Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

This year's Democratic convention may have helped forge a new progressive movement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Democratic Convention Was Anything But Conventional

By David Sirota, Creators Syndicate. Posted August 29, 2008.


This year's Democratic convention may have helped forge a new progressive movement.
Advertisement

When I first heard about the Democratic convention coming to my hometown of Denver, I wasn't all that excited. For many reasons, in fact, I was pretty unhappy with the whole idea.

As a transplant who moved from the overpopulated East Coast to the more manageable Rocky Mountain West, I was not looking forward to huge crowds taking over what is usually a pretty quiet town. As a D.C.-hater who fled Washington's career-climbers, I was annoyed that Beltway parasites would be infesting my backyard. And as an activist who has spent a career attacking -- and trying to halt -- the influence of money on politicians, I was nauseated that a corporate-funded bonanza draped in Democratic Party bunting would take place just a few miles from my house.

Now that the convention is over, I can report that all of what I feared, in fact, took place. Denver's downtown became a perpetual throng, insufferable Washington hacks from my past were unavoidable, and corporate money was so ubiquitous that even my ticket holder was emblazoned with a Qwest logo.

That said, I can also report that this spectacle actually had value, beyond the free booze and celebrity sightings. Conventions, I discovered, can be building blocks of social change -- and if this year's Democratic convention ends up with any historical legacy beyond nominating Barack Obama, it will likely be remembered as one of many events that helped forge a contemporary progressive movement.

Just outside the convention hall, the disparate threads of progressivism were brought together under one tent -- literally. On an empty parking lot, progressive non-profit organizations built a two-story pavilion out of tarp and beams. The Big Tent, as it was called, housed the grassroots groups and new media outlets that are pressuring the Democratic Party to stay true to its progressive base. Meanwhile, new independent films like Battle In Seattle -- which indict both parties' economic orthodoxies and are often ignored by major film distributors -- found enthusiastic audiences at a nearby movie theater.

Inside the Pepsi Center, the same movement drumbeat broke through the partisan noise.

The tables of live broadcast radio shows teemed not merely with right-wing loudmouths, but also with new left-leaning voices (and news of movement progressive Rachel Maddow getting her own MSNBC show was the hot topic among delegates). Labor leaders celebrated their success in amending the Democratic Party platform with language demanding a reform of Bill Clinton's NAFTA policies. And the two most talked-about speeches -- one an emotional oratory by "liberal lion" Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., the other a populist battle cry by Gov. Brian Schweitzer, D-Mont., -- drove home the convention's overarching theme: The progressive movement is on the ascent, overtaking the business-backed triangulators that have been running the Democratic Party -- and the country -- into the ground.

But perhaps the convention's value was most pronounced at the interpersonal level where liberal activists kibbutzed with campaign operatives, bloggers met politicians, and -- as I saw firsthand -- potential Obama administration officials began dialoguing with Congress' most committed progressive leaders.

Standing in the hot sun on the convention's third day, I happened to be arguing trade policy with Austan Goolsbee, the moderate University of Chicago professor who is Barack Obama's chief economic adviser. In the corner of my eye, I saw an old Capitol Hill acquaintance, Rep. Peter DeFazio -- the progressive champion from Oregon. I introduced the two, and within minutes they were finding points of agreement on economic issues.

Watching these very different Democrats briefly go back and forth, I considered how many similar bridge-building conversations were happening all week. I remembered that while conventions are usually television shows and business-sponsored cocktail parties, they can, at moments, be something more.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, progressives, democratic convention, big tent

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, "The Uprising," was just released this month. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network -- both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Conventions can be bamboozling
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 29, 2008 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The results will be the evidence that confirms or denies Sirota's claims. It'll take at least a year to see those results; through the election and the first 100 days and all that bullshit.

It's very easy to be bamboozled by talk, especially that unique emotional "lift" human beings have at large gatherings of this nature. However, the record of conventions bamboozlement shows something very different, David's piqued emotions aside.

All those logos and corporate money combined with owning-class culture ultimately will speak far louder and more reliably as a predictor of future action. History shows that progressivism is most often diluted by corporate/owning class privilege into hollow promises and good feelings with no actual, tangible, progressive political action to support them.

When I read this piece all I can think of is the old adage, you can dress up a rabbit in a cape, believing it'll become a magician, but he's still a rabbit. From the bottom of the class heap--not Sirota's privileged-class consciousness--his hope or attempt to reassure progressives that this time the DNC "got it" appears absolutely hollow until tangible results emerge. I bet a beer that those results will not be progressive at all.

Under all that talk and social "lift", the DNC crowd, Sirota, even the bamboozling Obama--whom I'm sure is a really nice guy, even nicer than ole' Bill--are still owning-classers, untouchables with immense privilege and more money than most of us can ever dream about who have a documented history of taking and taking from everyone lower down the class strata (despite their "feelings" that they were "just trying to help"). And all that money and all that privilege and all those noble but unsubstantiated feelings ALWAYS speaks louder than any "progressive principle" amongst owning-classers. What I read here is that David got bamboozled, hell I'm sure even I as a working class guy would have too in such a pristine setting. But real life isn't lived in a corporate sponsored event designed by specialists in bamboozling for specific effect. It's lived on the street, in daily battles and struggles for equality and access to resources and in getting needs met. Whenever owning classers and their middlings get all hopeful, the working class goes back to workbench, one eye over their shoulder, knowing all too well, those doors to progress are going to get locked up tight by the bossman. We may be cynical but that's because we know better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wishful thinking
Posted by: wjfaust on Aug 29, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure the convention was uplifting--very eloquent speeches and all. That's what conventions are for. Sadly, the die was cast some months back when Obama opted out of publicly financing his campaign. No amount of well-meaning and sincere speech will counter the fact that he is now indebted to those private interests. It was a Faustian bargain. It may get him elected but he won't be working for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uplifting? Yeah, but to who. Posted by: bottom-line
an open response to the first reply:
Posted by: using on Aug 29, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a working class stiff, you write really well -- logical, intelligent, coherent and there is truth in your pessimistic view that many of us fear.
But, you have given up. Why? The fat lady hasn't sung yet, although she is close enough so we can hear her practicing! If we want a democracy, which we never completely had -- and one that serves us, instead of stealing from us, we need to learn to stand together as a group against what is not in our own best,long range interests and for what is. There is plenty of talent amongst the good, hard working, thinking, middle class
On that at least, we can agree with Obama: "When ordinary people (ofcuase his calling us ordinary is what immediately seperates us from him) get together, they can accomplish extradinary things." Just think of the strength of one mother that single handedly has the rush of adinaline that allowed her to lift the car off her son's body.....The question is: how can we, the underfunded, seemingly powerless, blinded ones find a way to stand together? We must stop being the animals watching the leaders grow into pigs before our very own eyes.and accept the consequences they dole out to us ( reference to Orwell's Animal Farm).
I understand that this is difficult because: a. none of us are privy to what is happening behind closed doors b. very few of us understand the long range outcome to the forest when we are busy struggling to keep the trees alive and well. c. we are fearful of losing what we have d. those of us who see the forest have difficulty with creating or establishing practical pathways e. we have difficutly connunicating with those that are happy to busy themselves with the trees and want not to adopt fear that seems beyond their control.
However, if we stay in that "just give me my toast and my tv and leave me alone"--the movie Network) space...closing ourselves off by the negative "bosses always get you in the end", we have no options. Greed once it grips you is a desease. And the lower you bow your head the more they will think of you as cattle to be disrespected (any sadist or history book can teach you that).
However, if we are willing to take a chance and take a whiff of the air that is still somewhat fresh, options appear. But to be prepared, we must a. know what our best interests are b. find leaders that can point the way and help us dig the paths (change leaders as the need arises --( Jefferson on the Constitution) c. support each other so we grow strong enough to truck the paths. d. not allow ourselves to be fooled or our attention diverted by drama, or tinsel or anything that does not have its statements steeped in a logic that clearly delinates how it will serve our long range, best interests and then, since we helped them get where they want to go, we must find a way to begins to encourage, support and become a force for which it becomes in their best interests to keep us safe. In other words, the job of the populace in a democracy must in part become, while they are supporting us, we have to learn to help them stay the course and not teach themselves how to walk on two feet. (reference to Animal farm) And we better hurry up because our time is running out. Those who are supporting the "overlord" think they are ok...but watch the mafia shows .read our world history...if they do not serve the overlords purpose.they are. because of the overlord underlying attitude towards personal power, as vulnerable as the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boring Distractions Don't Ease the Pain of this Election
Posted by: bottom-line on Aug 29, 2008 8:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just a lot of blather, as though this were the 1950s and life is gay and we have all the time in the world to discuss the insignificant details of political posturing of phony puppet candidates.

Instead, we are in the same or worse position as Germany was just before WWII when Hitler burned the Reichstag.

Our government with the help of the Mossad pulled a false flag, murdered 3,000 people on 9/11, blamed it on a bunch of people who had nothing to do with it, and now we have to get strip searched when we fly, our phones are tapped, we get stopped and told to produce our papers, our skies are sprayed every day with chemicals to make us stupid and compliant and weakened. Meantime we're told on their phony government propaganda machine, aka as the controlled media, that bird flu is coming and we're all going to die. We know the concentration camps are built all over the country for the American people, the blond haired al Qaeda as they've said.

The Ameraican people are not murderers. We are not wanting to be over across the ocean bombing and straffing families, burning down churches filled with Christians as we just did in Ossetia when we sicked the Georgian Israeli puppet we installed on those poor Russian people.

Our media lies to us. People are finding htat out, shutting off their TVs, waking up every day to the horror that is our own government.

This piece here is a piece of fluff. This is 2008, and we are all going to die. We don't care about how Hillary's campaign helped or hurt Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I were as cynical and bitter as some so-called 'progressives' on Alternet are....
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 29, 2008 10:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would seriously kill myself.

Instead I'll be happy, rejoicing, and thanking God, this is a new beginning for America. I'm glad I lived long enough to see it. If you can't understand it, or it isn't 'progressive' by your standards, I could give a shit along with many millions of voters that DO get it.

The entire dem convention could not have been better. I knew it was going to be the best ever and I wasn't let down. In fact it exceeded my best hopes. Hillary and Bill Clinton redeemed themselves, I thought I would never forgive them but they are great and a classier act than I ever thought.

It was perfect. Obama's little girl "I love you daddy", so sweet watching this family interact with one another. The look on Biden's Irish mother's face when he introduced her was precious beyond words. BTW, Joe Biden's entire income, including the home he lives in, his net worth? $150,000.

The dem party has needed a good shaking up for a long time. Some of you say you wanted a campaign to grow from the bottom up, not from the top down. Barack has done that, bigger and better than anything we've ever seen, but still you bitch. So much good is coming out of this, so many millions of newly registered and excited, thrilled voters, delighted and happy to be a part of our democratic process.

Yet all too many of you can do is kavetch and whyne. You really are pitiful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Proof is in the Pudding ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 30, 2008 2:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And all the chefs are DLC ... Their patrons a whose who of telecom and Wall Street.

It should be of note that the plank of Universal Health Care, a staple of earlier conventions had to be reintroduced and fought for. Another great platform victory that won't be seen or heard again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the convention keeps on giving
Posted by: lb on Aug 30, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fortunately CSPAN is airing some of the "behind the scenes" panels. I saw a fascinating panel led by Gary Hart last night on Obama's foreign policy. (When did we have a national discussion and decide we were backing Georgia?) I hope the progressive arm of the Democratic policy made themselves heard in these panel discussion, as well. We have to keep pushing and give Obama the support to be progressive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Speaking of Gary Hart... Posted by: MartianBachelor
1969
Posted by: jebpgh on Aug 31, 2008 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of this makes me remember sitting in the old Chicago coliseum (gone now) in the balcony as the Progressive Labor Party (PLP) took over the SDS convention as the Revolutionary Youth Movement II (RYM-2) left the convention hall to morph eventually into the Weathermen. As the last of the RYM faction left the hall, the PLP seized the now empty podium and proclaimed that they had just taken over the most important New Left organization. As several of us who were actively involved in the draft resistance left the hall, we said "create 2, 3 many SDS's!" and walked off into the long and bitter night.

Progressives have a real knack for leaving the room just when the opportunity to do something presents itself. Some things never change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democratic Party: Soft on the Criminals Bush and Cheney
Posted by: left_libertarian on Sep 4, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a FACT. Criminals are running the government and the DemocRATS ain't doin shit about it!

F*ck them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

while protesters got their heads busted
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Sep 4, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
outside the AT&T PR GreenZone.

yeah.

that's some 'democracy'.

Sadly, the selling of responsible & pacifist activists (& activist Veterans!) in Denver... gave the GREEN LIGHT to the St.Paul fascist beatdown & pre-emptive arrests.

why? because when they saw that the media wouldn't cover THOSE abuses, the cops caved to the demands of the ReichWing (as in NYC) & their corporate OverLords.

yup. by having the Democratic & Progressive media (save FireDogLake, DemocracyNow!, The UpTake, SubMedia, Glen Greenwald & other independent activist coverage!) COMPLETELY IGNORE or undermine the reputations of individuals & activist movements...

they guaranteed the UGLY RNC actions which could be used for propaganda.

SADLY? the activists had to be sacrificed so the "AT&T / MasterCard" Dems could have their ugly comparative Press.

"see WE are the only alternative! there IS NO THIRD PARTY PLATFORM against which OURS should be compared!"

disgusting.

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
Spread Love, not corporate dependence, fear & hate,


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
" ... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"
┄┄
"True pacifism is not unrealistic submission to an evil power...it is rather a courageous confrontation with evil by the power of love, in the faith that it is better to be the recipient of violence than the inflicter of it, since the latter only multiplies the existence of violence and bitterness in the universe, while the former may develop a sense of shame in the opponent, and thereby bring about a transformation and change of heart." - MLK
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]