post is correct that his use of prostitutes goes back ten years, he started when his wife was raising three small children -- nice).


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: eliot spitzer, gender, politics

Katha Pollitt is a columnist for The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They are All Victims of an Unworkable System
Posted by: abemko on Mar 18, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are all victims of America's economic fundamentalism. The mantra of the Capitalist Religion is productivity and objectification summed in the word "More", like that mobster from Bogart's Key Largo who said it best. When asked what he wanted, he answered, "More". Thus men like Sptizer or your local illegal immigrant are caught in a system which only wants more, thus the men have to run faster and faster just to stay in place. Outsourcing is the logical outcome. Outsource meals, outsource child-care, outsource health care, inventory the old (in senior centers), inventory the young (in ineffective schools), measure success by the monthly income statement and balance sheet. Prostitution, pornography are just another form of outsourcing. Love can not be measured or sold thus it is proxied to sex and outsourced. While the most efficient use of men is production of More product or imposing discipline on the system to extract more product, the most efficient use of women is procreation and the initial training of children between bouts of outsourced titilation of men (when young and beautiful) or as a cheap alternative surplus labor source in Target or Walmart. All this is enforced through the mythology of Desperate Housewives, Sex in the City, the Apprentice and Fox News.

Do we have a choice - yes, but as my poly sci studying daughter said to me, "Dad, the more I learn, the more I helpless I feel. Democracy is largely a farce, good jobs in college or thereafter are hard to get and there is so much pressure for achievement I do not have much time for myself never mind relationships. I feel scared and don't know what to do."

I think it is time to stop condemning the person and start reevaluating and restructuring the system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a PERSONAL decision
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 18, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a woman decides to stand by her scandal-prone man, that is HER decision, and hers only.

It's a personal decision that can and should be made by only the person it affects; the wife.

You or I don't know any details of the circumstances of the marriage. Nor should we.

We should assume that the woman IN the marriage, has a better knowledge of it, and is making the right decision, and respect it, whatever that decision may be.

Feminism is NOT "you making another woman's decision for her".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» well said Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Exactly Posted by: Libertine
Since when...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 18, 2008 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when was it a liberal or progressive value to tell women what they should and shouldn't do with their lives???

Hey, maybe next you can start telling them whether or not they should be having children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Since when... Posted by: mercianomad
I'm shocked, not to mention disappointed
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 19, 2008 1:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[dripping with sarcasm]

Where are all the sexists--they masquerade as "feminists"--who claim that "a man's brain is his in his dick."

I can't tell you how disappointed I am with this--cough--shocking development. `;^)

[end dripping with sarcasm]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you should have that drip looked at Posted by: hurricane hugo
» It was a joke Posted by: joeunix
Assumptions
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 19, 2008 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This media obsession with the wives is out-of-control.

The assumption seems to be that they're all innocent victims who have selflessly devoted their lives to their politician husbands...That they have no skeletons of their own, and no material reasons for standing there (eg. Hillary). Nobody asks whether she was having the pool-boy at home while her husband was on the road having hookers.

Also, the media sees the wife standing there and assumes that she is docile and accepting. Do they assume nothing goes on behind closed doors? That she's not working quietly with her lawyers and book publishers to squeeze something out of this?...Or would they rather see her beat him with a rolling pin in front of the cameras?...Now that would be entertaining.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Assumptions Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Assumptions Posted by: BCcovers
Thanks, Pollitt!
Posted by: ladyoracle on Mar 19, 2008 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great observation likening Spitzer to Angelo in Measure for Measure. I have been thinking just this thing every time I see the images of Spitzer lately, because every time there's the downcast wife beside him. If I was her I'd start divorcing his lousy ass for all he's worth; now that he's lost the governor's seat and gone down so famously there's little hope for his future. Get it before it's gone, sister, I say. And show a little SELF RESPECT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not so fast
Posted by: ladyoracle on Mar 19, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only would that be entertaining, it would be much more liberating and empowering, most unlike the public pose Mrs. Spitzer is assuming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: not so fast Posted by: MyLeftFoot
Assumptions right on
Posted by: herbal on Mar 19, 2008 4:03 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media wrings its hands in amazement that a successful man with a beautiful wife could want a prostitute. Who knows what the circumstances are in their conjugal bed or twin beds or separate bedrooms. A successful hetero guy with normal libido might have a frigid wife, no nooky=? Give him a reverse dildo? What is the appeal of new excitement in a stale marriage when time does not allow normal relationships or work on a meaningful dialog of repair of lost love? Is she a codependent? Is he her codependent? The prudes of the women's movement help to perpetuate the false Victorian sexual mores of the last two centuries. Enough of this distraction in the face a melted down Administration and Pig Republicans and Blue Dog Dems who murder, maim, cheat and steal without accountability. Adultery is a private matter for those who stand before the public, even for the wife. Who are you all to judge this woman and her man? Cast the first stone at genocidal VP Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She who has not sinned cast the first stone...
Posted by: Bobsays on Mar 19, 2008 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is complete poppycock: have they not read the admissions by Mrs Spitzer that she had affairs too? Or, let's take Hilary Clinton: an innocent - puhlease!

Pretty well the only political wife I see out there who has the personal fortitude and honour to make such a move, is Laura Bush.

Most other political wives are not ingenues and virgins: they do not stride ivory pedastals floating above their husbands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Laura Bush ?????? Posted by: zipper696
» RE: Laura Bush ?????? Posted by: Bobsays
» Mrs Spitzer? Posted by: cflady
Laura Bush is far from a smart
Posted by: paula.c on Mar 19, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or even intelligent woman. She is hideously chained to that drunken man, that she should dump ASAP. The world wiould treat her more kindly in future history books. At least Silda Spitzer has the education and brains to continue with a rewarding career.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But really.......... Posted by: steven w
more than anything...
Posted by: Moira61 on Mar 19, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's sad and exquisitely painful to see the look on these women's faces while they are standing alongside their confessing spouses. It's painful enough in private but to have the entire world watch while your marriage gets flushed down the toilet is something I can't imagine. Whatever their reason for standing alongside their husband is, it's their's alone and they're deserving of sympathy not anyone else's judgment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not really our business to judge
Posted by: PandaBear on Mar 19, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there definitely should be no pressure, social or otherwise, on a spouse of an unfaithful politician, it's really no-one's business but his or hers who is making the decision whether or not to stand with their spouse in public. We know nothing of his or her heart, relationship, philosophy. They need to do what they need to do, and we should respect it. We just shouldn't expect it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The tragedy is the hypocrisy
Posted by: teenabooth on Mar 19, 2008 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Levels of hypocrisy all over the place is what makes this a unnecessary tragedy. Spitzer's hypocrisy of course, which is the reason he should lose his job, not the sex. But the system is set up to force us to pretend we're not what we are -- humans who are sexual, complicated.

But at least the judgment against him, well, he left himself open for it by running for office. To judge his wife is a different matter -- its ridiculous for feminists who want women to have the power to make their own choices to then trash them for the choices they make. I think it is the strong choice to stand up and show with her presence that the hypocritical system is ridiculous, that her husband's choices, while making him a questionable governor, do not make him a bad man who should be abandoned, that having sex with a stranger is not a reason to tear apart a family. I reject that it is weakness that makes a woman stand with her husband, weakness would be hiding at home, or running off to mother in outrage. Staying and standing up and being present in the face of complicated, messy life is strength and courage and the right example for her daughters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I do not care
Posted by: steven w on Mar 19, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what any wife does or does not do. It is none of my business. All I care about is "does the elected official do the job that the people elected him to do? Is he honest- within the law? If he is like that, then I could care less about who or how many people he/she screws or what his wife does/thinks about it. It is none of my business. I think people who are freaked out about it is these sex-haters we have had now in the past 15 or so years. It comes from that right-wing puritanical nuts that everything they stand for has something to do with stopping sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I were one of those women...
Posted by: bettyn on Mar 19, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would just let myself go.....to Paris, to London, to Milan, and a whole lot of places (where I could spend a lot of his money), but I wouldn't be standing next to my cheating spouse! (He'd would be living out of the trunk of an old Ford Pinto!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whose humiliation is it, anyway?
Posted by: activevoice on Mar 19, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find myself exasperated by the innumerable references I've heard to the "humiliated" wives of men implicated in sex scandals. The wives of such men have nothing to feel ashamed of or humiliated about (unless it's just shame or humiliation by association): It's his poor behavior, after all, not hers. Isn't it?

What I'd like to know is, how on earth does HIS shoddy behavior mysteriously become HER humiliation -- and why is this crazy conflation taken so much for granted in our society that we don't even notice it, much less question it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The new Governor's revelation was a political master stroke
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 19, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When David Paterson got up and said, on day one, that he and his wife had both engaged in extramarital affairs, I was amazed. Then it sank in - what a move!

All politicians should take a lesson from the new Governor of New York.

That being said, the Eliot Spitzer case comes awfully close to a case of political persecution. It'll be very interesting to read the details of the "sting operation" set up the Justice Department.

It's also curious that similar stories are being ignored - for example, try the case of Judge Nottingham, who presided. over the Nacchio trial (i.e. the Qwest CEO who was targeted for "insider trading" by the Justice Department because of Qwest's refusal to cooperate with the NSA spying plan). There was minimal coverage (see here for example) of this - bet you never heard about it, even though it broke at the same time, more or less, that the Spitzer case did, even though it is the same exact story:

"Judge Nottingham has remained on the bench since being publicly linked to the investigation last week. His office referred calls to his lawyer, Stephen Peters, who said Judge Nottingham "has no public comment at this time."

Based on the Web site of Denver Sugar/Denver Players, prostitution prices seem to be substantially lower than those in New York."


Essentially, it looks like the Justice Department is now being run by the crooks - who are using their position of power to hunt down all the opposition.

P.S. As far as why Eliot Spitzer's wife wanted to be on the podium, first of all, it's her business, second, we don't know the whole story, and third, who cares?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another pointless article
Posted by: sanaa on Mar 19, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another pointless article filled with no more than the boring sexual and sexist fantasies of a journalistic hack. Write about something you know and you have researched if you can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not your business
Posted by: BST on Mar 19, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are you so exorcized by a personal decision made by a spouse?

The public's concern should be with political hypocrisy and expenditure of public funds.

Marriage and love are far more complex than this article suggests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Okay, this time a serious comment
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 19, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mrs. Spitzer admitted to having affairs.

Mr. Spitzer admitted to having affairs.

So, why the condemnation of Mr. Spitzer, but not a word of Mrs. Spitzer's transgressions?

As I recall, when two people marry, they take vows.

Normally, the vows include "forsaking all others".

As I understand it, "Forsaking all others" means you vow to remain faithful to your spouse.

So, why the double-standard?

Am I to assume that when a man breaks his vow's that he bears full responsibility for his actions, but when a woman breaks her vow's it's somehow justified?

Where I come from, that's called duplicity (defined as "double-dealing).

Am I missing something here, Katha?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kentuckywoman
Posted by: kentuckywomen on Mar 19, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Katha Pollitt is right on target when she writes about the stand-by-your-man syndrome. But there is at least one example of a woman who didn’t buy into that sickness.

Judi Patton stood by her husband, Kentucky Governor Paul Patton, when he denied having an extra-marital affair. Several days later, when he admitted to the two-year relationship, Judi was NOT in the room.

Rumor had it that she was busy trashing the governor’s office -- before she left for her home in the mountains of eastern Kentucky. It was a long time before she appeared in public with the governor and, even then, she was often on the opposite side of the room.

The right-wing called for the governor to resign (he didn’t) but most Kentuckians focused Judi. An activist for the rights of women and children, who was an important force against all forms of domestic violence and child abuse, she is a role model for Kentucky women -- and this is a state that needs all the female role models it can get!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There are politicians
Posted by: willymack on Mar 19, 2008 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then there are hypocritical politicians. I wonder if the brilliant Obama and his equally brilliant and apparently devoted wife have done things they don't want us to know about. Of course they have, and it's THEIR BUSINESS AND THEIRS ALONE. Let's focus on who's the most qualified to set us on a course of healing and reconciliation, and MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality Politics
Posted by: MichelleH on Mar 19, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope I live long enough to at least see one political wife wait until her husband finishes his pathetic "apology" to the world, and just when he turns to smile sadly at her she hauls off and punches him right in the nose.

Now that would be real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

zepstein, herbal and others were more correct than pollit...
Posted by: art guerrilla on Mar 19, 2008 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. generally admire pollit's writing, etc...
but...
2. SHE makes a HUGE assumption that the wives are not only pure as the undriven snow, unknowing dupes, and otherwise clueless; but that they also MUST HAVE the same reactions, attitudes, etc as SHE HAS...
3. she does not -that i recall- condemn the whole sordid bidness as -basically- none of our fucking bidnesss (forget about the bullshit 'illegality', this was a TOTAL setup job to get spitzer, anyone else, and we never hear of it...)
4. she also is EXTREMELY presumptuous in what the wives and husband's personal lives, choices, and agreements are (which -again- is NONE of our fucking bidness)...
the ONLY THING i have learned in my years, is that you can NEVER know -much less judge- the choices and arrangements people make in their own relationships... period...
5. a politician hypocritical ? goshies, i don't bewieve it ! geezie peezie, we got a million more important issues that a million more important pols are hypocritical about, and we got to make sure spitzer is hounded from pubic (sic) office 'cause he was so-o-o-o uptight about persecuting prostitution ? ? ?
whatever...
6. again, i'm betting dollars to donut holes that this was picked up on with -what used to be, when we had a constitution- illegal wiretaps, etc, AND THEN was 'reverse-engineered' to appear spitzer was implicated in some otherwise 'normal' investigation...
(the whole 'money' launder bullshit, STILL doesn't make any sense on an number of levels...)

pollit is making w-a-y too many assumptions about the knowledge, reactions, spoken and unspoken deals, and general relationships of people she has never been within a million miles of; in short, a total projection job...

art guerrilla
aka ann archy

eof

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

False comparison: a john to a killer
Posted by: pinkj on Mar 21, 2008 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate all that Ted Kennedy has done for progressives politically over the years, but I cannot believe Pollitt is actually putting Spitzer's overpriced and irrelevant roll in the hay with a well-compensated professional prostitute in the same category with Chappaquiddick. Kennedy drove a young employee of his off the side of a bridge and then left her there to drown - both the reckless driving and the running away from the scene almost certainly attributable to having been drunk as a skunk at the time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Instead of writing this side show piece, why not look into what's really going on?
Posted by: LeftWright on Mar 22, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have a look at this.

You never know, it's entirely possible that Silda Wall Spitzer was ok with her husband using the discreet services of a professional call girl. Has anyone asked her? Is it really any of our business?

Btw, I am a humanist which means, by definition, I'm also a feminist (as I define it, anyway).

Hope you all enjoyed Persian New Year, y'all.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great video! Posted by: joeunix
Couldn't Agree More
Posted by: cflady on Mar 23, 2008 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly agree with the author. These women are setting a bad example for the next generation. And to those who say things like "you don't know the details of their relationship" I can say that I know enough - he had an affair.

I usually don't have any sympathy for these women, but I did feel bad for Mrs. Spitzer. She looked absolutely devastated, like she was in a nightmare.

Women should practice some self-respect. When a man disrespects you like that, there is only one solution: Hit the road, Jack, and don't you come back no more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]