Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Moaning Lisa demonstrates the videogame-like properties of the female body -- to give it an orgasm you have to follow different patterns every time.

Fed Up with the lies, and the disinformation? Support AlterNet and keep it honest.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Moaning Lisa: A Blow-Up Doll, Upgraded

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted October 16, 2007.


Moaning Lisa demonstrates the videogame-like properties of the female body -- to give it an orgasm you have to follow different patterns every time.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

She looked at me with her motion detectors as I rubbed the piezoelectric sensor between her thighs. Then I spun the potentiometers that jutted out from her chest like nipples. But it wasn't until I stroked the piezosensor on the back of her neck that she began to moan, first quietly and then loudly, like a thousand women reaching orgasm together.

I was standing in front of a naked mannequin with the proportions of a porn star, her eyes replaced with fat lenses to detect motion, her nipples transformed into knobs, her ass and pussy and neck covered in thin sheets of metal that could detect pressure. Jutting from her left ankle was a USB connector, and through a hole in her back I could see the wires that had helped her respond to my attentions. Her voice had come from two small speakers at her feet. I had just jacked off a USB device.

Her name is Moaning Lisa, and I fondled her at Arse Elektronika, a conference in San Francisco last week devoted to pornography and technological innovation. Her creator, Matt Ganucheau, is a local artist and musician who likes to work with what he calls "novel interfaces." He designed Moaning Lisa specifically for Arse Elektronika, with help from conference organizer Kyle Machulis, to demonstrate the videogame-like properties of the human body. Ganucheau used neural network processing in her programming, and the result is that her responses are randomized. Each time you try to give Moaning Lisa an orgasm, your sensor stroking has to follow a slightly different pattern.

That's what keeps me hovering around Moaning Lisa in fascination. Her interface, though attached to a strangely distorted female body, seems human. She's a reminder that every woman has different physical sensitivities, and that sexual stimulation varies from person to person -- indeed, varies from encounter to encounter with the same person. She suggests we shouldn't mystify sex, because after all it's just like a game you play with piezoelectric sensors and potentiometers. Our bodies are a technology. Arousal is a program triggered by specific inputs.

Moaning Lisa is also a poignant conversation piece, inciting discussions you'd never imagine having with strangers. I got to chatting with Ganucheau about why he doesn't plan to build a male version, and we immediately start talking about how men experience sexual pleasure, though in an oddly technical way. "Male sex sensors are biased, and not as spread out" over the body, Ganucheau said. "Sure, there are deviances in distribution, but overall it's not as dynamic as a female. I find that if you go straight for male genitalia, the norm is that you're guaranteed to get someone off." This situation, he asserted, would make for a pretty boring game. You grab the genitals and you win every time. I countered that men have sexual sensors and patterns as varied as women's. Neither of us had any proof other than our own experiences.

Aside from some pretty graphic discussions of sexual sensors, Moaning Lisa inspired a lot of admiration from the women at Arse Elektronika. Many of us had suggestions for Ganucheau, especially what one could learn from people's interactions with her. If he were to continue working on Moaning Lisa, Ganucheau said, he would want to track how women respond to men playing with her. "It would be interesting to have a study where you had one male in a room alone with Lisa, and five women behind a one-way mirror watching, commenting on the interaction."

I have less complicated ideas. I think Moaning Lisa would be a good educational toy for women who are shy about telling their partners what they like in bed. She would provide a lesson in how hard it is to arouse somebody who gives you no verbal feedback until you randomly "score" with an orgasm.

"I see the female body as an instructionless, interactive puzzle," Ganucheau explained. Moaning Lisa is like a Rubik's Cube, a puzzle that you have to solve with your hands and your innate pattern-recognition ability. But with her exaggerated Barbie doll body shape -- giant breasts, tiny waist -- she's also a parody of female sexuality. She meets our expectations for what a sex doll would be, then frustrates those expectations by responding to salacious touches in a chaotic and peculiarly human way. That's what makes her a truly great piece of art. You cannot pin her down. You cannot forget her.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: technology, orgasm, sex toy, doll, female orgasm

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who wants to give Moaning Lisa some actuators.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Objectifying Women
Posted by: BigGuy5000 on Oct 16, 2007 4:54 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess it's OK to objectify women as long as it's a lesbian doing the objectifying. Alternet readers hate porn, unless it's gay or demeans Christians. Then it's fine.

This reminds me of the Alternet reader who was defending white women going out with black men but considered it terrible that black women went out with white men. Sexism and racism are bad, no matter who they are directed against.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Objectifying Women Posted by: luzmejor
Objectification and double-standards
Posted by: pgw on Oct 16, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, not all Alternet readers have a problem with porn per se, though many of the editors here seem to.

Second, I for one, think the whole concept of "objectification" is hugely misunderstood. I don't think there's any inherent problem with objectification – in fact, there are a lot of things that simply couldn't be done without a certain degree of objectification, including interacting with strangers or making art. Nor do I see sexual objectification as inherently wrong – its a big part of what otherwise might be called sexual attraction. The problem comes when objectification becomes total, failing to acknowledge the subjectivity of the other or crossing the line into stereotyping or dehumanization. Some people think porn inherently does this – I disagree.

Finally, I think there's a certain degree of truth to what you say about liberal double standards. There do seem to be a lot of people who view female sexual self-expression positively (such as that of sex-positive women like Annalee Newitz or Susie Bright), but bring up the topic of male sexual desire and its strictly Robert Jensen-style self-flagellation. To put it simply – FUCK THAT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

huh
Posted by: aislinnluv on Oct 17, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i'm an old, white, straight woman and i didn't find this piece of "art" offensive. unusual, to be sure. i think it could be quite instructional, as the author mentioned. although films and some literature tell us that women are quite vocal during sex, i wonder if we are in reality a lot less responsive in that respect than that? is it that common for a woman to give her partner the cues and clues that certain behavior is successful? if moaning lisa can educate some men (and women, if they are in need of the lesson) as to what works and what doesn't, that's OK by me. if you want to rant about objectification, go take on the video game people or the doll makers. talk to them about thong-wearing bratz dolls for 5 year olds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: huh Posted by: luzmejor
It should go over big in Texas as an "educational tool."
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 17, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But frankly I'd rather pet a cat than a robot. A real purr is better than a recorded orgasm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is something...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 18, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is something about the need to have a toy/doll/art piece like this to connect us to the fact that we have a more complex sexuality that needs more intimate, careful, and involved stimulation than what we are usually led to believe that is disturbing. It is disturbing, I think, because so many are unwilling to do something far more human, far more enjoyable, and that leaves us far more open and vulnerable to another person.. and hopefully more fully connected with them as well.. which is to do this kind of deep and open experimentation with our real human partner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something's missing...
Posted by: melissazumsteg on Oct 20, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can safely say that as a woman, I do take issue with this "poke me in the right order and I'll moan" approach to female sexuality. When I first read the article, I said to myself "maybe this will inspire the video game generation of men to take more of an interest in their female partners pleasure..." But then the thought occurred to me that, at least my own sexuality, isn't a push-button type of mechanism. (If only it were that simple!) For me, a man must do and say things to inspire me to copulate WAY before we get to the poking and prodding part. Read me great literature, play me a Nocturne, do the romance thing and you can poke me anywhere to get that desired response. What we need is a video game that inspires men to do the good stuff, the prolonged mental foreplay, that sparks a real womans' circuitry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well, why?
Posted by: juno1957 on Oct 21, 2007 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With all the issues going on in our society, I fail to understand why a journalist would write about something like this, or why a media outlet would bother to publish it. I just don't get it. Why not run an article about the state of special education in our schools? How about the situation of foster youth in our cities? Or discuss how to carpool, drive our cars less, and put less carbon monoxide into the air? Or how to save water? Or how to use less electricity and gas? Conservative right wingers read this, and think San Franciscans are a passle of dimwits, but they may have a point, when our media publish this sort of drivel. Why publiish something that only appeals to small minds?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» just cause...:) Posted by: mjglow
The End of Something
Posted by: MT512 on Oct 31, 2007 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will likely take many years, but if we don't blow up the planet, many men will take out loans to purchase sex-capable "female" androids. Many men would settle for the simulation to avoid the "trouble" of relationships with real women. Then we will read innumerable articles about a dearth of "real" men because all the other men are at home fucking their toasters. Women now "competing" with Barbie, Playboy and media in general will eventually be "competing" with stamped-out supermodel sexbots.

Hmm... would they also make child androids for pedophiles? Would it be a crime to have sex with one of them? After all, it's already a crime to attempt to arrange to have sex with a minor who doesn't exist (chat room-based sting operations with cops posing as minors). So it doesn't seem like much of a stretch to criminalize actual sex with something that is far more child-like than a cop in a chat room.... and then what do you have? Thought Crime!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Biology vs Technology
Posted by: Shamus on Nov 3, 2007 12:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You state, "Our bodies are a technology" As of yet this is not true. Perhaps you are a creationist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]