Culture  
comments_image Comments

People Who Haven't Seen "Zero Dark Thirty" Should Stop Saying That it Glorifies Torture

There may be legitimate questions about its accuracy, but Bigelow's film is no apologia for the Bush administration's abuses.

Continued from previous page

 
 
Share
 
 
 

Couldn't Bigelow and Boal have dramatized that without giving torture the credit for getting bin Laden? Maybe so, but to put the question that way is to identify their far from boosterish thematic concerns, not their obliviousness. Nor is that the only irony in play here. Even if torture eventually turned out to be no help in getting him, people were almost certainly tortured in  attempts to pin down where he was. Can you imagine the outcry if an anodyne version of ZD30 had just left all of that out—the black sites, the brutalized detainees, the whole "enhanced interrogation" nightmare? Wouldn't a lot of the same people pillorying Bigelow now be accusing her instead of whitewashing the CIA and the Bush-Cheney administration by omitting those dirty deeds? Knowing they were dirty is one truth we should all acknowledge, and  Zero Dark Thirty does. 

 
See more stories tagged with: