Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Washington Insider to Lead Charge Against Military's Gay Ban

By Deb Price, Creators Syndicate. Posted November 26, 2007.


Despite popular support for lifting "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," it may take a Washington insider to get the job done.
Deb Price

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Deb Price

Congress Learns About Transgender Bias
The June 26th hearing was an important first step in educating Congress about why a federal law protecting transgender employees is sorely needed.
Jun 30, 2008

Gay Marriage Is Supported by a Majority of the Public
One of the most exciting things about the delightful first wave of gay weddings across California was how much the nation took it in stride.
Jun 23, 2008

Governor's Acceptance of Gay Daughter Sends Message of Tolerance
It is important that other prominent African-American politicians follow Governor Deval Patrick's lead and vocally support gay rights.
Jun 16, 2008

More stories by Deb Price

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Imagine flying on Bell Atlantic's private jet in 1997 as the telecom giant's chief congressional lobbyist. You're the sole traveling companion of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Raymond Smith.

With your incredible access, you casually mention that you assume Smith knows you're gay and you'd very much appreciate it if he'd testify before the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee in favor of banning anti-gay job discrimination.

Smith does testify, saying savvy corporations support such workplace protections because "no company can afford to waste the talents and contributions of valuable employees as we compete in a global marketplace." Treating gay workers fairly "is good business and ... good citizenship," he adds.

If you're Aubrey Sarvis, it doesn't take imagination to envision that scenario: He starred in it.

Sarvis enjoys amazing access, thanks to four decades in the corridors of power -- as chief counsel to the Senate Commerce Committee, at Bell Atlantic-turned Verizon and as the head of his own lobbying firm. He's proven he's willing to pull strings to help those of us who're gay.

Now Sarvis has been recruited to lead the charge for ending anti-gay employment discrimination by one of the nation's largest employers, the U.S. military.

"The new president will be our first window," says Sarvis, 63, the new executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, formed in 1993 to provide legal help to gay soldiers entangled in the abusive tentacles of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (sldn.org).

Sarvis has set his sights on getting Congress and the next president to repeal Don't Ask: "I will be concerned if in 2012 we aren't there."

Over the years, SLDN's groundbreaking reports have educated the nation about the damage Don't Ask does to patriotic young gay Americans and to national security: Polls now show most Americans agree that gays should be allowed to serve openly.

Yet repeal will be no easy trick: That anti-gay policy is a federal law. Sarvis' challenge is to persuade Congress -- largely filled with successful, older, white guys like himself -- to get rid of it.

To do that, Sarvis needs to build a critical mass of support in the largely conservative, older and male veterans community.

And the presidential election could replace one stumbling block with another, since the Republican contenders support Don't Ask and are competing to replace George W. Bush as the deliveryman for social conservatives.

All the Democratic contenders pledge to lift the ban. If the front-runner, Hillary Clinton, wins, she'll not only have to deal with the war in Iraq and show that a woman can be a strong commander in chief, but also avoid a run-in with the Pentagon, which, as Bush might put it, gave the last Clinton who tried to make it gay-friendly a "thumping."

So, clearing the hurdles standing in the way of repeal is doable, though difficult. SLDN made a smart tactical move in picking a seasoned Washington insider who enlisted at 17 in the Army and served for three years, much of it in Korea.

Public opinion hasn't yet gotten the ban lifted. But connections forged over decades at Washington cocktail parties and on private flights may be just what it takes to get the job done.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gay, military

Deb Price of The Detroit News writes the first nationally syndicated column on gay issues.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well....
Posted by: CatDad on Nov 26, 2007 9:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that our nation's military is the strong arm of a government that is acting like Imperial Britain and Rome at their worst, I do not support repeal of Don't Ask/Don't Tell...Gay or straight, young people need to stay out of today's military until our predatory foreign policy is reined in (if that can ever happen).

If Slick Mitt gets in...the repeal won't come (in spite of his pledge to be more gay friendly than Ted Kennedy) because he has to pander to the seething-rage crowd. If Billary gets in, you can almost bet that the co-president (Bill) would override any attempts to change the policy...Bill was going around in 2004 encouraging the passage of anti-gay marriage amendments...One of countless examples how the Clinton's will stab their biggest supports in the back. Beside, the Clinton's will bring with them a ton of old baggage to the White House...including difficult memories of how they were tripped up immediately on the gays in the military issue....The issue would go immediately on the back burner...after they have taken the votes of millions of gays/lesbians to get elected to keep those evil Republicans out....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DADT?
Posted by: kelt65 on Nov 27, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is hardly the time to be bringing this ridiculous issue up. No gay person should be serving in the US military, which is a homophobic shitpile of idiocy and murder.

We gays should be pushing for full exemption from selective service and any other military service. Were the Black Panthers pushing for black rights in the military in the 60's? Hell no. The obsession with this issue is absurd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DADT? Posted by: Axiom69