Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Duane Chapman, a.k.a. the Bounty Hunter, got the temporary ax from his A&E show after a hate-filled rant against black women. But he deserves to be shown the door for good.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Hysterical Defense of "Dog the Bounty Hunter" Tells Much about America's Racial Backslide

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted November 5, 2007.


Duane Chapman, a.k.a. the Bounty Hunter, got the temporary ax from his A&E show after a hate-filled rant against black women. But he deserves to be shown the door for good.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"I am sick and tired of people like you and the phony and fake Al Sharpton who go after white people who say something you don't like and then using the excuse ... it degrades black women, etc."

That was one of the tamer emails I got when I called for A&E Television to cancel outright the "Dog the Bounty Hunter" show. We all know by now what round em' up and bring em' back alive Duane Chapman aka the Bounty Hunter did to get the temporary ax.

He let fly a "B" and "N" word laced rant and borderline threatening oaths at his son for having the temerity to date a black woman. A&E "suspended" production of the show. That was a weak, tepid, and vacillating response. And I told why. Dog's comments about black women are more than just gender and racially demeaning and hurtful to black women. They are a vicious attack on and call to end interracial relations, as well as an incitement to violence. Dog the Bounty Hunter's' statement was far more damaging than shock jock Don Imus's.

I frontally challenged A&E and said that suspension of the show is not enough. A&E can send the strong message that the sentiments he expressed will not be tolerated by immediate cancellation of the show.

The suspension I also said is simply a cover your butt holding action by A& E that left the door wide open for Dog to climb back on the airwaves. That prospect was even more real and fresh in mind with the announcement the day before by Citadel Broadcasting that shock Jock Don Imus had cut a deal with the network and would be back on board December 3.

A&E might and probably would do the same once the furor died down. The reason is simple. Dog tinkles the cash registers for A&E. It's a network that in the past few years has transformed itself from a station that prided itself on high brow, educational faire into a channel that now routinely churns out reality type schlock to makes a buck.

But the hysterical defense of Dog and the bile emails this writer got has nothing to do with A&E or even the hunt down the bad guys thrill and titillation of Dog the Bounty Hunter. It has everything to do with the blame the victim with a vengeance mania of far too many whites toward blacks. Think about it.

If Dog were black and had unloosed a string of expletive laced white "B"s at his son for dating a white woman, there would have been a national outcry. A&E would have instantly and permanently pulled the plug on the show. And the Dog would have never in this life graced any studio in America.

There would have been no talk of forgiveness, or let by gones be by gones, and he's suffered enough prattle. He would have been the enduring fount of evil and eternal symbol of bigotry and intolerance. Just ask former Grey's Anatomy star Isaiah Washington or ex NFL superstar Michael Vick It's also evident in the backlash to the Jena 6 case in Louisiana and from Genarlow Wilson's case in Georgia. Two cases where young blacks were harshly charged with alleged crimes against whites. Many turned silly, verbal summersaults to rationalize, duck and dodge and ultimately justify the racial injustice against them.

It's no surprise why. During the past two decades, the drumbeat of black bashing, stereotyping, negative typecasting, and vilification of young blacks has ballooned into a lucrative growth industry in much of the talking head media. The hunt and scrounge for any excuse no matter how threadbare to justify racial abuse and injustice is relentless.

The battle over shock jock Don Imus was and is a near classic example of the let the villain off the hook syndrome. When Imus was initially canned polls showed a majority of whites waffled on or flat out dismissed his slurs as a right to free speech, or insisted that a hand slap suspension was enough. The pulsating demand for his return to the airwaves never ended. Now that he's back, he's hailed as a virtual conquering hero by his legions of admirers.

The same is happening with Dog. He issues a contrite statement, and a belated apology, and his manic defenders wail that he's touts Christian redemption. That's more than enough for them to bestow total absolution on him if not make him into an honored figure that has suffered enough. Then in the even more perverse and bizarre twist, leap at the chance to fling the standard name calls of demagogue, race baiter and clown at perennial punching bag Al Sharpton for blasting Dog's tirade.

Washington and Vick did the same tear jerk mea culpa as Dog but it didn't soften any public hearts toward them. It shouldn't with Dog either.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bounty hunter, a&e

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book is The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's not right ...
Posted by: TheRob101 on Nov 5, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You seem to leave out Michael Richards' experience, he's publicly apologized yet people still hate him. It's unfair to point the finger at society and cry out about racial double standards without showing the whole picture. Also, Michael Vick was ostracized for animal cruelty, and a lot of people in America (sadly) care more about animals than human beings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's not right ... Posted by: dbodine
» RE: It's not right ... Posted by: donl51
the "n" word
Posted by: buddy1 on Nov 5, 2007 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, it's a hateful, despicable word that should NEVER be used. By anyone, at any time. But the way I see it, part of the problem seems to be the black comedians who desensitize America to its historical meaning by using the word liberally in their acts.

Why is it funny when a black man says it and deplorable when a white man says it? It should be deplorable to EVERYONE, instead of guessing what is in the heart of each person who uses the word.

Dog had a right to say whatever he wanted in a PRIVATE conversation with his son. If you listened to the "entire" (I put that in quotes, because the ENTIRE conversation between BOTH father and son wasn't released - we haven't heard the conversation from "Hi son, it's me, Dad" or however he started the conversation) tape recording, Dog explains more than once what HE means by using the word.

Why are people so quick to judge him and bascially say "no, that's not what he meant - he meant the other thing just because he's a white man saying it." Dog didn't know that the tape would be released, so he wasn't explaining it for the thousands of people who would listen to it. He was trying to explain to his son what he thought of ONE black woman - the one his son was dating, and who allegedly was threatening the family.

Isn't it also racism to assume what someone means by something they say based purely on their RACE? Dog has always admitted that he grew up around "bad influences", and spent time in prison - and heard the word over and over again in his experiences. If he knew that he couldn't refrain himself from saying the word because of how he grew up, at least he TRIED to do the next best thing - by using it to mean ignorant and intollerant PEOPLE, and explaining how he was using it.

As for the apology that you claim came "too late", he had already apologized to his son and girlfriend for using the word PRIOR to the tape being sold. And since his use of the word was directed at ONE PERSON and not the whole race, he did what he should have done and apologized to the parties involved.

If Tucker hadn't illegally sold the conversation (yes, in Hawaii it is legal to tape a private conversation with the consent of only one party, but it is ILLEGAL to disseminate the conversation publically), would you still have expected Dog to apologize to the world for what he said in the heat of anger - even if no one ever had found out what he had said?

As for the right to free speech argument, I wholeheartedly agree with it! What gives the American Nazi Party the constitutional right to walk through the streets of a largely Jewish town (ie. Skokie, IL) spewing racially charged words and take that right away from a man using an unfortunate word in a private conversation with his son? When you can successfully answer me that, I'll give up the "free speech" argument.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the "n" word Posted by: luvjanis
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: Reba
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: dharmatrainwreck
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: brown1
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: zipinbye13
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: monkeesilly
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: QS69
» RE: the "n" word Posted by: ddsharper
Freedom of Speech
Posted by: Shellz on Nov 5, 2007 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has the right to call whoever, whatever he wants, no matter how bad that it is.

Sign this petition that's going to A&E:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/petition/320722340

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Freedom of Speech Posted by: jupiter9
Just A Private Conversation Calling Someone Out For Being Different
Posted by: hole11 on Nov 5, 2007 4:50 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the word nigger is so bad that if someone uses it they get fired? Amazing. And a private conversation too. Sounds to me like someone has a copyright on this word.

Can you imagine if you called someone Disney and then the owners of ABC (sorry can't think of many owners of the media right now), fired you? Can you imagine that? Doesn't matter what color your skin is but you do have masters that will buy your private conversations and use them to fire you.

It's bad enough that some dupe like Hutchinson jumps through corporate hoops so that his inner most thoughts will never be revealed. But yes, I can imagine black people calling white bitches hoes or whatever but I never hear them getting fired for some reason.

Have fun jumping through those hoops. Just know that I am judging you by your ability and not your families historical upbringing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For "Christs" sake
Posted by: serp450 on Nov 5, 2007 5:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I surfed the internet today to look at the reverse. Black racism towards whites. There seemed to be plenty of "I hate white people"remarks - My "research" was not as a means to excuse or deny peoples angst but merely to explore the jokes and epithets levelled from the other direction as being equally untenable.
In short I was dismayed by the huge amount out there. There are joke sites,blogs, all sorts of angry responses to the white community.
So it occurred to me that there is a divide and always will be a divide pontificate all you like but the US was born on racist mantra and continues to thrive today - not a position perhaps to give in and throw in the towel but I feel harbouring so much blame towards The Bounty Hunter is unsound.
Some African American families I am sure would have issue with their own dating Caucasians the reverse is also true.
Is this prejudiced? - probably but then again a reality.
There is also an issue of relevance - private conversations are just that - surely if we are honest we have all said something at some point about someone that if made public we would be ashamed of? If thats true which I believe is so, then this media frenzy on The Bounty Hunter is a trifle hypocritical. But the media does love to be the harbinger of all things moral.
If the argument is to be that "dog" is a public figure and he should be accountable - I'd agree if this recording was made in a public forum. The fact that his son recorded it was done for money and effect - the effect of hurting his father.
With all this in mind - I don't see what the point is of driving a wholly bigger issue against one man..surely the media/government should spend a little more time creating a country that is less prone to such things ...now that would be a topic worth persuing and not cheapening the bigger topic by berating a former con from Texas for Christ's sake. Did I say Christ? Perhaps he should judge not the Enquirer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For "Christs" sake Posted by: Rychediel
racist comment
Posted by: luvjanis on Nov 5, 2007 5:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i wonder why dbodine's comment was even posted when " a straight up ignorant REDNECK" comment is clearly racist. i thought you couldnt post racist comments on here but i guess its ok since its not the N word

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: racist comment Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: racist comment Posted by: Vik
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» link to racist rap lyrics Posted by: EasterBunny
» RE: hutchinson is clueless and whiny Posted by: revwillnotbetelevised
» RE: hutchinson is clueless and whiny Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
if dog had been black....
Posted by: buddy1 on Nov 5, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must disagree with your comment "It has everything to do with the blame the victim with a vengeance mania of far too many whites toward blacks."

Perhaps you are not familiar with the case in California after the "Rodney King riots". A white truck driver, Reginald Denny, was just doing his job driving his truck, when he got stopped in the wrong place at the wrong time.

A group of black men pulled him out of his cab, and beat his head in with bricks to within an inch of his life. Their defense in court? "Black Rage." And guess what? The jury bought it and set them free!

If a black man attacks a white man and claims "black rage", then his actions are ok? But if a white man uses the n word during a private conversation, then crucify the man! Take away his AND HIS FAMILY'S livelihood! Make him pay until the day he dies!

Something is wrong with this picture, and America....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: if dog had been black.... Posted by: miked21atl
» RE: if dog had been black.... Posted by: niliadis
Racism never died
Posted by: kelt65 on Nov 5, 2007 6:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was merely shamed.

And it's coming back with a vengeance.

Has anyone noticed the similarity between these racists, and say gays, or other minorities? They are claiming that they're wounded, shamed, unable to express themselves. They're actually daring to position themselves socially as oppressed people.

We live in dangerous times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: acism never died Posted by: Rychediel
dee
Posted by: Deanna Maria Weakly on Nov 5, 2007 8:20 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big duane dog chapman would be quite surprized to know not only is his son tucker attractive for black women. WE watch Tv too! His son Leland with all those great tats is a nice specimen to view, he's a favorite of many women of color. I always told my family that Mr. Chapman had a problem with blacks I just knew it. Ijust knew it I watched the show waiting for him to slip. But, of course there were never blacks on his show & he never arrested blacks. I think alot of his feeling comes from his days langushing in prison. I mean he had to blame some one for being Big bubbas little girlfriend!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dee Posted by: Enigma
» RE: dee Posted by: monkeesilly
» RE: dee Posted by: QS69
» RE: dee Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: dee Posted by: CabotWitch
The dreaded "N" word
Posted by: SassySmurfy on Nov 5, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's amazing how much media something like this can cause. We have wars going on over seas, we have fires burning half of California, we have rapists on the streets, and everyone gets fired up over a conversation a television bounty hunter has with his son, which wasn't even supposed to be public.
I think what I find most disturbing is response:
Why is it ok for a black entertainer to use the "N" word, yet when a white person uses it, hysteria breaks out?
Why do we fight to get Dog the Bounty Hunter taken off of TV because he used the "N" word in an argument with his son, yet promote the young black entertainer with CDs full of the word?
It's ok for an entertainer or a comedian to use the phrase... IF they're black themselves. It's ok for someone of the same race to use it for humor or to make a point. It's even ok for someone of the same race to use it as a form of greeting a friend.
The ONLY reason this is causing an uproar is because he's not black. That in itself is racist, don't you think? I do.
I don't think everyone that uses the word is using it in a disrespectful mannor. Otherwise, most of the black people I know are VERY disrespectful toward their own race. I realize to some this is an offensive word. But then again, so is the word B*&CH, yet we allow that to be said, even on TV. Everyone is so obsessed with being politically correct, yet something is always going to be offensive to someone.
Until a black person uses the word and gets this type of reaction, I don't think taking someone off the air is fair. Otherwise, why don't we remove all the Cd's and boycot the singers that use it? Why don't we take all the comedians that have used it off the stage? Instead of trying to ruin their career, which is what people are trying to do to Dog the Bounty Hunter, we promote it and support it.
Why don't we cause an uproar when a black person says it? Until we do, I think this type of reaction is uncalled for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The dreaded "N" word Posted by: Enigma
» RE: The dreaded "N" word Posted by: Shamus
Black Dog down?
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 5, 2007 11:20 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Dog were black and had unloosed a string of expletive laced white "B"s at his son for dating a white woman, there would have been a national outcry.

I disagree. I think a black dog could've gotten away with it. And I'm having a hard time understanding how an immediate and indefinite suspension of a TV show mid-season can be constituted as a "tepid" response. You suspend, then evaluate. You allow the suspended a chance for explanation, reconciliation and forgiveness and then you decide whether it's worth it to keep him off air. Sort of like trial by TV executives.

After all, what he said was private. Imagine if we had access to every private conversation of every TV show personality who has ever existed. Now imagine we fired all of them for every racist, sexist or otherwise bigoted comments they had ever made. There'd be no TV left, likely.

It's not that I disagree with the suspension, really. It's just I don't see the value of going into hysterics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Black Dog down? Posted by: 747btrfly
» RE: Black Dog down? Posted by: Joe
Time to be thoughtful
Posted by: talkville on Nov 6, 2007 4:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Hutchinson would like to remove, one-at-a-time these recent recurring "accidents" in media related mainly to race and racism.

It's instructive to carefully compare the similarities and differences in this "Dog" occurrence (in time and in place) with the occurrence of the Imus event. In the case of Dog, it has a very curious aura of 'constructedness' and the appearance of an 'artifact' about it. Read carefully the text of the 'intercepted phone call and the exact wording of this 'Dog's) reprehensible communication.

There's 'The White" sphere, 'The Black" sphere and the 'Hispanic' sphere IN PLAY in the last couple of years, a heightened attention to 'race relations'. These are occurring WITHIN each sphere as well as AMONG each sphere. As always in these cases, it is the "White" sphere which is the pivot point (couched in current contexts of 'diversity', 'multiculturalism' and "relativism" - e.g. the Kulturkampf of Mr O'Reilly and his ilk).

As always, Power is involved in it's many faceted dimensions and elections are approaching soon.

I would like to ask Mr Hutchinson, who is most likely to benefit in the realms of Power-relations if Hispanics are maintained struggling with Blacks (immigration, labor and such) and both are maintained struggling with Whites? (I do not for a second think that analyses based on race are fundamentally sound nor categories based on them -yet, sadly their here for some time to come). I suggest a strong possibility that a particular and specific section of White cultural and theological thinking is the most likely to benefit and to remain 'holding the reins' of this wagon which is our society. Divide and conquer, over and over again; tried and true and deadly effective every time.

The 'moral' and 'values' aspects in our society are undeniably in need of discussion, debate and attention. But the conditions large sectors of the 300 million of us, in their flesh and blood conditions (which, after all are the 'holders' of this or that 'morality' are daily degrading further in their material well-being. Based on the preaching and admonitions of many comfortable, prosperous and leisurely positioned thinkers and intellectuals.

People barely fed, barely housed, barely healthy, working 10 hrs a day to just keep a house-hold (oikos) going, have very minimal time to sit and consider the lofty niceties and refinements of moral and theological philosophies, especially when the contradictions of their life conditions are so intimately inter-woven with precisely those very same philosophies.

Taking people who use 'the N word', who express reprehensible and vicious views of others, one at a time is going to take a long, long, LONG time. Meanwhile, it's the Sixteen Tons song sinking deeper and deeper and adding more and more people into the rolls of the Preached To.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Earl Ofari Hutchinson's "Rant"
Posted by: remeredyth on Nov 6, 2007 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lighten up people....one private conversation is NOT going to have any real impact on interacial relalationships unless we give it a hyperbolic importance by blowing it way the hell out of proportion. Mr. Hutchinson as a journalist should know better even if he doesnt know better as a human being .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: arl Ofari Hutchinson's "Rant" Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Dog Is Not A Racist
Posted by: CMorvant on Nov 6, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allow me to begin with a question....When did bugging a phone become legal? I was always told that you had to warn a person that a phone conversation was being taped for it to be totally legal to do so, otherwise it fell under the laws against "bugging" a phoneline. This was a private conversation between Mr. Chapman and his son, he had no knowlege that the conversation was being taped, therefore I would check into the legality of the whole thing.
Another point I would like to make is that, even after hearing the conversation, is that the so called "N" word is not just used by caucassion people, it is used by black people to describe persons within thier own race. Has anyone listened to music, especially Rap and Hip-Hop, the "N" word (as well as a few other racially and sexually charged epiphets) is used to excess in that type of music, yet I do not see music labels pulling Snoop Dogg or Eminem for spewing such things in thier lyrics. Also, I do not see anyone taking black comedy acts off of the air when predominately black commedians use the same terms to describe persons within thier own race. So, where is A&E in the right for pulling Dog The Bounty Hunter for utilizing so-called racial epiphets in a PRIVATE CONVERSATION that he had no knowlege was being taped?
Did the major networks pull WWE television programs after advertisers started pulling thier ads after complaints about violence in thier programming? NO. So why pull Dog's show after using "a few choice words" over the phone with his son?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dog Is Not A Racist Posted by: buddy1
Michael Vick had nothing to do with racism
Posted by: BitcoDavid on Nov 6, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Vick tortured and killed innocent animals. If a white guy had been caught doing the same thing, I'd hope he'd get the chair, as well. Dogs give us unconditional love, and undying admiration. In short, they give us, freely and without quarter, the whole of their lives, and anyone who'd abuse that symbiosis deserves whatever punishment they get.

Using racism as a defense for this unconscionable activity is wrong minded, and unfair. Let's focus the discussion on the thousands of disenfranchised voters, who were truly victims of racism, so that Bush could assure his victory in Florida. Perhaps we could start working towards sentencing equity in the courts, or putting an end to the inane "War on Drugs."

There are a plethora of valid examples of debilitating racist policies, perpetrated by the government and ignored by the media, but Micheal Vick's abuse of dogs is not one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drop It - It Was Illegal
Posted by: tommy1957 on Nov 6, 2007 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read many of the comments and was surprised by the vile lyrics of some rappers. I doubt these rappers were ever victims of white violence, but it is possible they had experience black or black violence. The reason for most racist comments on blacks in a public forum is to cause a reaction to support the racist’s goals. However, racism is not a one-way street. I have been privy to many racist comments from African Americans throughout my life. Sometimes I shot back, others I kept quiet. If we want to end racism in America, we need to attack it from all corners (all races) and not just pretend that it is a white issue. As far as Mr. Chapman's dilemma, his fate should not be determined by those with an agenda. He apologized to his son and his girl friend, which is all he should have to do. No man has the right to claim judgment over another’s personal prejudices unless that man intends to and/or makes it a public issue. In this case, Mr. Chapman, who was raised in an environment of racism, has not publicly stated he hates people of different races and/or supports this concept. Therefore he can not be held accountable, unless all personal conversations of people can and will be used against them. That would be a violation of the US Constitution. This situation should be handled by A&E; and I believe they should weigh the factors from a business point of view; not whether he was right or wrong. Why because this was an illegal act. I do not watch the show that Mr. Chapman is the “Star”. Not really my kind of entertainment. I am a white liberal, who was victimized by blacks in my past. I realized after a long period of time, that they were individual who did not represent a race, but rather themselves. I am married to a Hispanic woman who I have loved for more than 20 years.
Thank You

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rediculous...
Posted by: LANCE on Nov 6, 2007 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that most of the responses are along the line of, 'They do it so why can't we?'

George Bush's appointment of Condi Rice was racist simply because he chose her for her race. She sure brought nothing with her in the way of experience or knowledge of diplomacy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get a Life
Posted by: weslen1 on Nov 6, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. is practicing torture while saying it's not torture if the President says so.
We are on the verge of another war.
Americans are going hungry.
Children have no health care.
Our government is run by the most corrupt people alive today.
Congress is about to give the nod to a man who says he will uphold the constitution except when his president doesn't want him to.
On and on and on. And instead of worrying about all of that, all you can do is spend your time worrying about someone calling one girl a nasty name.
So how about firing every person in this country who has ever in their LIFE said something to OFFEND another person. Whether in a PRIVATE conversation on the phone or in public during a fight in a bar or on the street. Let's just get rid of ALL of them. Everybody stay in your homes and keep your mouths SHUT. I won't talk to YOU and DON'T YOU DARE TALK TO ME. Every person in the WORLD has, AT SOME TIME IN HIS OR HER LIFE, said SOMETHING that has offended another. Some a whole lot worse.
The point is that even though you have every right to be angry and disgusted when anyone uses that N word or any other that offends another you should not be spending your time and energy being the world censer. Spend it instead calling out the true wrongs, the intentional wrongs. Jena was a good example because some of those kids were taught from birth to HATE for no good reason.
But what we ALL really NEED, white OR black is our true leaders to speak against torture, the North American Union, the war we're embroiled in and the one to come, health care for children and adults who are ill, and for our troops who are getting the shoddiest care or none at all after they are wounded in Bush's Folly. Speak out about a nominee for Attorney General who says he will allow the president to decide what the law is and go along with whatever HE says, who refuses to call torture torture because that would be admitting that this president ORDERS torture to be committed in the NAME of the United States.
So many things.
Something said in anger in a private conversation does not represent that person's whole life attitude. So just don't watch. Let me tell you, Hannity, Limbaugh, Krystol, Buchanan, Colter, Cheney, Lott, Gingrich, Beck, and so many others offend me every day. I turn the channel. Stop making one nasty word the most important thing in the world. It's NOT.
I was offended by the comments that some black females were saying after the Imus thing. And that was that they were more offended by the phrase "nappy headed" than by the word "HO". To ME, that was the same as saying "Oh, it's perfectly OK to call me a whore. Just don't INSULT MY HAIR." Do YOU see something a little SCREWY in that?
All I'm trying to say is that a true racist is more likely to come up, shake your hand, pat you on the back, lather on the praise, and then go to their real friends and laugh and brag about how they fooled you. Duane Chapman is NOT that kind of person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get a clue Posted by: DesertStone
» Stay on the Subject Posted by: disgustedbyallofu
» RE: Get a Life Posted by: MFrog
It can only happen here!
Posted by: Orientalist on Nov 6, 2007 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Taking advantage of peoples situation!
The whole show stinks long way and is entertainment mostly for very ignorant people. The show is very degrading and shows that they are willing to do anything to make $$$$$$$!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's stop being coy and protecting those who use the slanderous term.
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Nov 6, 2007 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's stop being coy and protecting those who use the slanderous term. Stop calling it the "N"-word. It is just as vulgar as Fuck and the term "fucking" is used repeatedly in the conversation, not replaced with the "nicety"-the "F'-word. Take it back and embarrass the hell out of those ignorant enough to use it.

If Duane "Dog" Chapman admits that he has raised his family in such racist conditions that the word "nigger" is used so frequently that it will endanger his career for son, Tucker, to date a black woman, for fear that they be exposed for the "reality" of their "mission," it speaks volumes. A&E apparently sees that Nigger is not just a term tossed around the house to swear, but an inherent belief system that lies deep at the heart, if unconsciously, of the entire "DOG THE BOUNTY HUNTER" series and entity.

Nigger should STOP being relegated to the "NICETY" of "the n-word" to make bigoted white people feel better about their personal use and the history of it's use in the past. It is time to claim the term and use it JUDICIOUSLY---JUSTICE.

Dick Gregory does not want his book called, "The N-word." There is a reason he called it, "NIGGER;" remember that and stop letting the white press and those trying to cleanse their souls of past histories "euphemize" and thus "euthanize" a word that tortured and continues to be used to torture and demean an entire race of people to this day.

If you continue to placate the white population that took the French word for black "negro" and turned it into a slur, by saying, "you know, the N-word." Sooner or later, your own children will ask, "What is the "N-word?" And then how will you explain your capitulation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

john l.
Posted by: JOHN L. on Nov 6, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The explicit tone of the majority of comments here defend the "private" attitude of this brutish thug, just as defenders of the "cool" slug Imus, that most of our estemed big name millionaire "journalists" LOVE to rub up to.
The most common retort is "Why can"t whites use the dispicable N-word freely as (some) blacks do?"
The REASON is, ugly as the term (coined by racist whites), whites don't have Standing.
Blacks, by virtue of their entire history with whites have been shit on constantly, enslaved, tortured, robbed and slaughtered. THATS WHY.
Our heroic whites have turned a fairly gentle public into one that lusts for the most inane and indefensible main stream media cheap crap imaginable.
MOST everything being sold to us all is based on the crudest violence to promote the sleazyist profits imaginable, and most of the letters above demonstrate the increadible ignorance of the US public.
I'm deeply ashamed of the face this country shows to the world, who by the way are rightfully becoming fed up with our arrogance and general stupidity, our lies and violence.
9/11 should have been a wake-up call, instead it has been used to accelerate our war against the world, against civilization as we wish it to be, against the enviroment and life itself.
We will certainly reap what we sow.
~74 year old US retired military veteran

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

give me a break!!
Posted by: cornetts on Nov 6, 2007 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2 things:
1. "If Dog were black and had unloosed a string of expletive laced white "B"s at his son for dating a white woman, there would have been a national outcry." - that is a bunch of bull!

2. "He would have been the enduring fount of evil and eternal symbol of bigotry and intolerance. Just ask former Grey's Anatomy star Isaiah Washington or ex NFL superstar Michael Vick" - i'm sorry, are we comparing the seriousness of what michael vick did to someone that said a horrible word during a private (and none of our business in the first place) phone conversation? Someone that slays innocent beings for sport, money and fun IS an eternal symbol of evil and intolerance, no matter his/her race!!! Someone who may be racisit (no matter his/her race) is just ignorant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sticks and stones man.... sticks and stones....
Posted by: Feltixx on Nov 6, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ahhh... I remember the good old days when people would say sticks and stones... Nowadays everyone is so thin-skinned that the slightest prick brings forth a deluge of racism accusations. Some people actually make a living off of it! It's a sad and touchy world... in many ways. IMO

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes racism is still real
Posted by: DesertStone on Nov 6, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've found white people generally keep their degradation of people of color much more subtle than "Dog the Bounty Hunter". The movie the English Patient, a perfect example of white supremacy and racism. If you haven't seen it, all the brown characters are buffoons, they fumble about and bump into things, generally providing comic relief in contrast to the whites who sit fanning themselves elegantly. Then there is the horror movie cliché where all the colored characters die and the white characters always are the heroes and survivors. These are recurring and constant themes in movies and television and frankly much more damaging to people than profane expletives. They ingrain society with an image of what is possible for people depending on their race. To pretend that because rappers rap about killing white people while white people are innocent victims who could never get away with as much is simply inaccurate. Given the history of the US and the historic brutality of whites in general these things do not happen without a backdrop. It is a very different thing for a powerless inner city youth to rap about effing up a white guy than for a white man to do as much. Isn’t that obvious?