Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The fight for the nomination has fueled a combustible anger among Democrats. Let's hope the American people don't get burned.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democrats Must Move Past Anger

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted June 4, 2008.


The fight for the nomination has fueled a combustible anger among Democrats. Let's hope the American people don't get burned.

In politics, as in so many other aspects of life, anger is a combustible fuel. Affirmed and titrated, it helps us move forward. Suppressed or self-indulged, it’s likely to blow up in our faces.

With the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination coming to a close, there’s plenty of anger in the air. And the elements are distinctly flammable. As Bob Herbert just wrote in the New York Times, "the Clinton and Obama partisans spent months fighting bitterly on the toxic terrain of misogyny, racism and religion."

Herbert doesn’t spread the blame evenly. And, as an elected Obama delegate to the national convention, I don’t either. But at this stage in the nomination process, the returns of blame aren’t merely diminishing -- they’re about to go over a cliff.

The anger that’s churning among many Hillary Clinton supporters is deserving of respect. For a long time, she’s been hit by an inexhaustible arsenal of virulent sexism, whether from Tucker Carlson, Rush Limbaugh or Chris Matthews.

If Barack Obama were facing defeat now, his supporters might be more inclined to dwell on the thinly veiled, and sometimes unveiled, racial bigotry that caused some Americans to tell reporters that they could never vote for a black man for president.

There’s no lack of injustices, defamations and outright outrages to cite. They’re important to remember, assess, denounce. And: Now what?

In times of emergency, people have been known to put aside differences, at least for a while. Sometimes, feuding neighbors unravel hoses and pass buckets so the entire block doesn’t go up in flames. Or alienated relatives take care of a fading loved one. People who fear strangers learn to trust in a shared humanity.

The Bill of Rights is burning. Children are dying in Baghdad and Chicago and Los Angeles and countless other cities and towns because of Republican "leadership." Negative trends of governance are scorching a social contract that had been slowly weaving the threads of human decency.

This year offers an electoral opportunity to get out the fire hoses and douse the pyromaniacs of the GOP. But the long Obama-Clinton battle has depleted precious time with little good to show for it.

A lot of negativity has aired, and some of it has combusted. Despite the real progress of the past several decades, remaining prejudices and injustices of gender and race -- and, though less talked about in news media, of sexual orientation and economic class -- are still haunting us and shadowing the future.

Furious supporters of Hillary Clinton are now talking about Michigan and Florida. Understandably, they’re apt to see recent developments in the context of despicable male chauvinism and unfair caricatures in the press.

There’s more than enough anger to burn.

And John McCain is eager to benefit from every bit of such anger, the more displaced the better. Right-wing corporatists quietly cheer his calls to give them even more extreme tax cuts. Outright militarists are hoping for four more years, and the odds seem to be shifting in their favor. Men on the Supreme Court named Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito are waiting to welcome kindred spirits in black robes.

Unfortunately, the angry often end up burning themselves.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, clinton, democrats, nomination, mccain

Norman Solomon's latest book Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America's Warfare State (PoliPointPress) is available now. For more information go to www.madelovegotwar.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
anger deserving respect?
Posted by: foreverhope on Jun 4, 2008 5:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The anger that’s churning among many Hillary Clinton supporters is deserving of respect. For a long time, she’s been hit by an inexhaustible arsenal of virulent sexism, whether from Tucker Carlson, Rush Limbaugh or Chris Matthews.

Obama has taken plenty of hits from the likes of Rush and Tucker, Buchannan, Scarborough too. First she flat-out refused to gracefully or otherwise conceed to Obama, and at the same time positioning herself to demand he give her VP, wanting it both ways of course. And today, the talking heads (don't know about Rush, don't watch him)the same broadcasters and journalists accused of sexism are today saying, "give her time, let it sink in". Awwww....is she unstable? emotionally disturbed? She wanted the toughest job in the world. If she were a man would she get a few days to 'pull herself together', have her cry?

Whatever. I'm not buying what she's selling, she did NOT lose this primary because of discrimination or because she is a WOMAN. She is a Clinton! She and Bill are (were) at the TOP of the dem food chain. No one knew who Barack Obama was a year ago! Do you realize how very far he came? She ran a LOUSY campaign, unprepared in any way to move past February BECAUSE SHE WAS SO SURE THE NOMINATION BELONGED TO HER, THAT SHE WAS LITERALLY ENTITLED TO IT.

Even using Tucker or Rush as examples of sexism is disingenuous. If anything Tucker, Buchannan and Scarborough have talked Hillary up and defended her as if she is one of their own family. Scarborough said he was "in love with Hillary." NO SHIT!

The republicans SO wanted to run against her! Hahahahahahaaaaa......

These cries of sexism in the press are bogus. She got a frigging free ride at the ABC debate! The poor Clintons, victims of right wing conspiracies and left wing conspiracies and media conspiracies, every one out to get them, always an excuse for their poor even unethical choices and behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obama better watch his back Posted by: Smackback
Sen. Clinton
Posted by: crat3 on Jun 4, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sen Clinton was sabotaged by the DNC and the superdelegates of a corrupt, rigged Democratic Party.

The superdelegates failed in their responsibility to endorse Sen Clinton as the best qualified and the strongest candidate to win the general election in a landslide victory hands down.

In repudiation of the DNC and the superdelegates, Hillary Clinton supporters should work for the resounding defeat of Obama and vote for McCain. I will vote for McCain in a swing state.

It is delusional to think that Sen. Clinton's conceding or over time can "unify" the corrupt, rigged Democratic Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» repug troll Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Reality Check! Posted by: chaoslegs
For the record
Posted by: kiwijohn on Jun 4, 2008 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, but lest we forget... the root cause of the debacle remains the same as always.

This is what the Huffington Post published on October 12 2005 in an article titled: 2008 Will Al Gore be the Anti-Hillary.

It's still three years away but Hollywood is already starting to choose sides for 2008. And two very distinct camps have started to form: those backing Hillary, and those desperately searching for the anti-Hillary.

Hillary is descending on L.A. this week, with a small Democratic strategy session planned for Thursday at Ron Burkle's home with, among other Hollywood players, Haim Saban and Rob Reiner, and a trio of fundraisers Friday and Saturday at the homes of Reiner, Bruce Cohen, and Marta Kauffman.

The devoted Hillary-ites include deep-pocket donors like Saban, Steve Bing, and Alan and Cindy Horn.

The Hollywood insiders who are not going the Hillary way are not ready to go public yet (I'm sure some of them will even be at the Hillary fundraisers this weekend). But, in private conversations, a growing number of them say they are determined to find another candidate to support.

Even though they backed both of Bill Clinton's White House runs and Hillary's Senate campaign, they've had enough of Hillary's attempt to rebrand herself as a fence-straddling DLC Dem. They're tired of the relentless strategic triangulating, the all-too-predictable attacks on video games (Sistah Soljah, meet Grand Theft Auto), the willingness to go along with President Bush's missile defense fantasies (one of only six Dems to do so), and the endless photo-op-ready partnerships with the likes of Bill Frist, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich.

But most of all, they are put off by her bellicose support for the war in Iraq -- which has, at times, left her sounding more like a White House shill than a viable opposition candidate.

Exacerbating the problem is that, when it comes to Iraq, Hillary is telling Hollywood donors whatever they want to hear.

end of quote (extracted from the Huffington Post article - I hope this is ok)

So the real question becomes: what will President Obama do to change the ways of the Hillary supporters, once she has fallen from grace?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well put
Posted by: talkville on Jun 5, 2008 3:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In politics, as in so many other aspects of life, anger is a combustible fuel. Affirmed and titrated, it helps us move forward. Suppressed or self-indulged, it’s likely to blow up in our faces."

An eminently sensible and reasonable article with respect to the 'united front' needed within the Democratic Party in order to win the election and begin (merely begin!!) to undo the vast and deep gutting of the institutions of government as well as on-going attempt to 're-value' the Constitution and either replace it with or make it an addendum to the Bible and biblical law as the organizing principle of our government.

Also well to remember, however, is that this anger Mr Solomon speaks of over-flows the boundaries of the Democratic Party itself. There are vast numbers of people who as recently as 10 or 15 years ago would never have even dreamt of 'getting involved' in such things as Politics or Religius activism. They were busy Pursuing Happiness and building up their individual lives (singly or together with others as in families) and 'playing by the rules' and the ruling ideologies of the work ethic and such. Many of their lives now lie in tatters and bankruptcies and homelessnesses and all kinds of up-heavals. This 'raw anger' too must be considered, for there have been members of the Democratic Party also who have had an uncomfortably close relationship with policies and events that have brought the country to this current status quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JUST LIKE THE 2000 ELECTION ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 5, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was anger that got millions of people to register to vote. Mostly Democrats. Prolonged and protracted anger is unproductive. But lets face it alot of people got up off their lazy arses. We don't need a replay of 2000 when Gore lost for a lack of votes, no other reason. There's alot to be angry about. For the time being, I'm not sure Americans should "get over it". There's lots to be done. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real test is to come.
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 8, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack has already hinted that he will not use time in his administration to engage in a hunt to bring any of his predecessors to justice after they have left office.

Some people are morbidly angry about the mounting evidence of crimes committed by members of the Bush cabinet and others. Obama's refusal to join their zeal for revenge, while instead concentrating on the work that needs to be done to reverse the damage in the aftermath, will be viewed as either weakness or complicity by that crowd.

It will be neither. it will be a new President, offering us a new beginning. He will also be offering us a chance to renew ourselves by walking on a different path--one that he is familiar with, but that we have to learn, step-by-step. It's the path to a new better, kinder country, in which justice is upheld, and the wealth is available to everyone. The only rule--we can only walk forward, solving problems. Never backward, giving in to fear and anger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not ANY crimes. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: The real test is to come. Posted by: tennismom
No Way
Posted by: NikkiK on Jun 13, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not moving past the anger because this election is a SHAM. Had MI/FL been seated in full strength as the votes were intended, then Hillary Clinton would have 1,725 pledged delegates and Obama only 1,706 pledged delegates. Plus she won the popular vote - so HILLARY IS THE WINNER of this nomination, not obama.

why should we sit back and accept that the DNC leadership FORCED her to drop out even tho' she won?

I will do everything in my power to ensure that obama does not win this election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]