Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

MSNBC vs. Dennis Kucinich

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted January 17, 2008.


How MSNBC tried to keep Kucinich out of the Las Vegas debate, and how he fought back.
Amy Goodman

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Amy Goodman

Justice for Dead Journalists
A military whistle-blower has come forward with information that contradicts the government's official story about the deaths of two journalists.
May 15, 2008

America's War on Journalists
The Bush administration has engaged in assault, intimidation, and imprisonment to limit the ability of journalists to do their jobs.
May 8, 2008

Evangelical Doctor Touts Better Health Care Plan Than Clinton, Obama
Unlike Clinton or Obama, Dr. Rocky White, an Evangelical from a conservative background, is promoting a single-payer health care system.
May 6, 2008

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

One pundit called the Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas "a lovefest." It may well have been, but only because the corporate sponsor of the debate, General Electric-owned NBC News and its cable news channel MSNBC, rescinded its invitation to candidate Dennis Kucinich. NBC decided earlier that it would invite the top four Democratic candidates to the debate. Then New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson dropped out of the race, which elevated Kucinich to the fourth position.

Jenny Backus of NBC sent an e-mail to the Kucinich campaign, saying Kucinich "met the criteria set by NBC and the debate sponsors." So Kucinich was surprised when, less than two days later, NBC News political director Chuck Todd called the Kucinich campaign to rescind the invitation. Kucinich responded with a lawsuit, filed in Nevada state court, claiming that NBC had broken its contract with him to include him in the debate.

District Judge J. Charles Thompson ruled in Kucinich's favor, enjoining NBC from holding the debate without him. Thompson told the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "If the criteria was one set of rules and you changed the rules in the middle of the game so as to exclude somebody after having invited them, I'm offended by that." NBC escalated its efforts to exclude Kucinich, appealing to the Nevada Supreme Court. NBC claimed that "Mr. Kucinich's claim is nothing more than an illegitimate private cause of action designed to impose an equal-access requirement that entirely undermines the wide journalistic freedoms enjoyed by news organizations under the First Amendment."

NBC also argued: "A television station does not have to grant unlimited access to a candidate debate. If anyone's First Amendment rights are being infringed, they are MSNBC's."

As the hour of the debate neared, MSNBC hyped the event. The Nevada Supreme Court was debating whether to sustain Thompson's decision, which would have forced NBC to include Kucinich. Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC's "Hardball," said, "This promises to be the hottest debate of the political season, because only a few candidates will be up there on the stage." He did not burden his audience with the news that his network was working behind the scenes to exclude a candidate. The host of MSNBC's most popular program, Keith Olbermann, mentioned the successful Kucinich lawsuit and NBC's appeal, and reported when, 50 minutes before the debate, the Nevada Supreme Court sided with NBC, excluding Kucinich.

Late Tuesday night, after the debate, Kucinich learned that the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C., was going to take up a defense appropriations bill on Wednesday. He took a red-eye flight back from Las Vegas.

Unlike the candidates who General Electric/NBC News allowed into the debate, Kucinich stands alone in opposing war funding: "I'm the only person running for president who not only voted against the war, but voted 100 percent of the time against funding the war.

"They either voted for the war, in the case of Sen. Edwards and Sen. Clinton, or they voted to fund the war, in the case of Sen. Edwards, Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama, who, by the way, campaigned saying, well, he opposed the war from the start, but then when he was elected to the Senate, his voting record is indistinguishable from Sen. Clinton's with respect to funding the war."

Kucinich wants Congress to fulfill its obligation to use its power of the purse to shut off funding for the war in Iraq. He told me, "I'm going to be there to challenge the bill, to speak on it and call for a vote and, hopefully, keep alive the issue of a contest over defense spending policies."

He went on: "It goes right to the question of democratic governance, whether a broadcast network can choose who the candidates will be, based on their narrow concerns, because they've contributed -- GE, NBC and Raytheon, another one of GE's properties, have all contributed substantially to Democratic candidates who were in the debate. And the fact of the matter is, with GE building nuclear power plants, they have a vested interest in Yucca Mountain in Nevada being kept open; with GE being involved with Raytheon, another defense contractor, they have an interest in war continuing. So NBC ends up being their propaganda arm to be able to advance their economic interests."

A quick search of Federal Election Commission data showed that employees of those three companies -- GE, NBC and Raytheon -- have contributed in total $68,656 to the Democratic presidential candidates. Most of that went to the three GE-approved candidates who were on the stage Tuesday night.

In his farewell address, President Dwight Eisenhower famously said, "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex."

Add to that complex the media, with a company like General Electric, with its vested interests in selling weaponry and nuclear power plants, using its subsidiary, NBC, to exclude candidates like Kucinich, who is for an immediate withdrawal from Iraq, no nuclear energy, no Yucca Mountain radioactive waste dump, and for single-payer health care. If there was a lovefest at the Las Vegas debate, it was between the corporate-funded Democrats and their sponsor, GE/NBC.

Denis Moynihan contributed to today's column.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: kucinich, election08, msnbc

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Welcome to the Military Industrial Journalistic Complex
Posted by: gexrobert on Jan 17, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Military Industrial Complex learned a lesson from Vietnam. Uncontrolled media, like the disturbing images from the Tet offensive, can stir outrage that can derail a war with marginal popular support. The media can help turn the tide against war. When Regan and company moved in, the slow consolidation of the media began and with that the control of what images of war are allowed to be shown. The military industrial complex incorporated the Journalists into its mission and we now have the complex excluding candidates from debates. They really have taken over the show!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the royal kingmakers
Posted by: mwildfire on Jan 17, 2008 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sent a nasty message to NBC over this. Their only response to complaints about this blatant favoritism mentions their status as a PRIVATE company--indeed they are private, so why are they allowed to perform the critical PUBLIC functions of supplying essentially all the information for our elections? Who the hell gave the the media corporations the right to preselect our candidates, to tell us who we can have for president? It's not just NBC of course, but the other big companies as well, perfectly entitled to use their enormous power to decide for us which procorporate candidates we might select from, on the basis of style or regional origin or gender or ethnicity--entitled, they say, by the First Amendment (little did the framers of the Constitution know that the "persons" protected by the Bill of Rights would include corporations--that by the twenty-first century these rights would in fact apply PRIMARILY to corporations).
The question is, in the face of a public still largely ignorant and apathetic, what can we do about it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the royal kingmakers Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: the royal kingmakers Posted by: Liberty G
» RE: the royal kingmakers Posted by: lenioui
Whats in a Name!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jan 17, 2008 6:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NBC has sunk below the level of Fox News. Olbermann would be screaming about the injustice being delt to a viable political candidate had a republican pulled this one. Kucinich is without a doubt the most progressive of the candidates and the democratic party isnt interested.

They're not looking for anyone who will make real change -they just want to sell the idea of real change for election purposes then do business as usual with the corporations - all about $$$$$$.

Chevy - Buick ; Democrat - Republican - looks alike, same engine just a different name!

I honestly do not see how NBC could pull this off and still keep any sort of integrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Whats in a Name! Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Whats in a Name! Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Whats in a Name! Posted by: MrIntuition
» RE: Whats in a Name! Posted by: lenioui
KUCINICH AND PAUL ARE THE ONLY TWO WHO....
Posted by: poppop_schell on Jan 18, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are fighting the elite establishment. That is why both are being censored. Months ago I called for a Paul/Kucinich ticket and was blasted. Kucinich recently when asked who he wanted as his VP, instatly said Ron Paul. In trun, Ron Paul said that Kucincih is a good choice for his VP because Dennis believes in the Constitution.

We need to coaelsce around Paul/Kucinich NOW. IF both these patriots want this, shouldn't we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, abbadon2007 -- it DOES matter!! Posted by: trappedintwilightzone
What to do?
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 18, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you know what SHOULD have happened when Kucinich was told he was being denied to participate. The remaining candidates should have refused to go on without him.

Now that would have been "class" and would have sent a strong message of democracy in action. But alas, too much to hope for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What to do? Posted by: Roger Király
» RE: What to do? Posted by: papananook
» RE: What to do? Posted by: Trazom
More paranoid conspiracy theories
Posted by: Sociallibertarian on Jan 18, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet must stop these wacko articles that promote ridiculous conspiracy theories.

A progressive site shoudl be all about logic and reason not fantasy and unreason, paranoia.

Kucinich for president, what a laugh. It is like having Pat Robertson for president, equally disastrous and laughable.

But fortunately Kucinich has no chance in hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More paranoid conspiracy theories Posted by: whiteman12049@yahoo.com
What wrong about the truth, soclib?
Posted by: papananook on Jan 18, 2008 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dennis Kucinich has been consistently trying to get his anti-war, anti-corporate message across and has been marginalized by the corporate MSM without reason.If voters were actually allowed to hear him, he wouldn't be #4, he'd be #1!
Get real, Sociallibertarian and understand what's really going on here, or STFU.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take the Blinders Off!
Posted by: williameon on Jan 18, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
D.K.and R.P. are the two most truthful candidates.
Why should G.E. a military contractor control any Media?
It is a conflict of interest.
They control the content and the debate or should I say Hoax!
Here is some Conspiracy FACT!
G.W for wrong.B. and D.C.are lying, spying,torturous,
TRAITORS!
They should both be impeached and tarred.
We all know they are already feathered!
Chicken George and Dead Eye Dick!
The worst that our country has to offer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

taxidriver
Posted by: taxidriver on Jan 18, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched the "debate," and without Kucinich it was a snooze. Basically, all three candidates played it safe. I learned nothing new about them or the issues. NBC (and all of us) missed a genuine opportunity to see how the "big three" would respond to the more "radical" message of Kucinich. If he had been there, the debate might have been a true debate, with some substance. And I think Clinton, Edwards, and Obama would have been tested by some unscripted comments dealing with real issues. Instead, they just repeated their stump speeches. So much for democracy and a true exchange of ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: taxidriver Posted by: sliver
» RE: taxidriver Posted by: taxidriver
» RE: taxidriver Posted by: Trazom
Paul Cardwell
Posted by: Paul Cardwell on Jan 18, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All those Kusinich supporters who were kicked in the face by the arrogant junta of the Democratic National Committee and their servant corporate media should simply join the Greens.

Most of us in the people's party are either New Deal Democrats who refused to sell out, or those who, because they are too young, would have been had they been around then.

Indeed, we go back farther than that, at least to the People's Party of the late 19th century. Indeed Sam Rayburn (who carried much of the New Deal legislation) was from that heritage in that his father was an active Populist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Already considered Posted by: sliver
The troika
Posted by: willymack on Jan 18, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The unholy, illegimate, and evil alliance of business interests, the military, and our government, including the judicial branch is at work, here. Pushing Kucinich out of the picture is but a tiny example of how this pack of criminals plans to destroy our democracy and replace it with a fascist dictatorship. It began quietly with the fraudulent 2000 "election" as a test case, and the thugs have become bolder with each unchallenged success. Before long, all pretense of rule by law will be cast aside, and the full fury of this group of psychopaths will be brought to bear, perhaps as a nuclear attack on Iran, or maybe something worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't blame the media...
Posted by: lightmind on Jan 18, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unjust, yes. But we all know the media are whores. Sold out to the highest bidder, the same malevolent people who control our commerce exchange mechanism and (subtly or not so subtly) massage us out of 40, 50 percent or more of our HUMAN LABOR. Everyone knows the game and nobody knows the game.

The media conglomerates are PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. No one but a fool would believe that they would, or should, be looking after our interests. They have every right not to. It is our ignorance that is to blame. After all, we can chose not to read a paper, or not to watch certain channels. We have every right not to. It is our participation that gives them power. We have handed ourselves over to the point that they can manipulate nearly every facet of our lives, even our elections.

Dennis Kucinich does what he thinks is right, I'll give that to him. It would be great if he should expose fraud, as many of us believe the vote count system is highly suspect. Ron Paul was correct in stating (I believe on Jay Leno) that he would not pursue action against Fox for exclusion from the New Hampshire republican primary debate (ironic since he is more of a traditional republican than any of the others) because they are a private business entity. He respects private property. Even private property as malignant as fox. An amazingly astute observation for a presidential candidate.

Corporations used to be required to operate in the Common Good in order to be chartered. And their charter would expire within a few years. It's obviously been quite a while since that was the case. Corporate Personhood paved the way for the bloodfest we now have.

It's not NBC, Fox, CBS, or MSNBC that are the problem. It's our own stupidity. They would be gone overnight if nobody watched them. Americans have reached the last stage of defiance- that of the awareness of their own ignorance.

We must take a close look and get educated in understanding the REAL reasons we who desire to be free languish in ever increasing servitude. Learn about our fiat money system (1913), corporate personhood (1866), Interstate Commerce Clause, jury nullification, and all other knowledge that can set us free.

And lastly, did you ever ask yourself, why the debates are not held on PBS?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Progressive Party - It's Up to Us.
Posted by: ckuhn on Jan 18, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I read of the attempts of corporate media to control our votes and the leanings of the leading democratic candidates, I recognize that these are not the true ideals of this country.

The message of change is off track. The call for change is not drastic enough. Revolution is more appropriate.

Perhaps the cry fo change is heartfelt, but it will not get those who proclaim it elected. Their message is not strong enough. We have allowed corporate America to grow too strong. They will not acquiese voluntarily.

How does change really happen? A third party. A viable third party with progressive ideals, whose leaders do not buckle at the knees when taking on the powers that be that dominate our existing decision making process. Our voices and our numbers must demand real accountable moral courage, championed by a tuested leader not afraid to stand up to existing controlling powers. As a majority, we can demand, define and expect change. But only as a majority. Are you ready?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Brings Real Change?
Posted by: Candleinheart on Jan 18, 2008 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PAIN brings real change, agonizing, crucial, excruciating PAIN brings real change. Look at your own lives, what REALLY made you change? An accident, suspicion of Cancer? Threat of lung cancer through smoking? Loss of a loved one? A major disappointment that caused a NDE? Alcoholisim and lives destroyed? Until more of us SUFFER from this horrid mess brought upon us, until we're reduced further to puppets, until one day we wake up floating in the waste and sludge of greed and rights denied will we change. Gas at $7 a gallon?? Oil $6 a gallon? Milk at $10 a gallon? Unemployment at 17% ala the Depression? No less than a Revolution sparked by real pain and sufferring will we change.Currently there is no spirituality amongst anyone in government. In 1984 I spoke with a fullblooded Iriquois Indian. His comment? "it's all too late. My, your grandchildren will never live to full life expectency. The pollution, poisens in our water, food, sealife, fowl.....it's too late."
NEVER in recorded history have we been on the brink of total destruction, waste, pollution, greed, corruption. Mother Theresa stated of all the countries in the world she visited America was the most loveless." And, a very great teacher thousands of years ago stated, "it is easier for a Camel (was it?) to get through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE UNITED STATES IS A MILITARY JUNTA RULED BY THE GENERALS:
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jan 19, 2008 12:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
General Motors, General Electric, General Dynamics, and others too numerous to mention. They are contemptious of us. They are contemptious of democracy.

I haven't voted yet. The corporate media limits who I may see or hear. We really need to find a way to hurt these bastards.

Perhaps, after the next election, we should eliminate all corporate contributions from educational TV and NPR to remove as much corporate control as possible. Then all TV campaigning could be carried on under our control. I think I can already see the slobber and foam around the lobbyests mouths.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brave Ohio Congressman gets my support
Posted by: gush6860 on Jan 19, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live inCosta Rica because I have a better audience in Latin America.I also have more freedom!!! I have a better chance of getting the truth out in the press down here . Dennis is one of my heroes, Unfortunately he gets little press. The People in the US are the problem, as is mostly true in the rest of the world. The Americans have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by the powers that be, includoing the Military industrial complex. Where will it all end???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yoma
Posted by: yoma on Jan 19, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vote for Dennis in your state primary--if he is not listed, write his name in. If you can, contribute to Dennis's campaign and volunteer even if you can just make some phone calls. Do something positive and push back to corporate media. His positions on issues are our positions on the issues. Only Dennis is for single-payer, NO corporate middle blocker to true universal medical insurance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]