Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

During the Bush administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has been more intent on providing protection to employers than workers.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Utah Mine Disaster: A Teachable Moment About Workplace Safety

By Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post. Posted August 23, 2007.


During the Bush administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has been more intent on providing protection to employers than workers.
Advertisement

Before the hordes of reporters move on from the Crandall Canyon Mine disaster, taking their note pads, satellite trucks, and the nation's attention with them, we should seize the opportunity to turn this tragedy into a teachable moment -- one that will allow us to look beyond the tragedy in Utah and the dreadful safety record of the mining industry, and focus on the larger issue of worker safety.

During the Bush administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the agency meant to oversee workplace safety, has been more intent on providing protection to employers than workers -- eliminating dozens of safety regulations since 2001.

"The people at OSHA have no interest in running a regulatory agency," said Dr. David Michaels, a George Washington University expert on workplace safety. "The concern about protecting workers has gone out the window."

Peg Seminario, director of occupational safety and health at the AFL-CIO, agrees: "They've simply gotten out of the standard-setting business in favor of industry partnerships that have no teeth."

Indeed, over the six and a half years Bush has been president, OSHA has imposed only one major safety rule, and has reduced the categories of recognized workplace injuries. Nevertheless, in 2005, the last year government statistics are available, 4.2 million workers were injured or became ill from on the job causes. And more than 6,800 workers died from workplace injuries.

Yet we rarely hear much about worker safety -- until high-profile deaths like the ones in Utah put the well being of American workers into the media spotlight. Why does it take a tragedy to grab our attention -- and for our government to pass and enforce worker safety laws?

The unsettling reason hangs over the Utah mine cave-in like a cloud of coal dust: as I detailed on Monday, more and more frequently, federal regulatory agencies are being used as a payback mechanism for rewarding major political donors, with industry hacks given key government positions not because they are the best people to protect the public interest but because they are willing to protect the very industries they are meant to supervise.

That's what has happened with OSHA, which is under the leadership of Edwin Foulke, a lawyer with a long history of open hostility to health and safety regulations. Earlier in his career, while serving as chairman of the federal agency that hears appeals from companies cited by OSHA, Foulke led a successful effort to weaken OSHA's enforcement power. With Foulke now in charge of his former target, OSHA has, not surprisingly, issued fewer significant standards than any time in its history.

Foulke's agency is charged with overseeing regulation of the transportation, agribusiness, and constructions industries -- powerful interests that have together contributed more than $630 million since 2000, with over $450 million of that going to the GOP.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: workplace, utah, mine, osha

Find more Arianna at the Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Workplace Safety
Posted by: jdlemasters on Aug 23, 2007 9:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I appreciate your attention to the topic of workplace safety, as a safety professional, I feel there is plenty of blame to go around. The existence or lack of a government safety regulation doesn't guarantee worker safety. It is the attitude of an industry, for instance mining, that is ultimately responsible for workplace fatalities. Safety regulations can influence some of that attitude through enforcement, but that cannot be relied upon or blamed upon why these things happen. For instance, using illegal drugs and driving under the influence are laws or "regulation", and people break them every minute of the day. Just as an industry (worker and management) will ignore or violate safety laws everyday. Congressional hearings and additional regulations bring attention to the issue of workplace safety. That is a good thing, because I agree that it does not get enough attention from anyone, not only a republican administration. You say in your article that the issue of workplace safety is ignored until a tragedy like the one in Utah occurs. That is a slap in my face and to thousands of others safety professionals who strive everyday, working side by side with workers and management, to make jobs safer. I, and the workers and companies that I help are not and will not wait for the government to come up with a new safety regulation to "make us safe". Industries have to think beyond the fog of a government safety regulation that is cut to pieces by debate before it is published.

You criticize society for not paying attention to safety until something tragic occurs. Would you even be writing about workplace safety or lack of government safety regulations if the Utah tragedy didn't occur? Keep on writing about it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bennie
Posted by: lbamusical on Aug 24, 2007 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry for those who are mourning their losses in the Utah mine disaster, but I'd bet that most of the victims solidly supported and voted for Bush and the Repugs - another example of voting against one's own interests!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

0SHA is not MSHA
Posted by: wm on Aug 24, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I don"t disagree with the blog; OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) does not regulate mines. That is done by MSHA(Mine Safety & Health Admin,) This is another example of the general ignorance of mining by most of the American media- the staements in News items that the miners were working 4 miles underground being the most glaring example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's about patronage stupid!
Posted by: Doggycuny on Aug 24, 2007 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Workplace safety? Are you having a laugh? This whole unfortunate event wasn't about workplace safety. It was about rednecks in power giving high paid jobs to their buddies who were unqualified to do the job. The redneck who ran the mine was given his job by King George via a recess appointment. He was not qualified to do the job. Even fellow republicans knew that! I could have done a better job. I might have GOT the job if I was a redneck and gave money or my soul to King George!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brownback
Posted by: JSquercia on Aug 27, 2007 5:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What really got me was the revalation that the disgusting piece of garbage that owned that mine threatened a mine Safety inspector by saying that Senator Brownback had named HIM one the five greatest Americans and that " last I heard he was sleeping with your boss " a reference to Elaime Chow the WORST Secretary of Labor in History . I'd call her a whore but I don't like to insult hard working Ladies of the Evening

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]