Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The new movie American Gangster reinforces the enduring stereotype that the drug problem comes with a black face.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

"American Gangster" Reinforces American Stereotype

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted November 8, 2007.


The new movie American Gangster reinforces the enduring stereotype that the drug problem comes with a black face.
Advertisement

American Gangster is a big, brash and brilliant cinema tour de force. But it also reinforces a glaring stereotype, in fact, one of America's most enduring stereotypes, and that's that the drug problem and by extension drug kingpins come with a black face. There are two telling scenes in American Gangster that drive that point home with a tormenting vengeance.

The first is near the end of the film when intrepid cop Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe) whose sole mission is to nail black drug lord Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) faces off with the busted Lucas in a police interrogation room. He indignantly lectures Lucas that his dope peddling spread death and destruction that wrecked and ruined hundreds of lives.

In the second scene there is a fleeting glimpse of a white GI shooting up heroin in a Bangkok, Thailand honky tonk serviceman's hang out. Other than that one scene and a flutter look at a white junkie getting whacked by Lucas, there's absolutely no hint that the drug racket, the gangsters that run it, bribe cops and politicians, and put an army of small time dealers, and bag men and women on the street are anything but African-Americans.

Washington as only he can do with a character such as Lucas invests him with a chilling mix of charm, business savvy and raw brutality. That further reinforces the notion that a black man can be bigger, smarter, and more audacious than the organized crime racketeers that in decades past ran and still largely run the drug trade in America. They are the ones that hold an iron grip on the foreign growers and suppliers, the transport, street distribution, and the network of banks that launder the dirty money.

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey on the sex and drug habits of Americans last June further tossed the ugly glare on who controls and who uses drugs in America. The survey found that whites are much more likely to peddle and use drugs than blacks.

Other studies have found roughly equal rates of drug usage by blacks and whites. But what made the CDC survey more eye-catching is that it didn't solely measure generic drug use, but singled out the use of cocaine and street drugs, the kind of drugs that American Gangster depicts the sale of.

The findings fly in the face of the conventional drug war wisdom that blacks use and deal street drugs while whites use trendy, recreational designer drugs, and that these presumably include powder cocaine. That once more calls into question the gaping disparity in drug sentencing between whites and blacks. More than 70 percent of those prosecuted in federal courts for drug possession and sale (mostly small amounts of crack cocaine) and given stiff mandatory sentences are blacks. The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the racial disparities in sentencing.

But that's the morality tale theme that heavily underpins American Gangster. If you're black and you use drugs you'll either die, become a walking zombie, or rot behind bars. And more than likely the guy that sells the junk will skip away scot free, live a princely lifestyle, retire with fabulous wealth and if unlucky enough to get popped cut a deal to rat out crooked cops or competitors.

Lucas did just that and, considering the very real death and destruction that he spread, waltzed away with a relative hand slap sentence. Then in what has to rankle and fascinate gives the supreme self-serving rationale for the dirty dealing by wailing if I didn't do it somebody else would. True to form that's exactly Lucas's fall-back cop-out line in American Gangster.

However, the somebody that Lucas suggested would be the drug boss if not him rarely looked like him. In fact, Lucas and his black competitor who has a cameo role in the film Nicky Barnes, the subject of a recently release documentary, Mr. Untouchable are the rarest of rare birds. Lucas as a black drug boss that supposedly topped the Mafia for control of the drug business in Harlem, through cunning and dumb luck found an opening the Vietnam War, a willing, strategically placed accomplice among the black GIs in Vietnam, and a supplier to get him the drugs and help with the transport.

It all adds up to one thing. The public scapegoat of blacks for America's drug problem during the past two decades has been relentless, and the at all costs hunting down by Richie (Crowe) of Lucas (Washington) in American Gangster is stark testimony to that relentlessness. The greatest fallout from the nation's hopelessly flawed and failed drug hunt for scapegoats is that it makes it easy for on-the-make politicians to grab votes, garner press attention, and bloat state prison budgets to jail more black offenders, while continuing to feed the illusion that we the drug was is winnable. American Gangster won't do anything to change that illusion.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drug dealers, drugs, racism, denzel washington, russel crowe, american gangster

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Go for the white guy with the English accent
Posted by: may261989 on Nov 8, 2007 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That always works. Everyone loves to the see English guy buy the bullet at the end of the film. And no precious sensibilities are insulted ( save for English people with posh accents but who cares about them)
Then again, it might be a hard sell for this role.
They should just make the film with an all white cast next time, o.k sure black actors will find it harder to get a gig ,but hey, its worth it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Earl are you ok?
Posted by: dbodine on Nov 8, 2007 2:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, I realize to you I am part of a huge widespread conspiracy amongst ALL white people to destroy the lives of black people, but....are you feeling alright? I'm not one to advocate self-medication, but perhaps you should consider some Xanax, you seem a little paranoid. I'm just saying, between this article and the one on Dog the Bounty Hunter, you'd think The Revolution was just around the corner.

This story got made into a movie because it's a kickass biography, basically it's like the new Scarface (or perhaps the new New Jack City). Reading into this like you do is like siding with the Republicans who get all bent out of shape over a cartoon - it's a freakin Denzel movie, man, lighten up. If you really want a movie with excellent social commentary on the Drug Problem, don't watch this, go watch Traffic instead, since it directly confronts race issues in drug trafficking - on ALL sides.

Look, don't get me wrong. I do not apologize for racism, it is illogical and terrible. But I do take issue with people who use it as an excuse to live their lives the way they are, no matter how good their intentions. We DO have to learn to live together at some point, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: arl are you ok? Posted by: Enigma
» RE: arl are you ok? Posted by: dbodine
Not sure I see your point, Mr. Hutchinson...
Posted by: Chirico on Nov 8, 2007 2:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always like reading Earl Ofari Hutchinson's work here at Alternet...but I don't know what to make of this one.

I saw AMERICAN GANGSTER, and it is a powerful piece. But I did not see any of the flaws that Mr. Hutchinson was talking about. This is not a slam on him--perhaps he was looking at it through a different viewpoint--but I'm not sure if the fault is mine or his.

AMERICAN GANGSTER _is_ based on the true story of Frank Lucas. Ironically, it was because of this film (or at least the buzz surrounding it) that I actually HEARD about him (the same thing happened to me in regards to "Bumpy" Johnson, who was played by Laurence Fisbourne in HOODLUM). To me, this article seemed to say that what Lucas and Barnes unleashed on Harlem in the late 60's and 70's was not due to them, but to other factors.

Maybe I'm wrong. I could be. Or perhaps I should see the film again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

equal rates of drug usage between whites and blacks
Posted by: dhowser on Nov 8, 2007 3:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it is interesting that the usage of drugs is equal between blacks and whites since according to the cia world factbook the population of the US is as follows: white 81.7%, black 12.9%, Asian 4.2%, Amerindian and Alaska native 1%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.2% (2003 est.)

this would suggest a much higher percentage of drug usage amongst blacks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About American Gangster
Posted by: anonymous black writer on Nov 8, 2007 5:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not know where to start. The movie seems interesting to me. I do not like how the gangster made his money, I question his ostentatious lifestyle like I would any other gangster, and I question other things but I do like one thing about the movie-it shows that a black person was capable of running a prosperous powerful operation without formal education-albeit,illegal,dangerous, and self-destructive in terms of the community. It remind me of Scarface in the Eighties.
Still, the things Earl Ofari Hutchinson mention are true.For one thing, Blacks are often disporportionately seen as criminals in the media .Blacks are seen as the face of crime. Although whites make up at least 70 percent of the users and dealers-one would not know that from the images on the All this reinforce stereotypes about how dangerous and criminal blacks are-which helps to encourage our rising prison rate. In light of all this, Earl Ofari Hutchinson leaves some things to think about.
I understand that people for the most part see movies as mostly entertainment-and nothing else. But the messages do not necessarily need to be ignored since the media/ image on film have impact on the way people are treated. Black people are seen in a few more positive roles than they want in the past but the present climate threatens those gains in addition to nothing else. I have so much to say but I do know how to word it today so I will stop here. I will say that the director's purpose was not necessarily a way to portray black negatively but that happens to some extent by default do to the subject matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't think the movie is the real problem.
Posted by: ahmlco on Nov 8, 2007 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I do think that articles like this one are, as it seems designed simply to throw up more dissent and controversy. Unfortunately, some people can't see anything without imparting their own biases and paranoias on what they see, and then spewing their own bitter vitriol and outrage upon the public.

Based upon a true story or not, it's just a movie. Deal with it. Take a deep breath, and move on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't think the movie is the real problem. Posted by: anonymous black writer
Culture should be analyzed
Posted by: kelt65 on Nov 8, 2007 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not seen the film, but I have to question the people here saying Mr Hutchinson should just "move on" - why do YOU resist analysis of the society in which you live? Don't you ever question the films you see? Are they designed to make you question or think, or to engage you as a passive consumer of propaganda? There's plenty of both, but I assure you the latter is far more popular.

It has been and still is an immense struggle in the US for derided minorities to be heard with an authentic voice, above the noisy din of corporations and the state. All of corporate culture should be ruthlessly analyzed and be shown for what it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EOH is kinda right about this
Posted by: Cesco8 on Nov 9, 2007 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of you make some good points. I watched the movie and I liked it a lot as a gangster movie and also as a black gangster movie. Why?
1- it’s a great film. Ridley Scott and Denzel have done it again. Just a great story, awesome plot, great actors and performances.
2- The reality is that there is racism in America. That’s a fact that can’t be ignored. And as a black man watching that film, you have that in your mind. So, I was proud to watch the story of a black man who was successful; so successful that he got to the summit. He became the best in his domain. Now don’t get me wrong. There is nothing in THAT kind of business that is good (drug, violence, death, murder). Lucas is depicted as a savvy well mannered intelligent hard working, faithful and family oriented black “business man” and a family man. That’s quiet something! Yes he is also a violent man. That’s part of the kind of business he is involved in. But beside that, it’s a very positive model. That’s quiet different from the character played buy the other drug dealer player by Cuba Goodwin Jr.

But EOH also has a point here. Because that movie is about drug, violence and blacks, it de facto reinforces stereotypes. Because there is racism in America. In other words, non-blacks whether racists or ignorant will not see this movie the same way as blacks (or myself). I repeat: it’s a great gangster movie. But because there is racism in America, Americans will see different things beside the fact that it’s a great movie. People who think negative things about blacks will have their thoughts reinforced when it comes to blacks and drugs and crime. They’ll think that the drug problem in America is because of black people. And that’s what EOH is pointing at. Many (whites or whatever) won’t see other things. They’ll only see a great film. But then again I won’t be surprise that the next time some of those movie goers see a well mannered, well dressed, rich black man, Lucas/drug/crime pop-up in their mind. The point is, there is not enough balance in the depiction of blacks on TV, movies …etc.
So I can understand that even such a great movie that to me as a black man shows some very positive stuff about a black man, can also contribute to reinforce negative stereotypes in today’s America. Nobody can honestly ignore that.

We then need more and more movies and TV shows where blacks are shown with positive QUALITIES in positive SITUATIONS/CONTEXTS. American Gangster is a movie about a successful black man with great qualities. The only problem is that the context is negative. And that context can reinforce negatives stereotypes. That’s my understanding of what EOH wanted to say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not much of a point... Posted by: newtype_alpha
» RE: Not much of a point... Posted by: janastasopoulo
» RE: Not much of a point... Posted by: Cesco8
» RE: Not much of a point... Posted by: anonymous black writer
I cannot believe this.
Posted by: g on Nov 9, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With dumb white people hanging nooses all over the place, discrimination, unemployment and incarceration of black males going through the roof, Hutcheson gripes about American Gangster?
Let's make something very clear. The movie is taken from a true story. Frank Lucas' race was *not* made up. If anyone is reinforcing stereotypes, that's Frank Lucas and people like him, not those who tell their stories. Movies and TV shows show non-black drug dealers and addicts all the time. If show business only pictured black addicts and dealers, I'd sympathize with Hutchison. But he seems to think that blacks should *never* be depicted in the bad guy role. This is just preposterous. Get a grip. Remember the boy who cried "Wolf"? You are being the boy who cried "racist!". People stop paying attention because of journalism like yours.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I cannot believe this. Posted by: anonymous black writer
The Image and Reality of Italians & African Americans
Posted by: janastasopoulo on Nov 9, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is absolutely correct in arguing that the film may perpetuate an image of African Americans in a negative light, similar to the way in which Hollywood has portrayed Italians as violent unfeeling and uneducated "goombas" that commit murder for a living.

But the fact of the matter is that American Gangster and several other movies about the Italian mafia are based upon unpalatable , but no less real, realities about American life.

Undoubtedly , movies that stereotype an ethnic group are objectionable at some level but consider how American Gangster differers from similar Italian mafioso flicks and movies that focus on the African American community.
(1) Traditional Italian gangster movies (The Godfather, Goodfellas and perhaps even Donnie Brasco) portray the Italian crime syndicates as organized and steeped in tradition, a quasi-subversive force in society that is to be respected by the viewer.
(2) In crime movies about African Americans, however, African American criminals are usually some kind of stereotypical small time gangsters that kill indiscriminately, are unorganized and are extremely violent. They are portrayed in such a light as to become objects of hatred and scorn from the viewers.

What American Gangster has done is the reverse this equation in (2). Based on a TRUE STORY, the film depicts the rise of an African American gangster to a level where only Italians and maybe even Colombians (Carlito's Way) were raised: the criminal that, regardless of the audience's disgust with what he does, still deserves some degree of admiration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yea, what's new w/ the movie indu$try?
Posted by: MobileSucks on Nov 9, 2007 2:16 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man, a lot of black people love a gansta movie. White kids too. I wanna to say most blacks, but hell if I know if it's really most African-Americans that dig some gantster shit up on the screen or not. It's most young blacks for sure. Scarface is cultural icon and great hero figure. And that's kind of funny cause of all the supposed (and no doubt some real!) hating going on between blacks and Latinos. Anyway.

Hollywood is and always will be greedy, profit driven... making movies is a business, plain and simple. We all know this. When I heard about this story I couldn't believe Hollywood hadn't made it already, like back in the 90s! Badass black ganster that's self made and above the Italians and everybody!? Is Denzel available? Cha-ching!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Higher drug usage rates among blacks?
Posted by: janastasopoulo on Nov 9, 2007 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not entirely sure that this is true, but assuming that it was, it is simply not because blacks are black, it is because blacks still continue to be marginalized economically, that drug usage, drug selling and joining a gang are the only viable ways to make money. I did a small study on this topic a while back, trying to understand if drug usage was correlated to poverty. What I found was shocking: the state with the highest drug usage in the country was Alaska, which also happens to be one of the poorest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gent258
Posted by: rerses on Nov 9, 2007 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I enjoyed Denzel Washington's performance in "American Gangster." Has he ever given anything less than a stellar performance? It is as nuanced and complex as real human beings are. The same man who blows out the brains of a competitor is kind and tender with his mother and wife. Washington plays the role superbly.
The real revelation is one that was given years ago in Al Pacino's "Serpico." We could solve the drug problem in America if we wanted to solve it; however, police corruption is rampant. As one character says in the movie: "Too many people make money off the drug trade: dealers, lawyers, judges, police officers, etc.
Of course, we could legalize drugs as they do in the Netherlands and remove the profit for the criminal element. The chances of snow in July in Miami are better than that ever happening in hypocritical America.
"American Gangster" is a film worth watching and discussing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Casting Creates Social Interpretations Thus Enforcing Stereotypes.
Posted by: SirWolfie on Nov 9, 2007 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would the casting of say, David Spade as Frank Lucas and say, Eddie Murphy as Richie Roberts reinforce a different American Stereotype? Is it the artist’s responsibility to provide a primer for every piece of work created?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more drug war failure
Posted by: eldoradoman1953 on Nov 9, 2007 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the truth about drug war is not about what the dealers and suppliers make on drugs .but the enormous profits the system and police make carrying out this fake war on drugs the police have become despicable profiteers in human misery

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Based on TRUE STORY
Posted by: Turkiye on Nov 9, 2007 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot tell you in what way African-American's were portrayed in this film, all I know is this is a movie based on a man from the 70's that cut out the white middle-man and was known for good product.
There are more than enough, heroin, crack, powder cocaine, LSD, meth, users and dealers that are white. Quite a few flicks made about them in past five years.
Did you want the screenwriter to make the man white? My 30 year old is Afro-centric Cuban, my 18 year old is Turkish Muslim, lots of bad things said, movies made about Latino/a's and Muslims. I am a mutt, Irish/Scandinavian/Dutch. The movie 'The Departed', lots 'o bad Irish there, not to mention the old, hey, are you IRA?
Truth/Reality based novels turned films are not made to inflame racial tension's, normally, assured NORMALLY. Should Malcolm X have been made into a film? After the NOI, Nation of Islam is shown for who they are. Muslim family, 50% of it, should I have insisted they made all al Islam practicer's be shown as most are, conservative and moderate?
Sometimes things are really what they are, not what we want them to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Based on TRUE STORY Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: Based on TRUE STORY Posted by: anonymous black writer
A tale of two criminals- Willie Horton and John Gotti
Posted by: Woodpecker on Nov 10, 2007 2:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't seen "American Gangster" yet but if it's anything like "New Jack City", it indicates just how racist the discourse on crime in America is- street criminals like Willie Horton become the equivalent of the Devil whereas organised crime bosses like the late John Gotti( and before him Al Capone) are lionized as folk heroes!

Terry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Saw This Movie Last Night...
Posted by: Snackattacka on Nov 10, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and became depressed and sickened during and after I saw it. Maybe I expected more of an "action" picture-styled treatment of Lucas' reign; what I got was a slow, boring, torture or a regular cop-crime drama crossed with what we already know goes on in Harlem even still today. In 2007, for me to have to sit through yet another form of black exploitation film since the 70s, while the exploitation of minorities continues with a vengeance up in Harlem (and the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and right outside the downtown theatre for that matter), was a slap in the face.

Harlem is a mess. Black people are all but off the map. The young are walking around in doo rags, jeans and down coats. You can't find the middle class. No one wears skirts, pearls, wool slacks, decent attire. What Lucas was wearing. The new condos are here and only white people are darting in and out of them with the credit to afford the mortgage. Still, the black dealers still populate every corner with hoodies on or patrol their areas in Escalades. '70s was Frank Lucas and heroin, '80s was crack cocaine. It's 2007. My question is: who is the new Frank Lucas?

All of this is on purpose. Which is the reason viewers should stop viewing Lucas as the pinnacle of the film the way the movie depicts. Instead, view BET's (Black Entertainment Television) "American Gangster" series documentary on Frank Lucas. After that, the movie itself will just break down in to 2.5 hour long saga reviewing the misery of our people in their destruction under drugs, at no matter whose hands. Which in the case of the documentary, viewers will learn it is really the CIA that facilitates Lucas and his connection to his Thailand drug connection and arranges his distribution. Doesn't that make better and complete sense?

No black man or any other state-side person is going to go overseas and arrange for anything to be imported into this country on a regular, illegal and grand basis without government imprint. And, why wouldn't the CIA, as usual, be happy to network a drug supplier with such an effective, "smart", "charismatic", black gangster that would be so good as killing his own people. In corporate environments, in hiring, its called a good match.

Stop calling American Gangster a "brilliant" "ingenious" blockbuster or whatever superlatives they're throwing at it. It was what it was. Lucas with a few psychotic violent flare-ups, some brief PG/R violent killings, etc. Give me a break. Come up to Harlem right now.

Apart for its run of the mill content, it looked low budget, made for tv. With commercials. And it still made me sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just Saw This Movie Last Night... Posted by: anonymous black writer
Enjoyed the movie, but I see the authors point
Posted by: fiddler83 on Nov 10, 2007 2:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just saw the movie last night and I thought it was quite good, but I understand what the author is saying. How many movies can you name that have the white low level street dealers? Now how many can you name that have black low level street dealers?

I thought there were two interesting points made in the movie:
One: There's a line where Russel Crowe actually admits the futility of what he's doing. The government doesn't want to stop the war on drugs because if they were actually able to stop all the drugs thousands and thousands of people would lose their jobs.

The other is that: Frank Lucas's help lead to the arrest of 75% of the NY DEA! I started laughing when I saw that. That's insane. And if you think its so different now, you've got to be joking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marcy S.
Posted by: Marcy on Nov 10, 2007 7:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article could have used an editor. I'm appalled by the omitted words, mis-typed words, and just plain messiness of the whole damn thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just in Time for the Election
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Nov 11, 2007 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We always need election year scapegoats so politicians can pose as tough on crime, when white collar crime actually dwarfs street crime in its impact. But we'll keep passing draconian laws that make us #1 in the world in incarcerations because it wins elections. Maybe this film is just a two hour Willie Horton advertisement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Response to Daniel1892, Elucid and Annoynous
Posted by: Snackattacka on Nov 11, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone in their response couldn't understand why a black man (or, black men) is not capable of arranging a large foreign drug importation scheme without consent of our government. They didn't even see the need for the government's participation in such a thing.

Well, I see both of you just proved my point. We didn't need this film to perpetuate the marginalization of our people, especially in this climate, as a tongue-in cheek, nostalgic retrospective crescendo to their polishing us off.

As for your debate about the Italians and the point about them being prosperous and organized and why or why not we can't pull off the same level of power and corruption without consent, well... that was my point about the CIA assisted drug shipments. One would have to be completely naive to believe we, much less a single person, has that much power, prowess, information, organization, assistance, protection, strategization on a large scale with foreign and illegal drug importation on a continuous basis without central intelligence. As I said, see the documentary, "American Gangster" on distributed by Black Entertainment Television (Google it) and stop being beguiled by the fantasy "facts" of the movies. In the documentary, Lucas sheepishly grins with an OJ Simpson-like smile mixed with bravado and embarassment when asked if his operation was all his doing and conceivement because it wasn't. When asked the follow-up question about involvement of CIA operatives and their arrangement of his meetings with Asian officials and distribution channels he still grins and sheepishly shrugs his shoulders. Check it out.

That's for your question: why not? There are plenty of ways a black man can find out who he is before he starts believeing he can rob a bank or put on a cape and fly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: esponse to Daniel1892, Elucid and Annoynous Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: esponse to Daniel1892, Elucid and Annoynous Posted by: anonymous black writer
Flip side
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 12, 2007 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually got the opposite out of the production. Finally a gangster movie where the protagonist is black. As for the idea that a drug movie featuring blacks is solely reinforcing a stereotype, I'd like to ask Earl where the heck has he been for movies such as Blow, Scarface, and Goodfellas? The drug gangsters in those films were not black.

Are we at that point of political correctness where no movie can be made that portrays blacks in a negative light? Will all films made hereon out have to feature Jackie Chanesque gangs that are either comprised solely of giant Nordic white guys or amalgamation gangs with one person of every size, shape and color?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]