Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Blackwater: The U.S.'s Trigger-Happy Guardians

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted October 3, 2007.


Why did the U.S. State Department tolerate -- and pay to conceal -- the wanton murder of Iraqis committed by Blackwater?
Robert Scheer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Robert Scheer

The Tortured Law on Torture
How has our government managed to justify one of the most egregious assaults on the rule of law?
May 14, 2008

Battle of the Hawks
Both McCain and Clinton have shown a dangerously cavalier attitude towards the option of a nuclear strike against Iran.
May 7, 2008

No Country for Old Men
McCain's age matters; especially if he picks his running mate from the crazy wing of the Republican Party.
Apr 30, 2008

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

How did it come to be that the ostensibly best-educated and most refined representatives of the United States in Iraq are guarded by gun-toting mercenaries who kill innocent civilians? More urgently, why did State Department employees and their bosses in Washington tolerate -- and pay to conceal -- the wanton murder conducted on their watch?

That's the real scandal of the more than $832 million the U.S. State Department paid Blackwater, investigated this week by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, headed by Henry Waxman (D-Calif.). The issue is not simply that of the Blackwater forces' horrid behavior but, more important, why the mayhem they unleashed upon innocent Iraqis was approved and covered up by the Bush administration. For example, why did a top State Department official initially suggest a payment of $250,000 of American taxpayers' money to conceal the uncontested fact that, as the House committee report states, "a drunken Blackwater contractor killed the guard of Iraqi Vice President Adil Abd-al-Mahdi"?

The State Department enabled the Blackwater shooter to be spirited out of the country within 36 hours, and although Blackwater subsequently fired him, he has never faced any criminal charges. Nor have any of the others involved in the 195 shooting incidents Blackwater officials admitted have occurred in the past two years, incidents in which 84 percent of the time Blackwater contractors fired first. According to Blackwater's own documents, the congressional committee reports, "in the vast majority of incidents ... Blackwater shots are fired from a moving vehicle and Blackwater does not remain on the scene to determine if their shots resulted in casualties." During one trip U.S. diplomats made to the Ministry of Oil, 18 different Iraqi civilian vehicles were smashed by the fast-moving motorcade. Those hit-and-runs were conducted in full view of the escorted State Department officials without any of them forcing a subsequent investigation.

Despite all the nonsense about a "liberated Iraq," one of President Bush's favorite phrases, the Iraqis still lack the authority to prosecute American mercenaries occupying their country because of a law pushed through by then-U.S. proconsul Paul Bremer, who was also guarded by Blackwater personnel. Bremer awarded the original no-bid contract to Blackwater, run by a major Republican campaign contributor, Erik Prince, who has donated $225,000 to the GOP. Prince's sister Betsy DeVos was Michigan's Republican Party chair and a Bush-Cheney "Pioneer" who came through with at least $100,000 for their 2004 campaign.

But this is not yet another story about payoffs to the GOP faithful who have predominated in the occupation and are totally untrained for their assigned tasks in the restructuring of a country that they know nothing about. The Blackwater guards know their job all too well, which is to guard top U.S. officials by any means necessary -- including the casual extermination of innocent Iraqis.

Clearly, paid contractors are better for this task than American military personnel, since contractors operate outside of the restraints imposed on ordinary troops by law and by their own consciences. Many Blackwater contractors have been recruited from the U.S. military at much higher pay than direct service to their country afforded them. Whereas a top Army sergeant is paid $51,100 to $69,350 a year in salary, housing and other benefits, a Blackwater contractor (often a retired sergeant) receives six to nine times as much. The U.S. government pays Blackwater $1,222 per day for one Blackwater "Protective Security Specialist," which, the congressional report notes, "amounts to $445,891 per contractor" per year. In an unusual display of disapproval aimed at Blackwater from the right side of the aisle, Rep. John J. Duncan Jr., R-Tenn., noted Tuesday that Army Gen. David H. Petraeus' annual salary amounts to less than half of what some high-ranking Blackwater security officials in Iraq earn.

Of course they're worth it, along with the Iraqi deaths they cause, if your own life is on the line and that's all that matters. This is clearly the position of the State Department employees in Iraq and their bosses in Washington who have covered up for Blackwater for years. As the House committee majority staff states: "There is no evidence in the documents that the Committee has reviewed that the State Department sought to restrain Blackwater's actions, raised concerns about the number of shooting incidents involving Blackwater or the company's high rate of shooting first, or detained contractors for investigation."

No better evidence that the Iraqis are the Indians, attempting as imperfectly as they may to protect their ancestral terrain. But this time the imperial majesty of the United States, represented by American Ambassador Ryan Crocker, is established not by the U.S. cavalry but by a band of hired gunslingers.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: blackwater, iraq, iraqi civilians, mercenary

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bringing "the troops" home
Posted by: Crazy H on Oct 3, 2007 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So we take these people - mercenaries, willing to kill for money. We send them to Iraq where they can satisfy their bloodlust at will. We subject them to the stresses of war for a couple of years.

And then they come home to the US of A, where ... what? They're just going to settle down and pump gas for $3.75 an hour? Have amicable discussion with an Arabic neighbor whose dog pooped in their yard? Smile at the nice Iranian behind the counter at the Quickie Mart? Laugh when your kid pops a balloon behind them?

I don't think so...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Security or Corporate Thugs
Posted by: EJW on Oct 3, 2007 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't for a minute believe the intent of 'private security' details are to actually protect our government and military officials overseas (or in this country for that matter), they are there to ensure that said official follow the corporate line. Our officials, here and abroad, are being held hostage to the 'corporate' mafia. They are not protecting the interests of the US and her citizens but the interests of multinational corporate cartels by whatever means necessary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality Check
Posted by: Georealist on Oct 4, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mercenaries (Volunteers) are the way its done..or has everyone here been asleep since the Draft was done away with decades ago? Or impoundment was ended by the British? Blackwater employees are special forces trained and simply don't put up with the death wish firefight rules liberals like..."When you have been shot or blown apart you may...if discussion fails..fire back."
Mr. Scheer didn't show Blackwater employees were either triggerhappy...part of the corporate "Mafia" or really..much of anything.
By the way..no one except the Mexicans who clean the peoples houses on this site get $3.75 an hour...and full service at gas stations is dead. Repeat after me..2007..2007

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality Check Posted by: Crazy H
» The usual righty BS Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: eality Check Posted by: JSquercia
How much...
Posted by: jimb on Oct 4, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much is an American life worth in terms of Iraqi lives? I'm sure that the fine folks at Blackwater have at least a ballpark figure in mind. I would hope, anyway, that there is a finite amount. We know it's a ratio of greater than 17 to 1, as there were 17 innocent Iraqis recently mowed down by Blackwater bodyguards when they only feared an attack,not waiting for one to actually occur. So, to save one American life, how many innocent Iraqis could be killed for which Blackwater and its Republican backers would still be able to justify it? Tens? Hundreds? Thousands? Is there a limit?

We're four years into our occupation of Iraq. We still have troops and contractors speeding down the roads, unable to stop, unable to swerve around pedestrians, having to run vehicles off the road, and sometimes spraying gunfire at anything that moves, just in order to get from point A to point B in one piece. That's progress? What was it we went there for again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Time For Congress to Demand That the State Dept & DoD Fire Blackwater
Posted by: global_butterfly on Oct 4, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has become clear that Blackwater USA has become a threat to any hope for peace in Iraq. How can Iraqi citizens possibly feel safe when a paramilitary organization, which seems to answer to no one, is running lose on their streets.

There is enough documented evidence to prove that Blackwater's tactics as well as their attitude toward the Iraqi people and culture are inappropriate, to say the very least.

The recent incident involving Blackwater contractors opening fire in a predominantly Sunni neighbourhood, killing eight and wounding 13 civilians is the straw that breaks the camels back.

Does the US Government really want to run the risk of Blackwater USA starting WW III?

It's time for the US Congress to demand that the Department of State and the Department of Defense cancel all contracts with Blackwater USA and order them to depart Iraq immediately.

If you agree please sign this petition. It's time to end Blackwater's terror for profit.

It's Time to Fire Blackwater

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imperial Thugs
Posted by: P. Hermes on Oct 5, 2007 3:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two years ago I had been recently back from extended anthropological research in Mexico and checking on what kind of deductions I was entitled to through the IRS for this work. All links sent me to the official US State Dept. website in order to determine my approved per diem and lodgings deductions. What I remember in particular on the main homepage was the foremost attention given to fees and deductions by US contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the degree that it said outright that these mercenaries had certain legal daily deductions (extremely high, as I remember) but that if these daily expenses were insufficient they were invited to request a waiver in the form of an increase in their daily expenses. I guess Blackwater and Halliburton employees needed relief from their expensive free room and board in the Green Hell Zone. It was also very clear to me at the time that the State Department (hear me Madame America-fuqing Condomless Rice?) was neck deep into a great scam on the American people.

Arrest and convict them all; arrest and convict; arrest and convict; arrest and convict!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Army costs less?
Posted by: monkopotamus on Oct 6, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would it not make sense that hiring mercenaries (esp. at the profits Blackwater is making) costs the U.S. more per "soldier" than the Army or Marines?

It would be interesting to see the cost analysis on this, wouldn't it?

Why not hire these men? A large number are former U.S. military. Are they making too much money to rejoin?

Remember the Hessians. Britain lost that war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Worth looking into, IMO... Posted by: CanuckKid