Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The initial press reports of the murder of Washington Redskins safety Sean Taylor illuminate the media's racist double standard.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Distorting the Murder of Football Star Sean Taylor

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted November 28, 2007.


The initial press reports of the murder of Washington Redskins safety Sean Taylor illuminate the media's racist double standard.
Advertisement

A handful of black sportswriters hit the ceiling when they read initial press reports on the shooting death of Washington Redskins All-Pro safety Sean Taylor. The issue was the perennial, suspect, and sneaky alleged double standard in the reporting on and public view of tragedies that befall blacks and whites, especially athletes and celebrities.

The howl of protest goes up that when a black athlete is accused of bad behavior, criminality or boorishness the press and public go ballistic. They dredge up every misdeed the player has committed and ad nauseum drill it home that they are bad guys (or girls) and deserve the scorn of the nation.

When white athletes are accused of the same or worse bad behavior, criminality or boorishness, the excuses fly like raindrops in a hurricane, and then the news of their misdeeds vanishes from print and the airwaves faster than a Houdini disappearing act. Taylor is no exception to this rule, and the black journalists that raised the hue and cry were right to scream their lungs out about it.

The first accounts of Taylor's murder were spare on details of the shooting, since there was almost none, and there were no suspects, no reported clues, and no reported motivation for the shooting. But the reports more than made up for the sparseness by dredging up every sordid detail about Taylor's past run-ins with the law.

The image rammed into the public brain, what's become a template for depicting supposedly bad behaving, was bad acting young black males. The war of words was now on with a vengeance. The denials flew hot and heavy that any disrespect, and minimizing the tragedy, or that a subtle dump the blame for Taylor's death on his alleged thug lifestyle was intended. After all, those run-ins did badly color his life.

As distasteful as they might be, they were fair game for reporting. That's a good, even valid, point. Taylor did have problems, and there was nothing inherently inappropriate from a reporting, fact finding, or just plain human interest standpoint in saying that. The double standard line, however, is vaulted when a black athlete's woes are continuously repeated, and endlessly speculated about as a possible reason for his murder.

Though in most accounts after the initial harp on Taylor's past, balance was restored, and the reports emphasized the suffering of his parents, friends, and fans. There were sympathetic quotes about Taylor being a mature, positive role model, and about the pace of the investigation.

Yet, while follow-up stories mercifully dropped the dig at his past, the new take on him was that he had turned his life around. That still left the bitter taste that Taylor was a bad guy that went good, but it might have been too late to save him. To their credit most fans and writers and much of the public were more than willing to step past the blatant initial and ongoing subtle bias and give Taylor his mournful due.

But the bad taste of the initial paint of Taylor as a bad actor stuck like a lead weight in the craw. This isn't the only thing that's hurtful in the coverage of Taylor. There was the hint, and some talking heads did more than hint, that though Taylor was a rich, star athlete, he was still a young black male. And like all young black males he was in mortal peril of being gunned down.

In other words his fame and athletic prowess did not shield him from the black on black violence that supposedly rages in all big city poor black neighborhoods. The problem with that as with the skewed initial picture of Taylor is that it's a lie. Taylor did not live in a poor, black inner city Miami neighborhood. He lived in a palatial suburban home with his long time companion and daughter. Those that actually knew him said that he was a loner and that he did not hang out with a drug peddling, gang connected crowd.

But even if Taylor was the thug that initial accounts subtly implied he once was, the Taylor as a casualty of black violence line still is a falsity. Murder rates among young black males in Tayor's 16 to 24 year old age group are still far higher than those among young white males. But those rates in Taylor's age group have plummeted in the last decade according to FBI crime reports, as have murder rates in most urban areas.

In New York City, for instance, murder rates have dropped to the lowest level in forty years. In Miami-Dade County, crime plunged more than 20 percent and murder rates also dropped. The chances of a young black male dying at the hands of another young black male are far less today than in the past. The senseless snuffing out of Taylor's life was a heartbreaking tragedy. But it's Taylor's death, not his life, that's the only thing that should leave a bad taste. Unfortunately, that's not the case.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: redskins, sean taylor

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
hmmm
Posted by: chomsky on Nov 28, 2007 11:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're going to feel really stupid when it turns out that his murder was in response to his "past" or him behaving like his "past" self. It's not racism, it's common sense. He got shot in his home by intruders who apparently weren't there to steal anything. They were there to shoot him. And apparently, in the groin, which could either mean he messed with the wrong girl, or the intruder was just a bad shot.

And of course, this isn't the first time he'd been shot at. This time he wasn't in a truck to take the bullets for him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hmmm Posted by: francomef
» google Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» Where is Mr. Hutchinson? Posted by: scott balogh
» RE: hmmm Posted by: shanona_g
» RE: hmmm Posted by: Phenix
» Hey, Know It All!!!!!!!! Posted by: mrgray301
Instead of claiming racism, why not deal with the actual..y'know..facts
Posted by: Javier Zuniga on Nov 28, 2007 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I'm not hopelessly naive enough to believe that there isn't a certain amount of bias in the way the media presents African American athletes, what does that have to do with the case of Sean Taylor? In many ways, media outlets have spent so much time talking about how tragic his death was that they have tried to gloss over the actual facts surrounding the case.

For instance: YOU actually spent so much time talking about the murder statistics in Dade county that you completely ignored the facts surrounding Taylor actual LIFE:

--His arrests include a 2005 incident where he waved a gun at somebody because he thought they stole a pair of ATVs. That little scuffle resulted in a group of guys rolling up on Taylor and his friends and firing 15 rounds into his SUV. Their means of conflict resolution sounded like something out of GTA.
--Eight days before this shooting, his house had been broken into. NOTHING was stolen. But a large kitchen knife was left on his bed.
--Friends are being quoted in DC papers as having told Taylor he would've been better off moving out of the Miami area because of the people he used to associate with.
--He slept with a machete under his bed. That sounds to me like a guy who knew he had some enemies.

In the end, while it's easy to yell RACISM because media outlets didn't present Taylor like some kind of sainted figure, it's also hopelessly naive and insulting to the inteligence to think that there's not even a possibility that Taylor's death was connected to hs violent past.

And it's especially frustrating because these claims of racism become so much "white noise" when there really IS a problem that needs to be addressed because people get so tired of all the rhetoric; the Boy Who Cried Wolf and all that, etc.

So go find a cause somewhere else. Sean Taylor ins't teaching us anything about the media. The only lesson here is for young men - ALL young men - to see that they need to make better decisions growing up because bad choices, no matter how hard we try, always catch up to us in the end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We All Have a Past It Doesn't Mean You Deserve To Die
Posted by: raganwalker on Nov 28, 2007 12:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Out of much respect for Sean Taylor's family and friends, I will only say this; We all have pasts, and have made mistakes,and for the majority of us...the past will never return to haunt us...it doesn't give anyone the right to kill you, and it sure as hell doesn't give the media the right to run your name through the mud. It is sad, but after his death he has become more of a celebrity than he was when he was alive...people should think before they write things that could be hurtful to this OPEN MURDER CASE. As for the race issue, I would be a fool to say that race doesn't matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well
Posted by: capsfandmd on Nov 28, 2007 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually the person wanted to rob him but got scared and ran he probably thought that Sean wasnt there cause there was a game in Tampa Bay and went to steal from him and saw him and shot him. in the femer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well Posted by: elfinito
Michael Wilbon's Head Fails to Hit Ceiling
Posted by: sdnunes on Nov 28, 2007 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Click here to read his column on Taylor's murder.

I eagerly await the "Wilbon's an Uncle Tom" retort.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Nearly Every Single Mean-Spirited Comment Validates Hutchinson's Point
Posted by: Kym525 on Nov 28, 2007 3:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get it through your thick and insensitive skulls people--a life full of promise was cut short and now there is a little girl who no longer has a daddy to kiss her goodnight or lift her high up in his arms. There is a family in pain having lost a cherished son, cousin, brother, friend long before their time.

Frankly I am appalled by the lack of empathy shown by most of the supposed "liberal" posters here in response to the tragic death of Sean Taylor, but I am not surprised. Typical sanctimonious, knee-jerk reactions from those whom racism does not touch and because they cannot experience it, they choose to ignore it, and yet complain loudly because those of us that it does affect have the audacity to speak out against the injustice. I don't always like what Hutchinson writes, but when he points out something so glaring as this double-standard in regards to Taylor's death, I have to agree. Even if it turns out that something or someone in his past finally cuaght up with him, that's still no excuse to behave as if he got what he deserved. People change and grow up.

No one has ever painted Taylor as being a saint, but then again, neither was Augustine in the beginning--remember he asked god to make him good but not yet. None of us are perfect and we all make mistakes. That's what makes us human. Taylor, by all accounts, had shed the follies of his youth and was becoming the kind of man he knew he could be. He was becoming an asset to his team and was also a good father and partner. His past mistakes are no reason for him to have been killed, nor should they be subject to the double-standard of the media. The only thing we should all be mourning is the tragedy of a life cut short.

What I find even more disgusting is I expect this level of vitriol from conservative wack-jobs like Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh. I'm beginning to wonder if there truly is any difference between them and the mean-spirited posters in this forum. At least with Coulter, I expect nothing less.

You should all hang your heads in shame--but I don't think you have any.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And you missed my point too!!! Posted by: elfinito
» this ain't a funeral parlor Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» But are you sure he's black? Posted by: thelostsailor
Easy killer...
Posted by: thelostsailor on Nov 28, 2007 4:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You said it yourself- your past should not condemn your whole future. Does the past and plight of the black man condemn you to scream bloody racism for the end of your days?!
Why don't you pay this guy the respect you say he deserves by giving a salute to what he accomplished on or off the field? To disrespect his death by running off into left field with your anger is all wrong.
Get a punching bag. Write a journal. Talk it over with a friend, but don't project your timeless anger on the masses and secure the continuance of the fruitless racial anger. I'd be the last person to deny that the black American has not been as wronged as one can be, but you need to project love and get positive- there's no where to go from where you are but to keep spreading hate.
It's like bombing the world into peace- it ain't ever gonna work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have a question...actually TWO Posted by: thelostsailor
» WELL SAID KYM525!!! Posted by: mobile68
» Well said again... Posted by: elfinito
» RE: Well said again... Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Well said again... Posted by: elfinito
» RE: Well said again... Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Well said again... Posted by: elfinito
» well said Posted by: thelostsailor
» RE: I have a question...actually TWO Posted by: thelostsailor
» WONDERFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: elfinito
» This is Your Mess Posted by: Kym525
» RE: asy killer... Posted by: Enigma
» RE: asy killer... Posted by: thelostsailor
» RE: asy killer... Posted by: Enigma
» RE: asy killer... Posted by: thelostsailor
» RE: asy killer... Posted by: ALANHESTER
MR. OEH: We need a break
Posted by: Just The Facts on Nov 28, 2007 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from you for awhile, better yet forever would be just fine. Two identical "racist conspiracy theory" Op/Ed diatribes in two days is more than any website should be burdened with. Since when does every high profile misfortune involving an African American give you the right to reshape events into your personal social statement? We got it already, OK? Let these people grieve without any nonsense from you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» When all you have is a hammer Posted by: Bubba3000
» RE: MR. OEH: We need a break Posted by: ALANHESTER
One or two questions...
Posted by: Alli on Nov 28, 2007 5:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll start by saying that I do not know anything about this particular case and honestly hadn't heard of Sean Taylor until his death. However, there are two things I noticed about this article. First, the author states, "In other words his fame and athletic prowess did not shield him from the black on black violence that supposedly rages in all big city poor black neighborhoods." Is there evidence of black on black violence in this murder case? Please tell me Mr. Hutchinson isn't assuming this to be the case. Kind of undermines his anger at the media for mentioning the victim's troubled past, especially since he brings it up again: "The chances of a young black male dying at the hands of another young black male are far less today than in the past." That's wonderful, but is there a black murder suspect in this case?

As with any other celebrity, be they black or white, athletic or otherwise, the more you have, the more you can lose. Like someone else said, most of us aren't so naive as to believe that racism is exctinct and that black citizens aren't subject to unfairness. But aren't things bad enough without people going around looking for issues to cry out against?

According to this article, the police have no suspects and don't believe the murder was related to Taylor's past: www. usatoday.com/ sports/football/nfl/ 2007-11-28-sean- taylor- investigation_N. htm

Kind of makes me wonder why Mr. Hutchinson kept mentioning black on black crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Earl color blind! - he only sees black!
Posted by: rocketman on Nov 28, 2007 5:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is wearing his blackness on his sleeve again. All I read about this was Taylor was shot and he had trouble with locals which could point to the reason. They also talked about his football career and how he accumulated more penalties than usual..But anyone watching football knew that.

So here's what his childhood friend (who is black BTW) had to say -

"""Still in disbelief of his childhood friend's shooting death, Arizona Cardinals cornerback Antrel Rolle vowed Wednesday to make sure Sean Taylor is remembered.

He added he did not believe the killing was part of a burglary gone sour, and that Taylor had many enemies on the streets of Miami.
"He really didn't say too much," Rolle said, "but I know he was pretty much scared every time he was down in Miami."

Rolle and Taylor, whose fathers were policemen in Homestead, Fla., started playing football together when they were 6 years old. They went on to become University of Miami teammates and NFL first-round draft picks. Both wore No. 21, Rolle for the Cardinals, Taylor for the Washington Redskins.

Rolle said he hadn't talked to Taylor in a while, and that the Redskin had withdrawn from the crowd he hung around with to build a new life with his girlfriend and young daughter.

"There was so much surrounding him," Rolle said. "Everyone was talking about him bad, so he just had to distance himself from everyone and live a life of his own. ... Within the last year, I've never seen anyone make such a dramatic change,"

Withdrawing from a bad crowd isn't easy, though, Rolle said......"""

mmm.. could the "WHITE press be correct.. there is more to this than just a random shooting!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hmm. Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Journalists Doing Their Job; Inform
Posted by: gradioc on Nov 28, 2007 5:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The initial reports I heard did not mention his past or his race. They were quite simple and shocking. Redskins defensive back shot and critically wounded during apparent home invasion was the jist I got. My only question, why he was home in Miami on a Sunday night, was answered in the secondary reporting on his condition. (He was injured and did not travel with the team.) It was not until the news broke about the mysterious break-in a week previous that I was reminded of his past, which I had not connected to Taylor til then. It had to be brought up by any decent jounalist then because it was starting to look less like an economic crime and more like a personal one. There was nothing wrong with the coverage I heard. It may still turn out to be a random economic crime (the kind that scares the rich white folks all to hell), but there are legitimate questions here and the fact that he's been shot at before is relevant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» RE: Sean "thug" Taylor Posted by: ALANHESTER
Not racist, sorry
Posted by: Jingo Jim on Nov 28, 2007 6:46 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of article stinks of liberal guilt and an excess of political correctness. When the police are investigating Taylor's murder, I'm pretty sure they're going to consider his past pretty damn relevant.

Also, check out the article on foxsports.com by Jason Whitlock. He thinks Taylor's past- and the "hip-hop" culture that helped guide and shape it- had everything to do with what happened to him. Since Whitlock is black, i'm pretty sure this is not an inherently racist viewpoint.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not racist, sorry Posted by: neosoul
» WRONG!!! Posted by: ALANHESTER
Typical white B.S. from White Amerikkkans and their black aplogists
Posted by: neosoul on Nov 28, 2007 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the white trolls show up again with the same BS, I am tired of white Americans and their tired “pull yourself up by your bootstraps rhetoric” when we make a point of MSWM racist posturing and their Black apologists and then these A-holes come on here and want to call us race baiters when the media did first and the white male defenders are playing the race card like it’s a game of “texas hold em” and talking about ‘black culture’ pathology hip- hop and broken families. Dr. Hutchinson is right, Sean Taylor died a tragic death and we do not know who committed this it may well be a white, asian, hispaic or a woman.

The media and their double standards on race never fail to amaze me, as a Black Man given the choice between Bin Laden and white Amerikkkans who fawn over Jason "big chitlin" Whitlock (A complete lying- ass uncle tom)and other black apologists I would rather deal with Bin Laden and the Islamic terrorist because they aren't phony like many of these White Amerikkkan pousers with their racist B.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Earl you keep doing it
Posted by: Everitt on Nov 28, 2007 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the third time I have had to comment on Hutchinson's apologist tendencies. Michael Vick, OJ Simpson, Marion Jones and now this athlete - Earl your writing on racial issues could be about much better subjects. By defending the indefensible all you are doing is diluting a very important message.

Just leave this one alone. Let it play out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» RE: arl you keep doing it Posted by: Feltixx
» RE: arl you keep doing it Posted by: neosoul
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» What did KRS 1 say? Posted by: Everitt
» RE: What did KRS 1 say? Posted by: neosoul
» RE: What did KRS 1 say? Posted by: Everitt
» RE: What did KRS 1 say? Posted by: Jbuuty
» RE: arl you keep doing it Posted by: ALANHESTER
This time Hutch, you nailed it . . .
Posted by: jackblack on Nov 28, 2007 9:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, the tragic death of this person couldn't have been for any reason other than his being involved in a dangerous thug live style? How do we know this with out any other facts or evidence to support this claim? Because of the color of his skin, that’s how! Don’t talk about his past, everybody got a past. Talk about what we know.

He was black therefore no need to grieve or act civilized when it comes to his loss or our collective loss as a society.

The only thing more evil than vilifying Sean Taylor and making him responsible for his own death is to do so in order to sensationalize the story for your own enrichment.

Way to go Hutch! You nailed it this time; "Pointed out the devil and called him by name”. Those that have made Sean responsible for his own death are clearly, racist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cite Some Examples
Posted by: hole11 on Nov 29, 2007 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see what you are saying but you don't back your words up at all. I mean who cares what the black on black crime rate is in New York City? I don't. And I fail to see what it has to do with Taylor.

Sleeze sells. And a journalist's job is to sell the story. If you got a guy that hold back information and another guy that doesn't guess who is going to get paid more.

I think it's bad to convict people with the press, but as a journalist I can see how all those allegations are important and can be considered news.

But why is everything about race Mr. Hutchinson? Are you still protesting goods from China because they threw out all the blacks that were living there in the 70's?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Didn't seem that way to me
Posted by: jverner@earthlink.net on Nov 29, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I got out of the news was that a promising young athlete was murdered. I didn't hear any of the "thug" stuff. But then I get my news from the Internet, not the "mainstream media."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Didn't seem that way to me Posted by: ALANHESTER
Better
Posted by: jeffr on Nov 29, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After yesterdays apologist piece about Vick and OJ and others, I found todays post to be, at least in my mind, much more objective, and I think , honestly much more to the point.

Sean Taylor's death was a tragic loss certainly. To his family and friends, fans and teammates.

He would not, at least on the surface, appear to have been doing the slightest thing out of the ordinary by sitting on his sofa at home watching tv or whatever. To extrapolate from that that his death was his own fault I think was, at the least, in poor taste. At worst, it could very easily be seen as an opportunistic attack on Mr Taylor because of his past, and/or because he was black.

Was it racist? I don't know. That would depend on the motive I think. I don't believe every sensationalist report falls under the umbrella of "racism" just because it's about a young black man.

I think the point Earl was trying to make though, and I'm sure he doesn't need anyone to defend him, was that the "initial" reports could certainly have been more objective and compassionate, and if they were going to mention his past, then it would only have been reasonable and fair to also mention the fact that Mr Taylor had indeed, at least on the surface, appear to have turned his life around.

Where Earl and I diverge it seems is our takes on the answer to this question... Would it have been any different had the dead person been white, or Mexican, or Asian, or Muslim, as opposed to being a young black man? Mr Hutchinson obviously feels that race makes all the difference. I think race in this case is a side-note, and the primary (mis)focus is simply on Taylor's past, instead of on his tragic death.

Of course, we all make our beds, and at some time must lie in them. Ask Tupac and many many others that lived the gang life-style, and even after they rose above it, it eventually reclaimed them and drug them down.

So is it really objective reporting to separate the past from the present and write only of the present?

At what point do you draw the line? Yesterday? Last week? Last month? At what point is the past no longer relevant?

So whether or not Mr Taylor's death was related to his past or not, I don't know. But I don't think a little objectivity would be too much to ask for. It's bad enough that we, as a society, are so quick to pass judgment on the living, must we also be so quick to pass judgment on the dead? What's the rush? They aren't going anywhere...

Of course, that's rhetorical, because we all know the answer is "Yes, we must" because by tomorrow afternoon, this incident will have faded into the background, only to be replaced by something more fresh, more sensational(or sensationalized), more controversial....

But a home invasion burglary could happen to anyone, of any color or age, especially in Miami... I think it would have been only prudent to not jump to the conclusion that it was automatically related to Taylor's past, even though the facts in the end may well prove that to be the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Better Posted by: ALANHESTER
mirror please
Posted by: skydog on Nov 29, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of all the inordinate media attention this murder got, this is the FIRST time I've heard Sean Taylor referred to as a thug, run-ins with the law, or casting any aspersions on him whatsoever. The very first time.

Now I'm wondering why all this hasn't been more widely reported.

Must be some black racist conspiracy.

NOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mirror please Posted by: ALANHESTER
ANOTHER FINE WHINE from the whiniest black author in America.
Posted by: phelander on Nov 29, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He should live in Napa Valley, he whines so much. He should open a Whinery. He should be considered a whine-o.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the White "Left Wing" Can't Recruit Anybody But Whites
Posted by: Nuuon on Nov 29, 2007 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Nazi vomit spewed over the dead body of Sean Taylor is the best possible demonstration why the America's white "left wing" is utterly useless, powerless and ineffective.

The stench of self-importance and "know-it-all" world view leaves them discredited time and again. I would never associated myself with such people, never join a march with them and would never vote for them: Another reason why the democrats don't have a chance in the next presidential election.

One example that proves Earl Ofari Hutchinson point: check out the treatment of Joe Namath or Mark McGuire versus the black athletes who partied and drugged themselves to the same degree. Anyone who can't see the difference must surely be a member of the "white left" ("white left" is code word for "today I'm left, tomorrow I'm a shill for the right wing." Ala Christopher Hitchens and company.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
These people(?) just don't get it...
Posted by: K.D. on Nov 29, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wilbons piece was actually better than this one. If you haven't learned from the Hip-Hop scene, unless you plan to stay active in the gang life after you become rich, GET OUT OF THE HOOD. Yeah, some want to be stubborn and say that their success shouldn't force them to leave their home, but when you have known enemies nearby, a family to take care of, and, most importantly, the MEANS to leave, what reason do you have NOT to? No, there still are no facts as to what happened and why. And yes, the point of the ABOVE piece was aimed at the MEDIA, but nothing said will change the outcome. You can't prevent things like this from taking place ANYWHERE in America, but that doesn't mean you can't TRY. If not for your own sake, the sake of your family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As Cliche As It Sounds, White People Just Don't Get It
Posted by: Kym525 on Nov 29, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racism is something white people can choose to ignore because they don't have to live the reality of it everyday. They have a buffer zone from all of its ugliness that people of color do not. Of course whites are tired of hearing about racism that they could never experience--it gets in the way of 'Dancing With the Stars'. It makes them uncomfortable and it makes them wonder just whether we have come a long way from the days of Jim Crow (and yes Virginia, we have, but we still have a long ways to go).

For many whites, the clear and certain face of racism is still the Klan, neo-Nazis, nooses and burning crosses. This is a myopic view at best because racism has become a lot more subtle. No one with any common sense wants to be accused of being a racist, because that image brings to mind an unwashed, illiterate, gun-toting redneck yelling "sieg heil" and not having a clue as to what the hell it means. However, David Duke turned in his 300-count percale sheets for a Brooks Brothers suit and a facelift, but he still has the same old message. The late Lee Atwater helped to usher in the era of negative campaigning and race-baiting with his Willie Horton ads, and Ronnie Ray-Gun kicked things up a notch with his war on so-called "welfare queens". We racially profile young men wearing Fubu and Ecko Unlimited or black men driving "nice" cars through "nice" neighborhoods--ask Will Smith. Even Clarence Thomas, a Supreme Court Justice, cannot catch a cab at night in spite of being a member of the highest court in the land because he is perceived as a threat (I think the worst thing he could ever do is bore one to death about how 'misunderstood' he is). Barack Obama is touted as being "articulate" as if that's such a big surprise--and perhaps it is to most whites who get their information about black people from Faux News Nutwork and Rush Limbaugh.

Racism IS an uncomfortable topic of discussion and it brings out a lot of negative emotions on all sides. Whites live in denial and blacks live in frustration. Few whites ever attempt to see things from another point of view, but would rather be upset when they're forced to do so. Is Mr. Hutchinson correct in his assessment? To many black people he is. We clearly see the double-standard because we LIVE the double-standard. Quiet as its kept (as my grandpa used to say), had Sean Taylor lived an exemplary life all the way up to his death, the media being the media, would have still looked for a 'gang-related' angle. The media does that with just about every gun death involving young black and brown men--regardless of whether he was a high school valedictorian or a blue collar worker or even in a three-piece suit. Where's the responsible journalism in that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While Earl is a good writer and is sometimes correct....
Posted by: Voicedude on Nov 29, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....with every article he sounds more and more like David Chappelle's character Conspiracy Brother in the movie "Undercover Brother".

Only, at least he was funny!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As Cliche As It Sounds, White People Just Don't Get It - Part II
Posted by: Kym525 on Nov 29, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To be fair, it's not just myopia that whites suffer from when it comes to dealing with the ugliness of racism. Whites are indeed frustrated too, especially those who believe themselves free of the nasty trappings of racist thought. For them, everything racial was dealt with--or should have been--in the 60's and should have rectified past injustices. The Strom Thurmonds, George Wallaces (whom by the way for those who believe that blacks consistently hold a grudge, when Wallace ran for re-election, he garnered a great deal of black support in spite of his segregationist past--something that apparently many blacks, especially older ones, forgave) and Bull Connors are dead.

Unfortunately, that which gave rise to those men has not been laid to rest. It continues to fester in nearly every facet of American life--in education, housing, health care, law enforcement--and even personal aspects of our lives such as dating, marriage, sexuality. Race rears its ugly head more often than not. This is what Hutchinson and others are trying to address. And it is the height of arrogance to tell him that he's wrong just because you cannot see it. Frustrating as it may be for whites to hear, it is far more so for blacks to LIVE.

I would like to point something out and you do the math: Black people have been in this country for nearly 400 years. It has been less than 60 that black people have enjoyed some of the freedoms guaranteed to ALL MEN in the Declaration of Independence. Now, correct me if I'm wrong here, but 400 does not equal 60. Yes, within that 60-year span, black people have succeeded far beyond anything the virulent racists ever imagined (and I'm sure Condeleeza Rice gives Tom Metzger nightmares). Still, it is not the overt racism that is at issue here.

It is the endless double-standard that abounds when it comes to the perception of blacks (and other groups). The media and the justice system tends more often than not to be much harsher and more critical of black and brown wrongdoing than it is about white malfeasance.

When whites misbehave, there tends to be a rush to "explain" how such behaviour could have possibly occurred--for example, Columbine High School. We all remember the Marilyn Manson witch hunt (and I actually like some of his music, though I'm much more of a metalhead), the targeting of "violent" video games, the scapegoating of the gothic subculture, the blaming of the parents. Now, had Columbine High School been located in South Central L.A. or Harlem, N.Y., it would have been viewed as a matter of course because we all know "those blacks are violent". There wouldn't have been a bunch of psychologists and other talking heads decrying bullying or trying to pass laws against it.

That's just one glaring example. That's why we have to talk about it, whether it's uncomfortable or not. You might not agree, but it would go a long way to give Hutchinson the benefit of the doubt. After all, he lives it. You don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» substitute black for white Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» RE: Cry to me next Katrina. Posted by: neosoul
but who's on first?
Posted by: thelostsailor on Nov 29, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So who started (up again) the mean-spiritedness, besides white America long ago?
Did this article here start it up? Is his take accurate? Does it only reflect one obscure news story? Some actual quotes would have given him proof and made a better article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» read first Posted by: thelostsailor
Black People Don't Get It: Response To Kym525
Posted by: hole11 on Nov 29, 2007 4:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I challenge Al Sharpton or any black leader to come to my area and protest my violations/charges by the state that they recently dropped. Come on down because I don't have a racial case. See white cops and white people can get away with screwing over a white person's life. No one is going to stand up for that person at all. So you can slander the name through the press and afterwards they still have their jobs. It's like Imus with a badge saying you are disorderly against the white race, throw you in jail and that is the end of story even after you get out you can't scream racism, cronyism, unjust termination, or hiring practices because you will never have a case. Who would believe you? A white jury?

So no it is impossible for a white person to grow up in a black neighborhood and understand what it's like to be a minority. It's for a white person to have his civil rights violated by white police or slandered by a white press. But come on down Hutchinson or Sharpton and I will show you what it's like to be oppressed by a so called free state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]