Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy and Elections

Voter Fraud Myth Persists, Despite Facts

Project Vote. Posted March 14, 2008.


At a recent Senate hearing, Republicans say droves are impersonating voters. But public interest groups present studies saying otherwise.
Advertisement

At the third hearing on voter suppression in as many weeks, members of Congress again sparred over the prevalence of fraudulent voting. This time, it was members of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration at a hearing on In Person Voter Fraud: Myth and Trigger for Disenfranchisement? called at the insistence of Senator Chuck Schumer.

The starkly partisan contrast between those who believe voter fraud is the worst affliction on the country's electoral system and those who believe the greater threat is voter disenfranchisement could not have been clearer.

The Democrats on the committee called several witnesses to debunk the myth, while Republicans brought in friendly testimony from true believers. The Department of Justice, arguably the arbiter of the actual extent of any fraud, stayed out of the fray altogether by refusing to send a witness to testify.

Committee chairwoman Sen. Diane Feinstein of California opened the hearing with a pertinent question aimed at the heart of the seemingly endless debate. Are people showing up at the polls to impersonate registered voters? This persistent idea is part of the rationale for laws requiring photo IDs at the polls.

"I think getting to the bottom of this is important because, in essence, this is the only type of fraud that would be prevented by a photo-ID requirement," she said, adding that the IDs don't address other types of voter fraud, such as absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, fraudulent registration or ballot tampering.

Indiana's enactment of a photo-ID law is being challenged in the Supreme Court, but similar laws are poised for passage in several states, which could retard voter turnout in November's election. By some estimates, as many as 21 million adult citizens, generally minorities, the poor, disabled, and the elderly, do not routinely use photo IDs in their daily lives.

Feinstein's comments were heartily endorsed and added to by Senators Chuck Schumer of New York and Patrick Leahy of Vermont, among others. Meanwhile Senators Robert Bennett of Utah and Saxby Chambliss of Georgia backed a myth-making contingent behind Sen. Chris Bond of Missouri.

Bond argued that "voter fraud is alive and well in America". He pointed to what he said was the St. Louis voter registration card for an English spaniel by the name of Ritzy. "One person a photo ID requirement most certainly would catch is this person here," he quipped. He did not claim, however, that anyone tried to use Ritzy's voter registration to actually vote.

Bond's assertions were undercut by the testimony of Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, who stated that "we have found no documented instances of in-person voter fraud in Missouri" despite the best efforts of Bond, Ritzy, and others to perpetuate the notion that the problem is widespread. "Like the myth of Bigfoot, the more folks hear about it, the more they might think it is true," she said. "Unfortunately, this can hinder voter confidence and discourage participation."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: photo id, voter fraud, voter disenfranchisement, department of justice

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Democracy and Elections! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"I looked for voter fraud," Iglesias said.
Posted by: dougo on Mar 15, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I looked for voter fraud," Iglesias said. "I wanted to prosecute voter fraud. But the evidence was not there." The republicans have a red herring here. They swear people are voting fraudulently but can produce not one example of this myth,because of just that reason. It's a myth perpertrated by them for their own benefit. If you can prevent legitimate voters from exerciusing their right to vote,half the battle is won. I suggest the only voter fraud is done by these criminals through their caging lists and overvotes tallied by the Diebold voting machines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what matters
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 17, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facts and evidence do not matter in a Strict Father mindset, only authority, orders, obedience matter. To such people, who are essentially arrested emotionally at the level of a four year old child, voter fraud myths are merely building on their entire mythic worldview. Such people must be disqualified from positions of power or leadership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

victrola
Posted by: victrola on Mar 21, 2008 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to support Senator Chambliss on his assertion that there is a lot of "apparent" "voter fraud." He talked about dead people still voting on election day. Now, how do you suppose they pulled that off? Election day after all is very close to Halloween—very scarey. Senator Chambliss, you've topped me with the dead people voting story, granted. But here in Ohio teenagers are apparently allowed to vote. How else can you explain their signatures in the poll books in some southwest Ohio counties? Now, who let those teenagers sign the pollbooks and vote on election day anyway? What parent would allow their kid to break the law like that? Well, I know of one parent who has been asking her Board of Elections to remove her son's name from the voter registration rolls and they for some time now have refused to comply with her request. Dogs, dead people, adolescents voting. What is the world coming to? You don't think the BOE's might have something to do with all this "voter fraud" now, do you? Do you?:-(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]