Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

In New Hampshire, Shadows Trumped Hope

By Will Durst, AlterNet. Posted January 9, 2008.


Clinton's victory revealed the teeniest kind of invisible fear, a form of prejudice known as "the Bradley Effect."
Will Durst

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Will Durst

It's Over for Clinton
In politics, anything can happen. Except for what needs to happen for Clinton to secure the nomination.
May 10, 2008

Welcome to the Nomination Race That Will Not Die
Thanks to Pennsylvania, the Democratic primary circus continues. Meanwhile, McCain is free to roam the country frightening children.
Apr 25, 2008

President Whatshisname
Whatever happened to the Decider?
 
Apr 15, 2008

More stories by Will Durst

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Listen my friends and you will hear a tale of a fateful night. It's a tale no other dare speak of. Not a matter of political correctness. It is shame. Of which I have little. If any. Okay. None. So here goes. What follows is the real and true story of how Hillary Clinton overcame a double digit same day deficit and won the New Hampshire Primary. A tale of a race and of race.

We all know what happened. Tom Brokaw knows. John King knows. Okay, maybe Laura Ingraham doesn't know, but how is that different? Hillary knows. Barack not only knows, he feels it in his bones like a creeping worm of osteoporosis every day of his life but he'll never say a word.

It was not a polling glitch. It was not co-opting the mantra of "change." It was not Hillary's vulnerability in Saturday's debate or her moist eyes in that Portsmouth coffee shop. It was not Bill turning into a 60 foot George Bailey Transformer rampaging through Bedford Falls. It was a little bit of the teeniest kind of invisible fear. A form of prejudice detritus known as "the Bradley Effect."

In 1982, Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, an African- American, was 10 points ahead in the polls the day before his California Gubernatorial election against George Deukmejian. Ten points ahead. Day before the election. He lost. Sound familiar? Ding. Ding. Ding. Give that man a kewpie doll.

To add insult to injury, Bradley led in the exit polls. Which means people not only lied about how they were going to vote, they lied about how they did vote. Proof positive that something crazy happens inside the heads of white people when they get behind that polling curtain. But after two terms of George Bush, that ain't news.

Why didn't the "Bradley Effect" rear its ugly head in Iowa? Simple. We're not talking about racism, we're talking about nervousness. A fear that attacks your marrow in the dark. In Iowa, everyone watches you vote. No curtain to hide behind in a caucus. You bunch in a corner in full sight of all your neighbors under a bright fluorescent light. In New Hampshire, it's just you and your demons. Your inner New England demons. And hope tends to dissipate in those lonely enclosures. No matter how warm the January night, it gets dark at five up there. Northwoods dark, where shadows trump hope.

The difference was women over 40, which, forgive me, but in both New Hampshire and Iowa means white women. In the Hawkeye State, they went with the black guy in the wide open. In the Granite State, behind the curtain, they chose the white woman. I know. I know. I know. Sacrilege! Implying discrimination exists in America today. Blaspheme! Accusing DEMOCRATS of possible prejudice. Heresy! But it's not bigotry so much as it is dread. Obloquy! "What?" Never mind. In the last six years, we've been taught to fear. Bang! Salivate.

One can only hope the Clinton campaign understands this and doesn't convince themselves it was their wacky emotional leakage weekend strategy that turned the tide, because that would mean 10 months of Bill shrieking and Hillary keening, and nobody wants that. The only thing worse would be to go on pretending this effect does not exist, because future opponents are already drawing up plans to ramp it up.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election08, barack obama, hillary clinton

Will Durst is a political comic, syndicated columnist, AM radio talk show host and defense liability.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hillary Du Jour
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jan 9, 2008 5:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see. The voters are tired of the partisan, militaristic status quo, so a plurality of New Hampshire Democrats vote for a candidate who is at least as hawkish and divisive as George W. Bush--a fortiori, at the same point in her career, far more. I'm sure her new personality du jour, cooked up from the menu proposed by consultants, has helped. No one cares that she hasn't shed a tear for the 4000 Americans and million Iraqis who have died in a war, founded on a patently fraudulent casus belli, that she has always gleefully supported; it's enough that she choked up about the difficulties of campaigning, riding on her husband's frayed and semen-stained coattails while portaying herself as a feminist, a strong and self-sufficient women while Bill talks as if he were running for reelection. At least she seems to have discovered the first person plural.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What follows is the real and true story of how Hillary Clinton overcame...
Posted by: Patrick Henry on Jan 10, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the real results of the election:

DIEBOLD.

DIEBOLD.

DIEBOLD.

DIEBOLD.

DIEBOLD.

Their voting system is absolutely unsecure, it makes the Windows OS it runs on look secure by comparison. Computer and security experts have repeatedly proven that these systems are NOT secure. The company insists they are. The company knows better - they have a long history of being in the security business. This is proof of conspiracy, for they are not that grossly incompetent.

81 percent of the vote was counted by Diebold, a company with ties to the Bush/Clinton junta.

Your country has been stolen. The elections are to entertain and distract us from what is really happening, including the theft of the elections!

www.blackboxvoting.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]