Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The VP used to be a bench-warmer called in to perform PR tasks. When did vice presidents become important political figures?

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Who Cares About the Vice President?

By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet. Posted June 24, 2008.


The VP used to be a bench-warmer called in to perform PR tasks. When did vice presidents become important political figures?
Advertisement

Seems everyone's talking about prospective vice presidential candidates. But who cares about the vice president?

Go ahead and laugh but the VP view of the "founding fathers" wasn't far from the sentiment embedded in that question.

An afterthought in the construction of the Constitution, it was on Sept. 6, 1787 that America's powdered-wig wearin' Constitutional Convention approved Alexander Hamilton's proposal to create the office of the vice presidency, declaring that the Veep should be the runner-up in the race to be president.

That's how VPs were picked until the rules were changed to allow presidential nominees to pick their running mates, which has since been used as a way for candidates to garner more votes with a "more balanced" ticket.

The first two vice presidents had two different perspectives. John Adams famously quipped: "My country has in its wisdom contrived for me the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived."

Jefferson wrote: "The second office in the government is honorable and easy; the first is but a splendid misery."

Is it a stretch to think Jefferson considered the vice presidency "honorable and easy" because, as Adams observed, it's "the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived?"

As recently as the beginning of the 20th century, VPs were still considered of such little consequence that when Vice President Garret Augustus Hobart died in November of 1899, the office was left vacant, as it had been on ten previous occasions for periods ranging from several months to as long as four years. Don't you just love progress? We've gone from the marginal significance of the vice presidency to the shadowy co-presidency of Dick Cheney. And while Cheney is arguably the most powerful (and secretive) vice in U.S. history, the transformation of the office began long before he was officially embedded in the White House.

The first VP, John Adams, attended a Cabinet meeting in 1791; something no other VP did until 1918 -- the year President Wilson asked Vice President Marshall to preside over the Cabinet while he was off at the Paris Peace Conference.

The expanded role of the vice presidency took another leap when President Warren Harding invited his VP, Calvin Coolidge, to attend all Cabinet meetings.

But, it was Vice President Charles G. Dawes who, in refusing to attend Cabinet sessions, cautioned that by doing so, "the precedent might prove injurious to the country." (Did he foresee Cheney?)

The response to Dawes warning: precedent, schmecedent!

Eisenhower took it to the next level, directing Vice President Nixon to preside over Cabinet meetings in his absence instead of following precedent in which the Secretary of State presided.

JFK and LBJ kept the VP snowball rolling before handing it off to Carter and Reagan, both of whom further expanded the office. Bush and Clinton followed suit.

Then came the JFK expansion, making LBJ chairman of the National Aeronautics and Space Council and the head of the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: cheney, vice president, gore, government

Sean Gonsalves is a syndicated columnist and news editor with the Cape Cod Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Veep on the Cheap
Posted by: Shehova on Jun 24, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about if Ron Paul runs with McCain and Kucinich runs with Obama?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Veep on the Cheap Posted by: reelectnoone
» RE: Veep on the Cheap Posted by: pomes
The VP DOES Matter, At Least Now Days
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jun 24, 2008 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll tell you why the VP matters, at least in the case of the McCain ticket: Because McCain is like 150 years old, that's why.
And a big reason too, at least now days, is that Cheney has made the status quo equal to VPs have lots (way too much) power.
That is why I am especially worried that McCain will pick an ultra-far-right running-mate like Mitt Romney.
Mitt could even end up being worse than Cheney, if McCain is elected (or installed) as president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT Did I Just Say? Posted by: QQOblivion
» Why does the VP matter? Posted by: charemor1
Well put Sean Gonsalves
Posted by: the baron on Jun 25, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Not to understate the semi-importance of VP candidates (especially in Obama's unique case, given America's historical penchant for assassination, especially popular leaders labeled by racial politics as "black") but, isn't it more important to bring some focus to bear on Israel flirting with an attack on Iran?

Fool us once, shame on them. Fool us twice and, never mind, shame -- say hello to zero credibility."

Thank you, some one with some wit and interest who writes for this site has it where our attention should be. Not that electing a leader is unimportant, but if we don't do something to curb the stupidity of out current administration, will it really make any difference as to who we pick?

Seriously, THINK about that. "ZERO CREDIBILITY".

I may have not approved of Reagan's presidency but he had a good point, and it is the only reason I respect him in any way. "If we can't begin to forgive now when will we ever start?"
(in regards to holding a (very formal) memorial service to the fallen Nazi soldiers of WWII.)

That took 40 yrs. Forty. Then look at where we are heading.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well put Sean Gonsalves Posted by: cleopatra97
VPs became important when JFK was blown away.
Posted by: billwald on Jun 25, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is a walking dead man if Mrs. Clinton is his VP candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no one really thinks Bush is behind anything do they?
Posted by: thealltheone on Jun 25, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the beginning, Cheney has been running the show, along with his minons. No one really thinks the current Bush is any thing more than a ignorant arrogant pup pet. I think they got the idea when Reagan became sick with alzheimers long before any of us knew about it,how easy it was to run things behind a dark curtain. Cheney picked up where he left off many years ago, saw a last ditch all or nothing opportunity for his insane plan for world domination and to squash the euro and took it. It's not over yet, until they are brought up on war crimes or they bomb Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Such amazing ignorance of history
Posted by: Edward George on Jun 25, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm intrigued by the current consistent dodging of the significance of the administration of the only President elected four times. Franklin Roosevelt did not allow his vice presidents any role, indeed did not even keep them informed. Therefore when Truman tried to take over he was completely lost. Alben Barkley, Senate Majority Leader and close friend of FDR saved the day by becoming Vice President and advisor. He was widely respected as an honorable and decent man and fondly called "The Veep" - and he was the first Vice President with a significant role. (He was also a childhood and lifelong friend of my father.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]