Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Environmentalist Ted Glick is now on the 99th day of a fast to protest the failure of Congress to address climate change.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Activist Reaches 99th Day of Climate Emergency Fast

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted December 11, 2007.


Environmentalist Ted Glick is now on the 99th day of a fast to protest the failure of Congress to address climate change.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

AMY GOODMAN: As the IPCC and Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, negotiators entered the final week of talks at the UN climate conference in Bali. The meeting hit a roadblock Monday from the United States. The US announced it won't approve a draft agreement setting firm targets for cuts to carbon pollution. The Bush administration says a proposal for developed nations to reduce emissions by between 25 percent and 40 percent by 2020 is "totally unrealistic" and "unhelpful." The 25-40 figure is based on the work of the UN's IPCC. Harlan Watson, the senior climate negotiator for the United States, said the panel's calculation was based on "many uncertainties".

Efforts to reform US environmental policy are also stalling on Capitol Hill. On Friday, Republicans blocked a Senate vote on the House-approved energy bill. The Bush administration and leading Republicans oppose the measure. They've singled out provisions that would impose $21 billion in taxes on the oil and gas industry and require utility companies to draw 15 percent of their power from renewable sources by the year 2020.

Ted Glick is the coordinator of the US Climate Emergency Council. He is heading to Capitol Hill today to protest Republican opposition to the energy bill. Ted Glick is now on the ninety-ninth day of his fast to protest the failure of Congress to address climate change.

Joining us from Washington, D.C., Ted Glick, welcome. Your thoughts on these speeches of the Nobel Peace laureates?

TED GLICK: Yes, thanks, first of all, Amy, for having me on the program.

A couple of things about Pachauri's speech. He talked about conflicts over water. We have conflicts right now over oil. We have wars for oil. We have to be clear that right now there are conflicts over continuing the same path that we have to get off of. We have to end wars for oil. But he was very good in terms of the equity issue. We have to understand that this is an issue of climate justice. Those who are most affected already and will be most affected as this crisis unfolds are people in Africa, people in Asia, low-income people, people in the Caribbean hit by more destructive hurricanes, people in the United States hit by hurricanes. The most impact, as we saw in New Orleans, low-income people, particularly people of color.

As far as Al Gore, I was interested in his solutions, what he put forward in terms of solutions. It was important that he called for a moratorium on coal plants. We can't build any more coal plants absolutely anywhere in the United States, and really it shouldn't be happening anywhere in the world. He talked about tax shifting, the need to shift taxes from being on payroll or on sales taxes, for example, to taxes on carbon. That absolutely is the way to go. That's the way we have to go in this country.

My concern, he talked about the cap-and-trade system. What we need is a cap-and-reduce system. Maybe some trading is involved of emissions, carbon emissions permits, but the emphasis has to be on reduction. We can't let major corporate interests, utilities, coal companies, oil companies game a cap-and-trade system, which we've had experience with actually internationally and in Europe.

As far as Congress, there was the beginnings of a turn in the direction that we need to go that took place on Thursday, when the House of Representatives voted a pretty good energy bill. To the credit of Nancy Pelosi and others who worked with her, it's a good beginning. That was smashed down the next morning, on Friday, by the Senate, with the Republican Party voting overwhelmingly to reject this House bill. There's now negotiations going on to try to come up with a revised version in the Senate.

Today, about an hour from now, as I'm talking here in D.C, at 10:00, a number of us are going to the office of Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, and we're going to be sitting in in his office at 10:00 a.m. It's in the Russell Building, Constitution Avenue, room 361-A. Anybody in the D.C. area who can join us, we'd love to have you there in support. We need to stand up for the future, stand up for justice and our climate. We cannot accept people like Mitch McConnell and George Bush and Dick Cheney and the rest of them, who are, I would say advisedly, climate criminals. I think that's an accurate phrase, to describe what has been the reality under the Republican administration for the last seven years. What's happening is really criminal, facing what we are facing in this world.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: climate change, global warming, congress, fasting, ted glick, bali

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ted Glick
Posted by: michael098762001 on Dec 11, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ted when he was active with the Berrigan brothers defense comm. in the early 70's, pledged to fast until the Vietnam War was over. That war didn't end till April 30th, '75. Moral witness needs to balanced with a certain level of pragmatism, 'ya think?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read this book
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 11, 2007 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy", by B. Comby
English edition, 2001, 345 pp. (soft cover), 38 Euros
TNR Editions, 266 avenue Daumesnil, 75012 Paris, France;
ISBN 2-914190-02-6
order from: http://www.comby.org/livres/livresen.htm
Read a review of this book by the American Health Physics Society at:
http://www.comby.org/media/
articles/articles.in.english/
HealthPhysics-NUC-July2002.htm

www.ecolo.org
Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy [EFN]

Fossil fuels such as coal oil, and gas, massively pollute the Earth's atmosphere
(CO, CO2, SOX, NOX...), provoking acid rains and changeing the global climate
by increasing the greenhouse effect, while nuclear energy does not participate in
these pollutions and presents well-founded environmental benefits.

Renewable energies (solar, wind) not being able to deliver the amount of energy
required by populations in developing and developed countries, nuclear energy is
in fact the only clean and safe energy available to protect the planet during the XXI
st century.

This book answers essential questions about nuclear safety, the Chernobyl
accident, the public health problems our society has to face, viable solutions for
nuclear waste, the benefits of clean nuclear energy for the environment, and
important information about the future of our planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reproduced from the journal "Health Physics" with permission
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 11, 2007 11:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subject book: "Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy", by B. Comby
AT A TIME when most of the media and politicians seem to be brainwashed by
antinuclear cults, it is refreshing to encounter a book that presents the issues
regarding nuclear energy in a clear and dispassionate manner. In plain non-
technical language, the author, a French environmentalist trained as a nuclear
engineer, presents a primer, in large letters, of the essential facts regarding all the
major aeas of controversy about nuclear power.

The first half of the book, titled "The Atomic Paradox," describes in layman's
language the risks of nuclear power, its environmental impact, quality and safety
standards, waste management, why a power reactor is not a bomb, energy
alternatives, nuclear weapons, and other major global and environmnetal problems.
In each case the major conclusions are framed for greater emphasis. Although
examples are taken from the French nuclear power program, the conclusions are
equally valid elsewhere.

The second half of the book is titled "Information on Nuclear Energy and the
Environment" and briefly provides a historical survey, an explanation of the
different types of radiation, radioactivity, dose effects of radiation, Chernobyl,
medical uses of radiation, accident precautions, as well as a glossary of terms and
abbreviations and a bibliography (…)

Its simple language makes the book suitable as a primer for high-school classes,
teacher training courses, or environmental discussion groups.

Despite the slightly provocative title, it is a well-balanced if unapologetic
exposition of the competitive advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy as a
power source. It should appeal to all readers with an interest in the subject who
have not already closed their minds.
EFN Environmentalists For Nuclear power

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 11, 2007 11:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Table of Contents
Preface of the English edition by James Lovelock
INTRODUCTION
An environmentalist For Nuclear energy

PART I :

THE ATOMIC PARADOX

CHAPTER 1: Nuclear energy: it's cleaner than you think.

CHAPTER 2: A well-designed nuclear power plant has little effect on the
environment.

CHAPTER 3: The risk of accident is reduced by strict quality and safety standards.

CHAPTER 4: Safe management of nuclear waste.

CHAPTER 5: A nuclear power station is not an atomic bomb.

CHAPTER 6: Managing the planet's energy as best we can.

CHAPTER 7: The economic and strategic advantages of nuclear energy.

CHAPTER 8: The real enviromental issues lie elsewhere: starvation, malnutrition,
political unrest in third world countries, drugs, alcohol and cigarette addictions,
destruction of tropical forests, chemical pollution of the environment, urban
wastes, overpopulation…

CHAPTER 9: The example of France, the world's leader in nuclear energy.

CHAPTER 10: Nuclear fusion: an almost unlimited supply of clean energy for the
future?

CHAPTER 11: No to nuclear war: for an end to nuclear weapons and the spectre
of nuclear war.

CHAPTER 12: The environmentally friendly solution to transportation problems:
electric vehicles.

CHAPTER 13: Modern, efficient, and intelligent environmental program: pro-
nuclear green movements for tomorrow.

CHAPTER 14: Errors to avoid.

CHAPTER 15: For better information - and against disinformation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy PART II:
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 11, 2007 11:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN FAVOR OF BETTER PUBLIC INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR ENERGY

Principal dates in the history of nuclear power. What is an atom? The principle of
nuclear fission. The principle of nuclear fusion. What is radioactivity? What is
radiation? How we can protect ourselves from radioactivity and radiation.
Different types of radiation. The difference between irradiation and radioactive
contamination. The natural disintegration of uranium 235 to lead. The natural
disintegration of uranium 238 to lead. Units of measurement of radioactivity and
irradiation. How do we measure radioactivity? Permitted and lethal doses of
irradiation. The effects of intense irradiation on the human body. Authorized limits
for human irradiation. A few examples of received doses. Natural radioactivity is
considerably different from region to region. Average natural irradiation by region
in France. The Chernobyl accident. International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) -
classification of nuclear accidents and incidents. Irradiation resulting from the
Chernobyl accident. The medical use of radiation. Doses of radiation delivered
during some medical radioisotopic examinations. Comparison of the effect of
nuclear arms, of nuclear medicine and of the nuclear power industry. How a
nuclear power plant operates. Diagram of a PWR nuclear power unit. Nuclear fuel.
Reprocessing spent nuclear fuel. How to prevent accidents in a modern nuclear
power plant. Three successive confinement barriers isolate nuclear fuel from the
environment. Countries possessing nuclear arms and the problem of their
proliferation. The half-life of some radioactive substances. The irradiation of food
products. Authorized food irradiation table. What to do in case of a nearby nuclear
accident war (or atomic bomb explosion).

 
CONCLUSION:

LET'S BUILD A BETTER WORLD NOW.

Some useful addresses - Abbreviations - Bibliography.

About the Author - Acknowledgments - Other publications by Bruno Comby

Association of Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy. http://www.ecolo.org/

http://www.ecolo.org/base/baseus.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]