Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Activists are creating alternatives to mainstream media and holding corporate media giants accountable. The corporations are pushing back.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Road to Better Media

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted June 12, 2008.


Activists are creating alternatives to mainstream media and holding corporate media giants accountable. The corporations are pushing back.
Advertisement

"This way to better media," read the floor sign directing people through a skyway to the Minneapolis Convention Center. Thousands of people gathered there for the fourth National Conference for Media Reform, hosted by freepress.net. They came from all walks of life and all ages to address a central crisis in our society: our broken media system. I was one of the invited speakers.

Despite increasingly complex digital-media offerings and hundreds of channels, we see the diversity of media ownership shrinking, along with the diversity of voices that are broadcast. People are fighting back, organizing, creating alternatives and holding the corporate media giants accountable. The corporations are pushing back. With life and death, war and peace, at stake, hinging on an informed and engaged populace, the stakes have never been higher, the media never more important.

Prominent traditional journalists with decades of experience mingled with the emerging generation of new media producers. Journalist Bill Moyers, who has won more than 30 Emmys, authored four best-sellers and currently hosts the popular PBS weekly news program Bill Moyers Journal, opened Saturday with a plenary address, saying:

"Our dominant media are ultimately accountable only to corporate boards whose mission is not life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for the whole body of our republic, but the aggrandizement of corporate executives and shareholders." Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. is the poster child of media conglomerates. Murdoch's media empire spans the globe, with 35 TV stations in the U.S., the Fox News Channel (so-called) and many other cable channels, The Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, HarperCollins, 20th Century Fox movie studios and a slew of interrelated sports and entertainment properties.

Moyers' outspoken critique of the corporate media has provoked Murdoch's chief attack dog, Bill O'Reilly. Last week on his Fox show, O'Reilly said of the media reformers, "These people are crazy ... real nuts!" Josh Silver, Free Press executive director, responded: "He's a mouthpiece for the largest media corporations. And that kind of omnipotent power that these large networks have, taking control of that and taking that power back from them is what this conference is about."

As Moyers finished signing his latest book, O'Reilly Factor producer Porter Berry and his camera crew pounced. Dan Rather was at the conference but eluded the Fox stakeout. Moyers turned the Fox ambush back on Berry:

Moyers: "Rupert Murdoch said the best thing that will come out of the Iraq war will be [oil] at $20 a barrel. Now, today, when I came here, I looked, and it was $130-something. When is Rupert going to explain why the war didn't give us $20-a-barrel oil?"

Making the link between media conglomerates and militarism, Moyers questioned Berry further about Murdoch:

Moyers: "Does Bill O'Reilly work for Rupert Murdoch?"

Berry: "He works for Fox News."

Moyers: "But who owns Fox News?"

Berry: "News Corp. ... "

Moyers: "Rupert Murdoch is the boss."

Indymedia videographers crowded around the two, and the video clips soon found their way onto the Internet. O'Reilly ran a heavily edited clip of the exchange, with none of the above included, but had a "body-language expert" on his show, attempting to smear Moyers. The fact that Murdoch producers were at the conference trying to discredit prominent participants demonstrates the need for honest, strong, countervailing media outlets.

Sen. Byron Dorgan also addressed the conference. On Monday, he and Sens. John Kerry, Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg introduced a bill that would end Pentagon use of funds to spread propaganda and charged both the Pentagon inspector general and Congress' Government Accountability Office to investigate allegations that retired generals were used to push for war with Iraq.

Elected officials will not solve our media crisis alone. The grass-roots movement for media reform is growing, and with mass layoffs in newspaper and broadcast newsrooms, critical elections, burgeoning military budgets and multiple wars and occupations, and with emergent and accessible digital-media tools and networks increasingly available to most people, there is no better time to join it.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, corporations, murdoch, free press

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Really.
Posted by: non-person on Jun 12, 2008 7:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this supposed to be an analysis of media ownership and control? If so , it is a bad joke.

If you want to know how media is controlled, you do the same thing you do when you want to find out who controls any corporation - you follow the money. Yes, that includes non-profit corporations as well as for-profit corporations.

One thing I notice that the foundation-sponsored left-wing media ignores is how non-profit foundations are used by large corporate interests to funnel money secretly to false front operations.

This has been done extensively in the pharmaceutical and resource extraction industries - there are hundreds of examples of non-profit organizations that merely serve as false fronts for corporate agendas.

There is a far better source of video news than Democracy Now (which doesn't even allow comments on their stories, nor do they make their list of funders available to the public) - that would be the Real News Network.

Personally, I'm of the opinion that most of the "left wing" and "right wing" news outlets in the United States are actually controlled and funded by the very same corporate interests that control CNN, FOX, NPR, etc.

NPR, for example, did their utmost today to smear Dennis Kucinich's impeachment bill.

This is because they have to follow the money. If Amy Goodman's foundational supporters (DN! has a $4 million dollar a year budget, you know) don't like what she's doing, she loses support.

This is why you see so much fluff on the left, and so little real analysis.

For example, why isn't their a serious science section on any of these "left-wing" outlets? Why is their so much "emotive content"? Why do they focus on old issues like race and gender, and not on issues like corporate corruption?

No matter how well-intentioned, the left-wing press is a gross failure.

Where are the independent reporters? In a real alternative media system, the reporters would be the ones deciding what stories they cover - the REPORTERS! Instead, you see the same kind of top down editiorial control on the left as you do on the right and at the NYT and the WP - and at least they have full-time reporters on staff!

Where is the coverage of the Iraq war? During the Vietnam war, every night there was footage - but now there is blanket silence, across the left and across the right - amazing.

I think that the people who fund the left are frightened of the levels of public anger towards corporate America - and corporate America is who funds the left-wing press. Everyone else is going broke, losing their homes - but the corporate foundation funding keeps pouring into right-wing and left-wing media outlets, doesn't it? Donations? Who can afford to donate much to any cause these days?

Amy Goodman ran a bunch of articles claiming that biofuels were behind skyrocketing food prices, and never mentioned commodity speculators - and she receives a lot of funding from George Soros' Glaser Foundation, who just happens to be one of the world's leading commodity speculators... is there a connection? The money trail says that there is.

Not only that, I've personally called up DN! to ask why they won't allow public comments on their website - seems like a natural thing for a public democracy advocate to support, doesn't it? I have gotten no response - I couldn't even get past their receptionist. What's the explanation for that?

The American Empire is a done deal - it WILL collapse - the only question is this: will Americans decide that enough is enough, and voluntarily relinquish the throne, or will the whole thing collapse under its own weight, with vastly greater suffering for all?

Choose. That's the only choice you have. Let it go or go down in flames.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» maybe the world's a done deal Posted by: Richard House
Media
Posted by: MUSE46 on Jun 13, 2008 1:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When i watch O'reilly from time to time, i do, because i enjoy the show. I could care less if Murdoch owns the show. The show is succesfully rated and therefore earns Fox profitable advertising dollars. Who the hell is Bill Moyers? I don't see him being on television without the taxpayers piggy back ride. This is just more sour grapes from you liberals who can't get the public to buy or listen to your crap. Ms. Goodman ought to know that by her own failure in the media business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

democracy now is investigative journalism
Posted by: whealeydj on Jun 14, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with a leftist slant whereas O'Reily is an opinionated right wing opinionated ranting jerk. I think Alternet readers should get Democracy now and judge for themselves;ignore the previous posters who are trying to smear her with rhetorical questions on her funding. I think Soros funding is a good thing and a tiny antidote to Murdoch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]