Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

This will be the second recession since 2001 that was caused by the bursting of an obviously speculative asset bubble.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Lesson From the Last, and Next, Recession

By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. Posted January 3, 2008.


This will be the second recession since 2001 that was caused by the bursting of an obviously speculative asset bubble.
Advertisement

In the baseball-and-sex classic "Bull Durham" Susan Sarandon accidentally calls out the wrong name in the heat of passion and makes a remarkably quick recovery. She asks her partner which he would rather have, her having sex with him and saying the other guy's name, or vice versa? In the movie, it seems to work; for the moment, at least, he doesn't seem to realize that these aren't the only two possibilities.

Former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan appears to have gotten away with a similar trick, as the housing bubble that bloated up on his watch continues to deflate, dragging the economy towards recession. Since the bubble was easily recognizable (and recognized) as early as 2002, he could very likely have prevented it from growing to dangerous proportions. But he has made it look as though his only choice would have been to raise interest rates, and thereby risk taking down the entire economy much earlier. In the numerous interviews he gave promoting his latest book of memoirs, the journalists neglected to ask him about a more logical option: simply explaining the bubble to the public, and thereby curbing the expectations of ever-rising prices that fed the speculative frenzy.

It is also now widely recognized that the Fed abdicated its responsibility to regulate against predatory, deceptive and abusive lending in the sub-prime mortgage market - although the bubble itself was still the main problem.

Greenspan himself recently put the odds of a recession at 50 percent. And that was before the latest data on house price declines (October, year-over-year) of 6.1 percent - the biggest in more than six years. Greenspan's prognosis was also made before this Christmas holiday shopping season came in at what looks like the worst in five years. But he was overly optimistic even with the data at hand.

It is difficult to imagine that a collapse of asset prices of the magnitude expected - probably on the order of $8 trillion - would not cause a recession. Most of the six-year recovery from the last recession, which ended in November 2001, was fueled by trillions of dollars of borrowing that consumers were able to take against their rising home values. That source of credit is now drying up as home prices fall, and the decline has only begun. It would take another 28 percent in real house price reduction just to bring house prices back to long-term trend levels.

Consumer spending is about 70 percent of the economy, and it is mainly debt-fueled consumption that has kept our economy afloat since the housing bubble began to burst last year. Over the last six months, exports have also expanded considerably - due to the fall in the dollar, which makes US products more competitive in world markets. But exports are only about 12 percent of our economy - so even fast-growing exports cannot compensate for a serious decline in consumer spending.

The international credit crunch, brought on by the collapse of subprime-mortgage-backed securities has added another source of drag and uncertainty to the economy. It could worsen as house prices decline, and losses in assets tied to the rest of the mortgage market - including prime mortgages - will add to the mess. A glut of homes on the market, the prospect of millions of foreclosures, declines in residential construction, a weak labor market, and rising food and energy prices also weigh upon the economy.

Since this will be the second recession since 2001 that was caused by the bursting of an obvious speculative asset bubble - the previous recession was induced by a stock bubble collapse - the question of what the Fed should do about such bubbles should be the subject of Congressional hearings. And we need something better than Bull Durham answers.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporate accountability, sub-prime, lending crisis, greenspan, the fed

Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director and co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan. He is co-author, with Dean Baker, of Social Security: The Phony Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2000), and has written numerous research papers on economic policy. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Stockmarket
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jan 3, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything with the Federal Reserve is about the stockmarket. If the stockmarket is having problems, lower the interest rate. If the stockmarket is high the economy is good. The problem is that it's hard to determine what is real in the stockmarket. Are we to believe that the Enron-like practices have ended? Are we to believe that corporations are reporting real gains and losses? How do we see through the smoke and mirrors to the real ecomomic situation? Greenspan can rewrite history through a book and rationalize those decisions that supported the stockmarket at the time and embraced those bubbles that have impacted the economy. The current Federal Reserve Chairman doesn't seem so different from Greenspan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Federal Reserve is an illegal and destructive construct of the
Posted by: thekidde on Jan 3, 2008 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
robber baron class and corporatocacy. It needs to be eliminated before it totally destroys America and our money. While we're at it, the IRS can go too as what it does is blatantly unconstitutional.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Fed is unconstitional Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Obviously you can't read, Yellow Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Obviously you can't read, Yellow Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Long winded tomes aren't a post Posted by: ReallyBearish
» As usual, your thinking is backwards Posted by: ReallyBearish
Work at home...
Posted by: Dellmae on Jan 4, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The high tech bubble, and then the housing bubble more correctly called the subprime bubble will be followed by another area of speculation in the investment world.
The next areas of speculative excess are most likely to be alternative fuels such as biofuels. This will affect our food supply. Then, possibly a bubble in our Unemployment with almost the entire nation not working and not knowing where to turn. Housing not built in China too expensive, food not grown in China too expensive. Medical care originating in America too expensive. And the list goes on. Americans may be reduced to growing food in the backyard, walking to and from the bus stop to go to their subprime job and grateful to live in a family home of 2 or 3 bedrooms instead of McMansions. The reality is we will have subprime student loans that can not be repaid from subprime wages, medications sold for $72.00 and only worth $8.00 which do not heal and cannot be paid for by low income.

Wall Street seems to hold the reins. Now they are encouraging commodity speculation. You can see this with the proliferation of business tv channels. Getting Americans to invest their retirement and savings into new uncharted areas (biofuels, commodities) will be Wall Streets job. Like sheep we will follow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, consumer spending is headed for the tank, but...
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 4, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...those with money enough to join the money traders will not even notice a drop--just inflation to stay even.

I am only guessing. And money trading isn't the only way. In Zimbabwes (and we shall see more of them) officials just print money for themselves to spend. But as that always ends badly, one alternative is to buy and sell currencies as they go up and down. Isn't that how South American wealth has stayed afloat despite incredible inflation? Inflation is the real killer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I KNEW THAT ALLAN GREENSPAN WAS MY ENEMY
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jan 9, 2008 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when he admited out loud that he knew he had to something when he discovered that Bill Clinton was preparing to pay off the national debt. Greenspan never was anything but a servant of the people that hold the national debt. I do think that he and George Bush did raise the debt high enough that discussions about paying it off are moot now. But, of course, we could simply repudiate the debt. They made it let them pay it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]