Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Let's Face It: The Warfare State Is Part of Us

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted August 23, 2007.


The warfare state didn't suddenly arrive in 2001, and it won't disappear when the current lunatic in the Oval Office moves on.
Normon Solomon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Norman Solomon

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity
Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
May 7, 2008

Let's Party Like It’s 1932
Obama has the potential to become as great a president as FDR, while activists have the potential to prompt change comparable to the New Deal.
Apr 21, 2008

NPR: National Pentagon Radio?
When even public radio parrots the military's official line on the war in Iraq, what hope is there for unbiased, quality reporting?
Mar 27, 2008

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The USA's military spending is now close to $2 billion a day. This fall, the country will begin its seventh year of continuous war, with no end in sight. On the horizon is the very real threat of a massive air assault on Iran. And few in Congress seem willing or able to articulate a rejection of the warfare state.

While the Bush-Cheney administration is the most dangerous of our lifetimes -- and ousting Republicans from the White House is imperative -- such truths are apt to smooth the way for progressive evasions. We hear that "the people must take back the government," but how can "the people" take back what they never really had? And when rhetoric calls for "returning to a foreign policy based on human rights and democracy," we're encouraged to be nostalgic for good old days that never existed.

The warfare state didn't suddenly arrive in 2001, and it won't disappear when the current lunatic in the Oval Office moves on.

Born 50 years before George W. Bush became president, I have always lived in a warfare state. Each man in the Oval Office has presided over an arsenal of weapons designed to destroy human life en masse. In recent decades, our self-proclaimed protectors have been able -- and willing -- to destroy all of humanity.

We've accommodated ourselves to this insanity. And I do mean "we" -- including those of us who fret aloud that the impact of our peace-loving wisdom is circumscribed because our voices don't carry much farther than the choir. We may carry around an inflated sense of our own resistance to a system that is poised to incinerate and irradiate the planet.

Maybe it's too unpleasant to acknowledge that we've been living in a warfare state for so long. And maybe it's even more unpleasant to acknowledge that the warfare state is not just "out there." It's also internalized; at least to the extent that we pass up countless opportunities to resist it.

Like millions of other young Americans, I grew into awakening as the Vietnam War escalated. Slogans like "make love, not war" -- and, a bit later, "the personal is political" -- really spoke to us. But over the decades we generally learned, or relearned, to compartmentalize: as if personal and national histories weren't interwoven in our pasts, presents and futures.

One day in 1969, a biologist named George Wald, who had won a Nobel Prize, visited the Massachusetts Institute of Technology -- the biggest military contractor in academia -- and gave a speech. "Our government has become preoccupied with death," he said, "with the business of killing and being killed."

That preoccupation has fluctuated, but in essence it has persisted. While speaking of a far-off war and a nuclear arsenal certain to remain in place after the war's end, Wald pointed out: "We are under repeated pressure to accept things that are presented to us as settled -- decisions that have been made."

Today, in similar ways, our government is preoccupied and we are pressurized. The grisly commerce of killing -- whether through carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan or through the deadly shredding of social safety-nets at home -- thrives on aggressive war and on the perverse realpolitik of "national security" that brandishes the Pentagon's weaponry against the world. At least tacitly, we accept so much that threatens to destroy anything and everything.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: warfare state, war

Norman Solomon's book, Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America's Warfare State will be published in early fall. The foreword is by Daniel Ellsberg. For more information, go to: www.MadeLoveGotWar.com

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Norman Solomon: fringe pundit!
Posted by: scott balogh on Aug 24, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Solomon is one of the sanest and logical public voices today. However, he seems to have been relegated to the back eddies. At least, it seems to me he has been sort of muffled. If I believed in God, I would ask him to propel Mr. Solomon to the forefront of national prominence as our leader or at least to be respectfully listened to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plugging his book
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 25, 2007 1:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article starts out ok: addressing the naivete and historical amnesia of many progressives who think our warmongering began in 2000, and will end if we vote out the current regime. This quote sums it up nicely:

"The warfare state doesn't come and go. It can't be defeated on Election Day. Like it or not, it's at the core of the United States..."

The rest is melodramatic fluff that's hard to follow. I was hoping for a more down-to-earth, straighforward analysis of our narcissistic, bloodthirsty culture...Let me guess: I have to buy the book and read this guy's life story for that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Plugging his book. Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Plugging his book Posted by: justgreenleaf
Dont worry guys!
Posted by: TT5 on Aug 25, 2007 2:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reallity will soon start hitting in, just like it did with the Soviet Union;=)

You wanna now how empires fall?

Simple! Just...

follow

the

MONEY$$$

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TT5's style. Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: TT5's style. Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: TT5's style. Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Dont worry guys! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Dont worry guys! Posted by: Joshua Holland
And when dd you first realize....?
Posted by: igoeja on Aug 25, 2007 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone that I know is angrily aware of US imperialist history, and the grotesque expenditures allotted to warfare. It has been this way for years, although warfare is only part of the picture of greed, profiteering, and state-level political manipulation. Remember Eisenhower's reference to the military-industrial complex?

The reinstitution of the war state occurred after boon times under a liberal regime. The oil money, ala Bush, and the defense industry, ala Cheney and Rumsfield, have reinstated the military gravy train.

It was obvious that the US people did not want the Iraq war, but the populace was primarily manipulated with fears of terrorism, sympathy for its people by detailing Saddam's [US-supported] torture, and a historically nonsensical belief in American-instilled democracy, among other propagandistically-instilled motives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Now Contradicting Myself Posted by: igoeja
I respectively submit that there were no imperialist motives whatsoever for Kosovo, period
Posted by: xbj on Aug 25, 2007 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our five minute war ALONGSIDE NATO in the Balkans was one of the few wars in all of US history that cannot be blamed for a single second on US Imperialism; the area had no oil, the countries there had nothing we wanted or needed, and we had no designs on them other than stopping another Hitler from coming to power in a powderkeg area of Europe and his personal and governmental genocide against Muslim Europeans.

So after Viet Nam, SOME folks learned something, SOME folks learned the right lessons, and some folks learned how to fight a war no one wanted the right way, for the right reasons.

And no amount of NaziGOP shrieking before, during, or after, can ever rewrite this page of US history, WHERE NOT A SINGLE US CASUALTY OCCURRED.

Clinton got far more right than he got wrong. Much to the eternal chagrin of his vitrolic rabid enemy ASSHOLES, who engage in and perpetuate human misery and war for one reason and one Goddamned (literally) reason alone; PROFIT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Still Justifying War.... Posted by: igoeja
» There is no "other side" Posted by: Iconoclast421
» I'm curious... Posted by: Iconoclast421
» a Wellstone plane crash Posted by: Iconoclast421
KOOL-AID PLANTATION –> AMERIKA CORP
Posted by: Hal on Aug 25, 2007 3:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The warfare state doesn't come and go. It can't be defeated on Election Day. Like it or not, it's at the core of the United States - and it has infiltrated our very being… What we've tolerated has become part of us.”

Solomon seems decent but is typical of so-called MSM “leftists”. His is (at best) second-rate analysis.

As in ancient Rome, “the warfare state” is a thug rent-a-cop at work for whoever delivers the paycheck. In the U.S. that is a parasite owned corporate crime state that rules Washington and a Mockingbird MSM as surely as Stalin ran Russia.

The nightmare here is that the good little sheep are utterly brainwashed to believe they live under “democracy” and “capitalism” when both have been quite dead for going on a hundred years.

Whoever literally makes (creates) the fiat funny money, runs the Washington-MSM carny show. That would be string-pullers behind the “Federal Reserve” Corporation (not federal, no reserves) and associated enablers.

Follow the money.

In the end, “what we've tolerated” is a monopoly corporate crime state (Fascism) that runs the U.S. like a Kool-Aid plantation. Amerika Corp style.

Bottoms up, drones.




“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
PRESIDENT FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT (on oligarch rule in a letter to handler “Colonel” Edward M. House, confidence man for the cartel and founder of the Council on Foreign Relations. House also handled President Wilson in the foisting of a private and unconstitutional “Federal Reserve” Corporation sham with its IRS in 1913. FDR speaks of monopolists at cartel centers of New York & London that own the U.S. Government. November 21st, l933)

“This [Federal Reserve] Act establishes the most gigantic trust [private monopoly] on earth. When the president [Wilson] signs this bill, the INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT of the money power will be legalized… The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”
CONGRESSMAN CHARLES A. LINDBERG SR. (speaking to Congress in opposition to the global banking cartel and its privately owned “Federal Reserve” Corporation monopoly. December 23rd, 1913)

“Britain is the slave of an international financial bloc.”
BRITISH PRIME MINISTER DAVID LLOYD GEORGE (on the money cartel June 20, 1934)

“The real menace of our republic is this INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of self created screen…At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.”
NEW YORK CITY MAYOR JOHN F. HYLAN (on the banking cartel in a speech 3/26/1922)

“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.”
PRESIDENT THEODORE ROOSEVELT (on the global money power cartel, Quote1906)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

war binds people to their political masters by making them sacrifice
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 25, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
War is generally supported by the ordinary Joe who was humiliated in boot camp, was shipped out with his buddies (some of whom he may have seen mutilated or killed, who saw and maybe did terrible things, all the while thinking that he was doing it for a good reason.

To admit that he was duped is a very tough psychological challenge. We don't like to back down on our cherished belief in the goodness of "God's Country". It's scary and it feels bad.

What non-combatants see (or the little we are allowed to see) of the reality of war is very painful, so we suppress it. And we non-combatants feel that it would be very impolite to those who "bravely served their country" to criticize warfare, as though being involved in violent action somehow gives some moral authority to the compliant people who are willing to kill.

The impetus for war comes from the top, those in power who benefit from corrupting the rest of us, getting us to believe in "justifications" such as "defense", "national security" and "spreading democracy".

"Just war" is an oxymoron and, though disputes will occur between contending agencies, warfare is not natural, not inevitable and not "normal". Beware of those who want to send your sons and daughters to do good deeds!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Warlike Nation
Posted by: nim on Aug 25, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, we are a war like nation! We have a history of war going all the way back to the invasion of Mexico, 1841-46. And yet, the Dominionists are at work trying to convince the population that we are a "Christian Nation". They stress the "christianism" (my word) of the founding fathers. They toss out blatantly erroneous statistics, ie: half of the nation is in church every Sunday!, 80%+ of the population identify themselves as "Christian"!, etc. So, I conclude, following the Prince of Peace is a sure track to war!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At this stage ...
Posted by: jefhadist on Aug 25, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this stage of the game, the military-industrial machine has entrenched itself so fully in the affairs of all state and many local governments that it will be almost impossible to get rid of without open revolt. Where do you think that $2 billion dollars a day goes? It ends up in the pockets of workers who keep building the war machine, every day, in every state of the nation. Even a share of the money for the so-called "breast cancer stamp" goes to support the military. That's just one tiny example of how insidious it has become. A former student of mine was just offered $70,000 dollars to sign up for the army machine and rumor has it "special forces" folks are being offered up to $250,000 signing bonuses to reenlist. Even John Stewart got into the act last night and had some clone of General Petraus on extolling the virtues of counter-insurgency bullshit. What a world, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: At this stage ... Posted by: Lincoln fan
A fascist regime, not a warfare state
Posted by: citizenjoe on Aug 25, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Solomon and most on the left are simple minded economic determinists. The logic of the fascist state is empire based on military supremacy and corporate expansion. Those who reduce this to "the military industrial complex" show no understanding of states, nations, or empires. In short, they do not understand the modern world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Screwed Up Priorities
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 25, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While American soldiers labor in 100 degree heat 13,000 miles away, in an unwinnable war, Americans at home have to contend with:

Millions of us without access to medical care due to lack of universal health insurance.

Bridges falling apart and people dying because of a lack of enough money to fix them.

Crumbling schools and not enough teachers everywhere because of a lack of money.

Millions of Americans potentially losing there homes due to the previous real-estate boom and the "current economic correction."

However, for the rich:

Decreasing taxes, especially for the wealthiest, so there "investments," can "help build the economy."

An unparalled access to government ensuring only the most favorable (to them) laws are passed that govern how corporations function and how they (rich elite) can get by with even more rip-offs and even lower taxes.

It's good to know what America's priorities are, isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Screwed Up Priorities Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Screwed Up Priorities Posted by: edith
warfare will end
Posted by: daw13 on Aug 25, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when people perceive it to be a lose-lose proposition. Which it probably already is. The biggest lie our "leaders" tell us is that however we may deplore their methods, they can remain the top gang on earth and keep their own turf relatively safe. When their critics emphasize only the immorality of their behavior they are strengthened. No nation state today can survive a determined onslaught of uncentralized guerilla warriors dug-in not only in the deserts of the Middle East and the mountains of Afghanistan, but in London and Paris and Buenos Aires and Los Angeles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's face it: We can Live Better than This
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 25, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To say we're doomed to be a warfare society is to say we've buried ourselves so deep in shit we can't find a way out.
HORNSWAGGLE!!! The only thing we're short on is the 'action' of change. There's certainly a majority of us that are fed up with corrupt politicians. Fed up with the war we caused by having a Foriegn Policy that's good for nothing.Fed up with the aide that's no help in a National Crisis. Fed up with offering the gun instead of the olive branch. We can correct this. Stop participating in their system. Stop voting for their puppets. Stop buying their ideas on who to hate and whom to blow to smithereens.Stop accepting the thin slices of Freedom and Liberty they give us and start LIVING all of it.
To straighten out the mess they made for us will take some sacrifice. For those of us on the bottom leveles of society it won't be so bad,we're used to 'trickled on economics'. We can get by. The rest of you cushy, don't rock the boat, oh my social position folks with your heads and values securly anal, you'll have to get used to a little less excess. You made you money looking the other way while this country was drug into
the cesspool. More than a few of you made a fat living off of the killing devices that were made.Some of you are looking,right now, for the next 'hotspot' to make some more war bucks. I feel sorry for you useless sacks of skin.
We know in the deepest parts of our beings that killing to get you point across is for the weak. We know a friend is better than an enemy. We know these bums are killing off all living things to get rich. We know they don't deserve the positions we put them in.
Think Outside the System
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez
www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indeed- but it's far more pervasive than Solomon indicates
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 25, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm no fan of Donald Rumsfeld - but at one point, he lost his temper and blurted out: "The Truth??!! The American People Can't Handle the Truth!"

Every once in a while, the facade slips, doesn't it? What is this 'truth' that the American people can't handle? Well, let's look at our public employee's retirement system, as just part of it. Teachers don't like war, do they? Yet CalPERS, the California Public Employee Retirement System, is heavily invested in the likes of Exxon... and what bank controls CalPERS? State Street Corporation, that's who. State Street is also the #3 institutional shareholder in Halliburton. They also are a significant holder of Raytheon.

I don't mean to pick on CalPERS in particular - they're just a convenient example of a widespread phenomenon. The only robust manufacturing sector in the US is weapons manufacture. Basic industries like steel manufacture have been shipped offshore, and US agriculture is now serf feudalism based on illegal (read: deportable) immigrants, aka economic refugees from NAFTA trade deals that destroyed local agriculture in Mexico and other countries.

Now we've got an aging population of baby boomers that is entirely dependent on foreign weapons sales and military control of global oilfields for their retirement incomes. Cheney and friends actually believe in this system - which is why, in their twisted little minds, they view themselves as patriotic Americans. This is the very same generation who endlessly praises itself for halting the Vietnam War... ever hear the phrase, "these idiots actually believe their own PR?"

Take a drive across America - look at the isolated enclaves of wealth, the gated communities, the dead industrial wastelands, the giant slave-run agricultural plantations, the environmentally devastated poor communities, the world's biggest prison system, the corporate-run public universities, where fraud and corruption rule supreme...

The Disneyland media trys to maintain the myth of "America, the World Leader" - but the propaganda has a tinny, desperate quality to it. The arms wave faster and faster, the music grows louder and louder, but nothing can hide the awful stench of the rotting corpse of a once-great nation... and if we stop producing weapons, then the whole thing will go belly up and the baby boomers, like those pathetically greedy Enron employees who crowed over their stock values till the whole thing collapsed, will see their retirement incomes vanish into thin air.

Yes - Rumsfeld was right, wasn't he? The people can't handle the truth - especially the ones who get their info from the corporate media outlets - but it's pretty clear to the rest of us.

Think Argentina:

"IN HIS backyard, behind a makeshift fence to keep his two scrawny chickens from digging it up, Raul Alaniz has a tiny patch where he keeps earthworms, feeding them food scraps, which they will turn into organic fertiliser, which he hopes to sell. Unlikely as this sounds, Mr Alaniz, an unemployed bus driver, says that several of his equally desperate neighbours in Las Delicias, a district of Rosario, are doing the same, in the hope of earning a few pesos. Others are raising snails and frogs to sell to restaurants.…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what to do?
Posted by: voicecoil on Aug 25, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Solomon hits the nail on the head; no surprise there. Likewise, par for the course that many us agree with him, save for the usual couple of nut jobs, and of course the last knucklehead who describes the class structure as being utterly polarized: the (apparently) single, childless, idealist warriors such as himself, and in the other corner, doughy middle American bible-thumpers with McMansions and hummers.

But wait... what about the VAST MAJORITY of us? Married, a kid or more, little dinky house (rented or owned; it hardly matters any more), shitty jobs (or cool jobs with shitty pay) for both parents, and FEAR FEAR FEAR of losing everything, landing on the streets, in a hospital, a detention of some kind; fear of even exposing the terrible depth of our fear to our very own children.

It's a crushing blow around this age, now nearing 50, having grown painfully aware of the dysfunction in our own families, having had to accept our own roles in that, and perhaps having vowed to alter the course. Don't many of us believe that Peace Begins At Home, and that there will be no mending of the world until we mend our own souls, one by one? And now we come to see that all of this work and good faith comes to nothing in the larger world, as much as it makes breakfast conversation markedly less dominated by neurotic squabbling. It certainly seems as though the whole process of trying to learn how to live together more peacefully is nothing more than one of the diversions of Freedom (trademark symbol) that we are allowed to consume here.

It is no trick at all to do the research and demonstrate how bad things have been and how bad they are, although as usual I have great respect for Norman Solomon for his writing chops and for the spirit that shows through the words. Nonetheless, it all boils down to one question only:

What now?

I mean in actual, practical terms. None of this "let's all refuse to accept the paradigm" crap. We don't accept it, already, and that's fine with them. I believe they even grugdingly encourage it on some level, as a less-than-ideal option, since it channels our discontent to a harmless place, and it makes us feel as though we a experiencing a choice of some sort or participating in something (which is essential for making us retain a sense of identity as Americans).

Does anyone in this forum actually believe that anything will change unless there is a massive upheaval, a massive public display of grat duration, outrage, violence, tremendous loss of life, detentions, imprisonment... in short, a series of events that finally forces the Shadow Government to operate in the open? Doesn't is feel like a distinctly 21st centural liberal discussion, to be debating the existence of a Shadow Government... wringing our hands over whether or not it could be true while in our hearts we already know they are harvesting our souls, the souls of our children... welcome to the Matrix, I guess.

Like many of you, I am nauseated by such a thought; I have everything to lose. Halfway or more through my life, only to imagine choices like these? I did not become a parent in order to bring children into such a phase of history. No one did. Yete here we are.

Is it possible that the very same American sense of entitlement (or, if you prefer, the Judeo/Christian sense of being preferrentially selected) that helps to hold the Illusion together is the very same force that stops us from imagining that we are, right now, faced with the same prospects of bloody revolution that has faced many other societies before?

Do we think, once again, that we will have it easier than others, that we deserve an easier ride? Will our carefully cultivated inability to integrate the facts of history into our own realities be the thing that dooms us and our planet?

Just a thought. Curious what you all think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So what to do? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: So what to do? Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: So what to do? Posted by: Lincoln fan
quick clarification
Posted by: voicecoil on Aug 25, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By "the last knucklehead," I meant jeffrey7 (Let's face it: We can Live Better than This).

I rather agree with thoughtcriminal (CalPERS etc.), although I do respectfully pose my eventual question specifically to such a thinker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bursting at the seems
Posted by: vertical on Aug 25, 2007 10:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Earth's basic problem is that there are too many people. War is the only population control device we have. We need more war to thin out our ranks so the Earth could be a decent place to live. But we better not go nuclear because then we would take every living thing with us. WAR FOR A BETTER LIFE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bursting at the seems Posted by: Axiom69
war and peace
Posted by: vasumurti on Aug 25, 2007 11:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Linnaeus, who introduced binomial nomenclature (naming plants and animals according to their physical structure) wrote: "Man's structure, external and internal, compared with that of other animals shows that fruit and succulent vegetables constitute his natural food."

The myth that humans are naturally a predator species remains popular: "The beast of prey is the highest form of active life," wrote Nazi philosopher Oswald Spengler in 1931. "It represents a mode of living which requires the extreme degree of the necessity of fighting, conquering, annihilating, and self-assertion. The human race ranks highly because it belongs to the class of beasts of prey. Therefore we find in man the tactics of life proper to a bold, cunning beast of prey. He lives engaged in aggression, killing, and annihilation. He wants to be master in as much as he exists."

That predators exist in the wild does not imply man must imitate them. Cannibalism and rape also occur in nature. Robert Louis Stevenson, in his book In the South Seas, found no difference between the "civilized" Europeans and the "savages" of the Cannibal Islands:

"We consume the carcasses of creatures with like appetites, passions, and organs as our own. We feed on babes, though not our own, and fill the slaughterhouses daily with screams of pain and fear."

Studies indicate flesh-eaters have less endurance than vegetarians, while vegetarians have 2 to 3 times more stamina and recover 5 times more quickly from exhaustion. Most kinds of cancer, as well as heart disease, osteoporosis, kidney disease, diabetes, hemorrhoids, arthritis, gallstones and gallbladder disease are all preventable and/or treatable on a vegetarian diet.

The ill effects of alcohol, nicotine, etc. are known. The FBI reports 60 to 75 percent of all violent crime is alcohol-related. Might there not be a similar relationship between diet and aggression?

In a letter to a friend on the subject of vegetarianism, Albert Einstein wrote, "besides agreeing with your aims for aesthetic and moral reasons, it is my view that a vegetarian manner of living by its purely physical effect on the human temperament would most beneficially influence the lot of mankind."

U Nu, former Prime Minister of Burma, similarly observed: "World peace, or any other kind of peace, depends greatly on the attitude of the mind. Vegetarianism can bring about the right mental attitude for peace...it holds forth a better way of life, which, if practiced universally, can lead to a better, more just, and more peaceful community of nations."

"Who loves this terrible thing called war?" asked Isadora Duncan. "Probably the meat-eaters, having killed, feel the need to kill...The butcher with his bloody apron incites bloodshed, murder. Why not? From cutting the throat of a young calf to cutting the throats of our brothers and sisters is but a step. While we ourselves are living graves of murdered animals, how can we expect any ideal conditions on the earth?"

"I personally believe," wrote Isaac Bashevis Singer, "that as long as human beings will go on shedding the blood of animals, there will never be any peace. There is only one little step from killing animals to creating gas chambers a' la Hitler and concentration camps a' la Stalin--all such deeds are done in the name of 'social justice.' There will be no justice as long as man will stand with a knife or with a gun and destroy those who are weaker than he is."

The way we treat animals indicates how we treat our fellow humans. One Soviet study, published in Ogonyok, found that over 87% of a group of violent criminals had, as children, burned, hanged, or stabbed domestic animals. In our own country, a study by Dr. Stephen Kellert of Yale found that children who abuse animals have a much higher likelihood of becoming violent criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics Not Critiques Will Be The Ultimate Solution
Posted by: waterislifeaguaesvida on Aug 25, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is always good to be told once again what many people already know. The problem is not to know what's wrong, but to define the leadership needed to change it. This is the same Norman Soloman who refused to support an independent political alterative as a beginning in building a political alternative for change. The same Norman Soloman who spent his energy with the ABB crowd.Writing won't change a thing. Politics that define the reforms, structured organization that can lead the battles to extend representation and new political parties that can use the levers of power and begin to present change in the United States as a viable project are tasks being called for by many Libertarians, Unity '08, Greens and others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nothing changes
Posted by: Melvin on Aug 25, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How true I don't know. AT the beginning of WWII the USA produced enough arms for its own use. At the end of WWII it propduced 60% of the worlds weapons. It's a war economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a single mention of the United Nations?
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 25, 2007 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the US is the biggest supporter of the UN in the world?

Yes, the US has been an imperial power since the turn of the century war in the Philippines. But after WWII, the idea of internationalism took root. True, it was soon drowned out by paranoia about the Soviets (yes, Stalin was a cruel and ruthless dictator) and has been continued by the opportunity for the economic exploitation of foreign lands.

Our planet cannot afford another world war to show us once again the need for international cooperation. Experience demonstrates, however, that international cooperation is hard to build, especially with the power and income gaps between the first and third worlds.

Give me a discussion of the issue whether the primary obstruction to internationalism is the vested interests of today's powerful nations or the resentful reluctance of the weak. I expect no greater wisdom on that than on the wealth gap in the US. Social change comes slowly at best. When it comes too fast, it gets out of hand, in all directions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

warfare core of the United States
Posted by: caru on Aug 25, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if we were not lied to over and over we maybe would know this truth. warfare IS the us. where did the us come from? genocide of the indigenous peoples. i do think we can have a mass change of cosciousness, we just have to start teaching our kids the truth. tell the truth about how one people one species has continued to kill each other over and over.


"The warfare state doesn't come and go. It can't be defeated on Election Day. Like it or not, it's at the core of the United States."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This country was founded on and credited with MASS MURDERING the Native Americans
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 25, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as the solution/panacea to most if not all problems in America is VIOLENCE, America will be stuck in FAILURE mode.

P.S.: IT IS NO COINCIDENCE THAT THE PROHIBITION ON ALCOHOL WAS QUICKLY OVERTURNED WHEREAS THE PROHIBITION ON CANNIBAS HAS YET TO COME CLOSE TO BEING OVERTURNED. ALSO, NOTICE THAT LIKE ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO, ANY SUBSTANCE THAT TURNS PEOPLE MORE AGGRESSIVE OR EVEN VIOLENT BUT IS PROFITABLE GETS A FREE PASS WHEREAS DESPITE THE PROVEN NON-VIOLENT USE OF CANNIBAS AND THE FACT THAT CANNIBAS NOT ONLY IS NOT HARMFUL BUT IN FACT SAFELY CURES, BECAUSE NON-VIOLENT MEDICINES ARE NOT DEEMED PROFITABLE, THEY WILL BE KEPT ON THE BAN LIST.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Prohibition: You're right! Posted by: vasumurti
Domesticum ad absurdum
Posted by: Belegandir on Aug 25, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It comes down to three points in our Itch to spill blood: Evasion, lack of imagination, Absolute power-And we all know what Churchill had to say about that problem.

Evasion: Our Economy is not in the great shakes it used to be. With the stock prices and opinions of the federal reserve. If anyone has a grain of intelligence, it is not going so well/ The way things are gauged as far as GDP and consumer spending of course its is going to mask the reality: watching the gas consumption, home sales, durable goods. No one seems to care about the How of the spending, more about the What of the quantity.

If people see how the goods are being spend and the why it will show that the Middle class is spending more on energy and basic commodities. Tuitions are going up and that means mom and po are dipping into the equity.

The bottom line is the country is not facing the fact that NAFTA, and outsourcing as we know it has been a colossal failure.

The tax base is decreasing along with the dollar, The phobia of taxation is outrageous. taxation is needed to manage infrastructure, defense, and social projects that are beneficial to all Americans. People who see their Medicare and roads health, and education of their children decline cannot necessarily bitch about it if they voted for an anti tax candidate.

Services take money people. Yes, if my money is spent on something I find offensive, like sponsoring a country who kills dissidents for a living yeah that would piss me off, thats why you call your congressman, protest, or blog.

Lack of Imagination: In the next fifty years or less our gas supply, the easy half will be extracted. The hard stuff, like crude trapped in shale and other minerals is harder to extract and more expensive to refine.

Petroleum is no longer economically viable resource, and as we can see the cost in greenbacks is less than the cost of lives that are being lost for this resource.

its time for the US to step up production of plant based fuels and put some teeth into the alternative energy movement.

lastly restart the movement of made in America, products, we cannot expect other countries to follow our safety guidelines to the nines like we aim to do with what little is actually being produced in our back yard.

Absolute power: Since the aftermath of entering Iraq we have become a muti polar world. Venezuela, Russia, Iran, China have become major economic and political players. the UN has no teeth it is simply the tacit enforcer of US ideology.

The government has been hell bent for the last thirty years to maintain its supremacy with little effect, if only buying some paltry time. Instead of fiercely protecting what has been lost. Its best to admit to our selves that we are no longer top dog and the more we keep trying to jam this down other countries throats it will make our lot far worse down the future for each attempt.

It is far more disconcerting that the senate continues to stonewall on impeachment proceedings for Bush, Cheney and Gonzalez. If the American People want to have the faith of the world again, WE as a nation must get rid of these bad apples or less the whole barrel as we know it will be spoiled for the determent of all in the next ten to twenty years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you want peace and prosperity...
Posted by: TT5 on Aug 25, 2007 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Bush, if you want peace and prosperity, then stop sending war and destruction to other nations!

Mr. Bush, if you want your economy to grow and still be one of the worlds largest, then Mr. Bush, tear down these trade walls you and your country have created in the name of economic nationalism!

President Bush, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the United States and the west, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Bush, open this gate! Mr. Bush, tear down this wall!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amerika's love of war? No, more like Love of Domination
Posted by: chief of okeefe on Aug 25, 2007 6:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country starts all the wars, incarcerates all the prisoners, tells other countries how to behave, issues sanctions, and threatens to bomb. The country crawls with beefy crew-cut men in wrap-around sunglasses looking for someone to kill, someone to "detain", someone or something to fight or control. These men lead a determined attempt to control all life on planet earth, and put every single last shread of living tissue on every square inch of Earth under control of the US government.

All this to perpetuate the "international order" or "civilization"-- codewords for "world controlled by and exploited for the benefit of Amerika's wealthy white ruling class".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article!
Posted by: talkville on Aug 26, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In so many ways this is a great article. We must face the fact we are an aggressive, assertive and militarist country and that the Bush Regime is only one of many manifestations of this fact. I like especially Mr Solomon's reference to internalization and compartmentalization; it's right-on and accurate. The current state of our social relations shows it in so many ways. Visit any Corporation and see if it's organization is not almost exactly analogous to a Military ranking system for the employees -- down to the 'last private', the Janitor, out-sourced from the labor outside. We have internalized and accepted the proposition, primarily theological, that there are 'places' we each fit in- starting from the edict of some god that ordains these things; this 'naturalized' as if nature follows these same 'rules'. It has been said that War is economics by another means; it is also true that it has been said that Economics is war by another means. But it has always been said by actual, flesh and blood persons - individually or by alliance with others.

"Those politicians", "the Government", "the Corporations"; how often do each of us use those constructions to refer to WHAT IS GOING ON? When we get up each morning to go to work (economic and political) governed by conditions established by the government and corporations. When we eat our breakfast, before work, with the persons we live with, each of us is being a 'politician', a government, a corporation. It is not from Others our behaviors come from; it's from ourselves. Question assertions and pre-judgments; they are inside of us and not 'out there'. Thanks to our fore-fathers, we are war makers; they may have 'founded' but they did not determine! Liberty is serious business and not to be left in the hands of "the Military".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War Made Easy
Posted by: douglashoyt on Aug 26, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bought the DVD, because I am lazy. Here is the book, however.
http://www.amazon.com/
War-Made-Easy-Presidents-Spinning/dp/0471694797

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Warfare State=Welfare State
Posted by: corazon on Aug 26, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be a choice between guns or butter, now the public is sucked into believing they can have both. Now go back to sleep America, everything is fine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raising Boys (Little Soldiers)