Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

An interview with author Silja Talvi about her AlterNet investigative report on Gus Puryear, a Bush court nominee with a villainous past.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Gus Puryear: Bush's Latest Dangerous Court Nominee

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted May 22, 2008.


An interview with author Silja Talvi about her AlterNet investigative report on Gus Puryear, a Bush court nominee with a villainous past.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In 2004, Estelle Richardson’s lifeless and battered body was found on the floor of a Corrections Corp. of America prison cell. Four years later, that unsolved homicide has come back to haunt Republican stalwart "Gus" Puryear, the nation’s top private prison litigator and Bush nominee for US District Court. We talk to journalist Silja Talvi. [Read AlterNet's two-part investigative series this interview is based on by Talvi]

Amy Goodman: We turn now to an unfolding controversy over a Bush administration nominee for the federal bench. Just under a year ago, President Bush nominated Gus Puryear to serve on the US District Court in Tennessee's Middle District. Puryear is a Nashville attorney and general counsel for the Corrections Corporation of America, the largest private prison company in the United States. If he's approved, Puryear would be presiding over the same district where the CCA's headquarters are based.

Puryear is now coming under new scrutiny for his role in the CCA's handling of a prisoner death at its Nashville jail. The victim, thirty-four-year-old Estelle Richardson, was found dead with a cracked skull, four broken ribs in her solitary confinement cell. Four guards were implicated in what was later ruled a homicide.

The CCA eventually settled out of court with Richardson's family. No charges were filed against the guards. But a major new investigative piece on the website Alternet.org says Richardson's death could come back to haunt Puryear's nomination for the federal bench.

Silja Talvi is a senior editor at In These Times and author of the book Women Behind Bars: The Crisis of Women in the US Prison System. Her latest article, "Meet Gus Puryear," is online in two parts at Alternet.org. Silja joins us from Seattle, Washington. ... Tell us about Gus Puryear.

Talvi: … Gus Puryear's story wouldn't have been of particular interest for me or to me, had it not been for the fact that I had been following Estelle Richardson's case for years. I first came across a brief blurb about her murder back in -- well, it was four years ago -- and wanted to do something to include her story in my book. I had a gut instinct that something terrible had happened to this woman. I tried to track her story over the years and could get very little by way of any information. And very suddenly, in an unusual way, some of this information started to fall into place, and it happened to revolve around this man, Gus Puryear, and his bid for this federal judgeship.

So, he is, as you rightly point out, up for a lifetime appointment. He was nominated last year. And if appointed, that would indeed be for life. And one of the things that people have been bringing up, and rightly so, is that as a thirty-nine-year-old, he's only brought one federal case to trial so far. So with a real paltry legal background, there's already the question of, why is he even nominated in the first place? And once some of this stuff started to come up around what he had actually done or has done as general counsel for CCA, that's really gotten a lot of organizations involved in opposing his nomination.

Goodman: So tell us, in this case of Estelle Richardson, first focusing specifically, then we'll go larger with Corrections Corporation of America, explain what happened to her and explain what Gus Puryear had to do with it.

Talvi: She was in the process of trying to find herself in a better place in her life, she headed from Michigan to Tennessee in 1999, and she was actually going down there initially to be a surgical assistant. She was looking for a better life for herself and for her two children. As single mom, she had really been trapped in a very, very low-income, dead-end job as a telemarketer. And so, she headed down there.

Unfortunately, she found that the job opportunities weren't what she had expected. The school opportunities weren't what she expected. And she started hustling, like a lot of women do on low end, basically selling prescription pills. Initially she was just acquiring those prescription pills, then she got hooked on them. And she was first picked up around 2001, 2002, and was given a suspended sentence. Unfortunately, her UA subsequently came up dirty. And then she actually was found guilty of food stamp fraud.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gus puryear, cca, u.s. senate, judge nominee

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Won't he have to recuse himself from CCA cases?
Posted by: spacecadet on May 22, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Judges don't rule on cases that involve themselves do they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» so the Supreme Court should be all Liberal? Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
Spiritgirl
Posted by: Spiritgirl on May 22, 2008 10:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy shouldn't even be considered. As a
judge your loyalty is supposed to be to the
constitution and the facts as they relate to the
laws on the books and the case that they apply
to. I am so tired of the right wing talking
about the so called activist judges that are
only now being put on the bench by this
mis-Administration. Their loyalty to a
political idealogy should automatically exclude
them from consideration. However, as Americans
we have been dumbed down to the point that we
won't even raise our voices about the shenanigans and b.s. that we are constantly
being spoon fed. Enough already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is only a glimpse of a much larger picture
Posted by: roncypert on May 22, 2008 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
which has, for the most part, has not been displayed in the public gallery.

"Over the past two decades, America's prison population doubled, then doubled again, before finally leveling off at about two million inmates. One result: a $50 billion corrections industry. That's bigger than tobacco. The crackdown on crime has enriched corporations that build prisons or sell products to them, prison guard unions, and police departments that use budget-fattening incentives to pursue drug criminals. In this special report, American RadioWorks correspondent John Biewen explores how some groups with vested interests work to influence public policy— helping to keep more people locked up longer.

"On its Web site, the American Correctional Association points to the $50 billion spent each year to run the nation's prisons and jails. And it warns companies, "Don't miss out on this prime revenue-generating opportunity."

(sorry, the URL is too long for one line):

http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/
corrections/laws1.html

Here is another study in a pdf format

muse.jhu.edu/demo/labor_ studies_journal/v027/27.1chang.pdf

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jussive Distraction
Posted by: obliu222 on May 22, 2008 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Puryear should be embarrassed to advance such a hackneyed speculation in front of such a diverse and educated group with such an expansive knowledge of the legal system. Once upon a time people sought education in order to avoid these sorts of shameful displays.

I guess we're supposed to believe that someone is capable of accelerating to a speed of over 30 MPH within the confines of a 10 X 6 prison cell...or that anyone would have the inclination to.

The most disgusting part about this is the implicit implication that this lady, Ms. Richardson, was just flat nuts and flinging herself about her room for no apparent reason. If this were the case, if he were even going to suggest this were the case, I feel that he should explain why this would be the case.

Could have in the sense of could not have, another flotsam and jetsam of rhetoric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Typical Bush
Posted by: sicntired on May 22, 2008 7:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is everything that's wrong with America.He's a spoiled,rich brat that's had everything handed to him on a silver platter.His handling of the case of the woman who died in his corporate prison tells us all we need to know about this man's lack of conscience.The fact that he's never been in a criminal court sums up his qualifications.Bush loves to appoint in your face people to each body he sends people to.This will be his worst joke of all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corrupt to the Core
Posted by: macdon1 on May 23, 2008 6:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in the Gulag Archipelago a/k/a California, where we imprison more people per capita than communist China, while gang violence grows unabated. We also have for-profit prisons (two of which are CCA) and Blackwater wanna-be police departments that put fascist dictatorships to shame. Under the Bush regime they are in hog-heaven, getting more and more of those federal gang task force dollars. Meanwhile, somebody ought to be investigating the cozy little relationships between some of the police and those gang bangers.
When law enforcement becomes all about money and not about accountability to and protection of the public, it becomes corrupt to the core.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not new, more obvious Posted by: FemWorkingClass