Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The GOP could roll into their National Convention with an entire starting basketball team of prospective candidates posing as Ronald Reagan.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The GOP Candidates' Love Affair with Reagan

By Will Durst, AlterNet. Posted January 18, 2008.


The GOP could roll into their National Convention with an entire starting basketball team of prospective candidates posing as Ronald Reagan.

Thinning the Republican herd in this year's Presidential Sweepstakes is proving to be harder than 3-D chess with transparent pieces. In their first three primaries, the GOP has mounted three different heads on their electoral wall. And yeah, that means I'm disregarding the great state of Wyoming, for the simple reason they're responsible for Dick Cheney, and deserve to be ignored, if not flogged en masse and shipped to China to be coated in a lead based paint then towed to sea by the FDA.

But the exciting part is if Fred Thompson breaks out of his somnambulant trance and wins South Carolina and Rudy Giuliani reminds enough withered transplanted Floridians of the post-squeegee wonder years up north, the GOP could roll into Minneapolis for their National Convention this September with an entire starting basketball team of prospective candidates posing as Ronald Reagan.

Because that, apparently, is the current fashion. Parading around as spitting images of the 40th President, with an emphasis on the saliva. The problem is they can't find the whole package in one guy. They've Balkanized the Gipper. The Christian Right is genuflecting towards Mike Huckabee. The charm contingent is sidling up to his Rudyness, while the Screen Actors Guild wing is Clapping For Fred, Mr. Law & Order himself.

Reagan Democrats are big fans of John McCain, and the conservative money boys from Wall Street love that Mitt Romney character. Romney went so far as to appropriate Reagan's bulletproof hair, undoubtedly garnering the Secret Service's endorsement due to the added protection his hard candy shell would provide in the unlikely event he adopts a single position long enough to get a bead on. One has to consider Ronald Reagan lucky he's in the ground and doesn't have to watch these poseurs go through their paces or he'd be spinning in his grave like a rotisserie chicken during a power surge. Not to mention being royally pissed off about being buried alive and all.

Curiously, two names you never hear mentioned in these celebrity look- a-like pageants are "George" and "Bush." The President is studiously being avoided like a broken pallet of eight penny nails in the center lane of the Beltway. It's a vacuum almost big enough to suck an elephant through. They hope.

Among the names that do crop up on the campaign trail more often than that of Herbert Walker's son, are Barry Goldwater, John Wayne Gacy and Bjork. And the Prez is returning the favor by ducking out of town whenever possible, leaving the field wide open for whichever of the Dutch wannabees can best assume the mantle of looking Presidential. Of course, the impact of that little trick has diminished somewhat due to seven years of exposure to it.

Playing the "Reagan- Good, Bush- Bad" game has become so popular, candidates are clambering over each other like blind lemmings outrunning a dam burst, with their claims to be the ONLY one TRULY capable of bringing CHANGE to Washington. Living in the shadow of the last year of consecutive Republican Presidential terms (5 out of the last 7: 7 out of the last 10) and all the Republicans can talk about is... change.

You know what, that can't be good. Must be considered a back handed slap at Dubyah. Unfortunately, it's just a figurative slap and not a real one upside the head. With a chain mail glove. Which might be more cathartic of an experience for the nation. And more deserved too.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gop, republicans, reagan, election08

Will Durst is a political comic, syndicated columnist, AM radio talk show host and defense liability.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"a figurative slap...with a chain mail glove"
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jan 18, 2008 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be a literal/actual fisting.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Priceless
Posted by: particle on Jan 19, 2008 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Living in the shadow of the last year of consecutive Republican Presidential terms (5 out of the last 7: 7 out of the last 10) and all the Republicans can talk about is... change."

Well, I guess we can't expect any better from dyed-in-the-wool dogmatists. I don't know what's sadder, their performance or the cheeseburgers who buy into their crap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REAGAN
Posted by: lifeaholic on Jan 19, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone for FACTS
Reagan was not great.
There is not ONE number as great.
1994 Poll of historians rated him 29% as above average and 79% below average.
Poll of 500 History Professors in colleges and universities rated as tenth from bottom.

Americans for Tax Reform was financed by rich Conservatives to get something in each county promoting Reagan. My county passed.

want FACTS
google
clarence swinney +reagan firsts
+ reagan scandals
+carter vs reagan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Those crazy historians... Posted by: mr. joshua
CLINTON STOMPS REAGAN
Posted by: lifeaholic on Jan 19, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CLINTON VS REAGAN

1.JOBS—grew by 43% more under Clinton.
2.GDP---grew by 57% more under Clinton.
3.DOW—grew by 700% more under Clinton..
4.NASDAQ-grew by 18 times as much under Clinton.
4.SPENDING--grew by 28% under Clinton---80% under Reagan.
5.DEBT—grew by 43% under Clinton—187% under Reagan.
6. DEFICITS—Clinton got a large surplus--grew by 112% under Reagan.
7.NATIONAL INCOME—grew by100% more under Clinton.
8.PERSONAL INCOME—Grew by 110% more under Clinton.
SOURCES—Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.BLS.Gov)--Economic Policy Institute (EPI.org)—Global & World Almanacs from 1980 to 2003 (annual issues)
www.the-hamster.com (chart taken from NY Times)
National Archives History on Presidents. www.nara.gov
LA Times 10-11-00 on Market--www.Find articles.com

A vote for a Republican is a vote for Less Success.
A vote to reduce the Standard of Living for all Americans.

Clarence Swinney-Political Research Historian-Lifeaholics of America-President
Please submit comments to clarenceswinney@bellsouth.net or P.O. Box 3411-Burlington NC-27216

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CLINTON STOMPS REAGAN Posted by: blackie4aces
Obama's Reagan rhapsody
Posted by: YellowdogD on Jan 19, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who needs the GOP to rhapsodize Reagan when you have Obama? Why is there so little mention of Obama's recent bizarre tribute to Reagan? Obama is shamelessly trying to court the Republican and "independent" vote, when Reagan's values were profoundly against what the Democratic party has always fought for. Lifeaholic's summary of Clinton's record vs. Reagan is excellent. Methinks Obama is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama's Reagan rhapsody Posted by: blackie4aces
TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT REAGAN--AND BUSH
Posted by: shd1230 on Jan 19, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reagan is the best thing the repubs have--you would think that he was the second coming of Jesus to hear them talk and see their pictures of them walking about with Ronnie. Sheesh--he was the biggest phony ever in the White House up to the unmentionable current occupant that nobody in either party seems able to mention by name. When I hear someone stand up and tell the truth about Bush and his cohorts I will know who to vote for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Ain't Only the Republi-Cons
Posted by: blackie4aces on Jan 19, 2008 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the article by esteemed truth-teller Robert Parry, Consortiumnews.com, Obama's Dubious Praise for Reagan: Nothing much here that is new or unknown (today), but elegantly and meticulously stated. Any amount of adulation by Democrats for Ronald Reagan is either a crass political calculation or an indication that the Democratic Party since the advent of Bill Clinton has morphed into an auxiliary wing of the Republican Party. Considering their (the Democrats-the majority(!)) fecklessness on the issue of Iraq, anti-warriors all, but somehow just unable to turn off the money tap (how many more human beings will die as these people protect themselves from possible electoral consequences?), so careful to look after their own petty interests?), is it not surprising that they are also up to their necks as apologists for Ronald Reagan?

Obama is absolutely correct when he says that Reagan changed the direction of the country. Of course, that can be said about Adolph Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini, Franco, Lenin. Before I am charged with shrieking leftist hyperbole, let me be clear that I attempt no comparison, but only wish to demonstrate that directions can be positive or negative. This is where Obama hedged his bet. This is disappointing. It would be expected from the Clintons, but......?

For the first time in my lifetime religious fundamentalism became a factor in American politics, resurrecting itself from another beleaguered century, the period of 1820 through 1870 until economic fundamentalism replaced it. Yea, we have come a long way, baby. Along with religious fundamentalism comes absolutism and all the ills, blood, and criminal behavior that rides that pale horse. For the first time in my lifetime my country, my tax dollars had been put to use supporting terrorist operations in many parts of the world. Certainly not the first time in my lifetime that my tax dollars had been used to support brutal, repressive, murderous, and corrupt dictatorships, juntas, and the like, but on a scale of its reach and ecumenism around the globe (and in secret and illegally, I might add; therefore not debatable) that dwarfed previous policies.

Of course, to this must be added the economic terrorism promoted by Reagan against his own people, the little old ladies and the brave youngsters just starting out featured prominently in so many of his folksy tales, the arbitragers and investment bankers being his domestic version of the Contras. Yes, there would be deregulated, unrivaled (in my lifetime) economic freedom for the greed-obsessed, for the thieves who stole with pencils, but not so for the working people, whose unions and bargaining power were systematically destroyed, who were consigned to be "trickled on," if they happened to be lucky, like vermin devouring the discarded crumbs of the corrupt and figuratively obese wealthy in Reagan's panoramic vision.

The Reagan Legacy equals The Reagan Myth, a triumph of mass propaganda and the corruption of a political system. A triumph of money and power over "We, the people."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm no Reagan fan, but... Posted by: BenjamminH
» RE: I'm no Reagan fan, but... Posted by: blackie4aces
» RE: I'm no Reagan fan, but... Posted by: Cybershaman
Refreshing
Posted by: warriornation on Jan 20, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Living in Simi Valley for 7 years (13th most conservative city in the nation, probably the most conservative in California), it's nice to see that I'm not the only one who dislikes Reagan. I was trying to explain that Carter is actually better than Reagan to my government classmates. They looked at me like I ran into the class naked and took a dump on the floor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some Who Must Have Saints Posted by: blackie4aces
The Titanic is sinking with a Chimp at the helm.
Posted by: williameon on Jan 21, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trillions for the Super Rich!
and a
Pittance for the Poor.
Too little , too late.
He is bribing us!
Trying to shore up support before the November elections with even more deficit spending.
More Voodoo economics from The Cor‘pirate’ Zombies!
They are worried because the phony voting machine trick is petering out.
Wrong way Bush’s
Seven years of mismanagement and looting has taken its toll!
The Titanic is sinking with a Chimp at the helm.
How appropriate?
Reagan started it and
Bonzo is finishing it!
The damage is done.
Brace yourselves.
Get in your life boats now!
The Corpirate Stupid State is going down.
Big time!
The Corpirate Zombies
Dead Eye and the Shrub
Would love to take you with them!
With all the pain and none of the gain.
Sorry!
Two roads diverged when the 2000 election was stolen.
They took the path of greed and corruption and
We took the other.
Of peace, patience, brotherly love, helpfulness, true compassion and cooperation.
Self reliance and self sufficiency is the key!
Begin at home.
In your own back yards and communities.
Victory gardens.
Green energy!
Conserve and create.
Utopia is where you make it!
Start in your own hearts, souls and backyards first.
Sow the seeds of faith and
Reap the rewards!
Survive and prosper

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My own verse... Posted by: Gungneir