Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

As Goes Vermont, So Goes the Nation?

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted March 6, 2008.


Vermonters air their frustration with the U.S. quagmire in Iraq.
Amy Goodman

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Amy Goodman

America's War on Journalists
The Bush administration has engaged in assault, intimidation, and imprisonment to limit the ability of journalists to do their jobs.
May 8, 2008

Evangelical Doctor Touts Better Health Care Plan Than Clinton, Obama
Unlike Clinton or Obama, Dr. Rocky White, an Evangelical from a conservative background, is promoting a single-payer health care system.
May 6, 2008

The Worst Food Crisis in 45 Years
If our government and large food and energy interests don't change direction, the food riots in distant lands will soon be coming to their doors.
May 1, 2008

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

While the Iraq war is off the front pages, and Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama embark on what may well be a scorched-earth primary battle against each other, let's keep our eye on where the real scorched earth lies: who profits and who dies.

Clinton proclaimed in her victory speech in Ohio on March 4, after winning three of the four primary contests that day, "as goes Ohio, so goes the nation." She should take note, however, of how goes Vermont. That state might be a better bellwether, especially concerning the U.S. quagmire in Iraq.

While no one was surprised that Obama beat Clinton in the Vermont primary by a landslide, several details of the Vermont vote bear mention. Vermont's electoral system is based on the town meeting, a storied exercise in direct democracy. In the Vermont town meeting, local issues and ordinances are hashed out in an open forum, with all townspeople who want to speak given time. This is arguably the closest we come in the United States to real democracy. Part of why this is possible is the rural nature of Vermont, which Vermonters prize and protect.

In Brattleboro, the townspeople decided to arrest President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, should they visit. (This may be a moot point, as Vermont is the one state out of 50 that George W. Bush has not visited while president.) The question before the people of Brattleboro read: "Shall the Selectboard instruct the Town Attorney to draft indictments against President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our Constitution, and publish said indictments for consideration by other authorities, and shall it be the law of the town of Brattleboro that the Brattleboro Police, pursuant to the above-mentioned indictments, arrest and detain George Bush and Richard Cheney in Brattleboro if they are not duly impeached, and prosecute or extradite them to other authorities that may reasonably contend to prosecute them?"

The question passed, after a spirited discussion, by a vote of 2,012 for, 1,795 against.

I asked former Gov. Madeleine Kunin, the only woman ever elected to that position in Vermont, what she thought of the vote. Kunin [a Democrat] said: "I support the fact that these communities were able to do that. That's Town Meeting in Vermont. Anything can happen. Would I have voted for it? Probably not. But I do respect their speaking out and taking a stand. I think there are a lot of people in Vermont who are frustrated that there's no impeachment process going on of Bush and Cheney."

Exit polls in Vermont indicated that the Iraq war remains the No. 1 issue concerning people there. And it isn't some knee-jerk liberal position. Vermont, the first state to outlaw slavery, has a long Republican tradition, but one that is fiercely independent, more along the lines of the slogan on the Revolution-era flag: "Don't Tread on Me."

A central reason that the war hits home in Vermont is that the war touches almost everyone there. Vermont has the highest per capita death rate among U.S. service members, more than twice the rate of most other states. People feel the loss, see the suffering, see the businesses fail as family breadwinners are pulled away for years on multiple deployments. And it is in this elemental crucible of democracy, this Norman Rockwell setting, that anger and frustration find voice.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, vermont, clinton, obama, bush, cheney

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As Goes Verment, So Goes the Nation?
Posted by: eaanders on Mar 6, 2008 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Verment? Is that all the vermin in Vermont?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

State of confusion!
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 6, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vermont, beautiful country inhabited by a backwards out of touch population.. I base that on my relatives living there.. I'm surprised they even know where Iraq is. Yet they can go through the motions of arresting Bush/Cheney while they believe child abusers should be able to go free and attend rehab.

Maybe Bush should order any Vermin trying to leave Vermont to enter the US be detained and deported!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DON'T YOU GET IT! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DON'T YOU GET IT! Posted by: carbon-based
» no one here gets it Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: no one here gets it Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: no one here gets it Posted by: madmax427
» RE: no one here gets it Posted by: carbon-based
» Actually I do GET IT! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: DON'T YOU GET IT! Posted by: donnee
» Some will never get it. Posted by: carbon-based
» Attempting some clarity Posted by: smart soprano
» RE: Attempting some clarity Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: State of confusion! Posted by: doneman2000
» RE: State of confusion! Posted by: fsuthai
» RE: State of confusion! Posted by: carbon-based
» now you're just being silly Posted by: smart soprano
» Money for Nothing! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Money for Nothing! Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: State of confusion! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: State of confusion! Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: State of confusion! Posted by: carbon-based
Hooray for Vermont...
Posted by: mjabele on Mar 6, 2008 9:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I think we might consider moving to Brattleboro.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Town Meetings in Revolutionary New England
Posted by: signsongster on Mar 7, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A very accurate picture of the Town Meeting system in New England, much the same as it is here in Maine. Our town meeting is so well attended here in the little town of Sedgwick, pop. 990, that we need to break it into two days this year, at our hall that has served us since 1793. This year marks the beginning of the end of what many here call the dominance of the "genetic Republicans", people who automatically vote Republican in every election just because they always have, because people might talk if they changed, and when voting for someone like George Bush, deep down they think they have voted for the party of Eisenhower and Margaret Chase Smith. These last seven years have been enough for many of these people to finally see that the GOP of today in no way resembles the party of their grandparents, and the fact that this year we had 100 people at our Democratic caucus, compared to 18 four years ago, was illuminating. Many of these new Dems had been lifelong Republicans. So, perhaps the Sunrise State can serve as a beacon. As the first state that sees the sun, it's our job to wake up the nation and get rid of the Bush era, which would certainly only be continued by John Mc Cain. We strive to live up to OUR state motto, "dirigo" which means "we lead".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Non sequiturs abound
Posted by: smart soprano on Mar 7, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm lovin' these comments, but I have to ask, before I start my ranting, how did Michelle Obama become part of the commentary on an article about Vermont and its decision to arrest GW and DC, if they ever step unshackled foot in Brattleboro?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Non sequiturs abound Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Non sequiturs abound Posted by: smart soprano
» RE: Non sequiturs abound Posted by: foreverhope
Are Vermonters bad shots or something?
Posted by: smart soprano on Mar 7, 2008 12:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, now to my real post:

Someone explain to me how this could be statistically possible:

"Vermont has the highest per capita death rate among U.S. service members, more than twice the rate of most other states."

I take this to mean that for every dead soldier from any other state in the union, there are more than 2 dead soldiers from Vermont?

Wouldn't this depopulate Vermont?

SO how can this be? Do Iraquis target people from Vermont? Are Vermonters rotten shots (not likely considering it is a hunting state). Are they all stationed together and shipped off together, so that if we have a bad day in Iraq, that spells disaster for one town, or one state? I don't think so. And what about the per capita death rate in Afghanistan (the oft-forgotten 'real' enemy in the resistance to terrorism)?

Now I need clarity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» dumbass n/m Posted by: foreverhope
brief touch in guy
Posted by: davy on Mar 8, 2008 1:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was gonna make a comment, then I read a few and decided I would not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: brief touch in guy Posted by: oceanwaves99999