Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The "Rasputin of radio" is back, ready to beat down the defenseless for more cheap laughs.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Shocking But True: Imus Returns to Radio

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted November 2, 2007.


The "Rasputin of radio" is back, ready to beat down the defenseless for more cheap laughs.
Advertisement

Has it really only been six months? It seems like just yesterday that we had Don Imus to kick around. And his racist and sexist remarks about the Rutgers University women's basketball team seem as freshly offensive today as they did when he made them last Easter. Now, to no one's surprise, the self-styled "I-Man" is back, courtesy of the Citadel Broadcasting Corporation, which has announced that Imus will return to radio December 3 during morning drive time on WABC-AM in New York -- the same city where he was unceremoniously banished from the airwaves last spring.

To recap, briefly: Imus was up to his usual repugnant tricks of beating down the defenseless for cheap laughs when a sudden, perfect media storm erupted. The toxic combination of relentless, single-focus 24/7 news-cycle attention, sponsor desertion, and open employee revolt against executives at the corporations that distributed, enabled, promoted and protected Imus for so long suddenly toppled a man who had previously appeared immune to such pressures.

The surprising result -- after all, the loutish remarks and behavior of Imus and his on-air crew had been well documented for years -- was that, after first merely "deploring" their shock jock's characterization of the women as "nappy headed ho's," the corporate overlords at CBS and NBC were forced to suspend, and later fire, Imus for doing precisely what they had hired him to do in the first place: insult, "entertain," shock and enrage, thus creating controversy, boosting ratings, and making more money for himself, themselves, and the companies behind the whole pathetic crew.

Now the man even the normally staid Associated Press has taken to calling "the Rasputin of radio" is back from the brink, and, as the AP notes, "poised to do it again." I can't wait!

Neither can the I-Man's new bosses, apparently. "We are ecstatic to bring Don Imus back to morning radio," WABC President and General Manager Steve Borneman told the press. "Don's unique brand of humor, knowledge of the issues and ability to attract big-name guests is unparalleled. He is rested, fired up and ready to do great radio." And Citadel Broadcasting CEO Farid Suleman also defended Imus, telling The New York Times, "He didn't break the law. He's more than paid the price for what he did."

Las Vegas-based Citadel, which bought WABC and other ABC radio stations from Walt Disney Company last year, now owns more than 240 radio stations around the country. Its flagship station already airs other top-ranked, nationally syndicated right-wing talkers such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin -- a "galaxy of stars," according to station manager Borneman, who called Imus, "certainly an amazing addition to our station and for our company." And Phil Boyce, vice president of news-talk programming for Citadel, gushed to the New York Times that "The chance to get Don is something we couldn't pass up." Boyce also said he expected other Citadel radio affiliates to carry Mr. Imus's show, but declined to identify which ones yet.

WABC station representatives confirmed that they will bring back much of the original cast of Imus' previous show, including his longtime "news anchor" Charles McCord. No mention was made of fellow cast member Bernard McGuirk, whose hateful observations about the Rutgers women's basketball team provoked the affair that got Team Imus fired in the first place, but it's safe to assume that McGuirk will return in some suitably slithery role as well.

Although his supporters try to differentiate Imus from other conservatives who dominate talk radio, and claim he is "more liberal" because his guests include media luminaries (some slightly left of center) such as Frank Rich of The New York Times, David Gregory, Andrea Mitchell and Tim Russert of NBC, and political bigwigs such as Senators John Kerry and Bob Kerrey, the political dimensions and ramifications of the current round of hiring and firings at WABC seem fairly clear. The new Imus show will replace a more politically balanced program that was quite popular locally -- more highly rated, in fact, than the previous Imus show on WFAN, which it aired opposite.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: imus, don imus, shock jocks, right-wing radio, conservative radio, morning talk radio, citadel

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor is now completing AlterNet’s first-ever book, which is on the subject of radio talkers like Imus, and will be available early in 2008. O'Connor also writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's pretty simple.....
Posted by: Mewsician on Nov 2, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, DON'T LISTEN. I think Imus is an aggravation and an idiot, but that doesn't mean I think he should be censored. Keep free speech free - it's about all this sorry country of ours has left to defend.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's pretty simple..... Posted by: Bozwell
» Filth sells... Posted by: messedup
» RE: Filth sells... Posted by: donl51
» RE: It's pretty simple..... Posted by: mikelz
» RE: It's pretty simple..... Posted by: Amandalee
Am I supposed to give a damn?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Nov 2, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imus looks like he crawled out of a casket-announcing his return the day after Halloween. Must have been too busy yesterday. How old is this geezer anyway? He looks older (and uglier) than Barbara Bush!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares?
Posted by: Rune on Nov 2, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all of the truly consequential and worrisome events folding each day, do we really need to waste our time and energy pondering the pandering of a self destructive radio personality reaching out to other damaged and/or deranged people in a toxic political and economic environment? Why not pay attention to the real issues and trends that give personalities like Imus an audience and work to do something constructive about those issues? We've already established that he is a fool among fools. What more is there to say that is worth saying about him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agreed Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: Who cares? Posted by: Bulldog
Tune in - if you can find him
Posted by: rocketman on Nov 2, 2007 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's on AM radio..thats a comeback????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tune in - if you can find him Posted by: rabiabidabi
» RE: Tune in - if you can find him Posted by: rabiabidabi
The real story here is the network of media ownership behind WABC
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 2, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the above article: "Las Vegas-based Citadel, which bought WABC and other ABC radio stations from Walt Disney Company last year, now owns more than 240 radio stations around the country."

That's actually a fake sale, designed to hide the real ownership and control of these media institutions behind a webwork of holding companies.

See Citadel Broadcasting
On February 6, 2006, Forstmann Little and the Walt Disney Company agreed to merge Citadel with Disney's ABC Radio.[1] Shares representing 57% of Citadel were distributed to shareholders of The Walt Disney Company following the company's acquisition of 22 stations from ABC Radio.

After the merger, Citadel's ownership structure was:
57%: Disney shareholders
27%: Forstmann Little
16%: Former Citadel shareholders exclusive of Forstmann Little"

Who are Disney's shareholders? The usual suspects. . .

Fidelity, State Street, Barclays UK, Vanguard, etc. The CEO of Disney, Robert Iger, received $22 million in cash compensation in 2006 and another $30 million in stock options.

Imus is just their little dancing puppet. Why does he get rewarded for spewing out racist invective? He tried to apologize:

IMUS. And I - when I originally apologized on Friday, I apologized. And I didn't say what everybody said, you know, if I offended somebody, I'm sorry, because I knew I offended somebody. So I apologize. But I didn't want to be portrayed, as often, an excuse saying, well, what we have is a comedy show, which it is. I'm not a journalist, I'm not Tim Russert, I'm not a politician. I don't have any - we don't have an agenda. Our agenda is to try to be funny. And sometimes we go too far and sometimes we go way too far. In this case, we went way too far.

SHARPTON. Mr. Imus, do you think it's funny to call people nappy-headed ho's?"


So, why do the plantation masters think it's a good idea to whip up racist issues? Just like in the days of the old South, where you had a handful of wealthy aristocrats overseeing lots of black slaves and poor rural whites, the main concern of the aristocrats was making sure that the whites and the blacks didn't unite and seek real democracy - so then, as now, they made sure to whip up racial conflict at every opportunity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good quote from Barkley. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
If you want to reform the media, then this should disgust you
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Nov 2, 2007 3:28 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imus is part of the establishment in every way.

There is nothing to celebrate, and for the author to say so is not really seeing the bigger picture.

Of course they brought him back. He supports the formula of shoving this kind of programming down our throats, his anti-humane, anti-human style is all about keeping the same characters with the same type of games running the dishonest, inhumane media show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I REPEAT.... Posted by: Mewsician
How Totally Unimportant
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Nov 2, 2007 4:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So some potty-mouthed jerk is on the airwaves, calling people names. The fate of the country doesn't hinge on it. If you want to attack media malfeasance, go after political liars like Billo who actually influence the way people vote, not some joke like Imus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How Totally Unimportant Posted by: vssmith
Missed the point
Posted by: JSquercia on Nov 2, 2007 5:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think most posters missed the point which the article pointed out rather well . This is NOT about Imus this is about removing an articulate Liberal voice from WABC . The station is now just another of the endless right wing echo chambers which populate our radio dial . How can one make an informed decision when ALL you get is ONE side of the story . The point is that it can't be performance since the Curtis and Kuby show had better ratings than Imus . It must be about ideology leaving WABC Liberal Free . They even told Kuby NOT to report to work TODAY with a month left to go on the the Show that bears his name . He was replaced by some right wing lawyer telling us that those who oppose Mukasey over water boarding should wake up . Our Enemies he said behead people . So this is our argument for totrure "at least we don't behead people" . Has my country sunk that low ? THIS is the shining city on the hill .
All this points out the need to restore the fairness doctrine and to limit the number of radio stations that one entity can control . Citidal is obviosly a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party . Note that Boyce spoke of a spot for Curtis but refused ANY questions on the fate of Kuby . They don't want an exchange of ideas only , to use the phrase of our beloved leader , to catapult the propaganda . You will get a steady uninterupted stream of right wing viewpoints ranging from right to far right , from Rush and Sean to Mark Levine .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Missed the point Posted by: illit
» RE: Missed the point Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: Missed the point Posted by: semp
» RE: Missed the point Posted by: goldengrain
» I agree Posted by: Ellie1
» Here's an idea... Posted by: Mewsician
Welcome back - Imus - we can all listen online -
Posted by: illit on Nov 2, 2007 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as this 'commentator' ultimately admitted:
"Finally, in fairness, I must selfishly add that the resurrection of the I-Man also provides wonderfully endless fodder for media commentators such as yours truly!"

"yours truly"'s 'fodder' is copied (&pasted) from previous snips of articles by other/real writers' articles. 'Rory's' attempts at attacking Imus are as inane and frail as his pointless and un-credited recap. It is obvious that Rory has never listened to Imus, the effort to actually learn about the subject of one's article is, well, just tooooooo much work for him.

Imus raises hel* with all - wow, even Al/Jessie/Dicke/theW -

get a life, either listen to him or change the dial!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rasputin ?
Posted by: MobileSucks on Nov 2, 2007 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's silly, calling Imus "the Rasputin of radio". And it's not shocking at all the I Man is on going back on the air.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares?
Posted by: Doubtom on Nov 2, 2007 9:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really who gives a royal crap whether that talking skull returns or crawls under his pet rock? Don't we have more pressing issues in America? What's with this juvenile preoccupation with so-called celebrities? And by the way, what the hell is it that makes Imus a celebrity anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares?
Posted by: Doubtom on Nov 2, 2007 9:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really who gives a royal crap whether that talking skull returns or crawls under his pet rock? Don't we have more pressing issues in America? What's with this juvenile preoccupation with so-called celebrities? And by the way, what the hell is it that makes Imus a celebrity anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» error Posted by: Doubtom
» Interesting... Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Interesting... Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Interesting... Posted by: Doubtom
Bikerdude
Posted by: bikerdude on Nov 2, 2007 9:26 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rory sounds a hell of a lot more offensive than Imus ever was. What Imus said was meant to be humorous, and he apologized for what he said. In the mean time that bunch of right wing radio crazies say way more damaging and hateful things than Imus ever did. I've been listening to him since the early 70s when I arrived in NYC. He is entertaining, and not only attracts the very best guests, his questions and comments always are interesting and bring out the best during the interviews. I am way more offended by the likes of Sharpton and his Tawanna Brawley escapade. He never did apologize for that bunch of lies and misdirection.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imus, Coulter, Malkin, Limbaugh, Riley
Posted by: jaby on Nov 3, 2007 1:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did it ever occur to anyone that if we progressive types stopped listening to these people, stopped watching their tv shows, stopped reading their blogs and stopped buying their books that they would probably go away? That most of Bill O'Reilly's base are progressives who tune in to hear what this loser has to say so we can beat him mercilessly with it? That most of the people who read Ann(e) Coulter's books are merely progressives looking to attack her?

Stop feeding the beast!! These people are worthless attention-whores. They will say anything to get people riled up and get more attention! Anne Coulter doesn't really believe that women shouldn't be allowed to vote, she just says that because her mommy and daddy didn't love her enough (or loved her too much) so do yourselves a favor and ignore the screaming children. Let's all focus our energies on the problems that matter, not the losers, like Imus, who don't.

Because, in the end, Imus is just a loud guy with a bad haircut and a microphone. He isn't Martin Luther King, he isn't Gahndhi, hell, he isn't even Al Franken. So why should we waste our time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» huh??? Posted by: Moira61
» RE: huh??? Posted by: jaby
» RE: huh??? Posted by: slydad
I am U. S.
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 3, 2007 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After his unfortunate, off-the-cuff comments last April regarding the Rutger's University woman's basketball team, referring to them as "nappy-headed hos", the explosion of outraged opinion was not unpredictable. It must be honestly conceded that in recent years, Imus and - in particular - his otherwise talented producer, Bernie McGuirk, have crossed the line with respect to good taste. But the mistake a lot of people have made is to compare Imus to others in the main stream media. The argument seems to be this: had the remark been made by Brian Williams on NBC Nightly News, it rightfully would have meant the end of his career. Why shouldn't the I-Man be held up to the same standards? The answer to that question must be viewed within the framework of the format with which his program operates. Imus In The Morning is, it should not be forgotten, a topical comedy show. This is not to excuse what he said seven months ago, but merely to put things in their proper context. As Newsweek's Howard Fineman told him a couple of days after the incident, "The form of humor you do is risky and sometimes it goes off the rails."

The reaction of the media to the Imus controversy - left and right - has been curious, to say the least. On the surface, the general glee from the FOX Noise crowd at the fall from grace of this essentially conservative, registered Republican and ordained minister doesn't make a bit of sense. Unless, of course, one takes into consideration the fact that while, on occasion, Don Imus approaches the troth, he rarely drinks the kool-aid.

With the exception of Washington Journal on C-SPAN, no other morning program on radio or television (the show was simul-cast) was as infomative as Imus In The Morning. It should also be noted - and this is very important - that no other commentator within the main stream media has been more outspoken with regard to the crimes and utter incompetence of the Bush Mob than Don Imus. This fact should not be forgotten by left-leaning critics, some of whom have been as giddy as their counterparts on the right by Imus' downfall. That extremists on both ends of the political spectrum have been exploiting this incident for all it's worth, there can be little doubt. Maybe - just maybe - the phonew rightiousness of Al Sharpton on the left and FOX Noise on the right means that Mr. Imus, crude humor aside, has been doing somethinig right.

Remember that it was Don Imus alone who, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, publicaly condemned the overt racism of the Bush White House. He bravely pointed out that the government's almost non-response to that tragedy was due to the obvious fact that the majority of KAtrina's victims were black. As he pointed out at the time, had the disaster occurred in the very rich and white Hamptons or Crawford, Texas the response would have been instantanious and complete.

He is to our generation what Fred Allen was to his. Like Allen and Lenny Bruce before him, he is unique to his generation in that he is a humorist - not a comedian, mind you, but a humorist (There is a decided difference) - who holds up a mirror to our sick, hypocritical society. Society may not always like what's reflected it is a brutally honest if, at times, over-the-line type of humor that is truly valuable - if hardly ever cautious. This might be a good time to remind you that, as I write these words, there are actually organized groups of people in this country who are trying to have Twain's classic, Huckleberry Finn banned from our nation's school libraries.

He'll on December 3, humble and chastized....OK, maybe not humble - but definately chastizedT To quote the Reverend, Dr. Billy Sol Hargis, an Imus character from the early days:

"Say, 'Hallelujah!!!'"

Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I am U. S. Posted by: bikerdude
» I did, indeed, Sausage. Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: I am U. S. Posted by: VZEQICVA
one more thing:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 3, 2007 3:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a man who thinks with his heart
His heart is not always wise
This is a man who stumbles and falls
But this is a man who tries

Oscar Hammerstein
from The King and I

Here is a nasty little fact that every one of his critics has conveniently chosen to ignore: Don Imus is a good man. I don't need to remind you (but I will) of his Imus Cattle Ranch for Kids with Cancer; a place in Ribera, New Mexice where children (of all races, thank you very much), some of them mortally ill, come to work as cowboys and cow girls, learn to rope cattle, ride horses and, in the process, regain their self esteem - all but destroyed by their horrible disease. It is estimated that in the last seven years, he has raised at least one-hundred million dollars for the care and treatment of these children. Parse his words if you must but, please, look into the man's soul.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: one more thing: Posted by: illit
» NOT TRUE ABOUT THE RANCH Posted by: gellero
» RE: NOT TRUE ABOUT THE RANCH Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: NOT TRUE ABOUT THE RANCH Posted by: Stoney 12+1
Look at the good side.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Nov 3, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe he can keep Sharpton and the rest of the PC crowd safely distracted while real progressives get on with their lives.

Defenseless?...That's a bit overstated. How many 3-legged puppies are on the Rutgers University women's basketball team?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, please, Mr. O'Connor
Posted by: Democritus on Nov 3, 2007 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rory O'Connor's slamming of Don Imus gives the "politically correct" crowd again something trivial to pontificate about. Why doesn't O'Connor slam President Bush for saying he doesn't have the money to provide health care for poor kids? Now that's something really shocking and obscene.

Imus cares about sick kids, as witness the foundation he supports. His off-hand remark about "nappy-headed ho's" was an attempt to emulate black street-talk. The fact that Sharpton and Jackson jumped all over him for it really showed that they didn't want any white man taking over black speech. It was only after it was pointed out that this sort of talk is is prevalent in black rap music that Sharpton thought to broaden his criticism to the rapsters.

So, no, Mr. O'Connor, Imus is no racist. His iconoclastic take on the world is something that the PC crowd deplores, but your jumping on their bandwagon serves only to highlight what most realistic observers hate about the PC mentality--their stuffy, rigid, and humorless attitude.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Kudos, Democritus! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Oh, please, Mr. O'Connor Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Oh, please, Mr. O'Connor Posted by: VZEQICVA
all so shocking
Posted by: MobileSucks on Nov 3, 2007 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And people were shocked when they heard that Imus said nappy hair ho. _Shocked_ that _Imus_ made a rude, racist comment! Noo way. Stupid racist, sexist talk on the radio, in America? Couldn't believe it.

And rap lyrics continue to largely be racist, sexist, degenerate, materialistic, and celebratory of antisocial, self centered, greedy mentalities? Did you know? I thought things were really changing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: all so shocking Posted by: ALANHESTER
Why is anyone surprised Imus is back, he's a ratings monster!
Posted by: sausage on Nov 3, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, the guy's at an age...what, 67? 68?.. when most people are retired. He's made enough money over his life, so that can't be a motivation though whatever he's being paid he's taking. I think Imus truly likes what he does. But what he does is also truly childish.

Let's look at Imus's first big radio coup: During an on-air gag in California , where he ordered 1,200 hamburgers from a fast-food restaurant, Imus earned the distinction of inspiring a new Federal Communications Commission ruling that demanded radio personalities to identify themselves when telephoning listeners. Biography.com

That was in 1968 and Imus was a ripe old 28-years-old. Calling a fastfood restaurant and ordering 1,200 hamburgers to-go, with no intention of purchase, is a stunt from the mind of a 12-year-old boy. And in 1968 the majority of listeners to Imus's program most likely were 12-year-old boys. Well, over the years, Imus has aged and so has his core audience, only physically. Mentally Imus and his listeners are still at heart all 12-year-old boys, who giggle after pulling an infantile, surreptitious prank but sulk when caught.

Imus and the rest of the right-wing bloviators, your Rush Limbaughs, Sean Hannitys, Ann Coulters, etc, are merely saying the stupid crap that drunks say to each other. The difference between a conversation between drunks in a bar and Imus, however, is that his position as a radio personality lends legitimacy to the immature stupidity coming out his mouth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let the listeners decide!
Posted by: jlohman on Nov 3, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't listen, and if enough of you don't the advertisers will go elsewhere. But for those who want to listen, let them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would Stewart and Colbert have gotten away with what Imus said?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 3, 2007 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a point worth looking at. For example, Larry Wilmore (Daily Show correspondent) ran a segment that tried to place Obama on the color spectrum chart - somewhere between Michael Jackson (essentially white) and Flava Flav (very black). What would have been the response if Imus had tried to do that?

It sure seems that there is an awful lot of race-baiting going on in this country right now. Democracy Now, on the "left", ran over 300 articles on the "Jena Six" on their website, for example, and the KKK has also hopped on that bandwagon. There's also a lot of race-baiting targeting Latinos coming from the right (immigrant-baiting might be more appropriate).

The real issue is not racism, but wealth and poverty. Poor rural whites are more or less in the same position as poor urban blacks and poor immigrants right now - but for some reason, neither the "left" nor the "right" seems to want to discuss that. Prison statistics for poor whites are similar to those for poor blacks, for example.

Divide and conquer, is it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep speech free!
Posted by: peacelf on Nov 3, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let Don Imus spout his vitriol, and let fundamentalist madman, Rev. Fred Phelps speak for his god of hate at funerals and social gatherings alike. I need more evidence of intolerance and hate in america to write about.

peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A quick question...
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 3, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people remember who won the 2007 national women's collegiate baskeball title?

There was so much handwringing over the fact that Imus "stole their moment" (the Rutgers ladies team) that I bet most folks aren't even aware of the fact that they finished SECOND! It was an incredible achievement on their part, but the publicity that ensued behind the Imus gaffe resulted in their receiving far more attention than the actual champions, who really had their moment stolen.

No doubt the return of Imus will result in more of the same kind of social distraction as he injects his dumb opinions into the public dialog. Yeck!

And in case you forgot but actually give a damn, it was the Lady Vols (Volunteers) from Tennessee who won the title.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another DJ suspension story...
Posted by: shewolf666 on Nov 3, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where I live there's a story thats related to this issue http://www.wnem.com/news/14498730/detail.html I can't stand Burke myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just 2 words
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Nov 3, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HOWARD STERN It seems that everyone has forgotten the apparent God of Sexism and all that comes from the gutter. Compared to Howard, at least Imus is funny. He may have uttered the forbidden words once, but the media has taken great joy in repeating, in quotes mind you, the same forbidden phrase over and over ad nausium. I will put my hand on the radio when Rev. Billy Sol Hargess returns to the airways and shout a loud and long Amen!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mean reality.
Posted by: aka_bozo on Nov 3, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, liberals (socialist, leftists, progressives, whatEVER) are confused about human nature, the REAL life of peasants, and - apparently - cause and effect. IF there weren’t lots and lots and LOTS of white mean fascist peasants who thought EXACTLY like Imus, Limbaugh, Riley, etc.., these guys wouldn’t be SO popular. Meanness is natural in humans, which is WHY there are so MANY mean assholes running around, WHICH is why Republicans keep winning.

And, as to ridicule, you liberals are so thin-skinned the fascists ridiculed your NAME right out of existence – as you are now trying to call yourselves progressives (or is there a new one on the horizon?)

It’s time you guys accepted the reality of human meanness and adjusted your political philosophy around this REALITY. Otherwise, you’ll be perpetually thrashing around as a minority party, complaining about the conspiracy of the media keeping your lame ideas from influencing the peasants.

Find something for the MAJORITY of dumb-ass white peasants to hate and ridicule and they’ll follow you anywhere. They’ve been following the fascist for the last 40 years, which is WHY the country is in the condition it’s in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mean reality. Posted by: argyle
attention span?
Posted by: Amolibri on Nov 3, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What always disgusts me is the attention span of the average radio "listener" (and I use that term loosely). I agree with Tom Degan about Imus' goodness and conscience...and his lack of common sense. No apology would have been sufficient for his "enemies"...and their goal was accomplished, until now.
I believe that Imus does have his ear to the ground, and is well aware of the injustices and racism of our society. It is the "humor" and outragousness that people require of him, that has caused this furor. I don't defend his insensitivity. He was wrong and admitted it.

The posters who say that we have more serious issues are partly correct. The fact that this became such a monumental thing...even after the apology...is quite serious. How can we attend to life & death issues when we can't seem to move on?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: attention span? Posted by: ALANHESTER
Imus does have the face for radio! Boycott his sponsors ....
Posted by: Bambi on Nov 3, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imus does have the face for radio! Boycott his sponsors .... if you don't like him, and make some noise about it. That's the most effective way to show the network you think he sucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT IS NOW.......
Posted by: ALANHESTER on Nov 3, 2007 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....open season on racism. The American ideal is doomed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT IS NOW....... (now?) Posted by: aka_bozo
People enjoy this type of thing, unless it hits home.
Posted by: Buckroo on Nov 3, 2007 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People seem to like making off color remarks, to out and out nasty jokes about other people, races, size, color, looks.
The problem lies when it hit close to home, and then it's not a
a joke anymore.
If it's said in a joking way and not as a hate thing.
It should be judged as such
Also eveybody has said thing that came off,not just as we would of liked
Buckroo

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What national figure gave more support Harold Ford Jr. than Imus?
Posted by: TonyGottlieb on Nov 3, 2007 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pray tell, who gave more support to African-American candidate, Harold Ford Jr., in his unsuccessful bid for the US Senate in Tennessee, than Imus?
This is a racist? I don't think so. And Jr. may need to check his credentials on bigotry while remaining so off-the-radar during the entire fiasco.
Imus deserves gratitude now for single handedly raising the debate over double-standards in PC speech to an action item.
Keep-em coming Don, there are more double-standards from where that one came.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imus might be an idiot
Posted by: argyle on Nov 3, 2007 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]