Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Nowadays you'll read the NYT's Thomas Friedman decrying the "madness that is Iraq," but the real Friedman is the man who called invading Iraq "one of the noblest things this country has ever attempted abroad."

100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hooked on War: Thomas Friedman's Deadly Addiction

By Norman Solomon, CounterPunch. Posted September 7, 2007.


Nowadays you'll read the NYT's Thomas Friedman decrying the "madness that is Iraq," but the real Friedman is the man who called invading Iraq "one of the noblest things this country has ever attempted abroad."

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Reading his "Letter From Baghdad" column in the New York Times this week, you'd never know that Thomas Friedman has a history of enthusiasm for war. Now he laments that Iraq is bad for the United States -- "everyone loves seeing us tied down here" -- stuck in the "madness that is Iraq." And he concludes that the good Americans who have been sent to Iraq will not be deserved by Iraqis "if they continue to hate each other more than they love their own kids."

The column, under a Baghdad dateline, is boilerplate Friedman: sprinkled with I-am-here anecdotes and breezy geopolitical nostrums. For years now, the man widely touted as America's most influential journalist has indicated that his patience with the war in Iraq might soon run out. But, like the media establishment he embodies, Friedman can't bring himself to renounce a war that he helped to launch and then blessed as the incarnation of virtue.

On the last day of November 2003 -- eight months after the invasion -- Friedman gushed that "this war is the most important liberal, revolutionary U.S. democracy-building project since the Marshall Plan." He lauded the Iraq war as "one of the noblest things this country has ever attempted abroad."

But the assumptions built into a Friedman column are murky outside the context of his worldview. "The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist," Friedman wrote approvingly in one of his explaining-the-world bestsellers. "McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the designer of the U.S. Air Force F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's technologies to flourish is called the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps."

Those words appeared in Friedman's book The Lexus and the Olive Tree, but the passage first surfaced (with a few tweaks of syntax) in the New York Times Magazine on March 28, 1999, near the end of a long piece adapted from the book. Filling almost the entire cover of the magazine was a red-white-and-blue fist, with the caption "What The World Needs Now" and a smaller-type explanation: "For globalism to work, America can't be afraid to act like the almighty superpower that it is."

The clenched graphic could be seen as the "hidden fist" that "the hidden hand of the market will never work without." While the cover story's patriotic fist was intended as a symbol of the globe's need for multifaceted American power, the military facet had been unleashed just as the magazine went to press. By the time the star-spangled cover reached Sunday breakfast tables, NATO air attacks on Yugoslavia were underway; the U.S.-led bombing campaign would last for 78 straight days.

Writing columns and appearing on broadcast networks to assess the war, Tom Friedman was close to gleeful. (The man was widely viewed as a liberal, whatever that meant, and "the liberal media" provided Friedman with many platforms that often seemed to double as pedestals.) Interviewers at ABC, PBS and NPR ranged from deferential to fawning as they solicited his wisdom on the latest from Yugoslavia.

Even when he lamented the political constraints on the military options of the 19-member NATO alliance, Friedman was upbeat. "While there are many obvious downsides to war-from-15,000-feet," he wrote after bombs had been falling for more than four weeks, "it does have one great strength -- its sustainability. NATO can carry on this sort of air war for a long, long time. The Serbs need to remember that."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war, iraq, new york times, thomas friedman

This article is adapted from Norman Solomon's new book Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America's Warfare State, which just came off the press. For more information, visit: MadeLoveGotWar.com

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
But addictions can end up becoming...
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 7, 2007 12:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All wars have a price!
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 7, 2007 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Including this one!

yes - hooked on war is right!
Posted by: millamoon on Sep 7, 2007 1:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the power of nightmares - documentary by adam curtis.... some food for thought

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=881321004838285177

you can see all episodes on either google video or youtube.

Pathos
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 7, 2007 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is always a pathetic thing, indeed, to see a man trying despeately to white wash his dubious place in history. Robert Macnamara's memoirs from about ten years ago come readily to mind - a book so mind-numbingly boring that I couldn't finish it. The only other time that's happened to me in my life was trying to get through something called "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" - PAINFULL!

How anyone can possibly take Thomas Freidman seriously at this stage in the game has to be one of the great mysteries of the age. The man has zero credibility. The fact that he actually makes a living as a writer of opinion is difficult to if not impossible to fathom. Sure, now he decries the obscenty that is Iraq - but not when it really mattered.

In March of 2003, on the eve of the invasion, I saw the Iraq incursion for what it obviously was: the stupidest military blunder in American history. If a tenth grade drop out can get it right with not a smidgen of intellectual effort, what is Freidman's excuse? Please.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

» RE: Pathos Posted by: Sushi
Try this for size......
Posted by: daro on Sep 7, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I defy anyone to remain upbeat about war if they read this piece from the London Times today. timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article2402969.ece

Unless maybe they are strong on stocks in weaponry and pharmaceuticals.

I would ask the question if the Artful Dodger, your much-derided CIC, has recently set foot in a military hospital?

» RE: it's too big Posted by: Ripcord
Francis
Posted by: Francis on Sep 7, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try defining Thomas Friedman, William Kristol, Elliot Abrams, David Wurmser, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, without the inclusion of sadism and and the great joy they take in cruelty to humanity. It simply cannot be done. Compounding the evil is the flargrancy of their intellectual unseriousness, the proud stupidity, the contradictoriness and groundlessness of their assertions. They resemble nothing more than small children trying unsuccessfully to break a toy, in this case, civilization, amazed and amused by it's resiliency. There is mental illness here.

» Payday has finally come... Posted by: eddie torres
» Besides being Jewish... Posted by: HeroesAll
» theys ALL dejaVU's.... Posted by: Bozwell
Incitement
Posted by: lumenborealis on Sep 7, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Article 20 of the United Nations International Covenant om Civil and Political Rights states "Any advocacy propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law." Passages quoted from Friedman sound to me very much like incitement to criminal war activity.

» RE: Incitement Posted by: Earthian
Severely Misled
Posted by: US Citizen on Sep 7, 2007 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paul Krugman is ten times more intelligent than Thomas Friedman will ever be. Anyone who wasn't opposed to the Iraq War from day one was severely misled by the Bush administration and is not worthy of being read or listened to.

» RE: Severely Misled Posted by: blitzmesser
He may laugh heartily, but he doesn't get the joke.
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Sep 7, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's truly amazing that Mr. Friedman has a byline in the Newspaper of Record, to say nothing of a Pulitzer prize. His idea that globalism is impossible without the backing of American military imperialism, for instance, displays a naiveity that borders on the absolutely clueless. Not because it isn't, in fact, pretty accurate; but because Tom isn't the least aware of the U S.'s having morphed into a state that operates solely on the principle that Might Makes Right. What he's cheerleading for is in reality simply good, old-fashioned colonialism for fun and profit. And that blatant component of the current geopolitical equation is sailing right past Friedman's cerebral radar screen. I really doubt that he's heartless; he simply isn't all that bright.

As an illustration of the man's blissful ignorance--some time ago, he wrote a column about telemarketers in Bangalore, India, being trained to speak in a Canadian accent. "That's called globalism at work," crowed Mr. F. I mailed him the comment, "No, Mr. Friedman, that's called FRAUD."

These days, cluelessness appears to be a highly lucrative commodity. That's the whole trouble.

The Times ( New York that is)
Posted by: reinaldok on Sep 7, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the real casualties of the Iraqi debacle (too soft a word) has been without a doubt the demise of the NYT from certainly one of the world's great newspapers to something to help fill my cat's litter box.

» RE: The Times ( New York that is) Posted by: juanpecan81
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Friedman is a professional liar of the highest order
Posted by: skydog on Sep 7, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the risk of earning the Editor's Pick for worst ad hominem of the week, I must say that Friedman is shown a pig should be no surprise to anyone.

He's sold his soul to the corporate legions by dutifully waving the illusory banner of "free trade" in a global economy -- a virtually unchallenged and erroneous assumption that's shown to be false every time a poor grandmother wants to import cheaper pharmaceuticals from Canada. By some bizarre twist of logic, we conveniently and quietly institutionalize protectionism of their price gouging here in the US, and that's just fine and dandy to the free trade set. It's free trade set up to benefit working people they can't stand.

These loyalists in turn reward him by gluttonously gobbling up everything he has to say and swallowing it whole with no critical analysis, lending to his gobbledygook what the media in turn considers legitimacy, who in turn dutifully pump it out unchallenged for mass consumption. Meanwhile, our middle class and working poor are going straight down the shitter, and no candidate within reach of the Presidency in 2008 is going to do one damn thing about it.

It's the same, tired old racket, and Friedman has earned himself the title of kingpin.

Empire, what Empire?
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 7, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've already lost your economy Your freedoms and your military! What else have you left? Surdenly no "Empire" Just sand, and perhaps a couple of nukes, but thats about it!

A Barbarian With a Typewriter
Posted by: BiscuitBoy on Sep 7, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With each column of his the NYT publishes, their credibility goes down-- at this point it must be subterranean. Friendman is a barbarian with a typewriter, a shill for atrocity and murder, as long as the atrocity does not rain down on him, his family, anyone he knows, or Israel. And the American corporations he kowtows to are as destructive to the world as the military standing behind it. It is astonishing, breathtaking even, how wrong some people can get it. Unless, of course, there is an agenda he has that mitigates all conscience. That he is still publishing is criminal. At least someone had the shread of decency to fire Ms. Miller, though of course by that time her damage had been done.

» RE: A Barbarian With a Typewriter Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Did Friedman...?
Posted by: motamanx on Sep 7, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...really say that attacking Iraq was 'noble'?

Damn! I used to think he was smart. Because he is 180 degrees wrong on that one. It is the worst, least noble thing this country has ever done. And that's saying something.

» I Agree Posted by: US Citizen
» RE: Did Friedman...? Posted by: umrayya
Aggressive War = Noble?
Posted by: Glennk1949 on Sep 7, 2007 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Violate Int'l law and call it noble? Hitler did just that on Sept. 1st 1939 when he INVADED Poland. BV$H did the same in march 2003. He defied the world and went ahead and invaded that country . The real reason was all about OIL and power. The fake reasons, take ur pick. Friedman is just one of an continuing chorus of war mongering neo-cons. that are now busy beating the drum for MORE war. The next on against IRAN. These creatures sit in their plush Corp. suites and offices and wack off to the sound of bombs bursting and people being blown to pieces. They're evil bastards.

» RE: Aggressive War = Noble? Posted by: lively56
The real problem is . . .
Posted by: Bill in Chicago on Sep 7, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not so much his belligerence as his stupidity. Iraq is the wrong stinkin' country, period. And we have not yet lifted a finger against those who truly are responsible for 9/11:

www.asecondlookatthesaudis.com

The 9/11 Commission Report found evidence that a majority of the Al Qaeda recruits in those Afghan training camps were Saudi nationals. Now we're told that a majority of the suicide bombers attacking US soldiers in Iraq are Saudi nationals. Obviously, this is not a coincidence.

Yet the Bush administration continues to scramble around on their knees incessantly kissing Saudi royal ass, while the wise men of Washington obligingly remain silent.

FREIDMAN
Posted by: Roverton on Sep 7, 2007 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... looks like a man following instructions. Like marching orders. He's stuck doing a job.

The Olive Tree & The Lexus
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 7, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dubya blew up the olive trees trying to get oil to make gasoline to fuel the Lexus with money borrowed from Communist China and the Saudis, filtered it through no-bid contracts to cronies who further filtered it through other cronies and contributors who passed some of the money to the RNC and Neo-Con candidates, 'think-tanks' and so on. In the process he got thousands of our soldiers killed and maimed, along with uncounted Iraqis. BTW- he also stuck you, your children and grandchildren with the tab.

What a deal...

» Not if you emigrate Posted by: LMNOP
Greener pastures in Month #6
Posted by: eddie torres on Sep 7, 2007 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flathead Friedman spent the first 4 years of the Iraq occupation getting corporate media airtime with his perpetual "the next six months are crucial in Iraq" so shut-up-and-watch-the-spectacle pitch.

Now that the Petraeus Surge Report has arrived, Flathead concludes that Iraqis don't deserve US bombs anymore. Worse, "Letter From Baghdad" claims that while the US has floundered in Iraq, other lucrative targets (Iran, Russia, China, Egypt, Saudi Arabia) have muscled in on the action. Why isn't the US bombing them already, damn it?

If "war" is America's global brand, Flathead may suddenly be facing the reality that other countries have either stopped buying or are launching their own niche bargain brands.

And that leaves Global Inc's leading spokesperson dancing to a new tune for the $9.3 million / 11,400-sq-ft house that his wife built.

Friedman's "The Power Of Green" and "Green: The New Red, White and Blue" (Discovery Channel) tout new Green Ways To Shop At Wal-Mart and explain why future US energy production must change from Dirty centralized corporate-controlled technology to Green centralized corporate-controlled technology.

Key new Flathead/Green quote: "Well, I want to rename 'green.' I want to rename it geostrategic, geoeconomic, capitalistic and patriotic."

So the US should bomb China because of the threat it represents to the environment? Next stop: Friedman pimps "green-war" at US county fairs and carnivals for Boeing and Blackwater.

» right Posted by: Coleman
The Rush Limbaugh for the New Wealthy Elite
Posted by: sofla100 on Sep 7, 2007 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At one level Friedman seems like a misguided idealist. A typical neo-liberal whose faith in "the markets" and free trade unfortunately never makes it from the golf course to the poor in many a third world sweat shop hell hole. The great masses of humanity seemingly count for naught, as long as "GDP is increasing," which for Friedman, proves that "free trade is working." Never mind the increasing division between rich and poor across the world. We are to be delivered into a new world order, which of course will be backed by American military might. However, at another level, Friedman is undoubtedly representative of the point of view of not only the NY Times (which is obvious), but also your new rich elite. A cadre of rich investors, Wall Street financiers and corporate hunchos, with whom he has "seen the future." And, it is a future of increasing world wealth (trickled down to the poor as in Reganomics), unbridled capitalism and "free markets" (better chuck your national health care Britain and France due to it's "inefficiencies in the market") and, of course, dissatisfied third worlders (aka Muslims and all others who don't want to come aboard the gravy train to prosperity) . Bottom line, this guy has simply repackaged capitalism to blend with a 1950's style "America civilizer of the world" mentality and is smart enough to do it with enough intellectual spin so as not to come off as retarded like as Rush Limbauh. Even though, if you take apart their positions, they are hardly much different at all.

dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Sep 7, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Friedman is intensely loyal to Israel. thus his ambivalance in assessing and addressing the best interests of the USA rather than Israel's best interests.

» RE: dick Posted by: sofla100
Flat for Who?
Posted by: Missing Piece on Sep 7, 2007 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its very simple, the world is flat as long as other countries have resources we want. Very few 1st world countries have sustainable populations. This means they must go abroad to get these resources with out breaking the bank to buy them, and thats where it gets interesting. Thats what we should be discussing.

25ghostcommander
Posted by: 25ghostcommander on Sep 7, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am amazed and stunned that Friedman and others spout such vitrolic support for the acts of Fascism. Tass , Pravda and the Nazi press of Adolph Hitler would have welcomed them in their midst.

Friedman's A Cheerleader
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Sep 7, 2007 11:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Friedman's column runs in the paper where I work and I avoid reading it. He can't understand what guns and bombs and bullets do to people.
For him, a journalist, to promote violence, death and destruction without shame is despicable. The role of a journalist is tell the truth and expose lies and write with compassion.
I'd like for him to interview an Iraqi mother whose children were buried alive in a home from an U.S. bombs or see a man whose children were shot by "The Few, The Proud." He doesn't have the stomach for that. Let him go inside a hopsital and see doctors and nurses perform life-saving surgeries minus anesthesia and the right equipment; let him see a body at a morgue riddled with bullets or shrapnel or missing a limb. Or an infant squeaming in anguish with powder burns all over his tiny body.
I've seen these pictures of Bush's "Mission Accomplished". That was very hard for me to look at while this writer said they can't have concerts or attend an amusement park just because they don't live the way we do.
Friedman needs a reality check. Please someone tell him to put his pom-poms down and take a look at what he's cheering on. We're not rah-rahing in the stands.

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Fuck Tom Freidman...
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Sep 7, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Freidman is the enemy of every American working and middle class member, just an elitist sycophant pusillanimous little shit..

Can I say that..?

» RE: Fuck Tom Freidman... Posted by: weatherking
Charlie + Tom = repulsive
Posted by: fg on Sep 7, 2007 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish Charlie Rose would stop kissing Friedman's ass.

» RE: Charlie + Tom = repulsive Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
Thomas Friedman critiques
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 7, 2007 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's always fascinating to me when popular culture decides that somebody is an example of a powerful intellect. Kissinger? George Will? Thomas Friedman? He is a war-lover, and a statist.

Thomas Friedman's borderline racist reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Long but very worth the read.

Thomas Friedman critiqued by Kathleen Christison, a former CIA analyst specializing in this conflict.

Thomas Friedman: Liberal Sadist. Another article by Solomon about Friedman's love of war.

Friedman Thinks He Advances Israeli Interest
Posted by: wsking on Sep 7, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Friedman thought the war was in Israel's interest. That is what blinded him to reality and stoked his fervor for the war.

Poor Tom
Posted by: veive on Sep 7, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Golly, Tom, not only is the world not flat, your head is. Get HELP quick.

Dear Norman Solomon: Why attack the puppet? What about the puppetmaster?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 7, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why I have little faith in the liberal progressive left in this country - the apparent inability to look beyond the surface. Why no mention of the corporate board of the NYT? Why no mention of the NYT's endless trumpeting of the neoliberal global privatization agenda???

Sure, Friedman is atrocious - but who continues to give him a propaganda platform that takes his idiotic commentary into the homes of millions of Americans? Get rid of Friedman and the NYT will just bring up the next name on the long waiting list of neoliberal imperial apologists. There's an endless supply, after all.

Take a look at thehttp://www.nytco.com/company/ board_of_directors/index.html

Here's an entirely randomly selected sample: James M. Kilts

James M. Kilts was elected to the Board of Directors of The New York Times Company in 2005.

Mr. Kilts has been a founding partner of Centerview Partners, a boutique investment banking firm, since October 2006.

Previously, he served as vice chairman of The Procter & Gamble Company from October 2005 to October 2006. He also served as chairman, chief executive officer and president of The Gillette Company from 2003 until its merger with The Procter & Gamble Company in October 2005.

He is also a member of the board of directors of MetLife, Inc. and serves on the International Advisory Board of Citigroup.

Previously, he served as president and chief executive officer of Nabisco Holdings Corporation from 1998 until 2000.

Mr. Kilts served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Food from 1995 until to 1997 and President of Kraft USA, Oscar Mayer from 1989 until 1995, culminating a 23-year career at Philip Morris Companies. During his tenure with Philip Morris, he held a wide range of executive positions in business development, consumer products and strategy development.


Most of the others are just as bad, and all have seen their net value soar under the current Administration.

Now, why the hell can't pundits like Solomon make the link? Why is this topic off limits for both the left and the right? The Central Committee of the Soviet Union, and the Fraternity of German and American industrialists and bankers who backed Hitler were largely indistinguishable in their aims and methods and behaviors, after all.

My theory is this, and call it conspiracy if you like: the left wing and the right wing both belong to the same Totalitarian Beast, and the Beast can't fly without both its wings.

Christian Zionists; Lukid Zionists
Posted by: herbal on Sep 7, 2007 2:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Friedman is a respected expert on Mid-East affairs. However, he is inexorably a partisan for Christian Zionism and most likely Hillary Clinton, no? We all need to be aware of what may be the touchstone issue that effects the issues about the war that have eluded logical understanding. AIPAC, the Likid corporatist lobby is in control of US foreign policy

For peace activists there is no more urgent issue than this concerning the Primaries:

Hillary addressing AIPAC (3 min.):

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVWagtd8uwM&mode=related&search=

Rev. Hagee (self-described Christian Zionist) speech to AIPAC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt5Urh7Ctzw

"The Israel Lobby (excerpt from Tikkun newsletter)
In this Issue Tikkun Editor Rabbi Michael Lerner responds to the recent publication of The Israel Lobby by John Walt and Stephen Mearsheimer by giving an in-depth analysis of one of the most important issues in U.S. politics today: The power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to control the relationship between the United States and Israel.

"He comes to one conclusion: AIPAC is bad for the Jews, bad for the U.S., and bad for the world and he tells why.
This is not only a Jewish issue. Lerner presents ideas for how the Network of Spiritual Progressives can become the interfaith alternative to the Israel Lobby and shows that it can only do so with the help of non-Jews as well as Jews.

"Walt and Mearsheimer will be speaking at a series of Tikkun forums. The first will be held September 19th in Berkeley, California at 2345 Channing Way at 7:00 p.m. (reservations through Cody's bookstore)."

Herbal Editorial comment: Will US foreign policy continue to be directed by AIPAC under Hillary Clinton just as with the religious right dominated Bush regime? All the candidates need to be asked if they have accepted donations from foreign agencies and lobbies like AIPAC. It is time to join with the Jewish peace activists here and in Israel, and not fear the Lukid zionist backlash of AIPAC. Israelis are deeply divided over war and peace issues; we simply don't get their news past the US corporate media censors. Hillary Clinton represents a travesty of an added 4 to 8 years of the same world hegemony as Bush Jr. Let us not forget her perfect Bush agenda voting record up until the day her campaign began! There should be no options left on the table to defeat Hillary Clinton in the Primaries. We certainly must remember the Republican media campaign to declare all candidates as "unelectable" with the exception of Kerry (Yale, Skull and Bones, Wall St.) in 2004. This article seems to be cast in that mold that we see being cast in the TV "debates"; downplaying the most progressive candidates while focusing on the least threatening to the status quo. What do Carl Rove, Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton have in common? Invasion of Iran fixation.

Hillary AIPAC video address a call to nuke Iran:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVWagtd8uwM&mode=related&search=

Vaseline Tommy
Posted by: marid on Sep 7, 2007 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has been bending over and holding the jar for so long I don't even read him anymore. Puppets and prostitutes, the glue that holds the Neocons and the Merchants of Death together.

Here's the problem
Posted by: opeluboy on Sep 7, 2007 3:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Friedman is a Zionist, which is certainly his right. The problem is, there is almost no one in American media who is a so-called Middle East expert, terrorism expert, Arab expert, or Islam expert who is not a Jewish Zionist.

Apparently, if one actually comes from the Middle East, is a Muslim or an Arab, they are automatically disqualified from analyzing themselves. This must only be done by Jews from New York.

This is why we get unbiased views from people like Friedman, Pollack, Miller, Gold, Emerson, Ledeen, Schwartz, Krauthammer, Kristol, Pipes, Adelman and the rest of a list that reads like the guest register at a very upscale NY barmitzva.

Of course there are also very honest Jewish journalists, both Israeli and American, who do present the truth of the situation. But try to find one on TV. You won't. They are marginalized and ignored.

Next time you see Uri Avnery on Larry King, please let me know.

» RE: Here's the problem Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: opeluboy hates da joooozz Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
» Grow Up moron. Posted by: yellow
War monger
Posted by: uncleeddie on Sep 7, 2007 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my youth I couldn't understand how Germany could be so outragously bad? How could human beings commit such horrible acts and believe they were justified? Thomas Friedman has explained to me exactly how a country can behave with that much evil except now it is the USA that feels justified. Just ask Thomas.

Just... wow
Posted by: Redviper on Sep 7, 2007 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought the hard right was crazy for war. Friedman truly ups the anty.

Tom Friedman's reply letter to one of my friends concerning war and trade.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 7, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This letter that came from Thomas Friedman to one of my friends would put most any person in total outrage. The letter I am about to post was his exact reply to my friend who was concerned about neocons giving WMDs to Saudi Arabia and Al Quaida and "free" trade undermining security. Read and revolt !

----------------------

While I appreciate your concerns about where America's money is being spent, I must disagree with your claim that America should be concerned about Bush offering Saudi Arabia and Egypt billions of dollars in foreign aid. Those leaders are doing everything in their power to help America and the world win the war on terrorism. We cannot just go and bomb Saudi Arabia just because those 19 hijackers were natives of that country. Your claim that Cheney and the neoconservatives are funding Al Quaida is absurd. You should show some respect and understand that it is important to bring democracy to a country with brutal leadership. Maybe it was a mistake to allow Hussein to rule in Iraq but we took care of that and progress is slowly but steadily coming in Iraq. As to your concern about Halliburton moving to Dubai because of free trade, I am afraid that you don't understand the meaning of free trade. Halliburton has a right to relocate its business as it sees fit. Free trade is good for both America and participating countries because if we are to get a taste of each other's cultures and understandings, we must first cut down on tariffs and frivolous laws curtailing business. If you find yourself having to compete with a foreign worker, it's possible that you may have to get yourself a better education or find another profession that you might be better at. That's business, sir.
-------------------

FRIEDMAN'S RELEVANCE
Posted by: spratling on Sep 7, 2007 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just another Israeli lackey posing as an American.

War is not the answer!
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 7, 2007 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Continuing your current course will simply make things harder for EVERYBODY! And blaming Iran isn't an "answer" or an "exit" either!

» UPS! Posted by: TT5
» Not that... Posted by: TT5
Corporate Press
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 7, 2007 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NYT Is THE perfect example of the total bankruptcy of the corporate press. And Tom Friedman is a horse's ass. Wait, that demeans horses!

friedman: hypocrite
Posted by: defiant on Sep 7, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, I wasn't the only one to notice :) Thank you.

There is not such thing,as a small enemy
Posted by: compu on Sep 8, 2007 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People like Friedman and this other sob of Michael Ledeen
google him,and read Pat Buchanam,"who war",will be the ones
responsable for the ultimate horror.
The world is a very big place.How do we keep a nuke from
been smugled,with millions of containers arriving,with thousands,and thousands of shoreline,remember the cocaine
smuglers ?
I bet that those Pakistanies are trying very hard to figure out
how to smugle one of those things,why ?Remember Benito
Juarez,"respect of others means peace".

He's up for bombing Iran, too.
Posted by: Urstrly on Sep 8, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just the other day he wrote that one of the reasons for withdrawing some of our resources from the war that is not going so well in Iraq would be that it would give us more leverage to attack Iran. Maybe this is who former Timesman Chris Hedges has in mind when he talks about addiction to war.

On the other hand:
Posted by: luckypuck on Sep 8, 2007 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Freidman said in his article, “Hold Your Applause” "Because I could see, a) we didn't have enough troops there. And b) I’ve been an advocate of elections from very early on, and turning authority over to Iraqis as fast as we could. We did many, many stupid things there. We may have done so many stupid things that now we've dug ourselves in a hole we can't get out of. I hope not, because at the end of the day elections were held, eight million Iraqis did turn out. Now, Iraq is going to be what Iraqis make of it, and I would also point you to the fact that if we lose in Iraq, I wish we could say we were losing to the Vietcong, traditional Iraqi nationalists. But we're not, we're losing to Islamo-fascists, we’re losing to sectarian fanatics, we’re losing to criminal gangs, and we're losing in part as you say because we never established a secure context from the very beginning. I’ve been focused from the very beginning on trying to do this right so we had a chance for those democrats to emerge." Seems like he wasn't so far off the right track, doesn't it?