Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Jaime Sommers, heroine of the 1970s show Bionic Woman is back, but in a gender role that seems older than the original.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Modern Bionic Woman, Retrograde Feminism

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted October 2, 2007.


Jaime Sommers, heroine of the 1970s show Bionic Woman is back, but in a gender role that seems older than the original.
Advertisement

Of course I tuned into the series premiere of Bionic Woman last week. Some of my earliest TV memories are of watching the first Bionic Woman, a hopelessly and gloriously 1970s series about Jaime Sommers, a tennis player who gets bionic implants that give her super strength in her legs, one arm, and one ear. She was a cyborg before cyborgs were cool. And every week, she would fight bad guys and do bionic stuff for great justice.

Now ultimate women's lib heroine Sommers is back, all spruced up for the 2000s, and the results are rather strange. Thirty years have passed, and time seems to have gone backwards -- except the bionics, which have been updated to a nanopseudoscience involving something called anthrocites. This time around, Jaime isn't an independent career jock: she's a 23-year-old bartender and college dropout who has just gotten pregnant and is about to marry her surgeon boyfriend. When she asks said boyfriend why he likes her, despite her lack of professional success, he replies, "You're the one thing my father didn't plan for me."

This kind of weirdly retrograde treatment of Jaime and her relationship is all the more perplexing because the show is produced by David Eick, whose other show, Battlestar Galactica, is known for its strong female characters. Indeed, when Eick talked about Bionic Woman before the show debuted, he claimed it would focus on how we feel about women's roles now that we know women can do anything men can. Jaime is hardly the kind of woman to tell that sexual equality story. She's in a low-status, low-paying job, looking down the barrel of her future as little more than a rich man's wife.

All that changes, however, when she gets into a nearly fatal accident and her boyfriend takes her to his secret lab at Wolf Creek, where he gives her a secret surgery that turns her bionic. Anthrocites in her blood mean she heals instantly; implants in her eye and ear give her super senses; and she has those superfast legs and a superstrong arm. Even her superpowers come to her via a sexual connection with a dude. And, it turns out, so do the superpowers of her nemesis, a bionic lady (Katee Sackoff, who plays Starbuck on Battlestar) who had sex with another guy who works with the ultrasecret bionic lab.

Now that Jaime has these new powers, however, she doesn't have to be a bartender. What will she do with her bionic upgrade? Apparently, she'll have to do exactly what the dude who runs Wolf Creek tells her. He points out that she has about $50 million worth of his equipment inside her body now, and he has a business interest in making sure she toes the line. So the entire premise of the show -- that Jaime becomes a "saving the world" type -- is founded on the idea that she has no choice because her body literally does not belong to her. Most of her body parts are the property of a corporation. We are left to assume that if she refuses to do what Wolf Creek tells her, they'll take their toys back and she'll die. Or maybe they just won't give her any upgrades and she'll be infected with some kind of bionic virus that makes her scream "Viagra!" or "Mortgage!" over and over.

So let's assess our new-school bionic babe, keeping in mind Eick's comment that this show is about how "we" feel now that we know women can do anything men can. Apparently "we" feel that women only become powerful through their sexual relationships with men. "We" also feel that even when women are powerful, it's probably because men implanted something inside them that the men continue to own and control.

Sure, there a few ways the show tries to nod to feminism. Though Jaime isn't educated, we're told that she has an IQ higher than the Wolf Creek director who owns her. And her little sister is a hacker. So we know that women can have brains, that they aren't powerful solely because of things that male scientists surgically attach to their bodies.

Nevertheless there's something deeply wrong about a science fiction show, allegedly about a woman of the future, whose message seems taken from a past much further back than the show's origins in the 1970s.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: feminism, bionic woman

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is much better than that Fembot piece week.
Posted by: chaoslegs on Oct 2, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought the queston Jaime asked about why are you with me, was a little forced. A better cover would have been an outside interest, poetry reading, that brought them together. However, he probably doesn't have time between lecturing and working on Black Ops.

I find it a bit strange that Annalee doesn't go into Katee Sackoff's agressive sexuality with the need for emotional reassurance. Or that she was dumped when the doctor was found not to be killed. I disagree that character was empowered via sexual connection. She "played house" with her trainer, but I don't think that gave her the power, but refined the skill to use that power. It is a bit of a distinction.

Also why not look to the self-esteem issues surrounding the original/prototype that is Katee Sackoff's character via the need to eliminate/replace the weakness. The striving for an unattainable perfection. They seeing your flaws as a weakness.

I agree it is a weird situation, that Jaime is a bartender. But while not an ideal job, why is a person's occupation the thing that ultimately gives you value. How do my friends that work in a grocery store (a co-op) or post office rate in that scale??

What about a discussion of the fact that Jaime has stepped up to the plate and taken in her sister to care for. That is a pretty bold move for a 23 year old to take.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's that, and..
Posted by: AJN007 on Oct 2, 2007 1:48 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The show is basically unwatchable. Boring, cliche, predictable. Everything network television strives for these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give it at least 3-5 episodes
Posted by: rjray on Oct 2, 2007 4:57 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's a little early to be judging the show. Wait a few episodes and see where they go with the characters. The bits of preview from last week's ep hinted that she may yet grow as a character. At least there are no Seinfeld or Friends castmembers cluttering it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feminism Attacks Another Windmill
Posted by: newtype_alpha on Oct 3, 2007 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time a science fiction or action show pops up that prominently features women as a leading role, we always get at least a half dozen commentaries about "What sort of message is this sending to women?" or "What are the implications about a woman's role in society?" or even "What are the implications for modern feminism?" I always find this more than a little quixotic, sort of like watching Bush veto a bill for children's healthcare and then wondering "What sort of message is this sending to the peanut farmers of Southeast Asia?"

Newsflash: the Bionic Woman is no more about women's liberation than the Six Million Dollar Man was about male domination. The Bionic Woman was and is a story about a woman nearly destroyed by an accident, yet rebuilt and restored by technology, and thus given the capacity to expand beyond her previous limitations. It's a thought experiment about self-improvement through technology, and all the moral questions, identity issues and freaky implications thereof. That being the case, the reasoning behind Sommer's relationships--even that with her doctor friend who saved her life by giving her the implants in the first place--is just a plot device, no message intended and no implications involved. The message of the Bionic Woman is how Sommer's decides to cope with her new identity as a cyborg, as well as the fact that gigantic parts of her body were made in a factory somewhere.

Ironically, that's the part all these pseudo-feminists miss when they comment on a show like this. Ultimately, it turns into a battle between Jamie's autonomy and the demands of the organization; hence her closing comment to the director, "If we're going to do this, we'll do it on my terms." It's the same message whether the main character is a woman, a man, a child, a transexual, or a Republican. It's the message that technology can allow you to transcend your limitations and become more than you are... BUT that opportunity comes at a price. In Jamie's case, in the new version, the price she pays is to become a dog of the military.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Feminism Attacks Another Windmill Posted by: newtype_alpha
» RE: Here here Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: Windmill attacks another feminist Posted by: newtype_alpha
» RE: Windmill attacks another feminist Posted by: newtype_alpha
another view
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 5, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of thinking of it as a man attempting to control a woman think of it as a corporation attempting to control a person. Something we can all relate to given the current political climate in this country. The protagonist bucking the system in this story just happens to be a woman.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: another view Posted by: Shamus
the classic jaime sommers
Posted by: jcrakow on Oct 12, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the post Annalee. Totally jogged my memory of the classic version of the show and my experiences from it. So much so, I had to write about it as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]