Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Channeling Suze Orman

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted December 28, 2007.


Sometimes it helps to get some advice on messaging from a pro.
Normon Solomon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Norman Solomon

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity
Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
May 7, 2008

Let's Party Like It’s 1932
Obama has the potential to become as great a president as FDR, while activists have the potential to prompt change comparable to the New Deal.
Apr 21, 2008

NPR: National Pentagon Radio?
When even public radio parrots the military's official line on the war in Iraq, what hope is there for unbiased, quality reporting?
Mar 27, 2008

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I was near the deadline for a column when I glanced at a TV screen. "The Suze Orman Show," airing on CNBC at prime time, exerted a powerful force in my hotel room. And the fate of this column was sealed.

Orman made a big splash many years ago on public television -- the incubating environment for her as a national phenom. With articulate calls for intelligent self-determination of one's own financial future, she is a master of the long form. Humor and dramatic cadences punch up the impacts of her performances.

Seeing her the other night, within a matter of seconds, I realized that the jig was up. How could a mere underachieving syndicated columnist hope to withstand the blandishments and certainties of Suze Orman, bestselling author and revered eminence from the erudite bastions of PBS to the hard-boiled financial realms of General Electric's CNBC?

To resist was pointless. What if I tried to write as a carping critic? After all, Suze Orman has already explained that such critics, particularly the males of the species, just resent a strong woman with the guts, smarts and determination to cast off the shackles of a retrograde past. "Ladies," I could hear her say from the stage, with one of her magnificent flourishes, "don't let that nonsense wreck your future."

So, in hopes of putting myself in sync with her redemptive power, I turn the rest of this particular column over to a distillation of Suze Orman's messaging:

(The following paragraphs are not quotations from Orman; they summarize the gist of her repertoire on stage.)

Your money, your life. It's as simple as that. Ladies -- and you men, too -- the time is past when we hold back. Not having control over our own money is something we can't afford, and I mean that literally. We just cannot afford it.

I'll be blunt here. Anyone who tells you there's something wrong with getting rich and then richer has some serious unresolved problems. Heh heh.

If you want a solution, you go out and grab it. You rule money or money will rule you. People who can't wrap their minds around that vital concept -- they get nowhere.

You want to solve social problems, start with yourself. If you can't let yourself accumulate wealth, you're part of a social problem -- like I used to be. Now I do very well, thank you, and I don't want to hear about how some financial company is making money from my self-help website. Sure, I'm getting richer all the time. You got a problem with that?

The more people get rich, the happier I am. Even a leader of the Chinese Communists (and you know what dummies they were) said it straight out maybe 30 years ago -- "it's glorious to be rich." The baggage we're still carrying around tells us not to mind if some guy says it but if I as a woman make the same point then the knives come out. Ladies, to hell with that. We're not going back.

It's not glorious to be low-income, that's for damn sure. I know what that's like. Now I go back to PBS at pledge time, and they welcome me with open arms. Public broadcasting. Makes me almost sentimental. But catch me on CNBC these days, and you'll see that I'm swimming with the big-money fish.

I was a waitress for a pathetically long time. I had to find the courage. The courage, ladies. And I did. Now look at me.

I don't just want you to plan for the future. I want you to make enough money to buy your future: lock, stock and barrel. Money money money. I've got it on the brain, and I make no apology. I love money. It's freedom, and ladies -- you can earn freedom if you apply yourselves.

Some people can't stop complaining that the economic system has winners and losers. Whether they realize it or not, that's probably because they're bound and determined to be losers. Well, I think it's a heck of a lot better to be a winner -- don't you?

What kind of media future do you think I would've had if I chose to keep complaining about the system because of losers? I'd probably be a loser too! Not if I can help it. And I can, obviously.

So, I'm rich. And I'm trying to inform you about how to get rich, too. If you can't make it happen, maybe you haven't listened to my wisdom closely enough. You got a problem with that?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: suze orman

Norman Solomon's latest book Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America's Warfare State (PoliPointPress) is available now. For more information go to www.madelovegotwar.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Damn!
Posted by: darkhorse on Dec 28, 2007 8:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do love Suze Orman!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get on board!!
Posted by: talkville on Dec 28, 2007 10:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where can I rush out to purchase a slick-bound package of 12 cd's and 2 400-page volumes of S Orman's "Path to Wealthy Solipsism" for the Incredibly Low Price of 4 easy payments of $99.95 Conveniently Charged to the Credit Card of Choice??? Or am I too early for that? Of course she's rich, and if only every man, woman and child would follow her edicts there'd be cake and ice-cream for all (residuals going to Ms Orman and her sponsors of course)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never heard of her.
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 28, 2007 10:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never saw her perform. Of course, everyone wants to be rich. Not everyone is willing to pay whatever price it takes to get rich--such as a world divided into winners and losers. Yes, when all is quantified, as in a game, there will be winners and losers. So life, then, is just one more game?

And, yes, we do live at a time where almost everything is for sale. Clearly Ms. Orman has no compunctions about putting herself up for sale.

Actually the code she extols can be the code of the criminal as well as the law-abiding. By her standards, bank robbers and drug dealers are also to be envied. Unless she also added some standards that Norm didn't hear. However, it sounds as if she is content to be Queen Midas who turns all she touches into gold, even if her touch kills.

The alternative to being rich is not being poor. The alternative to making yourself into a product up for sale is being real, fully human. Yes, you can be as happy as a cog in a money machine. If that makes you happy. Don't call me, I'll call you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Never heard of her. Posted by: MEL810
That was soooo good!
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 29, 2007 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't stand to watch her or PBS during pledge month (how about more regular programming not the Suze Orman, Andre Rieu (sp?), and Celtic Woman overload). But from what I have heard about Suze Orman, Mr. Solomon nailed this one.

I do wish PBS would drop her, at least Andre and Celtic Woman have pleasing music to make them more palatable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That was soooo good! Posted by: MEL810
Where I disagree with Suze
Posted by: MEL810 on Dec 30, 2007 7:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that more Americans, particularly women, need to get a handle on our money and start saving and investing more. We're a nation of debtors and spendthrifts.
And I agree there is no nobility in poverty. I agree being prosperous is better than being poor.
However, I also believe that the more fortunate should help those less fortunate. I don't believe that it's all winners and losers and that anyone who isn't wealthy lacks guts and is a loser.
If that's true, 99% of the world's population, including most Americans, are gutless wonders losing the race in life.
Most of us would like to be comfortable, but many of us have values well above and beyond that of simply becoming wealthy and spreading the gospel of greed. We're not losers because of that difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Losers?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 1, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who's going to pick up your trash? Sweep the aisles after your self-help seminars? Work in the paper factories that churn out the paper for your crappy books? Who's going to serve you drinks at your favorite trendy restaurant?...Hmmmm...a WAITRESS, perhaps? Hopefully, she spit in your drinks before she brought them out.

What would we do without all the so-called "losers" who perform these menial, but essential jobs? That's what these Reaganomics know-it-alls seem to forget while they're up there preaching about how everybody can be rich.

If all the self-help gurus were hit by a bus tomorrow, the world would get along just fine, and probably better than it did before. If all the people who clean hotel rooms, fix the plumbing, work in the sewer, drive cabs, etc. sat down for five minutes, all the so-called winners would be huddled in a corner crying for their mommy.

Complaining about the system may be a waste of time, but it doesn't mean there's nothing wrong with one that rewards parasites and punishes those who do essential work. So the apparent message is: stop complaining and become a parasite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arie
Posted by: arieden on Jan 2, 2008 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Suze Orman and watch her a lot. I think she has been somewhat mischaracterized in this piece. She is really more about taking control of one's finances, understanding the financial system and making smart money decisions than about getting rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Free financial wisdom
Posted by: alona on Jan 4, 2008 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Orman is right that many of us need to change our attitudes towards money and consumption. Fortunately, Debtors Anonymous offers experience, strength, and hope on how to do this in our debt-crazy culture, and their help is free. No need to spend zillions of dollars on Orman's overly hyped stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you for this article!
Posted by: blondesprite on Jan 6, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Susie has been a burr in my saddle for quite some time. She is no different than Ted Haggart, Dobson, Robertson, and the rest. They are all selling that little acre of heaven and being the ultimate winner and too many folks are buying it.
So many unhappy people, so little time.
A number of years ago I was training my replacement. She wanted to know the secret to my own success at sales. I told her it was very simple. Find out what people's needs are and connect them with it.
Her reply, but that does not give me "f**k-you" money and I want lots and lots of "f**k-you" money.
She wanted, from me, a "kiss my ass while I take names" diploma. She also suffered greatly with migraines and digestive problems.
My response to her, "listen to your body, it is trying to tell you something". Most of the money she made, while screwing over her clients, was spent on doctors and prescriptions.
While this is not the end of the story, hopefully, it is enough to see where this example is going.
I also told this young salesperson, we are all floating on a raft in a sea of humanity. Our literal survival (happiness, wealth and add anything else you want) depends largely upon how well we take care of one another. She didn't get it. Her world view and idea of success was dependent upon how fast she could kick everyone else off the raft.
She also didn't see the inevitable result of that philosophy (ending up alone) or the disastrous effect it would have on the company for whom we both worked.
Success at anything in life, is completely dependent upon how well we help enough other people get what they need. If you can figure out the difference between your (and others) needs and wants, everything else fits into place quite easily.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

she just spouts common sense
Posted by: launcher on Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The few times I've seen Suze Orman, I was completely unimpressed. She just talked in cliches about "harnessing your money" and gave simple common sense advice like "don't spend more than you can afford". A Dr. Phil for IRA accounts (and with better hair).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]