Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A McCain Moment: Do You Want Four More Years of This?

By Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post. Posted March 26, 2008.


It's not just George Bush's war that McCain wants to continue; it's George Bush's approach.
Huffington

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Arianna Huffington

Caught Shilling for the Drug War, Pollster Attacks the Messenger
Pollster Mark Mellman was hired by Lockheed Martin to push for funding for drug tracking planes in Colombia and doesn't like being called on it.
Apr 16, 2008

Microtrends vs. Macrotrends: Why Obama Is Winning
Clinton guru Mark Penn tried to slice the electorate into the "small forces behind tomorrow's big changes," while Obama tried to unify us.
Mar 3, 2008

John McCain Sells His Soul: Backs Off on Torture Ban
The former POW embraces extreme interrogation techniques.
Feb 15, 2008

More stories by Arianna Huffington

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

If our polarized country can agree on one thing, it's that the greatest danger facing America over the next decade will not be Islamic extremism and instability in the Middle East, but rather Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. That's just "common knowledge," right?

So it only makes sense that the media have focused non-stop on this looming threat while paying scant attention to the fact that the presumptive Republican nominee for president apparently doesn't have a clue about what's going on in the Middle East.

And with the U.S. death toll hitting 4,000 (with 25 American soldiers killed over the last two weeks, the deadliest fortnight for our troops since September 2007), and with another 57 people killed in Iraq yesterday, John McCain's tenuous grasp on what is happening in the region becomes all the more worthy of attention.

For those who were too busy watching Rev. Jeremiah Wright damn America for the 10,000th time to hear about McCain, let's review: at a stop in Jordan last week, McCain made the ludicrous claim that Al Qaeda insurgents were being trained in Iran*. Asked again about it, he dug in deeper, claiming it was "common knowledge and has been reported in the media that al-Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran, that's well known."

A few moments later, McCain's chief lady in waiting, Joe Lieberman, leaned forward and whispered in his ear. McCain promptly offered a quick rewrite: "I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al-Qaeda."

Now, it's been widely reported that, heading into the Iraq war, George Bush had no clue about the differences between Sunni and Shia. But that was 2003, and it was George Bush. This is five years later and we're talking about John McCain. But it turns out this acclaimed foreign policy expert doesn't know the difference between Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda in Iraq, Sunni insurgents, Iran and Syria. Or, perhaps more charitably, he's doesn't care to know.

Yes, John McCain is a war hero, and yes, we're all grateful for his service during the Vietnam war. But as McCain's embarrassing foreign fact-finding fiascos make clear: having acted heroically in a foreign war does not magically translate into foreign policy expertise and judgment.

Yet every time McCain packs a suitcase, the press automatically anoints him as "presidential." They dutifully did it on this latest trip, even though it came just under a year after McCain's clownish stroll through a Baghdad market, which he declared proof that one could "walk freely" around Baghdad -- while being guarded by three Blackhawk helicopters, two Apache gunships, and 100 armed soldiers.

The fact that the presumptive Republican nominee doesn't grasp the general outlines in Iraq would seem to be a big story. But not to the mainstream media. As soon as they heard that the Straight Talk Express had run off the road, they sprang into action to get the wreckage out of view. Move along folks, nothing to see here.

To the Washington Post, it was just a "gaffe." CNN let stand the McCain campaign's assertion that he had just "misspoke." Brit Hume, senior member of the McCain Support Team, brushed it off as "blip," and a "senior moment." (Of course, Hume had a very different take on "senior moments" when it came to Jack Murtha.)

Not content with excuses, one of McCain's foreign policy advisors, Max Boot, decided to tout the "misstatement": "What gaffe?" Boot asked, going on to claim, "there is copious evidence of Iran supplying and otherwise assisting Al Qaeda in Iraq and other Sunni terrorist groups (including Al Qaeda central). The 9/11 Commission itself noted a number of links between Iran and Al Qaeda." And McCain senior foreign policy advisor Randy Scheunemann claimed there is "ample documentation" for this.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: trinity united church of , straight talk express, ray odierno, obama trinity, mccain moment, mccain media, mccain iraq, mccain iran, kyra phillips iraq, kyra phillips, john mccain sunni shiite, john mccain media darling, john mccain gaffe, john mccain al qaeda, john mccain 2008, john mccain, joe lieberman, iraq 4000 deaths, brit hume mccain, brit hume, 4000 soldiers killed, 4000 killed in iraq, 4000 killed, 4000 deaths, 4000

Find more Arianna at the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
presidential
Posted by: Dboy on Mar 26, 2008 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi Arianna,

I definitely agree with everything you're saying about McCain, but unfortunately the Democrats are trying very damn hard right now to lose this election. the media blesses McCain by calling him "Presidential", but compared to the democratic candidates, McCain DOES look presidential. In my opinion the democrats blew this election when Edwards took himself out. Clinton and Obama are both self-destructing now, but the blame really belongs with the Democratic establishment. Instead of properly vetting candidates, the democrats seem to just roll the dice and hope nothing bad happens. And now it's just too late to recover.

I don't think McCain is a particularly strong candidate, but at this point he really doesn't have to be. His minor slip concerning which bad-guys are being trained by which country is mostly irrelevant since the true definitions of words like "terrorist", "insurgent", etc. have been used so incorrectly for so long that those words don't even mean anything anymore. All McCain has to do is say "Me strong, other guy weak" and he wins.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» bush 2, electric boogaloo Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
McCain Needs Bush, and Bush Needs McCain
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Mar 26, 2008 1:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush needs McCain in the White House not only to continue his agenda, but to protect him, with vetoes and possibly pardons, from the consequences of his criminal behavior for the past 7+ years.

The press fails to point out the big picture: that the extremists have been motivated by our invasion and were not active prior to it, that Iraq is still embroiled in a civil war of our making, that the original casus belli, and its successors, have not withstood scrutiny, and that a million people dead and $3 trillion down the drain have accomplished nothing save making life worse for the Iraqi people and ourselves more hated in the world.

A slight (and probably transient) downturn in American casualties is irrelevant, a distraction to obfuscate the issues in an unjust and unjustifiable war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

whether you want John insane or not
Posted by: bitsfick on Mar 26, 2008 2:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
your going to get him. The lying main stream news is making sure of that. Bush and his cabal looted the treasury of 200 billion to bail our their banker friends, but what is the big news item? A DEMOCRAT GOT LAID. The American sheeple are being played like a cheap fiddle. Put your heads between your legs people, and kiss your asses good by.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey Dboy Posted by: David/Daoud
» RE: Hey Dboy Posted by: Dboy
the real greatest danger
Posted by: topbrick on Mar 26, 2008 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If our polarized country can agree on one thing, it's that the greatest danger facing America over the next decade will not be Islamic extremism and instability in the Middle East, but rather Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. That's just "common knowledge," right?

I assume Arianna believes it's the former. Well she's wrong. The biggest threat to the American people is their own gullibility and lack of critical thinking, which is what Rev Wright was employing when he made that speech. Also, let's stop calling McPain a war hero, please? He was bombing innocent Vietnamese when he was shot down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the real greatest danger Posted by: caitlain
» High five, topbrick ! Posted by: David/Daoud
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 26, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"He eventually spent five and a half years in various prison camps, three and a half of those in solitary confinement, and was repeatedly beaten and tortured before he was finally released..."

You gotta wonder what that does to a guys mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hadit Posted by: When In Doubt
There will be no difference at all
Posted by: xi_people on Mar 26, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're going to get a continuance of Bush policies no matter who is (s)elected. Why even pretend that the occupation of Iraq will "end" if either leading dimocrat gets in office?

Other political issues will essentially remain the same as well. If its Hillbilly that "wins" the prize, there won't even be a pretense of change. If its smooth Obama, he'll make noises about doing things differently, but the bottom line will remain the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This vs. That
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Mar 26, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big question we have to ask ourselves is this:

Do we want 4 more years of total and complete focus on foreign policy, all of which is a abject failure... along with its accompanying corporate cronyism...

Or do we finally want to focus at least a DAY or TWO of attention on domestic issues like the fact that hospitals are all operating on a razor slim margin and that the pharma companies run Washington.

Maybe we want to actually draw up some passable legislation to address our crumbling infrastructure.

How about at least a couple of good solid sentences or maybe at least a few brain cells humming along about the fact that we have no SUSTAINABLE energy policy whatsoever?

Perhaps we can a real live national discussion about immigration and talk about it like *adults*... kinda like what Obama did when he talked about race.

Maybe we can talk about rational regulation of financial instruments.

I'd like to see at least one of those topics discussed on a nationwide basis.

But Sean Hannity, Rush L., Laura I. Ann C. and their Fox Friends have made it clear and obvious that a McSame presidency will not address real issues that confront real people. They want and need this to be about fear, terror, a focus solely on the OTHER side of our borders at all times and the neglect of those in real need.

A John McSame presidency will certainly catapult the propaganda to even new heights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can anyone in this
Posted by: paula.c on Mar 26, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
country vote for this ignorant fool. His political time is over. Maybe he really is showing some senile dementia.

Too many people are throwing the towel in, claiming the Democrats are self destructing. I say, DO NOT give up hope yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How can anyone in this Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: How can anyone in this Posted by: Quannah
McCain is Defined By War
Posted by: freshlemon on Mar 26, 2008 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain loves war. Without the Viet Nam conflict he might have ended up as a used car salesman living from paycheck to paycheck. Instead he was given recognition as a hero and ended up in congress with the opportunity to reap the spoils of war.

He has done nothing, he knows nothing, he is no leader and he idolizes Bush. He's still riding down main street in an open car being swamped in confetti, bands playing and people cheering. A hero? Surviving as a prisoner of war doesn't make one a hero. Many men did that
and deserve recognition for their service. I do not demean McCain for this, but marvel at the fact that people can and do survive such life shattering episodes. No, I demean John McCain for using this as proof of leadership and ability.

The man is nothing more than an empty butt-kissing cry baby who is stepping on the graves of true heroes. War is his "thing" because that is the only way that he is able to define himself.

When the parade is over he is just a sad reminder of how war destroys minds, morals and governments. He is a man who deserves pity, not election as a leader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain is Defined By War Posted by: d.nweindeb
I think america deserves this fool the problem........
Posted by: The Big Raven on Mar 26, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With that is the rest of the world does not.
have a great day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:I couldnt agree more Posted by: The Big Raven
Don't let anyone tell you who the winner will be!
Posted by: jeffreytaos on Mar 26, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all the fear of election fraud, diebold machines, Cheny and Company Incorporated, don't let anyone try to connvince you to give up the fight before the final battles. Some commentators want you to believe that you don't have a choice, a voice, and should start waving the white flag today. I'm telling you to listen to your heart, to intelligent commentators, and read the news from outside the USA. The battle has only begun. Whether Hillary Clinton wants to play in this field of dreams or not is up to her. Barak Obama has said he'll continue the campiagn for freedom and justice on behalf of every American. I don't hear anybody interogating Bush or Cheny about their religious positions, their churches, their ministers past and present. I don't hear any commentators questioning Hillary Clinton on her minister or her failed marriage. I don't hear anyone asking MCCain about where he went to church last Sunday, or Saturday, or to account for something some minister said to the congregation years ago. Go to any fundamentalist church in America, and hide a a camera in your lapel and you will find plenty of hypocritical remarks to talk about. The spotlight is on Obama because he is ahead in the popular polls, in the delgat race, and in message that we Americans are ready to hear. You vote. You decide. In the end, we will do the best we can, but you don't jump ship because a few drops of water spilled on deck. And you don't run from the battlefield because of a few rumours started by the opposition. Thanks Ariana for the insight. More from people like you is what we need. Standing up for America from South Korea with love and faith.
PS I would speculate, given this is the internet, and I am free to do so, that the Republicans want Hillary to get the democratic nomination, because they stand a pretty good chance of defeating her. Once Whitewater, failed marriage, her relationship with her lesbian daughter, amongst other things get played out on Talk Radio, McCain will look like a preacher. So, consider the candidate that can hold his ground against McCain. Sorry, Chelsea, I love you, but even in the gay community, there have been vicious rumours about your Mom's stance on gay rights. And, you recall as I do how your Dad gave in under pressure to Bob Dole and all we got was the same old policy that we had for a hundred years, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Well, it didn't work. People are asking, and people are telling. It's time for a new America. Clinton should get behind Obama now, and make ammends for the derogatory things she has said, and in return, I think America would be proud to have her as a senior stateswoman, and there is no doubt that her chance at the Presidency would come again. But if she destroys herself in this campaign, there won't be another chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wait...lesbian daughter/ Posted by: Dboy
Dumb and dumber
Posted by: QCao009 on Mar 26, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's scary to realize there is someone more monofocused, more stubborn and more warmongering than Dubya.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dumb and dumber Posted by: VZEQICVA
Guess who's coming to dinner?
Posted by: jeffreytaos on Mar 26, 2008 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rest of the world deserves to know that when a member of the White House sits down to dinner, they won't puke on the Prime Minister, fall asleep during a speech, or dance a stupid two step to show off how common they think they are. There is only one person running at this stage in the game that I would feel comfortable representing America at a table with Kim Jong Il, Lee, Myung Bak, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Meles Zenawi, Hu Jintao, the latter whom got the 21-gun salute, the review of the U.S. troops and the Colonial fife-and-drum corps yesterday at the White House dinner. He got a meal of wild-caught Alaskan halibut with mushroom essence, an expensive bottle of chardonnay and live bluegrass music, but not a single word about Tibet, I guess because Nanci Pelosi had already carried the message. So who's coming to dinner, and what's on the table? I think they are reasonable questions. Who sits where?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hehe, Tibet! Posted by: Dboy
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Suasponte
Posted by: Suasponte on Mar 26, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The plutocrats will be pulling out all the stops in a vicious, mendacious, slanderous, no holds barred attack against the Democrats seen as leftwinger traitors and radicials and thereby see to it that another ultra-Right Stooge is in the White House to keep the Military-Industrial Complex even wealthier and more powerful by bamboozling the usual benighted crowd into eagerly voting for political Stooges dedicated to supporting them. There will be a tsunami of rancid propaganda coming out of the major media owned and controlled by the Plutocrats after June and into November.

The Bush Iraqui Legacy of Disaster will continue with no end in sight and the plans for more gunbarrel intimidation enforced by air strikes and invasions where necessary will continue apace against non-compliant countries daring to oppose our efforts to dominate the World.

Vote McBush and enter Bush Term III.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANOTHER 'WAR TIME' PRESIDENT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 26, 2008 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it odd that the Pastor thing and the speech that followed came in the same week that we reached the 5 yr. point in Iraq along with reaching 4000 lives lost. I'll bet McCain loved it. The Dems are too easily distracted and Obama prefers giving a speech to answering questions. Maybe for a week we could pretend Obama is Clinton. Fire questions and criticsm at him and see how he holds up. McCain is not an amateur. Is Obama up for the fight? ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why insult women?
Posted by: gladmueth on Mar 26, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree wholeheartedly. I've been seething watching every "news" channel go on and on about Barack and Hillary (neither getting covered for any real ISSUE, just getting attacked) and no one talking about McCain on his massive gaffaws OR his take on issues such as the environment (he's made ZERO votes for important environmental legislation) and his push for 100 more years of war.....
BUT... REALLY, must you insult WOMEN by referring to Lieberman as a "Lady in waiting"???? Aren't we sophisticated enough these days to know it's not nice (to women)to "insult" a man by calling him a woman? Call it like it is, Lieberman is McCain's MAN in waiting.... give men the credit they deserve for their behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Waterboy? Posted by: Rune
McCain the War criminal
Posted by: bryanth798 on Mar 26, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His job in the military was bombing civilians on a daily basis. God knows how many innocent women and children he killed. Then, when he got shot down, he regularly snitched on his fellow prisoners in order to get special treatment. He went over to Iraq to prove that he could just walk down the street safe from harm - in a flack jacket with snipers on the roofs and God know how many soldiers and helicopters guarding him. The only reason why he did this was because some TV reporter tweaked his ego a little bit. That just shows how vain and shallow he is. The people in the market where he staged this farce were later on killed for participating. McCain threw them under the bus just as casually as the people he used to bomb and the other POWs he used to snitch on. He will throw us under the bus if he gets a chance - kind of like what Bush and Cheney are doing to us now, only probably worse. Rove is going to steal the election and get him in, sure as I am sitting here. Greg Palast has the story on that. Check it out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LBj the real War criminal Posted by: carbon-based
Arianna has caved into O'Reilly and Karl Rove..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Mar 26, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arianna Huffington is changing her stripes to benefit Arianna again and it's a real shame she has decided to wreck her site go mainstream and also so tacky with all that celebrity coverage..

If your honest about issues her site has become just os slanted and it's really the Obama.com site but also if Americans can't express their disdain for Bill O'Reilly or Karl Rove then what's the sens these jerks are insulated everywhere else when Rove dared to post at Huffington the place went nuts and what's she do she bans and censors all who had to guts to tell Karl Rove off..

She was always just a rich spoiled opportunist the big right winger when married to a rich right winger now she wants to play Mother Teresa while allowing all that
anti-Catholic hate speech on her site..

You can call the Pope a Nazi and anything else there, but you can't tell off Karl Rove or Bill O'Reilly..?

Go pound salt Arianna we see through you and your censored biased dishonest little web site..


Go say hello to Bill O'Reilly and Karl Rove Heir Huffinton..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's on first
Posted by: willymack on Mar 26, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatt's on second, and I don't know is on third. Is this going to be the dialogue between mccain and Joe Sixpack? The Arizona senator is obviously out of it; call it age, fatigue, mental illness, or a combination of those. The glaringly obvious fact is that HE IS NOT FIT TO BE OUR PRESIDENT. Once the rancorous mess is cleaned up on the Democrats' side, the winner of that fray needs to point out mccain's shortcomings in a factual and forceful manner. No exageration of the facts is needed for this. This ain't an Abbot & Costello skit folks; lives are literally hanging in the balance, and the Democrats need to attack the bush clone's blathers as a UNITED party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who's on first Posted by: Dboy
He's showing signs of Alzheimer's...
Posted by: VickyinSD on Mar 26, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I know this because I lived with my mother when she was in the early to late stages of the disease, until she finally went into a care home.

It starts out with simple "mistakes" in speaking or stating "facts"... easy enough to write off as forgetfulness when one is older. But the disease is at work inside the brain, and the forgetfulness becomes more frequent and more obvious.

My mother held a public position, being on the governing board of a local community college. Her friends and collegues didn't realize there was a problem, even after she couldn't find the registrar of voters office to file for re-election... three times!

It took me several Dr.s to finally get the diagnosis made, and treatment begun. But this was after she'd lost her teaching position, her seat on the board, and about $150,000 to a suave, sweet-talker who was still going for more money when I stopped him. All along she believed that she was fine, and I was the one that was confused.

McCain shows many of the signs I first noticed in my mom... he needs to be checked out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War Hero?
Posted by: billybookworm on Mar 26, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does anyone call John McCain a war hero? First he almost sank the Forrestal killing over 100 sailors then he got himself shot down and cracked under torture.
Some war hero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War Hero? Posted by: donl51
» RE: War Hero? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: War Hero? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: War Hero? Posted by: PakiBoy
John McCain is Just the Front Man
Posted by: US Citizen on Mar 26, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neo-cons are working real hard to get their guy in as vice-president, and then they'll take care of old man McCain. A well-timed stroke perhaps?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the only way
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Mar 26, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to change things in this country is to wrest control of the media from the criminals who own it now. get ready for a revolution.armed

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the only way Posted by: sasquuatch55
The Chalice
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Mar 26, 2008 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scenario: I wonder if George Bush and John McCain ever ate together and drank from the same cup; what was in the chalice that made McCain turn into a Bush? Was the drink drugged with the date-rape drug? Arsenic?
We've got this senator saying he might continue down that same potholed highway as Bush has led us and it's clear to see McCain has no plan to lead us.
Let's get him to a hospital and terminate his presidential campaign.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anybody who hasn't figured that out
Posted by: donl51 on Mar 26, 2008 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has got to be very ill, ...or a devout Bush follower,totally ignorant works for me!lives in a cave?,essentially a vote for the flipflopper is a vote for another 4 more years of Bush w/o that look,...that sorta neat little, ''oh you're all so stupid out there'' smile he has, he's a good ole boy!,....man I hate that saying!....years back when my dad was a bird col. in the Army,[full] he was less than one year from making Gen. he retired,I'd asked why?too much politcs! was the simple answer,he did better as a gs.15 anyway,and now he's gone! too much politcs was a real interesting but sadly true answer, now Mc Cain never got that far but he got into politics and it spoiled him!...I personally don't care for politicians, they're deceivers!,I don't much care for lawyers either, not alone on that one,their should be a law that forbids lawyers from being politicians, although Reagan was an actor and he wasn't that hot, actors act in real life too, same as all cops and prosecuters think everyone is guilty....A vote for mac is a vote for bushy!...I ramble .sorry!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about Al Gore?
Posted by: carminis@msn.com on Mar 27, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arianna, when are you going to bring back Al Gore into the political arena? Perhaps he can team up with Barack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about Al Gore? Posted by: carbon-based