Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Who is speaking for the Democrats these days? A retired General accused of authorizing torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How the Democrats Are Aligning Themselves with Bush's Torture Policies

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted November 28, 2007.


Who is speaking for the Democrats these days? A retired General accused of authorizing torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Every Saturday, the president of the United States gives a radio address to the nation. It is followed by the Democratic response, usually given by a senator or representative. This past Saturday the Democrats chose retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez to give their response, the same general accused in at least three lawsuits in the U.S. and Europe of authorizing torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq. This, combined with the Democrats' endorsement of Attorney General Michael Mukasey despite his unwillingness to label waterboarding as torture, indicates that the Democrats are increasingly aligned with President Bush's torture policies.

Sanchez headed the Army's operations in Iraq from June 2003 to June 2004. In September 2003, Sanchez issued a memo authorizing numerous techniques, including "stress positions" and the use of "military working dogs" to exploit "Arab fear of dogs" during interrogations. He was in charge when the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison occurred.

Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, who headed Abu Ghraib at the time, worked under Gen. Sanchez. She was demoted to colonel, the only military officer to be punished. She told me about another illegal practice, holding prisoners as so-called ghost detainees: "We were directed on several occasions through Gen. [Barbara] Fast or Gen. Sanchez. The instructions were originating at the Pentagon from Secretary Rumsfeld, and we were instructed to hold prisoners without assigning a prisoner number or putting them on the database, and that is contrary to the Geneva Conventions. We all knew it was contrary to the Geneva Conventions."

In addition to keeping prisoners off the database there were other abuses, she said, like prison temperatures reaching 120 to 140 degrees, dehydration and the order from Gen. Geoffrey Miller to treat prisoners "like dogs."

And it's not just about treatment of prisoners. In 2006, Karpinski testified at a mock trial, called the Bush Crimes Commission. She revealed that several female U.S. soldiers had died of dehydration by denying themselves water. They were afraid to go to the latrine at night to urinate, for fear of being raped by fellow soldiers: "Because the women, in fear of getting up in the hours of darkness to go out to the portolets or the latrines, were not drinking liquids after 3:00 or 4:00 in the afternoon. And in 120-degree heat or warmer, because there was no air conditioning at most of the facilities, they were dying from dehydration in their sleep. What [Sanchez's deputy commanding general, Walter Wojdakowski] told the surgeon to do was, 'Don't brief those details anymore. And don't say specifically that they're women. You can provide that in a written report, but don't brief it in the open anymore.'" Karpinski said Sanchez was at that briefing.

Former military interrogator Tony Lagouranis, author of "Fear Up Harsh," described the use of dogs: "We were using dogs in the Mosul detention facility, which was at the Mosul airport. We would put the prisoner in a shipping container. We would keep him up all night with music and strobe lights, stress positions, and then we would bring in dogs. The prisoner was blindfolded, so he didn't really understand what was going on, but we had the dog controlled. The dog would be barking and jumping on the prisoner, and the prisoner wouldn't really understand what was going on."

Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch elaborated on Sanchez: "For those three months of mayhem that were occurring right under his nose, he never stepped in. And, also, he misled Congress about it. He was asked twice at a congressional hearing whether he ever approved the use of guard dogs. This was before the memo came out. And both times he said he never approved it. [W]e finally got the actual memo, in which he approves 'exploiting Arab fear of dogs.' " Brody dismissed the military report clearing Sanchez of any wrongdoing: "It's just not credible for the Army to keep investigating itself and keep finding itself innocent."

This is not about politics. This is about the moral compass of the nation. The Democrats may be celebrating a retired general who has turned on his commander in chief. But the public should take pause.

The Democrats had a chance to draw a line in the sand, to absolutely require Mukasey to denounce waterboarding before his elevation to attorney general. Now they have chosen as their spokesman a discredited general, linked to the most egregious abuses in Iraq. The Bush administration passed Sanchez over for a promotion, worried about reliving the Abu Ghraib scandal during the 2006 election year. Now it's the Democrats who have resuscitated him. Have they no shame?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: torture, democrats

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"...the difference between syphilis and gonorrhea."
Posted by: James W. Harris on Nov 28, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rita Mae Brown had it so right long ago when she said the difference between Democrats and Republicans "is the difference between syphilis and gonorrhea."

Speak out now for anti-war, anti-torture, anti-police state candidates of any party. While you still can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey syphulis is worse Posted by: citizenjoe
some dems bad, republicans much worse
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 28, 2007 2:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At one of Presidential debates most of the Republican candidates justified use of torture in a tougher than thou contest. I agree with human rights advocates that Democrats are going down the same path when they use Sanchez as a spokesman. Complaints should be directed to Democratic Leadership who are often crypto-Republicans imho.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pathetic
Posted by: may261989 on Nov 28, 2007 8:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dems Spineless,gutless Bush lackies. What ever happened to the "lame duck" label attached to Bush? - oh! its gone, you can't call Bush a lame duck when the Dems fall over themselves to rubber stamp his policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: George Posted by: Moore Hognutz
We'd better make this election count
Posted by: rjgwood on Nov 28, 2007 9:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or else...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right on!
Posted by: talkville on Nov 29, 2007 12:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But the public should take pause."

Most definitely. It's definitely urgent that democrats (small 'd') ought to hold Democrats (capital 'D') accountable. Granting Mukasey a pass to confirmation was, to say the least, deplorable. It is an unfortunate but actual state of affairs that among the current 'representative' constituency in the Legislative Branch who are Democrats can be found those who either out-right or very crucially support the status quo with regard to the actions of the White House Outlaws.

What possible good would come from voting in a Democratic Executive and Legislative while continuing to empty the democratic content of the country. There's already a whole lot to repeal and correct since the coup of 2000. And many to hold to account by We the People. A careful and massive vote is due in 2008. It IS happening here and is well advanced. Feinstein and Schumer buckled, and many more Democrats in the House and Senate have apparently a strong case of laryngitis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the People in all this.
Posted by: ErHoff on Nov 29, 2007 1:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We the People, or is it, some of the informed People?

The Democratic Party has come under the authority of the Cheney Bush Crime Syndicate, and their new purpose is to do all that it takes to make the regime in the White House look good. If that means Chuck Schumer's machine is in support of torture, or Clinton's support of Israel using cluster munitions on Lebanese children, so be it, all the while Obama want to steel more from healthcare and education and hand it over to the military. No wonder FOX's owner gave Clinton $20,000,000 good fascists don't grow on trees, it is where they should be hung from.

Many of us Americans can begin to understand what many Brits felt like under New Labour; at least the Aussies have tried making real change at the polls.

Any American that votes Republican or Democrat is a traitor to their country.

Congressman Kucinich and Senator Gravel please vacate the corrupt party you are currently part of, whereas you both have integrity far exceeding the Democratic Party.

It is the lazy-assed Americans that are too busy to read, learn and vote who are to blame; so I for one don't care about their tears for their little military monsters' deaths by good Iraqis who so gallantly are trying to defend their homes from a power more corrupt and murderous than any Saddam.

I for one would like the Iraqi people to know that some of us Americans are on your side. Some of us want peace, and don't support torture. Some of us will not support either Democrats or Republicans while they are building an evil empire out of my country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do they want to torture? Are they Fascists?
Posted by: citizenjoe on Nov 29, 2007 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do they want to torture? Not for gathering intelligence- its a lousy way to find the truth because tortured people say what their torturers want to hear. So why do they torture? Sadism is one small part. The big part is to draw a line between themselves and the people they are torturing: between superior and inferior peoples.The people who we torture are members of societies we can do anything we want to like invade, bomb, and steal their oil. In other words racism and empire are at the basis of torture by Americans. This is fascism pure and simple. Just think about it. These were the views and practices of Hitler an Mussolini. -- Joe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» auto-da-fe Posted by: citizenjoe
Way Out There
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 29, 2007 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to be a WAY-out-there pinko commie lefty pot-smoking tie-die-wearing drug-taking vegetarian long-haired hippy to be in any way against torturing people, even innocent people, these days!
This is what we have become as a society. Torture (TORTURE, for God's sake!) is now mainstream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What did our hero Generals say about torture?
Posted by: PaulC on Nov 29, 2007 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country's people view our military leaders from WWII as close to sainthood. Why is no one resurrecting their values, which I strongly suspect would have been absolutely against torture, in the same way they were against Nazi atrocities? Are there any military historians out there who can quote a Gen. Omar Bradley or a Gen. Eisenhower? That would have more impact than anything today's besotted leaders could say.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tortures OK but Hugging will put teen children in detention!
Posted by: common intelligence on Nov 30, 2007 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a couple of weeks ago the "media" did report that two girls, around 14 years, two seperate instances and locations, where given detention for hugging school mates.

Now compare that to the governement approved torture. Unacountable!

What in hell is wrong here folks? This nation of people doesn't even have the sense and care to send a gawd damn letter to congress in droves to protest this stupid friggin, obvious discrepancy in moral & ethical judgement?

What in hell has American become?

Oh, Diane Feinstein said in a (form) letter to me she won't support impeachment because "...will only divide the country even further, frustrating our hopes for a meaningful change in direction". What kind of moron is she. Meaningful change? Divide the country further?

My gawd, if the sensitivity of the country is divided along the lines of stupid thinking like this the country is already lost.

I'll tell you all what meaningful change is. Get all these assholes out of office now. That would be a meaningful change and it will bring the country together like the fingers of one hand into a fist of fury.

RECALL FEINSTEIN.

Screw censuring her. I just did! See how much good it does?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I pay no mind to Democrats
Posted by: Pick Up Artist 4 Life on Dec 4, 2007 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used to be big on Democrats, but I have recently become aware that it's just a game.

We are tricked to believe we have choice, but the cards are planted.

I am voting for only one person this year. That person is Ron Paul, and yes, he is a conservative.

Diana

---
I make my living in Forex
---

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]