December 20, 2012
Like this article?
Join our email list:
Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.
The Maker’s Mark Bourbon House and Lounge in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, used to be a decently classy place, the type of glass- and wood-paneled establishment striving for a level of authenticity beyond the reach of a chain restaurant named after a bourbon label.
Late this past August, however, the Bourbon House and Lounge officially became one of the most despicable restaurants in the country when it denied African Americans access to a public event held at the site.
Here’s what happened:
Andre Mulligan and his brother went to the Maker’s Mark Bourbon House and Lounge on August 17 to speak with managers from the restaurant about a public event to be held at the restaurant the next day. At the meeting, the managers wanted to know “the ratio of ‘black people’ to ‘white people’ attending the event” explains Mulligan in his lawsuit against the establishment.
Mulligan and his brother explained that the party-goers would be ‘100 percent African American,’ to which information the managers said essentially, nope, you can’t hold an event at our lounge—a clear violation of not only the states’ laws, but also all human decency and basic 21st century codes of ethics and respect.
Given the clear illegality of the managers’ claims, Mulligan, his brother and some of their friends showed up the next night anyway for the event. What happened next, according to the lawsuit, is that the restaurant’s bouncers yelled at Mulligan and his friends to “shut up,” told them they couldn’t enter the bar, and then threatened to call the police and have them “locked up” if they didn’t leave the area around the bar—also known as the public sidewalk. As this is all occurring, the bouncers are politely welcoming white diners to enter the bar. Okay, so the complaint actually doesn’t say anything about how the bouncers greeted the white patrons, but you can reasonably infer that they were polite, given that their job is to welcome (all) customers into the bar.
Now, before anyone attempts to use the incorrect the-bar-is-private-property excuse, let’s be clear. Barring any patrons based on skin color is an explicit violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act, which states
: "It is an unlawful practice for a person to deny an individual the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of a place of public accommodation, resort, or amusement, as defined in KRS 344.130, on the ground of disability, race, color, religion, or national origin.”
And what is “a place of public accommodation?”
As defined in KRS 344.130
, "place of public accommodation, resort, or amusement" includes any place, store, or other establishment, either licensed or unlicensed, which supplies goods or services to the general public or which solicits or accepts the patronage or trade of the general public.” In other words, a restaurant, such Maker’s Mark Bourbon House and Lounge.
Mulligan is suing the restaurant and its operating company, Cordish Operating Ventures, for violating the Kentucky Civil Rights Act. Meanwhile, I propose that the rest of Louisville—black or white—boycott the restaurant, and the rest of the country boycott Maker's Mark until it withdraws its name support from this racist restaurant. (Tennessee's Jack Daniel's is a decent, although slightly harsher, substitute.)
If companies and restaurants are going to pull this type of pre-Civil Rights era racism, then how about they get taste of its consequences?
Ammendum: The boycott call has been revised to reflect that Cordish Operating Ventures is the owner and operator of the restaurant, yet that Maker's Mark bourbon company has lent its support to this restaurant by licensing its brand name to this establishment.
Update: Four days after this article's publication, Maker's Mark (the company, not the lounge) issued a statement promising to take "appropriate actions." Company chairman Bill Samuels and chief operating officer Rob Samuels said: “The allegations in the complaint are extremely serious and, if true, reflect behavior that is abhorrent and unacceptable, as well as absolutely contrary to the core brand values of Maker’s Mark. Maker’s Mark does not accept, and will not tolerate, discrimination in any form, and has so notified and warned the company which is solely responsible for the operation of the Lounge. While not involved in the litigation, Maker’s Mark will continue to monitor the situation closely and will take all actions it feels necessary under the circumstances.”