Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Is Carbon Trading Just a Giveaway to Big Polluters?

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted November 1, 2007.


Congress will vote today on climate change legislation: Will it be a boon for the environment or big business?
Amy Goodman

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Amy Goodman

Obama Runs to the Middle
What should progressives do about Obama's move to the center?
Jul 3, 2008

Sy Hersh: Congress Is Funding Major Escalation in Secret Operations Against Iran
Hersh reports on a secret Congress-approved plan for activities ranging from supporting dissident groups to spying on Iran's nuclear program.
Jul 1, 2008

George Carlin: A Funny Man in an Unfunny World
Carlin gave voice to dissident perspectives that have been almost entirely blocked from mainstream media.
Jun 26, 2008

More stories by Amy Goodman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

AMY GOODMAN: We turn now to carbon trading. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will vote today on climate change legislation written by Senators Joseph Lieberman and John Warner. The bill is called "America's Climate Security Act."

It aims to combat global warming by using a cap-and-trade system popularly known as carbon trading. This involves setting greenhouse gas emissions limits and allowances for each industry and then creating a system to trade the allowances.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, countries can trade emissions credits and companies can earn credits by paying for emissions-reducing and clean energy projects in developing countries. Despite the US government's opposition to the Kyoto Protocol, California, New York and New Jersey embraced carbon trading Tuesday, as they joined European governments, Canadian provinces, and New Zealand to launch a forum known as the International Carbon Action Partnership. Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore and institutions like the World Bank and the Pew Center on Global Climate Change also support carbon trading as a viable market-based solution to fight global warming. But critics argue carbon trading actually delays the crucial process of big polluters reducing their emissions.

Rising Tide North America is one organization that opposes carbon trading. Activists from the group disrupted a Carbon Markets Insights conference held in New York Monday. Posing as delegates, they took to the stage and denounced carbon trading as "a sham approach to the fossil fuel crisis." This is a clip of their presentation at the conference.

ACTIVIST 1: We have a very special guest for all of you here as the cutting edge of market-based solutions to climate change. We present to you a deed to the next frontier that is literally over all of your heads.

ACTIVIST 2: "This indenture made on the 30th day of October in the year of our lord two thousand and seven on behalf of the secretary of the sky bestows the full and rightful ownership of all parts of the atmosphere to the Carbon Traitors of Carbon Market Insights." Generations of the future --

ACTIVIST 1 : -- are begging you now --

ACTIVIST 2: -- renounce this treachery --

ACTIVIST 1: -- for this [inaudible]. So sick this idea, offset your illusion.

ACTIVISTS 1 & 2: There's no market-based fix for offset pollutions.

AMY GOODMAN: Protesters, or as they call themselves "Greenwash guerrillas" from Rising Tide North America, led away after intervening at the carbon trading expo in New York.

Well, today, we host a debate on carbon trading. Joining me here in Washington, D.C., two environmentalists, both committed to fighting global warming. Annie Petsonk is international counsel with Environmental Defense, a leading national environmental advocacy group. She has participated in the development of climate policy since the inception of the climate treaty talks and works to develop international laws that provide economic incentives for environmental protection. Annie Petsonk supports carbon trading.

Daphne Wysham is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. She is also the founder and co-director of the Sustainable Energy and Economy Network and a member of the Durban Group for Climate Justice. Her research drew attention to the disproportionate ratio of fossil fuel investments by international financial institutions like the World Bank. Daphne Wysham is opposed to carbon trading. We welcome you both to Democracy Now!

Annie, why don't you start off by saying why you support carbon trading? And explain it in the process.

ANNIE PETSONK: The global warming problem is an urgent one, and we don't have time to continue putting global warming pollution into the atmosphere. If we want to get countries, companies and local communities to look for and implement effective opportunities to cut greenhouse gas emissions, wherever they can find them -- in the home, in the office, in the school -- we've got to give people economic incentives so that it becomes in their financial self-interest to cut global warming pollution now. That's what carbon trading does. Implemented effectively, it can be a huge help, along with other policies, in getting our nation to step up to the plate, take some leadership and tackle this problem.

AMY GOODMAN: But explain exactly how it works.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: climate change, global warming, congress, carbon trading, carbon credits, carbon

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How about other forms of trading?
Posted by: Crazy H on Nov 1, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't sell crack to school children, so I could sell all my extra selling-crack-to-school-children credits to some intrepid entrepreneur...

... it all averages out, right?

I figure I've got oh, about ten millions dollars worth of selling-crack-to-school-children credits for sale, but I'd be a happy to consider trading for some driving-over-the-speed-limit credits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crazy H is right
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Nov 1, 2007 11:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember "Low Carbon Coal"? Coal IS carbon. What is "Low Carbon" coal?
Coal that contains more URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY,
Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel, Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium,
Iron, Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium, Manganese,
Vanadium, Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium, Molybdenum and Zinc? Remember
"Clean" coal? Cap and trade is just another CLOWN ACT from a congress that
thinks we are stupid enough to fall for it. Let's tell Bozo to go back to the circus.

The very lowest level of action acceptable immediately is a CARBON TAX [to be
repaid by increasing the personal exemption on the income tax] Plus an immediate
ban on new coal fired power plants plus a guaranteed phaseout of all coal fired
power plants and coal heating worldwide by 2030.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think it's a good idea.
Posted by: bim on Nov 2, 2007 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think carbon trading is the perfect solution by any means, but I think it's the best one out there. I didn't like the idea until I took an environmental planning economics class and realized big polluters essentially are paying a luxury tax that enables low polluters to invest even more in better technologies (my professor was obviously an environmentalist and he felt it is the best solution). The way the US has traditionally handled pollution gives no incentive to reduce pollution below mandatory limits. This system does that and gives no economic advantage to big polluters as has traditionally been the case. Environmentally conscious companies are given a tax break is what this amounts to, and in the information age it is easier for environmentally conscious consumers to support those businesses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I think it's a good idea. Posted by: AsteroidMiner
» Cap and trade plus tax Posted by: bim
Is Carbon Trading Just a Giveaway to Big Polluters?
Posted by: flymulla on Nov 5, 2007 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sir
Is Carbon Trading Just a Giveaway to Big Polluters?

Can I have the measuring instruments? I have carbon but I just do not know how to measure nor who to sell, pack and at what price? May be you can let me have the address of eBay or some other party who wants to buy carbon form Tanzania. We have pockets, packet, bags, skies, mines full of the carbon

I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD
P.O.Box 6044
Dar-Es-Salaam
Tanzania
East Africa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalism rears its ugly head –– again.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 5, 2007 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering the fact that our little blue lifeboat, Earth, is a closed system with no input from the surrounding cosmos, save for the odd meteorite, carbon trading is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, to use a cliche. Actually, with the environmental problems that are rapidly descending upon us, it is more like trying to bail out a sinking boat by throwing the water from the bow into the stern. For profit.

The profit motive got us into this mess; for God sakes, we cannot for one minute depend on the profit motive to get us out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]