Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Checkbook Imperialism: The Blackwater Fiasco

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted September 19, 2007.


Why doesn't the Iraqi government have the explicit legal power to expel or adjudicate the U.S.-contracted troops that are killing its citizens?
Robert Scheer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Robert Scheer

The Tortured Law on Torture
How has our government managed to justify one of the most egregious assaults on the rule of law?
May 14, 2008

Battle of the Hawks
Both McCain and Clinton have shown a dangerously cavalier attitude towards the option of a nuclear strike against Iran.
May 7, 2008

No Country for Old Men
McCain's age matters; especially if he picks his running mate from the crazy wing of the Republican Party.
Apr 30, 2008

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Please, please, I tell myself, leave Orwell out of it. Find some other, fresher way to explain why "Operation Iraqi Freedom" is dependent upon killer mercenaries. Or why the "democratically elected government" of "liberated" Iraq does not explicitly have the legal power to expel Blackwater USA from its land or hold any of the 50,000 private contractor troops that the U.S. government has brought to Iraq accountable for their deadly actions.

Were there even the faintest trace of Iraqi independence rising from the ashes of this failed American imperialist venture, Blackwater would have to fold its tents and go, if only in the interest of keeping up appearances. After all, the Iraqi Interior Ministry claimed that the Blackwater thugs guarding a U.S. State Department convoy through the streets of Baghdad fired "randomly at citizens" in a crowded square on Sunday, killing 11 people and wounding 13 others. So the Iraqi government has ordered Blackwater to leave the country after what a government spokesman called a "flagrant assault ... on Iraqi citizens."

But who told those Iraqi officials that they have the power to control anything regarding the 182,000 privately contracted personnel working for the U.S. in Iraq? Don't they know about Order 17, which former American proconsul Paul Bremer put in place to grant contractors, including his own Blackwater bodyguards, immunity from Iraqi prosecution? Nothing has changed since the supposed transfer of power from the Coalition Provisional Authority, which Bremer once headed, to the Iraqi government holed up in the Green Zone and guarded by Blackwater and other "private" soldiers.

They are "private" in the same fictional sense that our uniformed military is a "volunteer" force, since both are lured by the dollars offered by the same paymaster, the U.S. government. Contractors earn substantially more, despite $20,000 to $150,000 signing bonuses and an all-time-high average annual cost of $100,000 per person for the uniformed military. All of this was designed by the neocon hawks in the Pentagon to pursue their dreams of empire while avoiding a conscripted army, which would have millions howling in the street by now in protest.

Instead, we have checkbook imperialism. The U.S. government purchases whatever army it needs, which has led to the dependence upon private contract firms like Blackwater USA, with its $300-million-plus contract to protect U.S. State Department personnel in Iraq. That is why the latest Blackwater incident, which Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki branded a "crime," is so difficult to deal with. Iraqis are clearly demanding to rid their country of Blackwater and other contractors, and on Tuesday the Iraqi government said it would be scrutinizing the status of all private security firms working in the country.

But the White House hopes the outrage will once again blow over. As the Associated Press reported on Monday: "The U.S. clearly hoped the Iraqis would be satisfied with an investigation, a finding of responsibility and compensation to the victim's families -- and not insist on expelling a company that the Americans cannot operate here without." Or, as Ambassador Ryan Crocker testified to the U.S. Senate last week: "There is simply no way at all that the State Department Bureau of Diplomatic Security could ever have enough full-time personnel to staff the security function in Iraq. There is no alternative except through contracts."

Consider the irony of that last statement -- that the U.S. experiment in building democracy in Iraq is dependent upon the same garrisons of foreign mercenaries that drove the founders of our own country to launch the American Revolution. As George Washington warned in his farewell address, once the American government enters into these "foreign entanglements," we lose the Republic, because public accountability is sacrificed to the necessities of war for empire.

Despite the fact that Blackwater USA gets almost all of its revenue from the U.S. government -- much of it in no-bid contracts aided, no doubt, by the lavish contributions to the Republican Party made by company founder Erik Prince and his billionaire parents -- its operations remain largely beyond public scrutiny. Blackwater and others in this international security racket operate as independent states of their own, subject neither to the rules of Iraq nor the ones that the U.S. government applies to its own uniformed forces. "We are not simply a 'private security company,' " Blackwater boasts on its corporate website. "We are a professional military, law enforcement, security, peacekeeping, and stability operations firm ... We have become the most responsive, cost-effective means of affecting the strategic balance in support of security and peace, and freedom and democracy everywhere."

Yeah, so who elected you guys to run the world?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: blackwater, iraq, contractors

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And why wouldn't king George want...
Posted by: babs on Sep 19, 2007 1:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... his very own cowboy army?

These mercenaries have no allegiance other than to the money that they are paid - in some cases twice that of a regular soldier.

Traitors started this war, and apparently traitors are prosecuting it on the ground as well.

But Prince is a good christian so it's ok, y'all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Chimpy is afraid of horses! Posted by: astockton
The U.S. military is not a mercenary force.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Sep 19, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are "private" in the same fictional sense that our uniformed military is a "volunteer" force, since both are lured by the dollars offered by the same paymaster, the U.S. government.

The otherwise cogent point--highlighting the further crumbling of the illusion that an independent, democratic, peaceful Iraq that respects freedoms of individuals could ever arise among the tribes in that region of the world as a result of U.S. intervention--is cheapened by the author's contempt of American kids who swear to protect their country, even during times when their country doesn't make very wise choices with regard to their lives.

They don't teach nation-building in basic or anywhere else in the military, and that's because standing militaries aren't very good tools for building nations. It is not the fault of the soldier that his Commander in Chief sends him across the world to do a mission he is neither trained nor equipped to perform. It is not the fault of the soldier that his Congress punted it's Constitutional responsibility to decide when and on what terms this nation Declares War using something it recently invented called an AUMF. And it is not the fault of the soldier that his fellow countrymen go about their lives (mostly) oblivious to it all.

The verbal Gipetto dance over grave failures of judgment and the the crass swipes at Private Joe (a cursory glance at deeply classified and highly coded HumInt codenamed "Payscale" indicates this "mercenary" isn't quite getting rich enough to get off of food stamps if he or she has a family) aside, the rest of the article is a thorough study of the obvious, as nasty as the author could make it towards the people who have sworn to defend his right to fart venom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It was a nasty swipe... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Unhinged? Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Unhinged? Posted by: PopRox80
» I gave the quote that burned my ass. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Nah... Posted by: ABetterFuture
fallawayjumper
Posted by: fallawayjumper on Sep 19, 2007 9:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Far from 'securing democracy' private security firms funded by the Pentagon, State Dept. et al., are in fact a THREAT to democracy for the operate outside the law. They are exempt from Iraqi prosecution, the ICC, do not have to adhere to the Military Code of Justice, run their own armies, air forces, prisons and pretty do much do whatever they please. Often that is shooting up the place and whomever unlucky enough to be in their vicinity.

And since they operate 'outside the system' they can be used as a sort of Emperor's Guard via the elasticity of their no-bid contracts. Blackwater in particular was 'guarding' NOLA after Katrina if you can believe that.

And the economic model is in keeping with the Bush/Cheney/GOP tradition of turning public treasure in to private profit for their friends and benefactors.

And of course the enormous number of contractors and their 'Contracts' represent an obstacle to a swift withdrawal allowing Iraq to achieve sovereignty and solve their own problems. For the occupation is indeed the very fuel that keeps the 'insurgency' alive. Proverbial gas on the fire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So why have the Iraqis not
Posted by: AussieGeoff on Sep 20, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
repealed the "100 orders"?

After that it is only a matter of getting the various factions in Iraq to decide to declare open season on every lowlife foreigner. It only requires a little common sense by the various factions - get rid of the invaders and then they (the Iraqis) are left to sort out their own problems.

The dead go into incinerators, the survivors get disappeared and questioned using enhanced techniques - note: not tortured (cough, splutter) - how could the US object - they are their tactics. No need to inform anyone - refer queries to the whitewash house.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Representatives Don't know About Blackwater
Posted by: grn1 on Sep 20, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes its on record, Congressman in the San Fernando Valley said recently in a meeting with peace activists that he knew nothing of Blackwater. He's either deceitful as hell or too stupid to be anyones representative!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thekidde
Posted by: thekidde on Sep 20, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's time in this country and, apparently Iraq, for pitchforks and torches. Americans and Iraqis need to take their country and their repspective constitutions back from the illegitimate power grabbers. Betrayus, uh, Petraeus is a Bush lackey helping to trash Iraq, Republicans and chickencrats are lackeys keeping Bush from imploding. Take to the streets - take back the country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thekidde Posted by: Doubtom
Blackwater Amok
Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon on Sep 22, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater was also in New Orleans after Katrina intimidating the citzenry. If we cannot stop them in the US, why would we allow them to leave Iraq when we still need the oil after the Saudi fields go dry?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blackwater, and other contractors
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 25, 2007 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I say bring our troops home right now. Let Blackwater and the rest of the private "army" fight the friggen insurgents! The Bush regime wants to privatize everything - privatize the stupid occupation!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.