Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The former POW embraces extreme interrogation techniques.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

John McCain Sells His Soul: Backs Off on Torture Ban

By Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post. Posted February 15, 2008.


The former POW embraces extreme interrogation techniques.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Arianna Huffington

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Has there ever been a more repugnant example of political pandering than John McCain's decision to vote against a bill banning waterboarding, putting hoods on prisoners, forcing them to perform sex acts, subjecting them to mock executions, or depriving them of food, water, and medical treatment?

That's right, John McCain, the former POW who has long been an outspoken critic of the Bush administration's disturbing embrace of extreme interrogation techniques.

But that was before his desperate attempt to win over the lunatic fringe that is running the Grand Old Party.

Earlier this week, I showed how outdated the image of McCain as an independent-thinking maverick had become -- and called on the media and independent voters to snap out of their 2000 reverie and see the 2008 McCain for what he has turned into: a Rove-embracing Bush clone, willing to jettison his principles in his hunger for the presidency.

And now comes this latest unconscionable capitulation, which should drive a stake through the heart of the McCain-as-straight-talker meme once and for all.

McCain the maverick had been unequivocal in his condemnation of torture, and eloquent in expressing why. "We've sent a message to the world that the United States is not like the terrorists," he said at an Oval Office appearance in December 2005, after he had forced the president to endorse an earlier torture ban McCain had authored and pushed through (a ban the president quickly subverted with a signing statement). "What we are is a nation that upholds values and standards of behavior and treatment of all people, no matter how evil or bad they are. And I think this will help us enormously in winning the war for the hearts and minds of people throughout the world in the war on terror."

He made a similar case on the campaign trail in Iowa in October 2007: "When I was imprisoned, I took heart from the fact that I knew my North Vietnamese captors would never be treated like I was treated by them. There are much better and more effective ways to get information. You torture someone long enough, he'll tell you whatever he thinks you want to know."

And there was this pithy and powerful summation of why torture should never be an option: "It's not about who they are, it's about who we are."

Of course, all that was before he put his conscience in leg irons -- and before caving to the would-be Torquemadas on the Right became his campaign strategy.

Now we get tortured logic instead. Taking to the Senate floor to justify his vote against the torture ban yesterday, McCain twisted himself in knots trying to explain how he could sponsor a bill -- the 2006 Detainee Treatment Act -- that prohibits the use of any cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment by the military while voting against a bill that would extend that ban to the CIA and other intelligence agencies: "It is important to the war on terror that the CIA have the ability to [detain and interrogate terrorists]. At the same time the CIA's interrogation program has to abide by the rules, including the standards of the Detainee Treatment Act."

Got that? The CIA has to abide by rules prohibiting torture but we can't tie the CIA's hands by making it abide by rules prohibiting torture. Straight talk, RIP.

What's more, McCain said he voted against the bill because it would be a mistake to "tie the CIA to the Army Field Manual" -- a Manual he gave a ringing endorsement to in a November debate: "I just came back from visiting a prison in Iraq. The army general there said that techniques under the Army Field Manual are working and working effectively, and he didn't think they need to do anything else. My friends, this is what America is all about."

But not apparently once you have the White House in your sights. Then all bets -- and deeply held convictions -- are off.

The media and independent voters need to stop offering McCain valentines, and start interrogating him -- humanely, of course -- about the Faustian bargain he has struck.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gop, torture, john mccain

Find more Arianna at the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Scumbag
Posted by: SoCalLib on Feb 15, 2008 10:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what he is, plain and simple.

Oh, and stupid and short sighted, too. Stupid because while he may gain the support of some of the more extreme wingnuts, he will lose just as much, if not more, of the support from independents. Short sighted because this is a decision that will follow him forever. He was given the opportunity to make a strong stand against Bush and his fascist doctrines. To show America, and the world, that not all Republicans are equal in their beliefs. To finally say no to the horrors of the past seven years. But no, he chose to pander. To give up his beliefs for a few endorsements.

Obama, and every Democrat, should hammer this hard and never give up reminding people that MCCAIN IS PRO TORTURE, ANTI-AMERICAN, and therefore, NO BETTER THAN THE PEOPLE WHO ATTACKED US ON 9/11.

Attention spans are growing shorter and shorter in this country due to the overwhelming amount of corruption by the Bush administration. But this is a point that everyone should remember. As Barack said, we need to stop the mindset that led us into war. And this is verifiable proof that McCain is merely a continuation of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scumbag Posted by: Hollie
» RE: Scumbag Posted by: famouspipeliner
A forked tongue politician
Posted by: solrev on Feb 15, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
now there is something you do not see every day in the US. If I hear one more time from any one, “if I knew then what I know now, I would not have voted for it, before I voted against it, or is that, voted against it before I voted for it”, I am going to puke. It seems like no one in this land is playing with a full deck any more. It must be global warming we are all suffering from heat stroke. I sure hope Clinton and Obama take a chill pill and realize that, it is not the economy stupid it is the “good war”. There is an Islamic fundamentalists hiding around every corner, who do you want to save you? Who is capable of killing the Muslim hoards? Choose wisely Grasshopper. Where is all the “turn the other cheekers”? Voting for Hucky to kill the abortionists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Torture it's as American as Apple pie ala mode..! ? WTF..?
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Feb 15, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We Torture, America Tortures people and loves it especially you Muslims..get used to it...

We taser school girls for Christ's sake we shoot each other over bullshit everyday, so why wouldn't we torture the shit outta you Muslims just for kicks it's The American way..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain? McWanker more like!
Posted by: Doggycuny on Feb 15, 2008 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's typical of American politics really. Just like McWanker said, "What we are is a nation that upholds values and standards of behavior." Although what he didn't say is that those 'standards' are immoral, money hungry, soul-selling, destruction loving standards. Or that these 'behaviours' are greed, power-hungry, crush the weak, support the rich, feed the military machine and bend to it's will like some grey wilting flower in a Pink Floyd movie. Well done to McWanker. Even USA war hero's are nothing more than scum sucking puupets that oil up and massage the greasy rod of the Bush Facism Movement. Heil Hitler! Submit to Satan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Person in the mirror!
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 15, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arianna Huffington - took her ex hubby for a fortune. First she loved him then she didnt..change of heart.. long term committment too long term for her.. it's ok to change ones mind now that the money is in the bank..


... and she's complaining about McCain dancing through this crazy maze called primaries. Obama and Hillary are doing the same..They both voted for funding the war.. now they are against it..Oh, I forgot, Obama was against it, that is until he joined the majors, now he towes the line as well.. that thing called politics.

Arianna - wake up and look in the mirror, see anyone who looks like Hillary, or Obama or McCain, or maybe all three!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Person in the mirror! Posted by: famouspipeliner
» RE: Person in the mirror! Posted by: carbon-based
verycold
Posted by: verycold on Feb 15, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not believe for one minute that he is pandering to the right. Don't you think he knew that making that distinction at this time would be problematic and still he is doing it. You can disagree with him, but have the decency to accept that he came to that decision for himself and was not considering the far right when making that distinction. Why is McCain, or any other candidate acceptable to the far left or the far right UNTIL they dare to disagree and then you can't hurl enough stones at them. I mean look what the far left has done to Hillary Clinton. She is being punished for her "yes" vote to authorize force never mind any other positions she has or her experience. It is all or nothing. It is this sort of outrage that is causing our country to fall apart. I would like somebody here to square how it is possible for so many to be so worried about the possibility of torture, but have absolutely no problem supporting the right of a woman to abort her unborn baby. It would seem that if a person was consistently opposed to any sort of force used on a human being, they would strongly oppose abortion and capital punishment. Torture makes it "possible" that the prisoner could die or be permanently damaged. Abortion absolutely makes sure the unborn child's life is snuffed out. Capital punishment takes another life. Humans are amazingly flawed. We pick what suits us. I maintain you can't have it both ways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: verycold Posted by: SoCalLib
» RE: verycold Posted by: SoCalLib
» Sorry Posted by: SoCalLib
» RE: verycold Posted by: hplvp
Don't judge, until thee know (the joy)
Posted by: Doggycuny on Feb 15, 2008 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess there is a danger that we are judging this 'torture' issue without understanding it from the other perspective. The educated ones amongst us know that torture is not a reliable method of extracting information, so maybe there is another reason for doing it. Maybe it is actually fun! Maybe the CIA simply enjoy doing it. They know it's not for information gathering (surely the CIA is not less intelligent than I am) so perhaps they just get a kick out of it - like those Abu Graib soldiers taking photos of prisoners. I mean, think about it: the image of a Muslim prisoner who is hungry, tired, cold and wet being wired to a battery or something and being told to jump around is quite an amusing one. Or the idea of a Muslim man urinating himself through fear of being bitten by ferocious dogs is also rather funny. So what's the difference between the low rank-and-file soldiers and the CIA officer? Nothing. Just the clothes they wear. If you were a CIA officer in a closed room with nothing but a Muslim man, a blow-torch and some pliers and no fear of ever getting caught, wouldn't you want to see how loudly you could make him scream for Allah? Never mind TV, this could be our next source of entertainment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Replenishing our Muslim "Enemies"
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 15, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, understand this is not really about torture as an effective or available method to acquire information. For the prisoners held for years on end at Guantanamo, surely any information they knew would have long since expired in terms of any relevance. No, what this is all about is proving to the Right Wing of the American political spectrum that he (McCain) is going to be tough on "terrorism." And, of course, tough on those "dirty Muslims" who "want to destroy America like the Nazis." But, haven't we heard all this rhetoric before? Yes, but for the Right-Wing it never ends. To justify the wars, to justify endless budget deficits and skyrocketing military spending, to justify torture, we must have an enemy. Without "an enemy," just what the hell are we doing? So, we torture them and let the stories of it leak out, perhaps release a few of them to talk about it back home. And, they will recruit their buddies for the continued jihad, and our enemy will be replenished. The game then can keep going, along with the billions and billions being spent, year after year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 15, 2008 7:24 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McLizard With Cheese or SmoovB

Some choice

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mccain completely lost me on torture flip flop
Posted by: whealeydj on Feb 15, 2008 9:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who thinks Mccain is moderate should see how extreme he has become on the 'war on terrorism' and his flip flop on torture which he should know better. Whether Obama or Clinton become the nominee, McCain should now be seen as towing the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld Gonzales line on necessity for a militarism take precedence over civil liberties and democracy and human rights. so sad to see a maverick sell his soul for power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain
Posted by: pana on Feb 20, 2008 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Naomi Klein's books: The Shock Doctrine and The End of America.

We can't trust McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]