Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Does the Microsoft-Yahoo! Merger Threaten Google?

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted April 16, 2008.


A look at the facts on Microhoo!
Annalee Newitz

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Annalee Newitz

Is the Creative Internet Just About Dead?
The era of free, open online innovation may be coming to an end.
May 15, 2008

Who's Afraid of Grand Theft Auto?
If the controversial video game were a movie, we'd all be mightily impressed by its dark, ironic vision of a world at war with itself.
May 7, 2008

User-Generated Censorship
The Web makes it easy for crowds to collaborate. But it also makes it simple for mobs to crush free expression.
Apr 30, 2008

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

For weeks now, analysts and armchair financial nerds have been mulling over what it will mean if software megacorp Microsoft buys Web monkey farm Yahoo! Would Microsoft-Yahoo! (known forevermore as Microhoo!) challenge Google to some kind of Web domination duel and win? Probably not. As much as I would love to see Bill Gates, Sergey Brin, and Jerry Yang in some kind of unholy three-way Jell-O wrestling match, I know it will never come to pass.

Microhoo! won't ever have what Google has right now. Sure, Microhoo! will have some solid assets: control of most PC desktops with the Windows OS, Microsoft Office crap, and the Internet Explorer browser. After chomping up Yahoo!, Microhoo! will have a second-rate search engine used by a forlorn 22 percent of Web searchers, followed by a very confused 10 percent who use Microsoft search -- I bet you didn't know Microsoft even had a search engine, did you? It would also have a giant mess of users on free Yahoo! mail, as well as Yahoo! instant messenger. Plus it would acquire a host of Yahoo! things you also didn't know existed, like Yahoo! Buzz and Yahoo! Answers. Along with about 8 percent of the Web advertising market.

What does Google have? Sure, it has a million things like Android and Orkut and Gmail and Reader and Blogger and Scoop and Zanyblob. But what it really has is Search. Fifty-nine percent of online searches go through Google servers. And if it can sell ads to 59 percent of the billions online? It owns the attention of the majority of the market. Google wins. That's why the company isn't worrying so much about Microhoo! and instead is doing things like investing in alternative energy research and letting its employees make psychotically long, company-wide e-mail arguments about whether it's Earth-friendly to provide plastic bottles of water in the lunchrooms.

I shouldn't be so glib. Google is making a halfhearted attempt to prevent Microhoo! from being born. The company offered Yahoo! an ad-sharing partnership where the two could pool their networks, put more ads in front of more eyes, and come out as an even more giant advertising machine. They're doing a very limited test of the ad partnership over the next couple of weeks. Maybe we'll see a Goohoo! after all.

I don't think so. Most business pundits think the Goohoo! deal is just Yahoo!'s last-ditch effort to get a bigger offer from Microsoft. Apparently Yahoo! wants about $50 billion to become Microhoo!, and Microsoft is currently offering a little more than $40 billion. No matter what the price tag, my bet is that we're going to see Microhoo! by this time next year. Microsoft is even contemplating a hostile takeover -- that's how serious the situation is.

So what does Microhoo! mean for us, the little guys, who just want a nice search engine that helps us find "hot XXX pussy" or "free MP3" on the Web? For one thing, it means we'll have fewer options when it comes to online searches, using Web mail, and just plain goofing around online. Microsoft actually considered bringing News Corp, owners of MySpace, in on the Microhoo! deal. That would mean MySpace, Hotmail, Yahoo! mail, and your PC software would all come from a merged corporate entity.

Let's say we did get a Micronewshoo! It's online offerings, combined, would be very much a version of Google's online offerings: mail, social networking, search, Web fun. There would be no cool new thing, no sudden breakthrough application that would transform our relationship to the Web the way Search did. It would be more of the same stuff, but from fewer players -- and therefore blander and bigger, like Hollywood blockbusters. New applications and content creators on the Web will be incredibly hard to find unless they have a deal with Microhoo! or Google.

Then in 20 years, a woman in a physics graduate program in China will come up with an idea for the next cool communications network. At last, we'll say, we finally have a network free from advertising! A place where we can share information without Big Business intruding! Not like the Web, which is all corporate content and has no place for the little guy.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: google, yahoo, microsoft, web

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who thinks Google should start recycling dinosaur bones.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Down with the monopolies
Posted by: celeborn on Apr 18, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Microhoo! comes about, I'm seriously considering switching to gmail after using yahoo mail since 1994. The most dangerous thing about monopolies is seen in the Murdoch takeover of News networks... what if suddenly censorship of "alternet" news happens! After all, he is the friend of the neocons and corpirates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They should all merge........
Posted by: tap17x on Apr 18, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
........and call it Migooya.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ... maybe Pangaea... Posted by: Bearzerker
You have to be kidding me
Posted by: nerotic on Apr 18, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is written with a bipolar model of search engines and content providers, it's almost as if the author traveled back in time to make the facts fit the case.

With RSS today and the insane multitude of search engines even if Google, Yahoo and Microsoft merged to form Moo Goo Yahpan we're hardly in any danger of seeing our options online limited.

We should be focusing our worries on the Net Neutrality debate which has the quite serious possibility of murdering the net as we know it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all about control...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Apr 18, 2008 5:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and he who controls it, wins!...

I kinda like Google as it seems to be the only megalith thats able to do a 1-2 punch to Intel and M$ at the same time...

anyways... who said "they" had the right to monopolize and limit free discourse anyways...

portals = bad
corpirates/governments can limit what people can do creatively which will limit the human dream and possibility [and is constitutionally illegal in a freedom loving world anyways]

open networks = good
free and unimpeded access to all, and is the ultimate library!

I think we need a commercial free WWW2 superhighway to bypass the portal environs!
and the option to choose what model we as consumers want to take!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come On...People. Find and Use Dogpile
Posted by: upHurled on Apr 18, 2008 11:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you had a choice between a single-person search party, or a search team of half-a-dozen, which would you choose? Yep, me too. Why not put six search engines to work on something in the same time it takes to use one? This is what we call metasearch.

Dogpile puts the power of all the leading search engines together in one search box to deliver the best combined results. The process is more efficient and yields more relevant results.

Aren't all search engines pretty much the same? They aren't. In fact, different search engines often return different search results for the same query. Based on everything from how information is arranged on a web page, to what each search engine pinpoints as most relevant, search results can vary widely across each search provider.

Dogpile brings together the Web's best search engines in one place and delivers the most comprehensive and relevant results, and this is what is called metasearch. The solution is an efficient, single-search-box engine that makes things easier for all of us.

Dogpile removes duplicates and analyzes the results to ensure the best results are always on top of the pile. Dogpile brings together the best results from the Internet's top search engines, including Google, Yahoo! Search, Live Search, Ask.com, About, MIVA, LookSmart, and more.

The mascot for Dogpile? That's Arfie! He chases down the most relevant results for searchers. Arfie is a virtual know-it-all and is always eager to please. Pretty compelling story, huh? Dogpile was just named top consumer search engine by J.D. Power & Associates for 2007. So get outta Google!

Check Out Dogpile!
Dopile Search Engine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]