Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

More than 40 percent of every income tax dollar in 2007 went toward military spending.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Portland Couple Has Refused to Pay Taxes for 30 Years to Protest Military Funding

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted April 15, 2008.


More than 40 percent of every income tax dollar in 2007 went toward military spending.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

AMY GOODMAN: Today is April 15th, Tax Day, a day when tens of millions of Americans scramble to file their income taxes on time. It's also a day when people across the country are planning to protest the use of tax dollars to fund war. In dozens of communities across the country, demonstrations are planned at IRS offices, federal buildings, post offices and other public places to protest the continued funding of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A recent study by the National Priorities Project shows more than 40 percent of every income tax dollar in 2007 went towards military spending. The largest share of that was for the war in Iraq, which has been estimated to cost taxpayers $12 billion per month. The total amount allocated for the Iraq war through fiscal year 2008 is more than $520 billion.To protest the continued funding of the war, some Americans are taking a stand today by personally refusing to fund the military. Tax resisters across the country are planning to withhold part or all of their taxes to protest the war.Pat and John Schwiebert have been war tax resisters for the past thirty years. John Schwiebert is a retired pastor who spent more than four decades as a United Methodist minister. His wife Pat Schwiebert is a registered nurse who founded support groups for parents who have lost their children. They both join me here in our Portland, Oregon studio. We welcome you to Democracy Now!

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: Welcome to Portland. It's good to have you.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, it's good to be back here. John, how long haven't you paid taxes?

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: Well, it's been over thirty years. I'm not exactly sure. I think it was 1977 when we stopped paying.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about your decision thirty years ago.

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: I think we just pretty much together came to the realization that we're conscientious objectors to war, and if you object to war, you don't participate. The only way we could participate at our age at the time is by refusing to support it. And so, we just said, well, we won't send in the military portion, the military percentage of our taxes.

AMY GOODMAN: And how do you work that out?

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: Well, you -- in that case, we just filled out our tax return, we told the IRS what we owed, and we said we're only paying a percentage of it, and we're refusing to pay the rest. The IRS just treats it as if it were a failure to pay, so the only thing they've ever done with us is to try to collect the money. And in some cases they have, and in some cases they haven't been able to collect it.

AMY GOODMAN: Pat Schwiebert, how do they try to collect it?

PAT SCHWIEBERT: Well, they've garnished our wages. They've taken a --

AMY GOODMAN: What does that mean?

PAT SCHWIEBERT: Well, it means that they will attach part of your wages and take it without your permission to pay the portion of taxes that you've refused to pay.

AMY GOODMAN: So your check is just smaller?

PAT SCHWIEBERT: Right.

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: Yeah.

PAT SCHWIEBERT: Right.

AMY GOODMAN: And in terms of the percentage, what are you calculating, for example, this year, the percentage that would go to the military? What percentage aren't you paying?

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: Actually, we've gotten to the point we're so upset by the direction the country has taken and the demise of democracy in this country, that after the Iraq war broke out we completely stopped cooperating. So we're paying nothing now. So the percentage that's estimated by the War Resisters League is more like 50 percent. But I haven't paid any attention to it this year, because we --

PAT SCHWIEBERT: We don't care.

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: -- we just didn't give anything. We're in total non-cooperation with the federal government.

AMY GOODMAN: So, do you set money aside at all to give somewhere?

JOHN SCHWIEBERT: We have traditionally redirected the money to some other cause. And now, since 2002, our decision has been to take the money that the federal government says we owe and to pay it directly to our local Multnomah County government. And so, day after tomorrow, we're going to go down to the Multnomah County Commission meeting, their weekly meeting, with a check in hand, and we'll give the reasons why we cannot support the federal government, and we'll thank them for not having a military department, and we'll give them the money to be used however they wish. But we have in mind that our county government has a heavy cost to pay for healthcare for people, including people who are in the position they are because of their involvement in the war and the suffering from the war.

AMY GOODMAN: What does Multnomah County, the officials there, say when you come to bring the money?

PAT SCHWIEBERT: "Thank you."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war, taxes, war tax resistance, war resistance

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Patroitism.....
Posted by: eosrk on Apr 15, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is a hard thing to do. Along with the over half-trillion spent just on Iraq and Afghanisistan, who know how big the miltary budget really is, but I figure a few trillion dollars per year more now....and all this mess really started under Regan-nomics, and blew up to Bushafuckup! That couple are what real patroitism is all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Patroitism..... Posted by: desidid
Can everyone play?
Posted by: brunowe on Apr 15, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I argue on the Nation's comment boards with someone who actually believes that all the government domestic programs set up starting with the New Deal are unconstitutional. Can he and his ideological confreres withhold their taxes?

The representative was right, regardless of the moral and strategic failure of the current administration's Iraq occupation, if everyone got to pick and choose what they paid for, it would be problematic at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Godwin's Law strikes again Posted by: brunowe
» It's not just Iraq Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Godwin's Law strikes again Posted by: peacefullaim
» Bushie Brunowe? Posted by: YogiBear
» I agree Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: I agree Posted by: CulturalMutilation
» RE: Can everyone play? Posted by: desidid
The actual amount is even more than indicated
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 15, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In Fiscal Year 2006, the U. S. Government spent $406 Billion of your money on interest payments to the holders of the National Debt."

As of early 2008, the total U.S. federal debt is around $9.5 trillion, about $31,100 per U.S. citizen. Of this amount, debt "held by the public" was roughly $5.3 trillion - this is the amount of money owed by the U.S. government to its creditors.

Since much of this debt was run up by delivering fraudulent and bogus contracts to giant international corporations like Boeing, Lockheed, etc., there is a very good argument that this distribution of taxpayer funds represents "taxation without representation".

Furthermore, the tax burden falls most heavily on the shoulders of the middle class, while the wealthiest benefit from tax cuts across the board.

Furthermore, the present President is a fraud who only gained office via a stolen election - an election stolen with the overt assistance of a right-wing, politicized Supreme Court.

Under such conditions, citizens are entirely justified in paying their taxes to their local or state governments. There's been the equivalent of a fascist coup in the executive branch of the federal government, so anti-war tax protest is more legitimate than ever.

Again, it has to go to your local government - not into your pocket - for it truly to be tax protest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the way it should be!!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Apr 15, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Historically income taxes were supposed to be put to rest after WW2. Then we were going to go back to the old school way. You paid tax on 'gains'. Income was'nt seen as a 'gain' it was more like 'compsesation for labor'. Well the young turks of the WW2 political class realized taxing income was a goldmine. Untold wealth waiting to be gleened off the people with a rate they set, and absolute power over the people by way of tax forclosures.
The True American Heros that have shucked Uncle Sam for a few decades are just that...HEROS. Heros for the people,for better governance,responsible spending and that greatest of American traditions...Self Determination. Without the money stolen from us in taxation most Americans would enjoy a better quality of life. Even if they went so far as to let individuals the same tax breaks as business,who also wants your money, then we might breathe a little easier.
I think we need to reincarnate another old school tradition....Jubilee. A time when all debts large,small,personal and National were forgiven. I know the idea of the rich and the poor getting their debts zeroed out might be a hard pill to swallow for some but the end result would be something we really need today.
REAL ECONOMIC STIMULATION. I may not be a Rhodes Scholar but I'm confident in saying if folks suddenly had the value of their house as an asset in stead of a loan,they'd be heading out to the store to pick up a few things.
I've always been against taxation if the money is not being used for education,healthcare,social security, and the
environment. I believe if we're going to be taxed,we should have say in where I send my money. If we don't have that,then we are controled and not truly Free. We are the land of the Free. Let's get a little free-er a tear up that tax check. Keep just enough money in the bank to be able to cash your work check,keep your cash at home,where you need it.
END TAXATION....LEGALIZE HEMP
dRAFT jEFFREY7 FOR pREZ '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Schweiberts ARE paying Federal taxes -- more than their share!
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 15, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush 43 entered office in January 2001 with two ideological objectives in mind: (1) attack Iraq and (2) give lop-sided tax breaks to the rich. The consequence of those goals has been a drastic reduction of Federal funds to states and local communities.

By paying part of their of their IRS tax bill and fully supporting state and local assessments, the Schweiberts, who live in poverty, actually pay a greater percentage of their meager inccome in taxes than many wealthy people including George W.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

zeitgeist!
Posted by: rmg on Apr 15, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this movie gives a pretty solid argument that the income tax is not in the constitution...www.zeitgeistmovie.com. scroll to 1:25:55

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: zeitgeist! Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: zeitgeist! Posted by: beijaflor
» RE: zeitgeist! Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: zeitgeist! Posted by: praedor
» RE: zeitgeist! Posted by: praedor
» RE: zeitgeist! Posted by: EncinoM
Been there,done that
Posted by: Knobby on Apr 15, 2008 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and still doing it... What the Schwiebert's are doing, thousands of others are doing too or doing almost the same,each for their own reasons...

I haven't payed taxes voluntarily off and on for last 20 to 30 years. I have had wages taken,bank accounts robbed, property attached. Why?, because I personally do not like the way government spends our money, whether it be for war or welfare or what ever, there is no accounting in government,especially nowadays...

They probably should read a book titled " The Complex, how the military invades our everyday lives" by Nick Turse...

Although we resisters keep doing what we do, most of us also realize that we're not really making a dent in the system. People pay for it hundreds of otherways, everytime you buy a can of Coke, cup of Starbucks coffee, buy gas,oil, Bounty paper towels,Butterball turkeys,Cheerios, etc. etc...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Been there,done that Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Been there,done that Posted by: abbadon2007
» Taxes are like Torture Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Been there,done that Posted by: Knobby
» Been there,done that too Posted by: PaulK
Should You Pay Your taxes to a Hitler or a Stalin?
Posted by: sofla100 on Apr 15, 2008 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the case of Iraq and the US military budget, your money is going for the commission of war crimes, to include paying private corporations (eg, Blackwater) who have killed innocent civilians and never been held accountable, to the torture chambers of the CIA and Guantanamo, and on to the many documented cases of rape/murder by USA forces in Iraq against the local people. In the case of Hitler, if Germans had not paid their taxes, the government would have collapsed even sooner, and then those Germans would have been in the Right. Now, generally I think paying your taxes is a good thing and should be done. But, with Iraq, it is a special circumstance. This war is illegal, no cause existed for the USA to invade. It was never declared. Ample evidence exists Bush made up so-called WMD's. On top of that, the illegal spying, the use of torture, and many other things, have been committed by him since that time. The Congress is too weak to stop him. Special Circumstances Demand Unusual Actions. It was true with Hitler, and true with Stalin, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, and it is true also with Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

johnny hempseed
Posted by: Johnny Hempseed on Apr 15, 2008 5:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
H.R.1921 Religious Freedom Peace Tax Fund Bill
The bill is to create a fund allowing conscientious objectors ,for religious or moral grounds,to pay thier full tax liability into a fund dedicated to non military spending.
The bill was last introduced by John Lewis D.Ga.(4/18/07)where it was referred to committee.There are 35 co-sponsors.See Campaign For A Peace Tax Fund peacetaxfund.org.
Many of us have spiritual prohibitions against killing,and that includes paying others to do it for us!I don't want my taxes paying for weapons,bombing civilians,land mines, cluster bombs or war in general.Congress shall make no law establishing or preventing the practice of religion,and my religion says Thou shall not kill!Please contact your congress people and ask them to co-sponsor or support H.R.1921 lets get this out of committee and onto the floor for a vote. peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: johnny hempseed Posted by: brunowe
» RE: johnny hempseed Posted by: Techubus
» RE: johnny hempseed Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: johnny hempseed Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
» RE: johnny hempseed Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: johnny hempseed Posted by: corey
The big boot!
Posted by: carbon-based on Apr 15, 2008 6:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Send them to jail..take their property then deport them out of the country to someplace they like! They don't get to decide what they will pay for.

This is a country not individual ownership interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boot! Posted by: ceraiteri
» RE: Boot! Posted by: carbon-based
» Good idea carbon-based Posted by: fearn
» RE: The big boot! Posted by: peacefullaim
Does your family have ANOTHER $40,000 for the next 4 years in Iraq?
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 15, 2008 6:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
E-Z credit is a wonderful thing, if you're a federal politician. You can put it all on credit. Somebody else pays later! You too can see what it's like. Google "3 trillion dollar spending spree".

I take the latest Joe Stiglitz estimate of maybe 4 trillion for the first 5 years, and extrapolate to 3 trillion for the next 4 years. 3 trillion split among 300 million American residents is $10,000 apiece, or $40k for a family of four. You're still on the hook for the first $50K, by the way.

Can't pay? No problem. We'll ask the next guy to pay your share too. Oh, you ARE the next guy.

Still can't pay? No problem. Shrinking the dollar by 50% makes both your life savings and all your social security worth half as much. Or you could work a bad job in a tight economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does your family have ANOTHER $40,000 for the next 4 years in Iraq?
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 15, 2008 6:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
E-Z credit is a wonderful thing, if you're a federal politician. You can put it all on credit. Somebody else pays later! You too can see what it's like. Google "3 trillion dollar spending spree".

I take the latest Joe Stiglitz estimate of maybe 4 trillion for the first 5 years, and extrapolate to 3 trillion for the next 4 years. 3 trillion split among 300 million American residents is $10,000 apiece, or $40k for a family of four. You're still on the hook for the first $50K, by the way.

Can't pay? No problem. We'll ask the next guy to pay your share too. Oh, you ARE the next guy.

Still can't pay? No problem. Shrinking the dollar by 50% makes both your life savings and all your social security worth half as much. Or you could work a bad job in a tight economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow, that's a pretty long time for a new record.
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 15, 2008 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got to get my wife and I to plan this kind of a thing. We get so disgusted every year every time we have to pay the IRS knowing where our money goes to. At the rate of where and how our tax dollars are going, I guess abolishing the IRS isn't such a bad plan. However, in case anyone hasn't noticed, guess where the money to pay for the tax cuts for the wealthy? China, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, etc ... We're gonna need a long way out of this upcoming dungeon when they decide to stop lending money to Washington. Stay tuned ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These two brave individuals are a thousand times the hero that
Posted by: thekidde on Apr 18, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain could ever be. I hope they receive a lot of support from the community and hope their church puts its money where its principles are supposed to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now, If There Was a National Sales Tax Instead of Income Tax
Posted by: Koondog on Apr 19, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
income earners would be able to 1) dispose of their income as they wished and 2) refuse to support the government's war fixation by not spending excessively on items that were taxed (food, medicines and other necessities could be exempt from sales tax). Moreover, the government would have an interest in seeing that the economy was doing well because otherwise, IT wouldn't have revenues it needs to operate. Under the current system, Uncle Sammy takes his share (often more than his share) right off the top and you have to spend hours and hours each year to get your share back. Replacing the income tax with a national sales tax would tax everyone fairly. The average Joe who buys a $100 item would pay about $125 with the sales tax. The rich Joe who buys a $1,000,000 yacht would pay $1,250,000 with his 25% sales tax. Even drug pushers and organized crime pay sales tax when they buy their Escalades. No loopholes for anyone like there are today with the current 50,000 page tax code. Oh, yes, and we could do away entirely with the IRS! This kind of a system would give the citizenry economic leverage over the people they elect to represent their interests. Either that, or the government can start spending tax revenues on programs that actually do the greatest good for the greatest number, unlike today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]