Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Obama is eschewing the populism that could undermine the royalist Right and fix the economy. And the GOP is filling the resulting void.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What Obama Is Doing Wrong

By David Sirota, AlterNet. Posted September 19, 2008.


Obama is eschewing the populism that could undermine the royalist Right and fix the economy. And the GOP is filling the resulting void.
Advertisement

Old Milwaukee beer's slogan -- "It just doesn't get any better than this" -- should be Barack Obama's after-hours toast these days.

He faces a Republican Party that built a house-of-cards economy -- constructed with paper by speculators betting against inevitable collapse. With recession looming, his opponent is a guy who admits "economics is not something I've understood as well as I should" -- a career politician who famously helped campaign donors intimidate regulators during the Savings & Loan scandal.

Yet, Obama probably isn't drinking to anything lately, as Reuters' poll shows John McCain leading on economic issues.

The numbers are tragic but predictable. Until this week, Obama largely avoided the contrasting FDR-style populism the nation wants and the moment demands.

For example, instead of endorsing forceful re-regulation months ago when the financial meltdown commenced, Obama responded with a vague white paper that not only offered few hard-hitting prescriptions, but denigrated key Depression-era regulations.

Likewise, despite slipping in the industrial heartland, Obama has muted his criticism of NAFTA. Indeed, one Obama adviser last week called trade only "an issue of symbolic importance." Another said that far from opposing a controversial NAFTA expansion into Colombia as promised, the candidate now wants "to make it possible."

The self-defeating behavior reflects both money and orthodoxy.

Obama has raised $9.8 million from investment houses (more than McCain). For economic advice, he relies on people like Bob Rubin -- the NAFTA architect who gutted market regulations as Bill Clinton's treasury secretary and who then tried to rustle up government favors for Enron as a $17-million-a-year executive at Citigroup, a bank embroiled in today's implosion.

Under such influences, Obama sends Wall Street hints that his "change" mantra might be empty rhetoric. This month, his adviser Cass Sunstein told The New Republic's Establishment readership that the senator is merely "a minimalist." In a recent New York Times interview, Obama himself reiterated his loyalty to free-market fundamentalism, even as it birthed the current emergency.

Discerning whether cash crafted or rewarded these statements is less important than Obama eschewing the populism that could undermine the Royalist Right and fix the economy. And the GOP is filling the resulting void.

Sans aggressive opposition, McCain likens himself to Teddy Roosevelt and pledges support for tighter regulation -- hoping America forgets his Keating Five past and March declaration that, "I'm always for less regulation."

His surrogates, meanwhile, are on the cultural offensive. Even as they endorse the crony communism of Bear Stearns bailouts, conservatives are using Obama's community organizing experience to depict him as an inner-city black socialist -- a caricature invoking the geography, ethnicity and ideology that Republicans regularly rely on to prompt white backlashes.

Regrettably, the underlying elitism charge may stick -- not because of Republicans' dishonest rationales, but because Obama confirms the attack's grounding in a different truth.

Polls show majority support for tougher regulation and fair trade reforms -- the very agenda opposed by the Washington and Wall Street elites who populate Obama's kitchen cabinet. The Democratic candidate's "minimalism" therefore isn't a desire to "accommodate, rather than to repudiate, the defining beliefs of most Americans," as Sunstein sententiously claimed. It is fealty to elites rather than the public -- the dictionary definition of elitism.

Certainly, Obama's is a less pernicious elitism than McCain's billionaire tax breaks -- and the Illinois lawmaker's sharper speeches and new ads this week might indicate an authentic shift. But if they don't and the elitism reappears, Obama could stunt real reform and lose a seemingly un-losable election.

"[Americans] crave someone who will be their pocketbook champion," writes Bob Kuttner, author of the book "Obama's Challenge." "If swing voters don't get that clear message from the Democrat, they will turn to the maverick patriot who did hard time in Hanoi."

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, obama, mccain

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So he's bought and paid for.
Posted by: oregoncharles on Sep 19, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're surprised?

Once again, Sirota offers a bizarre combination of highly informed journalism and utter naivete.

You can vote for a REAL progressive: Cynthia McKinney is running on the Green Party ticket. Her record in Congress was so progressive, and so outspoken, that the Democrats pushed her out in the primaries (with a lot of help from Republican crossovers.)

You can look her up at www.GP.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The anticlimax of an Obama victory...
Posted by: CatDad on Sep 19, 2008 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another said that far from opposing a controversial NAFTA expansion into Colombia as promised, the candidate now wants "to make it possible.
=============================================
This confirms my worst suspicions about Obama...that once elected...he'll be just like former Mayor Tom Bradley of Los Angeles....an affirmative action tool of the white ruling power elites....He'll talk a good talk...and you can be sure that many progressives will be drooling in awe...just as they did when Bill Clinton would give an emotional speech about Rosa Parks. All of it a great distraction while they turn around pass devastating economic programs that wreak havoc with the very people they [allegedly] claim to support.

If Obama wins, skip the champagne and just give me a Xanax.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barack O'Bilderberg is Right On Schedule ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 19, 2008 3:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He just announced that he supports giving Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson all the authority he needs...

No mention of helping the little guy ...

vote green

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mayor/McCheese Posted by: ranchero42
» RE: Mayor/McCheese Posted by: mmckinl
Gee, Mr. Sirota, you expected Obama to be a populist? DUMB DUMB DUMB !!!
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 21, 2008 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's get one thing straight. Mccain ain't no Teddy Roosevelt or Abraham Lincol and Obama ain't no FDR. Besides, if you really wanted progressive populists, why didn't you support Ralph Nader or even discuss him? I heard that you even banned users on your website who brought up Ralph Nader. Way to piss people off !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Elite": What Does This Mean?
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 24, 2008 6:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many times I have posted on conservative message boards asking for a definition of "elite". Not one single time has anyone responded. The word now seems to mean "people more educated than I am". The same folks that don't want speed limits, helmet laws, or compulsory school attendance laws also hate the idea that education carries authority. They resent teachers, professors, journalists, CPAs, lawyers, even physicians (townhall.com often carries long ads ridiculing physicians and urging self-medication with nostrums for sale). Silliest of all is the impliction that people who are formally educated are not as clever, wise, or competent as those who are not. About fifty years ago one of the deep-South candidates (Wallace? Maddox?) railed against "eggheads". "Why," he would drawl, "if a egghead, one o' them there college professors, had him a flat tire, he wouldn't know what to do [pause for laughter]. He wouldn't know how to change no tire. He'd just stand there on the side of the road and cry." Obama: Doctor of Laws, Harvard. McCain: 894th in his Annapolis class of 899. Biden: Doctor of Laws, Syracuse. Palin: six years to get through five schools culminating in a BA; flunking out of the University of Colorado, was not reinstated until she had made up the courses at a community college. And with all of this, a big marketing program to suggest that Obama is a snotty snob because he is the best-educated of the bunch and that Biden is clueless, but McCain and Palin are possessed of native wisdom fueled by instinct. How did Conservatism turn into Romanticism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sirota good, but article..el wrongo this time.
Posted by: hrayovac2 on Sep 24, 2008 10:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who watched Obama speak about the economic situation yesterday the 23rd, would notice right away that this man is the first to publicly mention a taxpayer equity in stock or holdings as a bargaining chip. In other words we'd actually get something for investment in this deal. I stood up and cheered at the TV, something I know that looks ridiculous. David, you're never going to find a more populist leader. Obama must bring the devil to dine. It's the way he learns and the only way in America to affect change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is no populist or liberal for that matter, he never was..
Posted by: TJColatrella on Sep 25, 2008 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are trying to understand why Obama is failing to deliver a strong blow against the failed philosophy of neo Conservatism and radical market deregulation the answer is:

GOLDMAN SACHS...!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]