Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The human proclivity for pointless, conflict-driven tribalism manifests itself on the web.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Color Wars

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted March 25, 2008.


The human proclivity for pointless, conflict-driven tribalism manifests itself on the web.
Advertisement

Imagine that you had a group of friends and acquaintances you saw every day at school or at work, and one morning instead of saying "How are you?" they suddenly started saying, "Have you joined one of our teams yet?" At first, you would dismiss it as some dumb joke you missed on The Colbert Report the night before. But it keeps going: "I'm on white team. But Bob's on blue team," your pal says to you later. "Are you on the puce team?"

At this point, you truthfully believe that everybody has gone fucking crazy and that the people you thought were your friends are actually a bunch of kids living on that island from the movie Battle Royale (2000) where everybody has to kill one another for arbitrary reasons determined by a capricious authority figure who thinks he's a comedian.

This actually happened to me last week on a social network called Twitter, an online service that lets you send short messages to people on your list of friends. As you look at your Twitter "stream," you'll see your friends' names and short "tweets" about what they're doing or how they're feeling. When you work at home and don't have office pals to say hello to in the morning, Twitter is your surrogate office chit-chat zone. In the morning, I see my friends saying things like, "Yawn, I'm drinking coffee" or "Gotta finish this awesome project." In the evening, people will say, "Going to Sugarlump Café -- anyone want to come hang out?" Though I'm home on my computer, Twitter keeps me in touch with the social world.

But last week, for the first time, I felt like my friendly chat zone had become a freaky arena of prototribal warfare. And not the good kind of tribal warfare like in the recent flick Doomsday, with punk rock cannibals and Malcolm McDowell dressed as a medieval king. Everybody had started joining colored teams. I kept getting messages like the ones I described earlier, where people were saying, "I'm on blueteam! I'm on greenteam! What is your team?"

Finally, after hours of this, I typed a quick message to everybody: "I do not want to join a team." One of my friends replied, "OK, I've set up a team for you -- noteam! You can join that!"

No. I do not join colored teams. I don't join nonteams just to feel like I'm part of the team-joiners. I do not like when social spaces degenerate into meaningless competitions. It seems too much like Facebook.

I had to get to the bottom what the hell was going on. After a few quick searches, I discovered that the color wars were started by a popular Web personality named Ze Frank, who is most famous for doing funny shit online and creatively promoting the hell out of it. He decided it would be fun to say he was on "blue team" and then see how many people would join it or join other teams in response. On his blog, he wrote that it would be just like summer camp, where everybody joined a colored team and played tug-of-war or egg toss.

Except there are no potato sack races on Twitter. It's a communications medium, not a freaking summer camp. I love the hell out of tug-of-war and summer camp, but if you want to do that, why not create a "summer camp" group on Twitter and get everybody to go out to the park, form teams, and do shit? And then -- post all of the photos on Flickr? Why divide a gregarious social space into meaningless factions?

The whole thing depressed me more than it should have because it confirmed my worst suspicions about humanity: one, that people will blindly do what a charismatic figure asks them to do even if it's stupid; and two, that in the absence of conflict, people will still race to form teams that fight each other for no reason. This team thing took over a huge portion of the Twitter social network within a day. It spread that fast -- as fast, perhaps, as our desire to form alliances based on conflict.

So forgive me if I can't think of Ze Frank's little game as something "fun," like summer camp. It was about as fun as the Stanford Prison Experiment, and just as revealing.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: social networking sites, twitter, conflict

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You just say that...
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Mar 26, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because you are not in the Red Team.




Could'nt help but say that. Never really got the whole facebook/myspace/twitter crap anyway. Productivity killers and not even close to a real social network. Its not surprising some people use gimmicks to make it more appealing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Speaking of Tribalism Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal
Speaking of pointless things...
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 26, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THis article certainly qualifies.

Of course, on a hypocritical level, I think what I am typing is as close as you can get to being brain dead.

I'm commenting on an article written about a virtual activity that mimics a real activity that is pointless as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Speaking of pointless things... Posted by: El Hombre Malo
Seepage
Posted by: talkville on Mar 30, 2008 1:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is in consciousness will seep into reality; what is in reality will seep into consciousness. Same with unconsciousness.

Let's not be too hasty in patting ourselves on the back for being the Ultimate Enlightened Society. We're in the presence of a rampant poly-theism with fetishes and witch-doctor Chiefs included. From Gangs to Teams, from Celts to Goths and Punks and X-ers, from IBM'ers to Exxon'ers to Google'ers to at&t'ers, there's gods and idols galore to serve -- in the Virtual- or in the Meat- Worlds.

In Avatars and such we see the re-emergence of Atavisms in all their glorious customs (e.g. 'morals'), rituals and celebrations of cruelty; cutting and pasting, sometimes into inter-active 'communities', sometimes into the flesh of the actual members of a tribe or its euphemism: "community".

An Agon of the multifarious gods: the 'competitive spirits' vying for the worshipers to feed them. They are hungry, some of them ravenous, many of them not virtual but actual. In Iraq, for instance: the Temple of Blackwater, the Temple of KBR, the Temple of US Marines, the Temple of Special Forces, the Temple of Exxon.... Each denomination feeding its special god and performing rituals of sacrifice to appease it.

Harmless fun, diversion and entertainment have a way of seeping into actualizations. It would be erroneous to think that we've mastered the Way to avoid repetitions of historical events. In post-modern dress and style we are rehearsing conditions 3000 or more years old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]