Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

While many migrants are forced into sex work, the rescue industry's moral position has hindered their own efforts to stop it, according to a new book, Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labor Market and the Rescue Industry.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Truth Behind the Sex Trade

By Susie Bright, SusieBright.com. Posted October 11, 2007.


While many migrants are forced into sex work, the rescue industry's moral position has hindered their own efforts to stop it, according to a new book, Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labor Market and the Rescue Industry.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Susie Bright

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

For quite some time, we've heard about the sex slaves -- the traffickers, the sexual bondage emerging at the border. The discovery makes free citizens sick; we feel like we must to do anything to make it stop, to uncover the beast.

But something very weird has been happening. Last month in the Washington Post, a shocking story appeared: Human Trafficking Evokes Outrage, Little Evidence: U.S. Estimates Thousands of Victims, But Efforts to Find Them Fall Short.

What?

It turns out nearly 30 million dollars was spent, in a passionate effort, to find a relative tiny number of victims. The "experts" had estimated over 50,000 sex slaves, then up to a million, and warned of a tidal wave on the horizon. Yet over ten years, and aggressive funding, the activists on the ground found closer to a thousand undocumented workers who matched the description of who they were looking for.

Of course, even one person found in bondage is more than enough. But the politics and polemics of rescue seemed strangely out of whack. Other reporters had raised a red flag years before: see Debbie Nathan's "Oversexed," and Daniel Radosh's critique of "Bad Trade."

When well-intended social workers and enforcement agents sought out female migrant workers with grievances, they often found people who said, "I'm desperate for papers, but I'm not doing sex work -- I'm in a different sort of bondage!"

Or, they found migrants who said, "I am doing sex work, but I'm making it worth my while, and the one way you could help me is by either getting out of my way or getting me legal documents so I make my own decision." Or, they found male prostitutes who didn't fit the feminine portrait of victimization at all, and they weren't eligible for "help," either. The problem as conceived by the policy makers was completely mismatched with the reality.

Author Laura Agustín has written a new book, Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labor Markets and the Rescue Industry, which rethinks the arguments of this entire tableau. If you've EVER read a story about trafficking, "immigration problems," and felt like you didn't know where to turn, this book will turn every assumption you might have on its head.

As Agustín wrote in a recent article in the Philly Inquirer:

It's the season, again, when the United States issues its annual Trafficking in Persons Report (TIP). Having named sexual slavery as a particular evil to be eradicated, the United States grades other countries on how they are doing.

... Grading everyone else on moral grounds is highly offensive, particularly when such grades are accompanied by threats of punishment if the line isn't toed. It's distressing to witness the deterioration of what good will is left toward this country since the post-2001 wars were initiated and campaigns intensified that presume the United States Always Knows Best.

For crusading politicians and religious leaders, a rhetoric of moral indignation is effective in uniting constituents and diverting the collective gaze away from familiar problems at home. So the culprits, those who get bad grades in the TIP, live far away from U.S. culture, which is assumed to be better.

Intransigent local troubles -- prisons overflowing with African Americans, millions of children malnourished -- are swept aside in the call to clean up other people's countries.

This moral indignation emanates from people who live comfortably, who are not wondering where their next meal will come from or how to pay doctors' bills. These moral entrepreneurs do not have to choose between being a live-in maid, with no privacy or free time and unable to save money because the pay is so bad, and selling sex, which pays so well that you have time to spend with your children or read a book, money to buy education or a phone.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sex trafficking, migration, immigration

Susie Bright is an author, editor, and journalist known for her original and pioneering work in sexual politics and erotic expression. She writes about sex and politics every day at her blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Both sides of the coin.
Posted by: ahmlco on Oct 11, 2007 2:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leave it to AlterNet to play up both sides of the same story. First in No Fair Trade for Trafficked Women, and now here.

Oddly enough, this story quotes the same Washington Post article and related studies that I had quoted in my comments to the original article... and for which I was condemned when I too used them to suggest that perhaps the sex trade angle was being overly sensationalized, and as such was overshadowing the real problem.

Nice to see that I was right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Both sides of the coin. Posted by: MartianBachelor
work locally for economic justice
Posted by: kenhymes on Oct 11, 2007 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hard to understand where the InterLeft falls on this stuff. I think it reflects a deep ambivalence about what constitutes justice and morality, and more importantly a habit of public argument being favored over quiet steady work for justice. On the one hand, the left (whatever that is these days) is seen as in alliance with feminist thought (which of course ranges from sex-positive types such as Bright to anti-porn crusaders like McKinnon, but certainly would include a lack of acceptance of male violence against women), and on the other hand the left is seen as in opposition to regulation of personal morality by government and church actors. This is one area where there is no strong compass exhibited by public progressives. Another is religion and reason.

I respectfully suggest that we focus on our strong suit: economic justice. That is not only the area that resonates with the body politic, but it also provides a way of dealing with issues like this more consistently and coherently. If women (or children or even sometimes young men) are being exploited sexually for profit, it is generally becuase they are economically vulnerable, with limited options and/or lack of the protections enjoyed by more prosperous citizens. So, stick up for vulnerable teenagers and women where you are, work on providing social and economic options, and you will reduce the chance that they will be prey to sexual exploitation.

Similarly, when it comes to dealing with religious fundamentalism, both here and abroad, the answer is not to attack belief - that will always create negative unintended effects, and actually reinforce unhealthy allegiances. Instead, the left should be consistently seen as supporting the economic justice interests of working and poor people no matter what their cosmology. This is not exciting, it doesn't help bloggers feel smart and cutting edge in their philosophical and historical tirades; but it leads to results over time, as evidenced by the work of truly successful organizers all over the world in the last hundered years. Almost no one becomes famous doing local organizing with and for struggling people, but it is what the left actually could do, and often has done, to be useful.

Peace
Ken Hymes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing the point
Posted by: Cruella on Oct 11, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can never know exactly how many women are in our countries illegally after trafficking. If we had some way of counting, we would have some way of finding them. Just because the police claim to have had a really good look and not found many, that doesn't mean there aren't many. The police in the UK only seem to find 6% of rapists, even though most are known to their victims personally. Once we do find victims of trafficking of course, we treat them with such contempt, it's not surprising they don't come rushing out to the police for help. Trafficking is a form of abuse and we would never expect a victim of abuse to immediately understand that that's what they're experiencing. It is a hallmark of abuse that the victim is convinced that it is their own fault and is thus inclined to protect their abuser from investigation at least at the initial stage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anecdotal evidence, maybe, but anyone who has visited (not necessarily used) the Redlight
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 11, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
District in any European country knows that a large percentage of the 'working girls' are immigrants, especially from E.Europe, Ukraine, Russia, former Soviet Bloc, Serbia, Albania,or Africa. It is plainly obvious in most circumstances due to language skills, as well as the 'look' of the women. Also, note the accents/look of many of the men on the streets 'looking after the girls'; Moraccan, Albanian, Chechyan, etc. Anyone who doubts this is crazy. In fact many 'tolerant' countries, such as the Netherlands, is started to 'crack down' on prostitution (and even change laws) due to the influence of these new criminal gangs that also traffic hard-drugs, guns, children, and illegal immigrants-- in addition to women for the 'trade'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real Slaves
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Oct 11, 2007 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the article, overall, but specially with the idea of "saviors" beign really impossing their morals and standarts to others. In the "black or white" scheme, its easier to put all prostitutes in the "victims" basket and refuse to aknowledge their free will and independence. It is easier than thinking that some people would do on their own free will what we would feel abhorrent even to contemplate. So we "save" them from themselves.

When I think of Human traffic, the first image that comes to my mind is not of prostitutes, but of the workers of a construction site in Dubai I used to colaborate in. The basic layout was made by a Boston architectural studio, the execution by a spanish engineering firm, with contractors from all over Europe and Asia. And the labor? the labor were indians mostly, whose passports were held until the work was finished (ETC 2+ years), whose meals and spartan living quarters were deducted from their salary, who were hired on a landing strip and loaded into cargo planes like cattle, whose accident rate was tens of times higher than that of any european construction worker.

All, to build luxury condos up to 350m2 in wich the room destined for the domestic service are 4m2 and have no windows. The maids in places like UAE or Kuwait are usually from SE Asia and suffer a rape rate of 60% before they return to their countries. As far as I know, I was the first person from the 30+ on both design teams (Boston and Madrid, Madrid team composed mostly of women) who realized there was no security plan for the construction site and that those houses were rape traps for domestic service. Not an eyebrow was raised when I mentioned it. I left that job.

Thats human traffic and its not shady rings who promote it, but first world indiference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bright Hits the Nail on the Head.
Posted by: Libertine on Oct 11, 2007 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This says it all for me:

"This moral indignation emanates from people who live comfortably, who are not wondering where their next meal will come from or how to pay doctors' bills. These moral entrepreneurs do not have to choose between being a live-in maid, with no privacy or free time and unable to save money because the pay is so bad, and selling sex, which pays so well that you have time to spend with your children or read a book, money to buy education or a phone."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

interesting take
Posted by: wolvirene on Oct 11, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good story. i worked a few years back as a bartender in a strip club in nc. we have a large pop. of migrants there and there was a demand for mexican dancers... from the spanish speaking population that is always growing there..
i watched the new dancers come in with hardly any knowledge of english buy some relation to another spanish dancer in the club--
we forget that the sex industry is not always entered by force.. typically women choose this option (in terms of strip clubs) because of the money (whether they are trying to support a family or a drug habit is another story)
the spanish speaking dancers at this club did extremely well because the migrant workers wanted to be entertained by women who spoke spanish and shared there cultural ideals..
the women i am inferring to struck me as strong independent and intelligent
they did really well
- i have no doubt that they came to thrk illegally. this same club eventually got shut down by allegations of prostitution and drug use.. but that goes on in almost every strip club
are these women victims of trafficking? i never thought to view it that way

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush policy on trafficking, misuse of statistics, and forcd labour
Posted by: siobhannigrath on Oct 12, 2007 1:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is absolutely untrue that "activists on the ground found closer to a thousand undocumented workers who matched the description they were looking for." This figure, pulled from a misleading Washington Post article published recently, refers to the number of victims of trafficking (in any industry) who have received T-visas. These visas are granted to those deemed by officials to be useful in prosecution of traffickers, and who are willing to assist in this prosecution - in spite of the risks posed to themselves and their largely unprotected family members back home. Thousands more victims have been identified by activists on the ground (many undocumented, some with guest worker visas or other temporary visas). The low figure represents only the fact that the Bush administration has prioritized law enforcement over humanitarian concerns in their policies around trafficking.

I am glad to see an article which raises the issue of over-emphasizing sex and sex work in the mass media's reporting about trafficking. But rather than just demonstrate that many sex workers are not 'victims' - which this article does - we also need to raise the profile of the millions of workers, male as well as female, working in forced labour in a myriad other industries around the world. This article ufortunately obsures the latter part of the picture just as much as the mass media does.

-Siobhan McGrath
University of Manchester

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]