Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama Spurns Black LGBT Community for an "Ex-Gay" Musician

By Deb Price, Creators Syndicate. Posted November 5, 2007.


Barack Obama has alienated a large number of black gays and lesbians for giving musician Donnie McClurkin, an "ex-gay," a platform for his campaign in South Carolina.
Deb Price

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Deb Price

Courageous Gay Bishop Weathers Storm
Bishop Gene Robinson calls on religious gays and lesbians to fight for acceptance within their spiritual communities.
May 5, 2008

Schwarzenegger Backs Gay Rights
California's governor has taken a humane and reasonable stance on gay marriage. John McCain should pay attention.
Apr 21, 2008

A Gay Friendly Message to Mega-Churches
A new generation of church leaders avoids rabid, anti-gay rhetoric. Can they be pushed to accept and support gay rights?
Apr 7, 2008

More stories by Deb Price

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Sad, disappointed and more than a little hurt.

That's how many Americans who are both black and gay sound these days when they talk about Barack Obama.

What's upsetting them is that the Democrat, despite stellar gay-rights positions, sat back and allowed a gospel concert for his presidential campaign to essentially spiral into an anti-gay revival.

How? As part of wooing black evangelicals in high-stakes South Carolina, his campaign gave star billing at an event to Grammy-winning gospel singer and preacher Donnie McClurkin, a self-identified "ex-gay" claiming to have been saved from "perversion."

When announcement of McClurkin's inclusion sparked an understandable uproar in the gay and progressive faith communities, Obama issued a big-tent statement that condemned "homophobia" and stressed he "strongly" disagrees with McClurkin's views.

But sadly, Obama stood by the choice.

Making matters worse, the Obama campaign then tossed in a white gay minister at the opening of the event rather than add one of the black gay or gay-friendly pastors who offered their voices.

Not surprisingly, at the Oct. 28 gospel show, a fired-up McClurkin told a cheering audience: "I don't speak against the homosexual. I tell you that God delivered me from homosexuality."

Afterward, Obama continued trying to distance himself from McClurkin's views. But the reality is that he gave McClurkin a stage, a microphone, an audience and national media attention. And Obama inadvertently ended up reinforcing two myths unfortunately believed by many religious African Americans: that gays are white and being gay is sinful.

Rod McCullom, a popular black gay writer and longtime Obama fan, said the fiasco makes him wonder how hard Obama would push for gay equality as president: "He folded like a deck of cards. If he is going to fold on the campaign trail, why would we not think he'd fold in the Oval Office?"

The "Rod 2.0" blogger laments that Obama could have used the controversy as a "teaching moment" to encourage acceptance of black gays in the black community.

Such a teaching moment could have especially helped the many black gays who share their musical gifts in conservative black churches while staying closeted for fear of being rejected.

"Mostly what I have heard from black gays and lesbians is disappointment. We had high hopes. White gays and lesbians on the Obama bandwagon jumped off. This was a deal-killer," McCullom said.

Black lesbian Pam Spaulding reports that the controversy generated lots of chat at her popular "Pam's House Blend" blog.

Spaulding thinks the Obama camp simply did the math and went for socially conservative black voters in South Carolina, where half of the Democratic voters are black.

The Obama team felt "it's no biggie for them to toss us under the bus," Spaulding says. "That is what is painful," she adds, noting the incident will drive black gays "deeper into the closet."

Alexander Robinson, the head of the gay National Black Justice Coalition, expresses "continued frustration that there is this double standard to individuals wrapping their bigotry against gay people in religiosity."

Politics is full of second chances. Many black gays express hope that Obama wants another chance and will make a bold move to help heal the divide between black gays and the conservative black church community.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: black church, ex-gay, mcclurkin, obama, gay

Deb Price of The Detroit News writes the first nationally syndicated column on gay issues.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Charliemudcat
Posted by: charliemudcat on Nov 5, 2007 1:40 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no way to unify this country if people on both sides refuse to be in the same space as those with whom they disagree. It is fine to disagree and be vocal about your disagreement, but you absolutely can’t make progress without even talking to each other. Both sides need to stop being intolerant and threatened by those who are different from them. We need more Rick Warrens on the conservative side and Barack Obamas on the progressive side.

For the full text of this blogpost, go here:

http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com

and select the McClurkin entry. Then, get over it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Symbol over substance?
Posted by: xconservative on Nov 5, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what, the sixth topic on Alternet regarding Obama appearing on the same stage with McClurkin? Are things going so well in the LGBT community that this is all there is left to talk about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do We Want Obama To Become The Bully We Fought to Defeat??
Posted by: Bob101 on Nov 6, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Help me here, please? For almost 30 years I have been a gay activist fighting for inclusion and acceptance, that is AGAINST the homophobic society's desire to reject us, bully us, push us off the stage if you will. Yes it has been a struggle and still is, but does that mean," if we can't beat 'em we join 'em." Are we to become like the oppressors themselves and bully those who bullied us?
Barack Obama has given us a chance to be true to ourselves here. Let's INCLUDE, not push away, when we are given the chance, then perhaps we can reach out to those who rejected us and have at least a chance to educate. It does really work you know, i've done it for many years.
Yet, if some of us were to have prevailed and somehow convince Obama to get McClurkin off that gospel stage, would we or he have been any better than the brutes who pushed us around for so many years? That would have been a giant lead backward and an act that assuredly would alientate, not educate. Does not our harsh judgement of Obama itself become and act of bullying because we disagreed. Sometimes great insight is hard to see at first, it shocks the eyes and blinds the sight. We should thank Obama for leading us here, not reject him for his guidance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The sad thing
Posted by: Forgiven on Nov 6, 2007 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad thing about the debate is that no one believes that Senator Obama is a homophobe or does not support gay rights; no one believes that he would try to push a Constitutional amendment against gays. So why is he getting all this heat? Because he is willing to stand up and not pander to the minority in opposition to the majority. These people have a campaign to run and hopefully win. During campaigns strategic decisions are made, decisions like which issues to emphasize and which ones to downplay. Would any of the people bashing Barack believe that Mitt or Giuliani would make a better candidate?

Senator Obama is making a concerted effort to enlist the support of the Black faith community. If you don’t like the views of the Black Church bash them not the candidate trying to reach out to them. Is the Senator flip-flopping like his Republican counterparts on issues of importance to gays and lesbians? I have not heard the Senator back away from any of his stated positions concerning this group. The Black Church has been traditionally a rallying point in the community and to enlist their support is a smart campaign decision. Black churchgoers tend to vote more than other blacks and they tend to be more united in their voting patterns. Ministers in the Black Church hold a lot of influence over their parishioners and so I don’t see what the outrage is over Senator Obama making an outreach to them.

It is precisely this type of criticism that makes the rest of America view Democrats and their candidates as “godless” and without faith. If any candidate tries to court the religious vote they are demonized by the gay and lesbian communities and their surrogates in the progressive community. The time has come for Democrats to stop running from their faith and for those who do not share their faith to back off and allow them their freedom to believe. No one is saying that everyone has to believe the same thing, but by the same token allow those who do believe differently the freedom to express it. The problem with being a democratic candidate is that you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Everyone expects you to cater to their particular viewpoint and if you are not 100% in agreement then you are a “sell-out”. Forget the fact that you won’t win, obviously that’s not important.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

The Disputed Truth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVE NOW!
Posted by: higginslads on Nov 6, 2007 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A sitting member of Congress is introducing a measure to impeach the vice president of the United States and the story isn't visible on Alternet. This should be the leading story on a website that bills itself as an "alternative" to the mainstream. Some alternative! More like left gatekeeper.

For those who are interested in doing something constructive about our current state of affairs, please call your representative and urge them to support Mr. Kucinich's bill. The Capitol switchboard is:

1-800-828-0498
1-800-862-5530
1-800-833-6354

Just ask the operator for your representative's office. If you don't know it, tell her/him where you live and she/he will look it up. Once transferred to your representative's office, politely tell the person who answers the phone that you urge your representative to support Kucinich's articles of impeachment against the vice president. You will probably be asked for your name and address.

I just did this. It's the first time I had ever called my representative (Rodney Frelinghuysen in NJ). It was easy and I felt better after doing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]