Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

We shouldn't let Ingrid Betancourt's long-awaited rescue distract from the abuses of the Uribe government.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Celebrate Betancourt's Release, Not Colombia's Oppressive Regime

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted July 10, 2008.


We shouldn't let Ingrid Betancourt's long-awaited rescue distract from the abuses of the Uribe government.
Advertisement

It is fantastic to see Ingrid Betancourt free. She was the Green Party candidate running for president of Colombia against Alvaro Uribe in 2002 when she was kidnapped by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) just days after appealing to the FARC to stop its campaign of kidnapping. She was held hostage for more than six years and was released last week along with 14 others. The flamboyant rescue operation by the Colombian army has been splashed across newspapers and TV screens globally, but the celebration of their release should not be confused with celebration of the Colombian government.

I reached Manuel Rozental at his home in Canada. He's a Colombian doctor and human-rights activist who fled Colombia after receiving several threats on his life: "We're talking about the regime with the worst human-rights record in the continent and the army with the worst human-rights record in the continent with the greatest U.S. support, including the contractors or mercenaries. So the fact that this regime was involved in this liberation does not and should not and cannot cover up the fact that it is a horrendous regime."

Colombia has been the largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid outside of Israel and Egypt. Amnesty International USA has called for a halt to all support for Colombia, saying " ... torture, massacres, 'disappearances' and killings of noncombatants are widespread, and collusion between the armed forces and paramilitary groups continues to this day. In 2006, U.S. assistance to Colombia amounted to an estimated $728 million, approximately 80 percent of which was military and police assistance."

John McCain was in Colombia on July 2, the day Betancourt was released along with U.S. military contractors and Colombian soldiers and police officers who were held. McCain's links to Colombia are worth noting. The Huffington Post reports that a McCain fundraising event was just given by billionaire Carl Lindner of Cincinnati, the former CEO of Chiquita Brands International. Chiquita, under Lindner's watch, paid and armed one of the most notorious right-wing paramilitary groups in Colombia, the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC). The U.S. government fined Chiquita $25 million for its funding and arming of the AUC, designated a "foreign terrorist organization" by the U.S. State Department as early as 2001. One of the conditions of the deal was that Chiquita would not have to name the top executives involved.

The Huffington Post and The New York Times recently reported another McCain connection to Colombia. His top adviser, Charlie Black, resigned in March as chairman of the Washington, D.C., lobbying firm BKSH & Associates in order to work full time on the McCain campaign. Since 1998, BKSH has earned $1.8 million representing Occidental Petroleum, which has controversial oil operations in Colombia. Occidental worked with a military contractor and the Colombian military to counter pipeline attacks. In December 1998, the Colombian military dropped a bomb on the village of Santa Domingo, killing 11 adults and seven children. According to the Los Angeles Times, Occidental "supplied, directly or through contractors, troop transportation, planning facilities and fuel to Colombian military aircraft, including the helicopter crew accused of dropping the bomb."

It was a photographed hug that grabbed the attention of Inter Press Service, an independent, global news agency. Soon after Betancourt was released, IPS published a story, "The General Ingrid Hugged," about the national commander of the Colombian army, Gen. Mario Montoya. Montoya has been linked to a secret commando group from the late 1970s that bombed and massacred political opponents of the right wing. While the initial flurry of photo ops, with Betancourt hugging Montoya and standing with Uribe, has boosted public acclaim for the Uribe administration and the Colombian military, Betancourt is beginning to assert her traditionally oppositional status. She told RFI radio in France: "President Uribe, and not just President Uribe but Colombia as a whole, should change some things. ... I think the time has come to change the language of radicalism, extremism and hatred, the very strong words that cause deep hurt to a human being. ... There comes a time when one has to agree to talk to the people you hate."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: farc, colombia, betancourt

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Model action.
Posted by: lamar on Jul 10, 2008 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's hope that this action is the model for future law enforcement actions in Colombia's future. There were no on the spot executions, and it appears that arresting the criminals was the goal. Colombia has a long way to go, but it looks like they got this one right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

alimadria
Posted by: alimadria on Jul 10, 2008 8:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is so obvious that the "rescue" was nothing but. We should all start demanding the colombian government releases the prisoners on their side now. There are many and suffering terribly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Willfully Blind?
Posted by: jjones29 on Jul 10, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only you were all so quick to condemn the murdering terrorists of the FARC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who is letting FARC off the hook? Posted by: antiapathy
Important article.
Posted by: talkville on Jul 10, 2008 11:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is well any time hostages of any other are liberated.

But please! Inquire for yourselves! No small factor is that this is an Election Year in the USA, an element of first-rate importance for many of many persuasions! It is immensely important, given the 'propaganda-aura' in all sections of the media and on constant display daily. Seek out sources and historical developments with regard to Colombia and it's internal dynamics. There is an article well worth reading in Monthly Review by the Political Representative of FARC-EP. One need not BELIEVE him, but for those whose knowledge of Other-Worldly affairs is based on what is reported in the USA almost exclusively, it is incumbent in these times to do a little 'self-service' and historical research into the present of Colombia.

Several years ago FARC DID try to enter the political process and formed a competitive party democratically competing for votes. Research for yourselves the outcome for its leaders, supporters and strongest representatives in that endeavor. Context is crucial, and there are always more than one aspect to any narratives or events.

Whether you agree or not with Farc or with Uribe or even with any other Interests involved in Colombia's travails, clear thinking and adequate historical information is of the utmost necessity in these matters; especially given the Election Year and its outcomes.

After all Farc's emergence doesn't stretch THAT far into the past - perhaps the 60's at most; more near '70's and ''80's. If anything, the mere label "terrorists" can just as well be addressed to Uribe's contingent as Farc's. There are many interests in the advancements and actual progress for the Colombian peoples. Some of these interests most definitely have little or no concern in the conditions of existence of a large and majoritarian part of the Colombian social structure. And ALL of them, in one way or another, are and must be involved whether discreetly or directly in the "Drug Trade" there-- after all it is an immense source of revenue for the Colombian State and certain of its population. Relations with such as drug-traders' are not so clear cut or seemingly 'complicit' as others. The drug-traders themselves form an independent political, economic and social role of immense proportions -- regardless of those with whom they "do business".

Besides the liberation of the hostages, it is very plain that much of this is meant for consumption, not in Colombia, but here in the US, in France and Europe and in places OTHER than Colombia itself. It is very easy and simple to render opinions and perspectives, we all do this kind of thing at least sometimes. Rendering INFORMED opinions and becoming aware of ALL the interests and interested parties in any given event seems a worthwhile and much needed task; in some situations more than others. It should be at least amply evident by now that it is most certainly not enough to BELIEVE the 'news' as reported and repeated by what is referred to as the Mainstream Media.

There are peoples everywhere that want to live, need to live, dignified, stable and secure and even minimally participate in the affairs of their communities, their children, their regions or their States. One may perhaps have to 'dig' a little bit now and then and do some clear and balanced thinking. How can that hurt? There's sufficient information 'out there'; inquire!

Who knows? Perhaps someday Opinion Polls may actually MEAN something substantial, especially in a country of 300+ million people. The goodness of the Part (liberating the hostages) does not necessarily imply or prove the larger goodness of the Whole. Does the goodness of the Bush Family's efforts in regard to literacy, reading and such imply the goodness of the Bush Regime?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now Look for the Columbian Free Trade Deal ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jul 11, 2008 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this good press will open the gates for the Columbian Free Trade Deal.

Of course is isn't a real free trade but a cornucopia of corporate rights and subsidies born on the backs of the American and Columbian people.

Wall Street is just itching to launder the hundreds of billions of drug money that the Right Wing Military Death Squads will now have a monopoly on with FARC being forced out of the picture.

Just after our election look for the Columbian Free Trade Bill ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]