Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Even though the Mitchell Report shows that much of the MLB was complicit in steroid use, Barry Bonds is the only one who will take the fall.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Barry Bonds: Baseball's Scapegoat

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted December 13, 2007.


Even though the Mitchell Report shows that much of the MLB was complicit in steroid use, Barry Bonds is the only one who will take the fall.
Advertisement

The long awaited and much ballyhooed Mitchell Report drives home not one but two disturbing truths. The first is that dozens of players with the wink and nod connivance of the MLB and union top cats, trainers, medical personnel, drug companies, and even federal watchdog agencies winked and nodded as dozens of baseballs biggest names pumped up their bodies with performance enhancing drugs.

The second and in some ways even more disturbing truth is that the dump for the deliberate blind eye to drug abuse crashed down on the head of one man, Barry Bonds. Though technically Bonds was not indicted by a federal grand jury for steroid use, the charge is lying to a grand jury, the real reason he's in the docket is that he is the most visible, high profile, and thus convenient scapegoat to take the blame for baseball's revel in its steroid filled home run bleacher shots that sent attendance records soaring and jingled cash registers.

Another bitter truth on top of that disturbing truth is that the Mitchell Report can name all the names it wants and make all the recommendations for cleaning up the sport that it wants, but other than Bonds no other MLB baseball player has or will wind up in a court docket for illicit use of steroids. Despite the hoopla, teeth gnashing, phony self-righteous indignation, and clamor to do something about the shame and disgrace of drug use in the majors, there's absolutely no guarantee that the MLB officials or owners will follow to the strict letter the reform proposals.

If anything the Mitchell Report instead of partially vindicating Bonds leaves him even further hung out to dry. None of the dozens of players mentioned in the report come anywhere remotely close to the public and media loathing that Bonds engendered. Long before the ink was dry on the first sentence in the Mitchell Report, the giddy orgy of Bond's vilification was brutal and relentless, and that was even before he was accused of any wrongdoing.

Baseball didn't say zilch about banning the use of steroids before 2002. It had absolutely any zero testing procedures that mandated penalties for those caught cheating until 2004. It did not scrub the use of the performance drug HGH until 2005. Even then, punishments were spotty and capricious. That is until the feds began to take a harder look at the use of the junk in the sport, and Bonds began to inch closer to MLB icons Babe Ruth's former home run record and later Hank Aaron's home run record.

The get Bonds hunt was then on with a full vengeance.

Bonds now began to run shoulder to shoulder with O.J. Simpson as the man much of the public loved to hate. He was a big, rich, famous, surly, blunt-talking black superstar who routinely thumbed his nose at the media. That stirred deep latent and not so latent visceral contempt and revulsion for him.

Bonds didn't help matters by seeming to take special delight in irritating the heck out of sportswriters, fans, and the baseball establishment. His surly shoot-from-the-lip, thumb-your-nose-at-the-sports-crowd defied, or defiled the pristine, story book, nostalgia dripped image of what sports heroes should be, and how they should comport themselves. It made no difference that Bonds is no bigger a jerk in his boorish, sulking, spoiled behavior than other legendary superstars. But coming from him it just seemed to rub nerves even rawer.

So here's a prediction. The Mitchell Report will grab headlines for a day. It will set the chops of talking head sports commentators, sports writers, and baseball buffs in full throttle. It will spark another round of angry calls from some public officials to crack down on drug use in the majors. It will draw solemn pledges from MLB officials to do whatever it takes to end the cheating. And just as quickly it will blow over.

What won't blow over is the fingerpoint at Bonds. He looms even bigger in importance. His trial will be billed as a sort of steroids trial of the century. All the dirt, real or manufactured, about steroids and baseball, meaning Bonds, will be piled on the publics and the legal table. A conviction will be even better. That would give MLB officials the perfect chance to distance themselves from the cheaters, or more accurately, the perceived grand symbol of drug cheating, Mr. Bonds. The only scenario that could be even more worthy of an A-list Hollywood script is for Bonds to come clean admit that he knowingly used drugs and do a public mea culpa for it. The owners, MLB officials, and many sports writers could then breathe a big sigh of see I told you so relief and skip along smug in the knowledge that an ugly, and tainted chapter in baseball's saga is finally past. Batter up!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: baseball, barry bonds, steroids

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He's no martyr
Posted by: sciascia14 on Dec 13, 2007 12:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that MLB had no problem turning a blind eye way back in the summer of '98 when McGwire and Sosa were trading homers like Mantle and Maris in '61 and people were actually, y'know, interested in watching baseball again. (God knows why.) It was, in many ways, the antithesis of the strike-shortened season of '94. But the idea that Bonds isn't getting what he deserves is as preposterous as the idea that he didn't "knowingly" take any steroids despite the obvious bloating in his head and the rest of his body (with the exception of that one special area. That probably got smaller.) The fact is the man LIED UNDER OATH. I know in this country we tend to look the other way when "important" people do things like that, but come on. The findings of the Mitchell report in this regard are basically irrelevant. So, many more athletes than anybody initially thought were doped up. That doesn't make the fact that Bonds was a user any more excusable. Not to sound like somebody's parents, but just 'cuz everyone else is doing it doesn't make it okay for you to. And, again, there's that pesky perjury charge. Yes, it's disgraceful that guys like Clemens, Petitte, and the rest of them were allowed to get away with cheating for so long, but none of them lied under oath about it. Yes, they should all be banned, and yes, we all know that'll never happen. But to act like Barry Bonds is some kind of target because he broke some record is the worst kind of reactionary horseshit. He was a target because he did less to hide the fact that he was a juicer than even Jason Giambi. And then he lied about it to cover his own ass, and now he's going to cry all the way to his asterisked place in the record books. He's no martyr, just a losuy cheat. No, I take that back. To paraphrase Hans Gruber, he's an exceptional cheat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On Bonds
Posted by: Kym525 on Dec 13, 2007 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barry Bonds is arrogant, surly and certainly no media darling. However, the last time I checked, neither surliness or arrogance was a crime. So the question once again begs to be asked: Is Bonds being punished because he refuses to talk to the media (and considering the media's penchant for twisting people's words I don't blame him) or is he being punished because he doesn't fit our society's small-minded view of what a black athlete is supposed to be like?

In all honesty, I don't pretend to think he's a nice guy on the field, and frankly, that's not what he's being paid for. I've seen him act like a jerk and you know what, it doesn't hurt my feelings in the least. But I've also seen him as a doting father to his children, and that's a hell of a lot more important. The bottom line is that he's paid the big bucks to perform and to make people get excited about a game that's rather dull without the occasional home run. Jerk or not, Bonds has made a lot of people who aren't him a LOT of money. A LOT of people showed up or tuned in to see him break Hank Aaron's record.

It's tiresome to hear folks get all bent out of shape because he's not a good "role model". For f*ck's sake, get a life will ya? You want role models? How about parents, teachers and community activists for starters.

What so many wanna-be moralists fail to realize is not the fact whether Bonds did or did not take steroids. What the issue has always been for the more thoughtful of us is the almost attack-dog tactics that our so-called evenhanded press and our so-called "justice" system have brought to bear against him. It's completely above and beyond the scope of his supposed crime. It's nothing more than a petty and personal vendetta.

Now, that we know that all-American poster boy Roger Clemens is a juicer, who's willing to make a bet that the media will go after him with the same vitriol that they've shown to Bonds?

ARE YOU KIDDING???

I've already seen the excuses and evasions--that Clemens never 'lied' under oath (as if that makes it okay). My cynical side tells me that somehow, Clemens will escape the kind of negative circus that continues to dog Bonds. I'm sure the spin doctors are hard at work on damage-control.

By the way, didn't Clemens throw a bat at someone? I can't remember if Bonds ever did that...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bonds is not boorish or rude, he is an enigma
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 13, 2007 4:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not one basebal player in history has the background of barry bonds. His life has been baseball,from his father to the best of the best in baseball willie mays,ect. his demeanor is nothing more than human and sane ,given his first hand experience with all that baseball is,and is not. only a sane well rounded person wouldn't be able to live a lie to please sports writers or fans, knowing what fame and greatness holds for someone with his place in baseball history. there are things in life that are important, and things that are unimportant. A lot of stars,, sports or otherwise don't know the difference. bonds will do fine without baseball, since he knew a long time ago exactly what to expect of baseball, and what not to expect. an empty relationship,with all the hypocrisy that racism and fucked up social priorities could give. we are in an illegal war,with no constitution left,on a rail to bankruptcy,and all you people can get up the energy for is hating barry bonds. good luck,and oh,,,I'm sure your little johnny is gonna be a big leaguer,just keep nagging till he is neurotic. you'll get to relive your childhood yet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bonds case is different
Posted by: sliver on Dec 14, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barry Bonds became a pariah because he was part of the Balco trial, where a company was caught supplying steroids to athletes. Roger Clemens was not part of that trial, he must have gotten his steroids from another source.

Leaked testimony from the Balco trial said that Bonds admitted to taking a clear substance and a cream substance which later turned out to be steroids. So before he set the home run record, we knew he cheated. Of course we hate cheaters.

While Clemens was setting his records, we didn't have any proof that he cheated . Now that we know, he should be smeared like Bonds was, but the timing is wrong. He's winding down his career. If he has another record coming up, I hope he gets banned from baseball, just like I had hoped Bonds would somehow admit to cheating.

Sports are sacred. Cheaters are the lowest and deserve to be banned from sport. Testing didn't work, and Major League Baseball didn't care until last year anyway. So the result is this spotty accountability, and because of the timing, it all fell on Bonds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you're clueless Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: The Bonds case is different Posted by: thezenhaitian
Roger Clemens / Barry Bonds
Posted by: US Citizen on Dec 18, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that it should be OK for athletes to use performance-enhancing drugs, but if Barry Bonds is banned from the Baseball Hall of Fame so should be Roger Clemens. Fair is fair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More of Earle's Whining Stories on Black People.
Posted by: phelander on Dec 18, 2007 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right, Earle?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]