Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Edwards did something that no one else did: He made poverty no longer a dirty word in the mouths of many.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Edwards' Withdrawl is America's Loss

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted January 30, 2008.


Edwards did something that no one else did: He made poverty no longer a dirty word in the mouths of many.
Advertisement

America just lost its best and brightest hope for real change when John Edwards gave up the presidential ghost. Edwards did something that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and certainly none of the Republicans would dream of doing: He made poverty no longer a dirty word in the mouths of many, and that included Clinton and Obama, for a minute anyway.

But Edwards didn't stop there. He relentlessly pushed the envelope on America's next greatest crime and sin, the absolute refusal of the nation to provide decent health care for more than fifty million persons no matter whether poor, working class, middle class and even some with a few bucks to spare. He didn't stop even there. He hammered corporate and special interests for their shameless and unabashed pillage, loot, and rape of American consumers.

Edwards was truly a modern day Jeremiah crying in the wilderness against poverty, corporate greed, and the health care abomination, and predictably was bum rushed by the gaggle of ultra-conservative slam artists, the Fox network crowd, talk shock jocks, and the New York Times neo-liberal bunch. They slandered, slurred, and ridiculed him, and ultimately tried to marginalize him as a bare after thought, warm up act to Clinton and Obama.

Edward's much needed and almost never heard populist message didn't mark him as a threat. The fact that he could win and would have been in a position to deliver on his heartfelt advocacy made him a threat. The seeds of the attack were there from the start. He had barely stepped out of the barber salon early in the campaign when the pokes and digs started. He was the butt of laughs and late night TV talk show gags for committing the unpardonable sin of blowing $400 on a haircut. The barbs and the taunts didn't stop even after he shrugged it off as fun and games stuff. Months later David Letterman took another hair shot at him when he grabbed at his hair and tried to muss it up during his appearance on Letterman's late night show.

This slapstick silliness wouldn't have raised an eyebrow since he is a wealthy guy who made millions as a corporate lawyer. But it was the poverty thing that raised the hackles of his rich pals. This was not just a cheap campaign ploy to give him an edge over the other candidates. He made the case that nearly forty million poor people in the world's richest country is an abomination that nobody seemed to want to talk about it, let alone do anything about it. It was irksome enough that the GOP presidents and presidential candidates would stay silent on the plight of the poor. It was downright infuriating that his Democratic opponents would also stay mute on the issue.

Edwards put his body where his mouth was. He barnstormed through eight poor regions of the South in July 2007 with his modern day version of an anti-poverty fact finding campaign. He kicked off his three day campaign in New Orleans 9th Ward. The nearly all-black area suffered the worst Katrina flood devastation and had become the universal symbol of poverty and neglect. Worse it stood as tragic testament to the failed and broken promises of recovery made by corporations and the federal government.

His poverty crusade stirred a mild flutter for a couple of months with Obama and Clinton, but again only a mild flutter, and any talk of a crusade against poverty has disappeared from their campaign lexicon faster than a Houdini disappearing act. And now that he's out of the White House hunt, the chance that it'll reappear in their spiels is zilch.

Edwards became the first Democratic presidential candidate to go where no other Dem or certainly Republican candidate has gone in four decades and talked up poverty disgrace, universal health and economic democracy. He bucked history, negative public and political attitudes, and of course ridicule for championing these populist causes. But here's the deal. Edwards may be out of the race but his message and the reason for that message won't disappear like Houdini. Obama and Clinton will continue to pilfer and repackage parts of his message, while of course giving no credit to the messenger.

No matter. Edwards did himself, us and the nation proud when he boldly stepped up and tried to shame the shot callers into facing up to their sorry and disgraceful neglect of millions of poor and uninsured Americans. We owe Edwards a profound debt of gratitude for that. Here's a guess. Edwards won't and shouldn't go quietly into the night. We still desperately need his voice and we should do everything we can to make sure that his voice continues to be heard.

John, you have my eternal thanks for who you are and what you did. You are truly the better angel of America.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: edwards, election08, poverty

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His forthcoming book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well Said
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 30, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I find most alarming about this election cycle:
1- How heavy handed the hostility of the MSM to Edwards' message has been from front to back.
2- How so many Democratic voters cannot tell the difference between a Republican-lite like Billary or Obama and a real Democrat.
3- How many people are insane enough to let a talk show host influence their vote. Talk about shallow.

I will be taking a vacation from voting this year. If Obama or Billary are the best the Democrats can do, I'll pass. No work, no wallet and no vote. As I already have two Blue-Tick (read Republican) 'Democratic ' Senators and a similar Representative, why should I bother to vote for a Blue-Tick in the Primary or General Election? I get a Republican either way.

Thanks guys. The Republicans just won the 2008 Presidential election- regardless of which candidate wins. You can go back to Oprah, People Magazine and Entertainment Tonight now. Just don't count on my vote, money or effort. I am too disgusted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» please don't Posted by: Drclaw
» We May Be Better Off Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: We May Be Better Off Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: We May Be Better Off Posted by: NoPCZone
» You could vote Green Posted by: setterwoman
» RE: Well Said Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: Well Said Posted by: yesman
» Clinton Fatigue Posted by: NoPCZone
John Edwards bows out
Posted by: minjiwe on Jan 30, 2008 1:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved the article about John Edwards as I was truly sad that he decided to bow out. I believe, as Mr. Hutchinson wrote, that he was a threat because of his message and the probablity that he would try to make it happen, were he elected president. God knows something good needs to happen for the people of the United States. I loved his message, however the first time I paid attention to Edwards I did not feel he could stay in the race though I wish he had because as much as I like Barak Obama, I would have voted for Edwards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disenfranchisement
Posted by: onevoter on Jan 30, 2008 1:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Edwards dropping out, and Kucinich, and even now Rudy, the voters of the remaining states that have yet to vote are effectively disenfranchised.

If you do what is necessary to get on the ballot in all 50 states, then you should remain a choice for voters. Unfortunately, money rules the system.

Blame it on corporations, the mainstream media, talk radio, etc, but the real problem is money, or the lack of it. We should have public financing of campaigns, with no personal money or any other donations allowed.

The "debates" should include any and all who are on the ballot, and should be sponsored by the government. Put them on C-Span. Let the voters decide, something which isn't happening now.

Between the money-soaked primary system and the antiquated electoral college, we do not really elect our President.

Change? Yeah, we need plenty of change....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Disenfranchisement Posted by: willymack
» RE: Disenfranchisement Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Disenfranchisement Posted by: onevoter
» RE: Disenfranchisement Posted by: HillbillyBob
A Little Late Earl
Posted by: desidid on Jan 30, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have been the biggest Hillary booster there is if you truly believed John was "the better angel" you should have been writing articles reflecting that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still An Attorney
Posted by: hole11 on Jan 30, 2008 6:15 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go take all your change and see how much you can get out of one. Bet you wind up in poverty real quick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sad
Posted by: poco on Jan 30, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards has made a difference and it is sad he is out of the race this time around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sad ~ so true Posted by: Sissy
CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jan 30, 2008 8:23 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards, the last great hope for America - gone. I agree with other posters - Hillary and Obama are Republican "lite" - too conciliatory and too many stars in their eyes over Wall Street.

Any Dem is better for us... but you can see that we will have no real change in the future no matter what, because these two have bought into the trickle down mantra too - they aren't talking about taxing the top earners as they should be taxed for all of their advantages and abuse of the median and under-income consumer.

Agreed on the shallowness of some voters. It's telegenics, not thinking, that dominates. Talk show hosts, not self examination.

It's the most dumbed down society ever as our schools perpetuate this by not teaching defensive economics, morals, humility, and public service - and that outrage should be expressed. Where are those subjects in the cirriculum? Purposefully left out and complicit empty media fueled idiocracy...has done us in.

300 or so days to go. Hoping for whatever crumbs are left - but the progressive agenda is in tatters. The masters of the universe have won - again.

Our only hope is that these two Dems are being cunningly conciliatory to the Wall Streeters as they fight on in the primaries and perhaps once installed in office they might pursue a truly brave agenda to right the incredible amounts of wrongs engineered by this plutocratic regime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: badkitty
I wonder..................
Posted by: Ivann on Jan 30, 2008 10:52 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if there is something wrong with me. John Edwards was the only candidate on either side who said anything that resonated with me, yet he has been kicked to the curb by the Dem voters. Are the Dems now completely unable to identify with someone who displays a degree of idealism rather than the disgusting claptrap that passes for politics these days?
I'll tell you this. In this country neither Clinton nor Obama is electable (female/black) & the Repugs will have a field day with them. Furthermore, if as now seems more & more likely, McCain is the GOP candidate, with the loonies relegated to the trashcan, he will seem like a less risky choice to many than Clinton or Obama.
So there you have it. A seventy something President suffering from skin cancer probably with Lieberman as VP. God help us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good Call! Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: Good Call! Posted by: Prairie Waif
RFK
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 31, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny how everyone has been so busy making lame comparisons of Obama to JFK.

Edwards is a rich guy, with a previous record as an establishment Democrat, touring poor areas of the South, and making poverty part of his crusade. Remind you of anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FK Posted by: using
» RE: FK Posted by: willymack
salamah mahdi
Posted by: salamah on Jan 31, 2008 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hutchinson unfortunately does not seem to be aware that America is a strange mix between Empire and Orwell's 1984. It's now owned by the richest for the richest and run by proxy by all that the richies' money can buy, including their parliament of whores at Capitol Hill and their Chief Pimp at the White House who help and justify the robbing of the 'just-about-haves' and 'have nots' in the US and within its Empire which stretches round the globe. (Check the # of US Military Bases and their locations on any World Map. Empires can be fun for a few (plenty of food and entertainment) but miserable for most others. Empires grow and reach their peaks but always come to an end, with a bang or with a whimper. The British ended with a whimper. The Roman, the Japanese, the Inca and most other Empires ended with bangs! The American Empire will end by a massive bang, IMPLODING from within. It's only a matter of time but implode it will!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: salamah mahdi Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
My vote for Edwards,
Posted by: jefhadist on Jan 31, 2008 4:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
now lost in the bureaucratic bowels of an absentee voter recycling bin here in California, felt real good...and was not wasted. I think I might even be able to vote twice...legally. Next time it will be for Cynthia McKinney!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My vote for Edwards, Posted by: jefhadist
otto
Posted by: otto on Jan 31, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad to see some others who take (took?) Edwards seriously. I just hope that something of his message works its way thru the other two Democratic candidates. I was profoundly disappointed in how poorly he did in elections, and in his decision to drop out of the race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

now that Edwards is out...
Posted by: ellie on Jan 31, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is there still a write in section of the ballot? my dog would make a great prez, compared to the bunch left now, don't like any of them, either party, don't trust them...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: now that Edwards is out... Posted by: willymack
Media Concentration and Corporate Welfare
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Jan 31, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Media Concentration and Corporate Welfare; I have yet to hear any Democratic candidate other than John Edwards even have these words pass their lips, yet alone condemn them.

I heard him speak about the dangers of media concentration early on in the campaign in a way that those of the "dumbed down" educational system could understand. He discussed the foreign ownership of the press and the collective ownership of the television, newspaper and other media markets and WHY this was so WRONG. People understood and decided to take back their mechanisms to find out some truths via media.

The threat was too much and the "chat" of haircuts and "trial lawyer" and "extremely rich white, candidate became the qualifiers before John Edwards, Presidential Candidate running on a poverty platform.

To discuss the breaking of the EMPIRES built during the Clinton era, when they have their "Hillary, Goddess Warrior" to maintain her husband's legacy must be maintained and the relentless marginization and relegation of Edwards to "page 4" was determined and indeed, guaranteed.

Discussing and explaining Corporate Welfare in laymen's terms nailed the coffin shut against such corporate schill's as Clinton and Obama. When Edwards' discussed limiting corporate welfare on Government contracts? The rest of his campaign became one of heading off the jokes about his person and not his place in the candidate debate; it became office water cooler conversation and fodder for "funny" email "FW:." The vilification John Edwards was on and the funeral pyre of his campaign was being stoked by Hillay's sense of entitlement and corporate "handlers."

And now? I REFUSE to vote for Hillary. Would rather cross my finger behind my back to vote for anyone of the Republicans that may not know how to appreciate the number of Democrats that voted for them, but it most certainly will let Hillary and Bill we won't elect them for the THIRD time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bilbehr
Posted by: bilbehr2007 on Jan 31, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a loss (not a blindside, though), but if we stop at losing, what does that serve? I share much with John and Elizabeth. My wife,Sue, just died from breast cancer, without insurance. Although I have worked all my life, I now get $750 a month SS, and that's in doubt (I have a pension which is wonderful, but only a breath away from poverty). John's campaign was the first I ever gave $ to, and I mourn with you all.

But we need more. The issue of poverty, headlining every other issue (global climate change, war, crime-by-the-rich and so on), and dovetailing smoothly with them, is not dead,and if it is moribund, we need to breath life into it! Al Gore did it. Edward's message was heard by the people, is a populist message, and we need a populist movement to keep this issue on the front of the screen. If Barak is president we need to hold his feet to the fire, Hillary even more so, if McCain, we need to depend on each other for a place to hide.

Si, se peude!

Bill

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about a write in campaign?
Posted by: warrior woman on Jan 31, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was going to caucus, now I'm not. Disaffected? Yes. Going to buy into the arguement that any Dem is better than a Republican? No. I'm tired of hearing that BS. On the surface it makes sense which is the issue with so many points these days. Once you look under the rug, you see the bugs and dirt. It makes no difference if we have a Hillary, Obama or a Republican. The scent of the power trail that Bush has left for the next president will not cause that person to re-establish all of the Constitutional rights that we've lost, fix the environment, move to public elections, give us all healthcare, improve education, equalize the tax structure, etc. The campaign against Edwards was very succinct and pointed. He was forced out and too many Dem's have drunck the Kool-Aid. I'm not doing it anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about a write in campaign? Posted by: thealltheone
» Go Green Posted by: setterwoman
Americans Will Now Get More of the Same
Posted by: MeridaLady on Jan 31, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am an American and have been so fed-up with my countrymen for electing Bushy twice that I left my country the day he was elected the second time. I have not been back since.
Americans finally had a chance to get back some dignity and fix our country but when Edwards was forced out and the American people just let it happen, well I give up!
Nothing in America will change. The campaigns will amount to petty bickering publicity on both sides and the cheap talk that has no substance.
It doesn't matter how you vote now, Rep., Dem. Green or Independent(last 2 won't happen), you all are in for more of the same. Good luck to you. Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ms
Posted by: using on Jan 31, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I too am profoundly sad at Edwards backing out.
I too believed that he was our one hope. However, I do believe that Bill who wrote on the blogs is right -- WE NEED TO ORGANIZE -- so we can hold the next democratic president feet to the fire.

We cannot count on the remaining candidates to do the job.

Edwards carved out a road. Now we, those of us that understood him and fear the ever escalating downward spiriling conditions in this country need to group together and figure out a plan --of how we can awaken the populace to action.

Sitting and waiting for the right candidate has not worked for us. Roosevelt had lots of enemies, but the people were ready to receive him. We, need to find a way to unite and strengthen ourselves so either an Edwards can step up to the plate or we can help the incomng candidates grow into a champion of the democracy and the people.

The first order of business is: how can we, who are strangers from different walks of life and do not feel particularly empowered, or flush with money begin the process of uniting and planning an agenda that will release our internal strength so we can stand for ourselves and each other?.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ms Posted by: thealltheone
» Vote Green Posted by: setterwoman
Americans prefer the big LIE
Posted by: luzmejor on Jan 31, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned quite young that people prefer a pretty lie to the truth and will oppose anyone who attempts to correct the records.

Edwards was a truth-teller and, what is worse, the truths he told them made his too-proud countrymen feel guilty and ineffectual.

Of course, we must know the bad news before we can change anything for the better, but Americans are lazy, wimpy and addicted to their rose-colored glasses.

The truth is so frightening to them that they are forever kept from improving even their own living conditions. All Edwards could do was to make them angry and that is not his fault, but theirs.

We haven't heard the last of Edwards, though. Just like Jimmy Carter, he will be more effective (and less threatening to establishment types) in his other roles in life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Dems will lose...
Posted by: motamanx on Jan 31, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...without Edwards on the ticket. God help us, we are not ready--for some stupid reason--to elect a black man or a woman to the presidency. Every other country has done it; but then, every other country is more enlightened than we.

We can't even impeach the treasonous liars now occupying the White House. Is it possible that the corporate interests have won, permanently?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Dems will lose... Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Correction on Edwards
Posted by: womanwarrior on Jan 31, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earl: I greatly appreciate your article on John Edwards. I wholeheartedly agree.
However, you referred to him as a "corporate" lawyer. He did not represent corporations, but instead he represented individuals who had been harmed. He was effective in getting people justice from insurance companies, and from corporations who would not take responsibility for the harm they caused others. He was proud to be a trial lawyer for people.
Hillary Clinton is a "corporate" lawyer. Her firm defended corporations and she was sitting on the Board of Walmart for years.
John Edwards worked in the trenches against corporations and he is a good lawyer. I am sorry I cannot vote for him in a primary and for president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Correction on Edwards Posted by: yesman
The Spectres
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Jan 31, 2008 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In America, we will get what we deserve. It's true that, during an election year, many of us use sound judgment and cast our "bullet", i.e. vote for one who will be the best candidate to help this country but all we get are wealthy multimillionaire bourgeoise nobility lawyer-types who are out of touch with America's "Untouchables" and their numbers are swelling each year. (Alice Cooper: "I wanna be elected!")
These candidates profess to know what's best for us and year after year it's the same old, same old: another war and fewer jobs. The cycle continues.
No candidate, save Edwards, made helping the poor the epicenter of his campaign. And it fell on deaf ears. He could have been the one to address their plight to the nation, but we're too damned busy spending our time in malls apeing the latest clothing style or milling about inside an Apple computer store or watching a reality TV show or wondering which celebrity is having problems. Reality bites us hard, huh? Pressure!
Adding to this somber tale is the news of foreclosures reaching an all-time high. In sum, the poor are regarded as feces to be avoided on Easy Street. (Watch your step!!) You know it's awfully hard to ignore garbage on your street and you know also that YOU will not pick it up. That's our attitude towards the poor. Yes, they're getting by in Section 8 housing or shacking up in a garage. It's a cruel and stark reminder of social Darwinism today.
Meanwhile Los Angeles police conducted a sweep of Skid Row and some of them were hauled off to jail. Their crime? Being poor; ergo out of sight, out of mind.
The poor will not disappear. They will haunt the land like a bunch of spectres. And Edwards told us so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Spectres Posted by: Nora
» RE: The Spectres Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
just vote democrat
Posted by: thealltheone on Jan 31, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards was the only one that actually scared Karl Rove. The only one who could have really turned things around. But once again the powers that be were not going to let it happen. No matter what you thought of him personally, Bill was cool and our country was much better off with him when he was President. I knew early on that it would between McCain and Hillary. They both changed and somehow became tainted after they both met privatly with Bush after Katrina. I can not stand her either, but the fight is not just about corporate rule and the poor. There is much chaos to go around, just pick a battle. Our constitution and our supreme court is at stake, those people stay until they die! All of the republican candidates want to continue with war, institute religion on all of us and push women's rights back 100 years! No matter how upset you are, just vote Democrat, please! Republican light is better than neo con full in our faces for another 4 years. Our country and the world can take no more!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: just vote democrat Posted by: willymack
estherme
Posted by: estherme on Jan 31, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The loss of John Edwards is the fault of the American people who voted in the primaries and most of the media who are controlled by big corporations who do not want the poor,elderly, working and middle class helped. They made sure they didn't cover much on Edwards and his message. They don't want money spent on Americans, they only care about what can make them a profit and to protect the wealthy and upper 1%. Even the internet kept pushing for Ron Paul. Not enought coverage was done on Edwards. The corporations own government and the politicians and Edwards was too much above their control that they didn't want him elected. They control the news and what Americans are allowed to see. This has been going on for a long time and is no surprise. Americans live in a dream world if they think any of the remaining candidates will do anything for them because they are all controled by the corporate world and have to answer to them. Guess who gave these candidates campaign money! Again Americans vote against their best interests. Obama, Clinton etc, etc will change nothing! It will be business as usual and again the middle class, poor, elderly and average workers will continue to get the shaft! I can not support any of the current liars running for office. See www.bigeye.com/elections.htm "Elections are a Scam." Even though the media didn't give Edwards much coverage, Americans knew enough about what he wanted to do, that they could have voted for him and shocked the hell out of the press and tv media. Instead they believed the BS that the other 2 Democratic front runners were saying and voted for them. Also many women voted for Clinton because she was a woman and others for Obama because he was black, NOT because they would help them or were best qualified. Most Americans are dumbed down and that is just the way the media wants it! There was enough internet information on Edwards, plus his own website to get his format and even C-span had a couple of his primary speeches. Americans are getting too lazy to do the research needed to make a wise choice instead of listening to the media on who to vote for. This was really our last chance for help!! American voters again show how stupid they really are and don't learn from previous mistakes!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Heart
Posted by: Candleinheart on Jan 31, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has been touched by all the comments here. Thank you all. You gave testimony to a very fine human being. When Edwards began campaigning with Kerry I thought the same: Another wealthy 'pretty boy' trying to fill JFK's shoes. How wrong I was . When i learned of their son's death I knew (having known losses myself) they had been through the fire. I knew he was a deep man who had been changed. I have liked him wholheartedly since then.
I felt the media was cruel and ruthless.Keeping him in the background like Gravel, Kucinich, Paul. Democracy? It was lost when these thugs took over. Terror in Iraq? (a smokescreen) Democracy?(another false front) Peace? (Laugh) . Remember someone just gave out the info that Bush and Co. lied to us 936 times. Bush ....Peace? Should get him a stand up comic spot. He went over there to seal a 20 billion dollar deal for his military pals. The whole thing has made me so ashamed of my country, the killing of innocents, millions homeless, etc. We are the terrorists. Wake up! Edwards and Kucinich were fresh voices in the wilderness. They had heart. They truly cared, but the nation still sleeps, is drugged, and glued to TV believing it is The Truth. People so desensitized by false TV they can't scream for or recognize the good people who really are on their side. As someone stated, perhaps Edwards, like Carter is meant for something grander and nobler for his life than being smothered by the corruption in Wash.. All along I hoped for a Edwards/Kucinich ticket. They would have seen a cleansing fire in Washington. Only The People can bring change. Not one person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A little late now isn't it?
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jan 31, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps you should have done this article instead of that stupid piece you did on Hillary awhile ago debating the nebulae of why people just didn't like her. It's journalists like you and articles like that that helped frame the debate as being about only two people.

You could have been fighting the good fight all along but just like your compatriots you jump on the bandwagon after it has already left the station. Thanks for being on the cutting edge of what many of us already knew a long time ago and were trying in vain to get someone to print.

This whole "freedom from choice" debacle is the fault of the media, even the so called "progressive media". In fact the so called progressive media may have even done more damage since it had the ear of so called progressives and delivered the black or woman message directly to them while pointedly ignoring Edwards--the true progressive.

Feh!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WishingForBetter
Posted by: WishForBetter on Jan 31, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I plan on voting for John in NJ, not matter.He deserves the delagates, and then he can choose how to use them to get something for the poorest in this country. Hopefully he'll have some kind of influence on the behavior of the final candidate. John IS a star in my eyes and will remain so. No One is going keep me from hoping for better, acting for better, and praying for better. No One is going to keep me from voting for the Dems, even tho I know in my heart John was the only ethical choice for America. One thing I won't do is sit idly by complaining and doing nothing. That is just too typical of Americans. Let's get it together people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Facts
Posted by: warrior woman on Jan 31, 2008 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HILLARY CLINTON (D) http://www.opensecrets.org/
pres08/contrib.asp?id=N00000019&cycle=2008
Top Contributors
DLA Piper $356,100
Goldman Sachs
$350,050
Morgan Stanley
$323,550
Citigroup Inc
$307,350
EMILY's List
$211,642
National Amusements Inc $193,850
JP Morgan Chase & Co
$173,350
Kirkland & Ellis $172,000
Skadden, Arps et al $151,460
Greenberg Traurig LLP $150,900
Cablevision Systems $135,113
Merrill Lynch
$125,550
Time Warner
$124,150
Lehman Brothers $123,450
Bear Stearns $120,580
Patton Boggs $118,400
Ernst & Young
$110,650
Blank Rome LLP $105,100
Latham & Watkins $100,950
News Corp $99,350

Barack Obama (D)
Goldman Sachs
$435,178
UBS AG $277,930
JP Morgan Chase & Co
$272,659
Exelon Corp $269,900
Kirkland & Ellis $253,089
Lehman Brothers $248,190
Sidley Austin LLP $233,825
University of Chicago $228,156
Citigroup Inc
$206,937
Skadden, Arps et al $204,866
National Amusements Inc $201,100
Jenner & Block $185,879
Harvard University $179,600
Citadel Investment Group $168,900
Jones Day $158,400
Mayer Brown $155,806
University of California $137,272
Time Warner
$129,668
Morgan Stanley
$127,425
Credit Suisse Group
$124,450

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Facts Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
» RE: Facts Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Facts Posted by: desidid
Edwards--Not Out
Posted by: LJAllen on Jan 31, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I truly admire John Edwards, but he is not really out folks.

Can you say, Vice-President Edwards?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards--Not Out
Posted by: LJAllen on Jan 31, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I truly admire John Edwards, but he is not really out folks.

Can you say, Vice-President Edwards?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dwards--Not Out Posted by: Sissy
» RE: dwards--Not Out Posted by: 2dogarage
Thank You and Thank You John Edwards....
Posted by: jr9657 on Jan 31, 2008 9:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could not have said it any better myself. Thank you for speaking out for the only man who deserved to win this election. His message resonated with so many of us, and I too really feel, it will now get lost since Hillary and Barack do not see it as important now that John has stepped down. Kudos for a great story!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards was on the side of the angels
Posted by: EllenJ on Feb 1, 2008 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards got the shaft throughout the media, 24/7/365. He was never going to get a fair deal because the MSM and their corporate masters were terrified of him. I just hope he stays in public life because this country needs him so much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I´m voting for JRE
Posted by: lpeacock on Feb 2, 2008 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards can still pick up delegates. He´s still the best choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Ewards Out!?
Posted by: Brian70 on Feb 7, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, not really. He only suspended his run for the Presidency. He didn't really say he dropped out. He is a lawyer so there must be some distinction.

I pretty much agree with what everybody has said about him so far. I don't know the man personally, but just in examining what he did, something doesn't seem right. For example, he has been campaigning for over 13 months, and now just a few days before Super Tuesday he suspends his campaign? Surely he was going to win some delegates on Tuesday and maybe even win 1st or 2nd in a State or two! More delegates would give him more power at the convention. Why didn't he campaign through Super Tuesday as it was only a few days away? Something happened. A deal cut? Innuendo of threats made? Bobby Kennedy scenerio? I don't know, but everyone should know something must have happened for him to suspend his campaign when he did. I simply feel that he is not a man that would go back and leave his supporters in the lurch when he has such convictions for his causes. As he pointed out several times that it was in his soul to promote his principals.

I would recommend that Edwards supporters still write him in and vote for him. Give him more delegates to work with. That's what I'm going to do. How's the media going to stop us from doing that? (I'm not that tech smart, maybe someone could create a write in website)?

I also hope that constituents in Nancy Pelosis' district vote her out in the primaries and send a different Democrat to take her place. Same with Conyers. We put these people in positions of power by electing and sending a Democratic majority to congress and they have ignored their constituents, The Constitution and the will of The American people. All for their own political gain. Get rid of them! Send a message!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 -