Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why is Bush Still Smiling?

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted March 19, 2008.


Iraq is in shambles and our economy is crumbling. But at least George Bush is still in good spirits.
Robert Scheer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Robert Scheer

Battle of the Hawks
Both McCain and Clinton have shown a dangerously cavalier attitude towards the option of a nuclear strike against Iran.
May 7, 2008

No Country for Old Men
McCain's age matters; especially if he picks his running mate from the crazy wing of the Republican Party.
Apr 30, 2008

Hillary Turns Up Heat, Threatens to 'Obliterate' Iran
Is the campaign trail the best place to ratchet up the rhetoric against Iran? Clinton thinks so.
Apr 23, 2008

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

That idiotic "what me worry?" look just never leaves the man's visage. Once again there was our president, presiding over disasters in part of his making and totally on his watch, grinning with an aplomb that suggested a serious disconnect between his worldview and existing reality. Be it in his announcement that Iraq was being secured on a day when bombs ripped through that sad land or posed between his treasury secretary and the Federal Reserve chairman to applaud the government's bailout of a failed bank, George Bush was the only one inexplicably smiling.

Failure suits him. It is a stance he learned well while presiding over one failed Texas business deal after another, and it served him splendidly as he claimed the title of president of the United States after losing the popular, and maybe even the electoral, vote. It carried him through the most ignominious chapter of U.S. foreign policy, from the lies about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to an unprecedented presidential defense of torture.

The totally unwarranted assurance was there this week as the once proud dollar fell into the toilet and the debacle of Iraq and Bush's other failed Mideast policies pushed oil prices to record highs. The Europeans, who didn't support the U.S. imperial intervention, are doing much better, not having to pay for guarding besieged oil pipelines while U.S. taxpayers are saddled with trillions in future debt, not to mention 4,000 U.S. military deaths and 30,000 U.S. injuries in a war the administration had promised would be paid for with Iraqi oil revenues. Even in Baghdad last week there wasn't enough oil to keep the lights on for more than a few hours.

But the president is happy because his legacy issue, the war on terror, is intact. No matter that this week the Pentagon was forced to release a report conducted over the last five years that concluded, after surveying 600,000 official Iraqi documents captured by U.S. forces, that there is "no smoking gun" establishing any connection between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida. The report was so embarrassing that we taxpayers who paid for it were not going to be told of its existence, even though the explosive conclusions were totally declassified, until ABC News forced its posting online.

The network reported that the Pentagon had canceled plans to issue a press release or make it available by e-mail or otherwise online because, as one Pentagon official put it, the study is "too politically sensitive." Damn right it is -- Bush squandered U.S. treasure and lives in an effort that had nothing to do with the infamous attack on America. As for the real war on terror against the real al-Qaida, those folks are very much on the rebound, just where they were before the 9/11 attack, building their bases in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Meanwhile, back on the home front, Wall Street is crumbling, not because of planes crashing into buildings but because the outrageous knaves of finance, freed from the most minimal requirements of public accountability, have been permitted to destroy America's reputation in the world for financial probity.

In the name of ending what were claimed to be onerous regulations imposed after the Great Depression, this administration accelerated a bipartisan pattern of allowing Wall Street to betray investors with impunity while abandoning the federal government's obligation, once accepted equally by conservatives and liberals, to ensure our national solvency. This tendency, under way for decades to give the bankers what they wanted -- codified in the Financial Services Modernization Act, which was signed into law by Bill Clinton and which permitted banks, stock brokers and insurance companies to merge -- was exacerbated by Bush's appointment of rapacious corporate foxes to watch the corporate henhouse.

They will take care of their own, which is why Bush was smiling, happily posed in that photo op between Henry Paulson Jr. and Ben Bernanke announcing the Bear Stearns bailout, made possible only by the federal government using your tax dollars to pick up the bad debt of the banks. Tape that picture to your wall to remind you, when you open a credit card bill with a 30 percent interest rate -- not the 2 percent the Fed will charge banks -- or see the increase in your adjustable rate mortgage, of just what your government will do for the really big guys that it will never do for regular folks.

In the years to come, as millions lose their retirement income and homes, we will have occasion to remember Georgie Porgie, who kissed the taxpayers and made them cry before he ran away.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: interest rate, bear stearns, economy, iraq, bush

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
...because he's happy, that's why
Posted by: Crazy H on Mar 19, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He got everything he wanted.

He got Saddam, he got to wear a flight suit on TV, he got billions of dollars for his buddies in oil & military industry, he got to push his religion on people, he got away with 9/11, he got rid of those annoying "civil rights", he got tax cuts for people in his bracket, and on and on.

Why wouldn't he be smiling? Hell, I'm surprised he's not ROTFL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gets his money for nothing. Posted by: Artkansas
» So? Posted by: purplewarrior
Takin care of biznus
Posted by: jebpgh on Mar 19, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
History will record that a small group of men, deeply connected to the most powerful corporations in the world were able to storm into office by building a coalition for whom they had no sincere commitment to. These men viewed this time as the last long gasp of the fossil-fuel based economy and their mission was to do everything in their power to find a way to exploit it. When they took office, oil was selling for about $30bbl. Today, less than eight years later, it is selling for $110bbl and climbing. This change should leave most economic historians breathless years from now. A 260% increase in the price of a commodity over seven years without any real justification is nothing short of amazing. Today, they have enriched these corporations with record profits and enriched entire nations who control this wealth.

Their second objective was the long-term and structural shift to an outsourcing and expansion of national defense spending at a time when all reason would have dictated a slow down and consolidation of defense spending. They were able to leverage a relatively minor threat of religious extremists into a justification for a military build-up not seen since the height of the Cold War. And for that, the captains of a highly consolidated and monopolistic defense industry will be eternally grateful.

To distract the public and solidify their popular support they campaigned in meaningless issues (to them) like gay marriage, abortion, gun control. In so doing they were able to radically re-draw the lines of accountability that connected the Executive branch to the Congress in ways never imagined possible by the founders. Coupled with their phony little war, they have been able to redefine the meaning of personal liberties, transparency, corporate immunity and other concepts absolutely central to a republic.

Bush did all this while acting a fool but I think we will look back and understand that the American people were the ones who were fooled and will be paying the price for decades to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Takin care of biznus Posted by: jlowelld
Bandar's Brothel
Posted by: colek on Mar 19, 2008 8:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's probably smiling because he's looking forward to the next time he goes to Bandar's brothel in Saudi where he gets his member polished by one of the Crown Prince's countless concubines. See he's smarter than Spitzer. At least when Dubya and Dick get theirs it's in a place where no paparazzi or bankers will be snooping them out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» is he taking jeff gannon with him? Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Smirking Chimp
Posted by: Robert Henry Eller on Mar 20, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we still asking questions about why Bush does anything? We knew all we needed to know about this clown from our elementary schooyards: A snotty, arrogant, cowardly rich little asshole. I've long had it with all the column inches wasted on "anal-yzing" this, as if this required some subtle insight. And the only reason for all this bullshit analysis is that people get paid to write things. Can we please stop giving any more time to "analyzing" this lying, cheating, stealing, murdering, cowardly SOB? Can we please start using plain speaking, and call him what he is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Smirking Chimp Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Smirking Chimp Posted by: sawdust
Scheer correctly notes that this Corporatist Empire is bipartisan
Posted by: amacd on Mar 20, 2008 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, in after five years of imperialist oil-war, our faux-emperor admits that the oil of Iraq must be secured for his global corporatist empire.

Ironically, the last militarist empire that raced its battle tanks toward Baku to fuel its global corporatist ambitions was also headed by a jig-dancing, fascist Commander-in-Chief.

Unfortunately, the ordinary people of Germany learned too late a lesson that average Americans could have taken to heart from Hannah Arendt’s prescient warning, “Empire abroad (always) entails tyranny at home.”

But even more unfortunately, for five years we 'ordinary Americans' have ignored the murderous "Empire abroad" part ---- and just now we are starting to suffer the economic oppression and "tyranny at home" part.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X pat observer
Posted by: davy on Mar 20, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on the money, or what's left of it. I can only think he's happy because his "real roll" was to sink the world as we know it so it could be COMPLETELY taken over by "the few" and he thinks he has now accomplished it. BUT sadly he is mistaken, BUT only time will tell. None of my Scot's friends can believe the guy, course we couldn't believe "the poodle" at the end of his mess either. O Tony it could have been . . . but you so wanted to hold hands with your bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imagine if . . .
Posted by: art614 on Mar 20, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . any candidate for President was required to have a psychological profile test, so we could see what "baggage" we'd be getting when we voted? The profile would also reveal how the candidate deals with his baggage. I.E., would he declare a war to revenge his old man, etc. Finally--and this is probably the most important point--how does he view his fellow citizens (especially those who don't have as high a position as he does)? Does he care about their welfare? Their life's savings? Their children's not getting killed, whether on the streets of America or Iraq? By any measure, George would, I'm sure, be revealed as a sociopath, if not a psychopath. I'm tempted to call him a "non-violent" sociopath, because he hasn't killed anyone. Except, of course, he has, over and over and over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dumb Like a Fox
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Mar 20, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's triumphs masquerade as failures. He may appear to have totally trashed this country, but he has in fact set it up for a new kind of existence. America as a democracy is dying, thanks to our Boy George. Using the fundamentals of disaster capitalism, he has set in motion a new way for himself and his friends to become ever more wealthy, with no consequences to be paid except by the middle class (until the middle class disappears). Even the war on terror is a big fake designed to justify invading other countries with the military-industrial complex that is a machine custom made for destroying countries and rebuilding them with puppet governments and a massive permanent military presence a la Iraq. Bush and Cheney had their own agenda from Day One, with nothing but self-interest as their driving force.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bobby Decker
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Mar 20, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I,VE BEEN REFLECTING THE LAST SEVERAL DAYS ON THE TELIVISED COMENTS OF OBAMAS MINISTER.....AND HAD A HOWARD DEAN FLASHBACK
THE FOX NEWS SOUND ENGINER SPLICES THE INTRO WITH A HEARTY DAVE CHAPEL GAAAAD DAAAAAM......THIS WILL BE ALL THE CLOSET CRACKERS IN AMERICA NEED TO JUSTIFY PULLING THE LEVER FOR POPS MC CAIN !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is Bush still smiling?
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 20, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because he's (a) clinically insane, and (b) hitting the bottle again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why is Bush still smiling? Posted by: willymack
Well, you said it
Posted by: modeler on Mar 20, 2008 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Idiotic smile, exactly. Only a misunderestimated lamebrained idiot can smile like that since he does not have the wherewithals to realize the crimes he committed and the damage he caused not only to his country but to humanity as a whole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

W IS
Posted by: fg on Mar 20, 2008 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MESHIGA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DELTA15
Posted by: 15delta on Mar 20, 2008 6:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHEN A PERSON IS ON SOMETHING LIKE PILLS HE DOES NOT REALIZE HOW HAPPY HE IS AND ACTS A LITTLE DIFFERENT.
I TOTALLLY BELIEVE THIS MAN HAS BEEN LOADED 90% OF THE TIME IN THAT HE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE. AND I DON’T MEAN INSIDE ALL THE TIME.
AND THE PROS CAN'T RECONNIZE THIS? THEN THEY SHOULD GET ANOTHER CAREER FIELD. I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT “WE THE PEOPLE” HAVE LET THIS MAN GO WILD WITH THE AUTHORITY OF THIS COUNTRY UNDER HIS CONTROL.
WE ARE NOT BLIND.
ARE WE ARE AFRAID TO REVEAL THE TRUTH?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DELTA15 Posted by: HillbillyBob
I'm not paying no Credit card interest of loosing the home I never had!
Posted by: common intelligence on Mar 20, 2008 8:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Say Bob, are you addressing those indebted "home Buyers" (not Owners)?

Part of the denial that Americans are wrapped up in is using the wrong language and word to discribe thier Am. Dream.

You can't loose that which you have never owned of money you never had. Mr. Scheer, I appreciate the stories intention, but I have to address how you reinforce peoples regret that they've duped themselves.

No bad feeling though. Everyone does it. That is, make out landish false claims that they are "loosing" that which hasn't ever been.

Home's, one is buying, is not one that is owned, except by the one you are paying to! Therefore why do they say and are told they are home owners?

The same is true with the "value" we have safed , we believe we have aguired like savings, with the false impression that it is worth what you "believe" it should be worth (like you 401k's) or your retirement fund, All while you support a corrupt establishment that you endorse to devalue the value of your savings, because you support the American system. Why are people crying? You all endorsed exactly what is happening.

It's no wonder why George is smiling. But Michael Moore is too in the sense he told you all so. But the complicentcy and denial continue without conscienceness. You all allow Bush and the corrupt system to persist, without resistance. Why are Americans whimpering?

Me, I did the BAnkruptcy thing before Bush made it a new hurdle. I got rid of all my credit cards. I wil not directly contribute. My home. Well that is where I make it.

The American Indians have been telling the everyone from the first invaders no one can own the earth. We are only visiters here.But somehow everone has been persuaded to believe they can own their home. And yet, that they all somehow embraced the idea of the home as an investment. Well now that's another whole loosing proposition, obviously , eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Manson
Posted by: mike_burns on Mar 20, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Charlie Manson, suposidly killed no one. We put him away, anyhow.
George and Charlie would make good cell mates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY???
Posted by: shd1230 on Mar 22, 2008 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BECAUSE HE IS A DAMN FOOL.

MY DAD ONCE TOLD ME THAT SOMEONE HE KNEW WAS "A REVOLVING SON-OF-A-BITCH--THEN EXPLAINED "THAT MEANS HE'S A SON-OF-A-BITCH ANY WAY YOU LOOK AT HIM.

USING THAT CRITERIA, GWB IS A REVOLVING DAMN FOOL. (HEY, BUSHIE BOY, SIC THE CIA ON ME, BUG MY PHONE, MONITOR MY EMAIL. I'M A 77 YEAR OLD WHITE FEMALE WHO DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT ELSE YOU DO--YOU'VE KILLED NEARLY FOUR THOUSAND AMERICANS (THAT'S ABOUT A THOUSAND MORE THAT 9/11) AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF IRAQI MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN HAVE DIED BECAUSE OF YOU AND YOUR COHORTS. WHY IS HE SMILING????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real question
Posted by: Tompatriot on Mar 23, 2008 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would the founders do? It's the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real question Posted by: Trazom
A GWB presidential image:
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Mar 24, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a slack-jawed swaggering staggering stammering hump of a miscreant twitching up for a sweet backhand across the smirk to slap the whistling snot out of his nasal proboscis.

Picture it in vintage Peckinpah slo-mo with the light of the setting sun catching the glint of drool droplets and teeth as they spray out against the backdrop of the stung gelatinous expression.

Let's not forget the soundtrack: the 33-1/3 bray of a 45 RPM donkey death cry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My fondest wish for GWB can be summed up in 4 words..
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 24, 2008 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeach....indight....imprison...execute

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Mar 25, 2008 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not too long ago, the Washington Post published an article that stated that Republicans are a happy lot - happier than Democrats. I would suggest this is because they are truly clueless and unable to see that free market ideology just doesn't work (although it certainly works to their wealthy constituent's advantage). And perhaps that's the point. Both clueless and very aware of what they are doing and happy about it both ways.

Meanwhile, Dems get to clean up the mess (after the S&L debacle in the '80's) and now this one. (Is it any wonder they are a little less happy - because they see the truth of these inane policies). And Dems get blamed for the necessary raising of taxes because after all, somehow we have to pay for this mess and make society run well again. But not while the frat house is in operation. The good old frat boys just pop open a beer, strike up the band, and say things like " you can just go to a hospital if you're poor"...instead of facing the health insurance issue. Like Mr. Obama said, we need some adult supervision in the White House. Wouldn't you be smiling too if you could act like an irresponsible frat boy, spend whatever you want and have no consequences (to you or your wealthy constituents)...but don't spend it on important things like progressive taxes, infrastructure, affordable housing, healthcare or all of those other unglamorous but necessary services that hold a great society together. It's easy to be happy when you're purposefully clueless. Now it's up to the voters to hopefully never let another what me worry frat house take root in this country again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]