Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Bank of Their Own: Latin America Casting off Washington's Shackles

By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. Posted October 31, 2007.


The western media call it "Chavez Bank" -- but what are they really afraid of?
Mark Weisbrot

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Mark Weisbrot

The IMF's Going Down -- Is that a Bad Thing?
Thanks to disasters of its own making, the agency is losing money and influence.
May 1, 2008

The Audacity of Populism
If Obama convinces white working-class voters that he cares about their economic plight, he will become the 44th President of the United States.
Apr 7, 2008

A Question of Values: Drug Patent Laws Must Have Public Health Exceptions
Big Pharma is up in arms about developing countries importing less expensive generic versions of their drugs.
Mar 25, 2008

More stories by Mark Weisbrot

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Developing nations must create their own mechanisms of finance instead of suffering under those of the IMF and the World Bank, which are institutions of rich nations . . . it is time to wake up."

That was Lula da Silva, the president of Brazil -- not Washington's nemesis, Hugo Chavez -- speaking in the Republic of Congo just two weeks ago. Although our foreign policy establishment remains in cozy denial about it, the recognition that Washington's economic policies and institutions have failed miserably in Latin America is broadly shared among leaders in the region. Commentators here -- Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, the editorial boards and op-ed contributors in major newspapers -- have taken pains to distinguish "good" leftist presidents (Lula of Brazil and Michele Bachelet of Chile) from the "bad" ones -- Chavez of Venezuela, Rafael Correa of Ecuador, Evo Morales of Bolivia and, depending on the pundit, sometimes Nestor Kirchner of Argentina.

But the reality is that Chavez (most flamboyantly) and his Andean colleagues are just saying out loud what everyone else believes. So official Washington, and most of the media, has been somewhat surprised by the rapid consolidation of a new "Bank of the South" proposed by Chavez just last year as an alternative to the Washington-dominated International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank.

The media have been reluctant to take the new bank seriously, and some continue to call the institution, pejoratively, "Chavez's bank." But it has been joined by Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Uruguay and Paraguay. And just two weeks ago, Colombia, one of the Bush administration's few remaining allies in the region and the third-largest recipient of U.S. aid (after Israel and Egypt), announced that it wanted in. Et tu, Uribe?

The bank, which will be officially launched on Dec. 5, will make development loans to its member countries, with a focus on regional economic integration. This is important because these countries want to increase their trade, energy and commercial relationships for both economic and political reasons, just as the European Union has done over the last 50 years. The Inter-American Development Bank, which focuses entirely on Latin America, devotes only about 2 percent of its lending to regional integration.

Unlike the Washington-based international financial institutions, the new bank will not impose economic policy conditions on its borrowers. Such conditions are widely believed to have been a major cause of Latin America's unprecedented economic failure over the last 26 years, the worst long-term growth performance in more than a century.

The bank is expected to start with capital of about $7 billion, with all member countries contributing. It will be governed primarily on a one-country, one-vote basis.

How ironic is it that such an institution would be called "Chavez's bank," while nobody calls the IMF or the World Bank "Bush's bank?" The IMF and World Bank have 185 member countries but the United States calls the shots; it has a formal veto in the IMF, but its power is much greater than that, with Europe and Japan having almost never voted against Washington in the institution's 63-year history. The rest of the world, i.e., the majority and the countries that bear the brunt of the institutions' policies, has little to no say in decision making.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bank of the south, imf, neoliberalism, "free trade"

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is needed. For years net capital outflows in the form of debt service plagued Latin America.
Posted by: yellow on Nov 1, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Latin America suffered Balance of payments problems and the resulting IMF stabilization plans for years because of net capital outflows that could have been used to develop the internal markets of these countries. Export led growth strategies led nowhere during the 1970s and 80s because of high tariffs in the developed world. It's time for LA to take on an independant development strategy with independant funding not linked to Western corporate or financial interests. It will be rewarding. And it will be far more economically sound in the final analysis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want one of those for California!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 2, 2007 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That sounds like a good idea, doesn't it? A bank that focuses on lending that will stimulate the local economy and won't act as the agent of the Wall Street - London economic axis. A bank that will finance renewable energy industry startups and will reinvest its profits in more of the same. A bank that won't play shyster loansharking games with homeowners at the behest of Goldman Sachs, but will instead provide capital that will allow homeowners to install photovoltaic systems on their roofs.

The Iraqi government might consider doing the same thing. By funneling a good fraction of their current oil revenue into a domestically controlled bank, they'd soon have all the capital they'd need to completely rebuild their oil, water and electricity infrastructure, with zero need for "foreign investment and expertise" - and no fraudulent overcharges from Bechtel, Halliburton, Washington/AIG, Fluor, Shaw and Perrini, either.

Of course the cynical and dishonest operatives at the IMF, the World Bank, the Export-Import Bank, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the US Agency for International Development, and the rest of them don't like the idea. Here you have local economic stimulation - and no cut for Wall Street! Citibank and JP Morgan must be furious that they aren't being allowed to wet their beaks.

"Apparently, these institutions that preach the virtues of international competition are not so enthusiastic when it breaks into their own monopolistic market."

Oh so true!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Credit Unions Posted by: JMTulip
» RE: Credit Unions Posted by: DaBear
Viva la Revolucion!!!
Posted by: EJW on Nov 2, 2007 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is wonderful. I wish them all the best. Magic is happening in South America. Viva!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yankee Go Home ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 2, 2007 12:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chavez has single handedly broken the American grip on South America.

The worst of it for America is that these countries can cooperate without the intermediation of the American corporatocracy. America wouldn't allow bilateral agreements so that they would always play the broker and get a nice slice of the pie.

The best of it for South Americaa is that they can kick the neoliberal multi-nationals right out of the country. This means real social spending , real labor rights and real money for their resources.

This is the death knell for the U.S. in South America on our terms. Not only do these countries have their own bank but they have other even stronger markets in Asia and Europe.

We are watching the crumbling of Empire , The American Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yankee Go Home ... Posted by: solrev
» RE: Yankee Go Home ... Posted by: MAD
the best layed plans of mice and men
Posted by: solrev on Nov 2, 2007 4:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always believed that the purpose of the invasion of the Middle East was to control the oil so that the NWO could control the oil currency. If they can control the international currency (oil currency), they can control the world. The countries of South America by creating their own financial institution are declaring independence from the NWO. The Iraq war is a disaster, so it should be obvious that the grand plan is not workable. I do not expect them to disappear but at least they should be willing to pull back and regroup. Unfortunately they are going to have to deal with the old international currency and the debt of the dollar. They will not be able to restructure their way out of it. What we need now is a revolt by Saudi Arabia to try and cover their ass, that should end it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Left needs to call for ABOLISHING the IMF and World Bank ! Until then,
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 2, 2007 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America and any nations, such as China and India, RAPED by those two motherfuckers will continue to LOSE LOSE LOSE !

P.S.: My wife and I just gave Cindy Sheehan a little help to TEAR DOWN PEE-LOW-SICK ! It's long past time to ABOLISH or HEAVILY REFORM the Democratic Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Don't forget the WTO ... Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: Don't forget the WTO ... Posted by: maxpayne
How Can I Invest in this Bank?
Posted by: Cap'n Solar on Nov 2, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the American economy drowns in debt, war waste, and corporate fraud - the dollar is weakening and I would love to put my money in this bank to a) keep it secure and b) help those countries with sustainable development. How can I do it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hope for the world
Posted by: dogster on Nov 2, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ending the stranglehold on the US economy and government by the bankster oligarchs is one goal of the Ron Paul rEVOLution!

I am certain Chavez' life is in danger as was Andrew Jackson's, Abe Lincoln's, James Garfield's and other political leaders who defied the power of the money interest. Perhaps these oligarchs should be the targets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hope for the world Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: Hope for the world Posted by: zizizzi
This will develop more democratratic gov't's and security around the world
Posted by: jreal on Nov 2, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The World Band was basically a booster for global corporations. Many 3rd world economies went into further ruin due to the Structural Adjustment policies of the World Bank and IMF. They basically forced governments to invest less into their economy and become less involved so global corporations could "run amock" and ravage their economy in the name of "good jobs".
The Bank was basically exploitation that ran up unnecessary debt to may countries that hog-tied their economies to this day.
This new 'Bank of the South' sounds like a true developmental bank but we'll have to wait and see how it pans out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now for a reality check . . .
Posted by: MAD on Nov 2, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love the junior economist hour here on Alternet. Alterneters maintain a dogged devotion to the notion of the noble Che/Fidel, and now, Lula archetype struggling to further the cause of Pan-Latinoism. Paying a little more attention to the region would serve the dilettantes among us well.

Having said that, a regional developmental bank is surely a good thing in terms of freeing LA governments from the dictates of the IMF. However, the cronyism and corruption present in South America is so insidious and pervasive that nothing short of a revolution will uproot it.

In Brazil, home of the new people's hero, corruption is looked upon as virtue. Those who embezzle, steal and divert the most money are considered deft operators. Lula's own son mysteriously entered the ranks of Brazil's millionaires after dear old dad was elected, and when pressed for an explanation on how he has amassed so much money coming from a dirt poor, Northeastern family, he is still unable to come up with a satisfactory response. I'm curious to know how someone goes from jobless to millionaire in less than 4 years. Hard work, right?

Anyone had a gander at where Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Bolivia, Peru et al rank among the world's most corrupt countries? The point is, Latin America can create its own bank, space program, political union and military, but all measures will fail until they root out corruption. Unlike most of you, I'm married to a South American (Brazilian) and own an apartment in Buenos Aires. Unlike most of you, I've seen the corruption firsthand in Argentina and Brazil. I've seen all the stories that were not big enough to print up here. I'm sure you all missed the countless stories of brown paper bags stuffed with dollars than no one can account for. "I don't know how that got in my office!".

Now that Argentina is standing on its own two feet, inflation is nearing 20% (but who cares, right? - they just elected a woman), price controls are in effect and Kirchner recently told banks that they would be forced to lend money at rates lower than inflation. Would someone like to tell me how that model will be successful? A couple of years ago, political allies of Lula were caught siphoning off millions of dollars from the postal service in a vote buying scheme called "Mensalao" or monthly payments. Lula declared he knew nothing of the scheme and yet his right hand man was directing the whole operation. Functionaries were caught in airports with hundreds of thousands of dollars stuffed down their pants. That is no joke. I was living in Brazil when it happened.

I don't think I need to remind you what's happening in Venezuela, do I? Currency just hit rock bottom yesterday and inflation is approaching 30%. Protesters are on the streets trying to prevent Chavez from modifying the constitution and NO ONE is willing to buy Venezuelan debt. Several debt sales were retracted after no buyers stepped forward. This is a country swimming in oil yet no one wants their debt. Does anyone see the problem yet? BTW, Argentine debt was the poorest performer of ALL nations this year and Brazilian & Argentine debt continues to skyrocket despite a commodities frenzy.

Make no mistake - I'm no fan of world banking cartels or corporations, but I recognize the problems as being far deeper than simply throwing together a bank with 7 billion in operating funds and expecting it to serve its function - corruption free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reality check II... Posted by: stryder
» RE: eality check II... Posted by: MAD
Here's hopin'...
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 2, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope this alt. bank works great for them. Things like this give me encouragement.

Now, I wonder how that'll affect the Bushies' land purchases in Paraguay..... just a little tabloid fun to add to the laughs. If they try to apply for development funds from Chavez' bank I hope they get "their" land seized. bwhahahahaaa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHAVEZ in the CROSSHAIRS
Posted by: stryder on Nov 2, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing about Chavez is – he’s not a temp stooge a la GW Bush, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and so many western so-called “leaders”. Despite serious autocrat shortcomings, Chavez is a genuine leader pushing real reform from a vast wealth base of Big Oil that gives him very real power on the world stage.

Chavez has been more ignorant on monopoly Fascist style Bilderberg Group economics than – for example – another genuine leader in Russia’s Putin (who recently did battle with western oligarch Big Oil proxies for Russian resources).

But strongman Chavez is learning fast as evinced by this BANK OF THE SOUTH gambit headquartered out of Caracas Venezuela. The “Chavez Bank” is no less than an economic declaration of war on true Fascist masters of the ultra-crooked west that pull their unconstitutional “Federal Reserve” Corp strings on the MSM and circus puppet shows at Washington, London, Tel Aviv, Riyadh, Qatar, etc, etc.

As a worthless “Federal Reserve” Corp petrodollar sham (worthless to ordinary people not to criminal oligarchs) goes into another tailspin a real assault from Chavez could be the fatal blow. Thus Chavez and Co may be the ones to help topple the entire blood money casino into the abyss of history

With the CIA already caught in attempts to overthrow Chavez, it’s also clear he has to stay alive long enough to collect on his challenge to an old corrupt monopoly order. One that hasn’t lost its Fascist grip from before the Gilded Age.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bailey Savings and Loan-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Nov 4, 2007 9:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in Bedford Falls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My view
Posted by: compu on Nov 7, 2007 1:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iam not in any way a financial guru.,but....
The left in Latinamerica had for a very long time blame the
poverty,and the rest of the region ills among other things
on the high interest on it foreign debts.
After Argentina stop payments on the debt,(interests mostly)
that many believe was the main culprits for the meltdown
believe it or not the contry did recovery a bit,despite the fact
for all efects the country was in the deeps of a depression.
So,there have to be some true,that those shark loans are
a ruin to poor nations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some like hot air
Posted by: Per Kurowski on Nov 13, 2007 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MW: “a new "Bank of the South" proposed by Chavez … as an alternative to the Washington-dominated International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank.”

It might be a new bank and it might actually manage to in some mysterious ways help out but to call it an alternative to the World Bank is laughable. You should see how all the other countries tried to position themselves to take over Venezuela’s shares in the World Bank when chávez had that fit of wanting to withdraw from it.

MW: “The media have been reluctant to take the new bank seriously”.

Well not only the media. Recently during the High-level dialogue on Finance for Development at the UN I overheard people taking bets on how fast those other than chávez contributors to the equity would retire their funds through loans to themselves, and it was already down to less than one week; and the second bet was how long it would take before "Bank of the South" could not deliver an audited statement. There the consensus was more generous and spoke about two years.

MW: Unlike the Washington-based international financial institutions, the new bank will not impose economic policy conditions on its borrowers.

Yeah no conditionality… except probably having to sign up for a master degree in chávez veneration.

MW: It will be governed primarily on a one-country, one-vote basis.

This is absolutely the funniest hypothesis of them all. Has anyone looked at chávez proposal for a new constitution in Venezuela where he besides from being President wants to run the Central Bank and manage personally the foreign reserves of the country? Just you wait to see some countries trying to impose something different from what chávez wants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]