Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Mike Huckabee has a populist economic message that may be shunned by the Money Party in Washington, but likely has an appeal among rank-and-file working-class Republican voters.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democrats Beware: An Economic Populist Is Rising In the GOP's Presidential Primary

By David Sirota, Working Assets. Posted August 14, 2007.


Mike Huckabee has a populist economic message that may be shunned by the Money Party in Washington, but likely has an appeal among rank-and-file working-class Republican voters.
Advertisement

Leave it to the New York Times' crack campaign team to take what is a truly interesting story from the Republican presidential primary and boil it down into an uninteresting, hackneyed attempt to mimic People magazine-style nonsense (Suggestion for a new Times slogan: All the fluff that's fit to print). The Gray Lady - like almost every other major news outlet that is covering the campaign - uses former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee's (R) surprising second-place finish in the Iowa Straw Poll as an excuse to write not about the unique nature of Huckabee's substantive message, but to make the claim that the only reason he is getting ahead is because his "humor amounts to a style of politicking that many audiences have found engaging."

I'm not saying Huckabee isn't funny, but I am saying that he also has an extraordinarily different message than any of the other Republican presidential contenders - a populist economic message that may be shunned by conservative operatives and K Street lobbyists in the GOP-dominated Money Party in Washington, but likely has an appeal among rank-and-file working-class Republican voters. Though Beltway reporters are too insulated in their cliched views of politics to see how this economic populist appeal may be fueling Huckabee's candidacy, it is a phenomenon Democrats should be well aware of if they want to win the White House in 2008.

Here is Huckabee quoted on the AFL-CIO's webpage from the recent Republican presidential debate:

"The most important thing a president needs to do is to make it clear that we're not going to continue to see jobs shipped overseas, jobs that are lost by American workers, many in their 50s who for 20 and 30 years have worked to make a company rich, and then watch as a CEO takes a $100 million bonus to jettison those American jobs somewhere else. And the worker not only loses his job, but he loses his pension. That's criminal. It's wrong."

Huckabee followed this up by telling The Politico: "I am not interested in being the candidate of Wall Street but of Main Street. Wealthy CEOs get paid 500 times what the average worker does, but they are not necessarily 500 times smarter or harder working and that is wrong."

On trade, it's the same thing. Here's Huckabee at a recent campaign stop in Iowa:

"If somebody in the presidency doesn't begin to understand that we can't have free trade if it's not fair trade, we're going to continually see people who have worked for 20 and 30 years for companies one day walk in and get the pink slip and told 'I'm sorry but everything you spent your life working for is no longer here.'…I'd like to prove that this presidency is not going to be just up for sale. If that's the case, let's just put it on eBay and be done with it. I'd like to think it's going to be more about our principles, not just our pockets."

Even on health care, Huckabee populist line seems to be working with GOP audiences. Notice this report from Raw Story:

"If you want to know how to fix it, I've got a solution," Huckabee said at the Republican debate. "Either give every American the same kind of healthcare that Congress has or make Congress have the same kind of health care that every American has." As he spoke, the electronic graphs rose dramatically for both moderate and conservative Republicans, from a neutral reading of 50 into the 80's.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: huckabee, populism

David Sirota is the author of Hostile Takeover: How Big Money and Corruption Conquered Our Government--and How We Take It Back (Crown, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There is a bipartisan populist trend in Washington DC. It's a sign of the times.
Posted by: yellow on Aug 14, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember that the US economy has most benefited the rich since 1981 and especially over the last six years. Many of these southern Republicans represent lots of poor folks. These constituents have finally become disaffected with the Bush agenda. The poor haven't benefited from the federal income or capital gains or dividend tax cuts (three quarters of the latter went to the upper 20% of tax payers with about a third going to the top 1% alone!!), or from free trade agreements that have shipped jobs overseas and destroyed local industries only to reimport the goods they once produced, in some cases, at higher prices. They haven't benefitted from budget cuts in social programs, home foreclosures, rising health care costs or a tax shift to states and localities that is highly regressive. They haven't benefitted from slow GDP growth and rising economic inequality. They certainly haven't benefitted from rising interest rates, massive consumer debt and rising debt service ratios for those below the national median income which, when taken into account in the national poverty rate calculations, add another three million or 1% to the national poverty rate.

These poor folks, many of whom hold a job, need more gainful employment, universal health care, a stable growing economy based on the development of new sectors like mass transit and renewable energy that will absorb the unemployed and meet human needs, and increased real incomes and wages. We won't get this from K Street Republicans. We'll just get more of the same Bushonomics that has produced tax cuts for the rich, big federal deficits, trade deficits, more financialization of the overall economy, and social inequality. It is no wonder that the populist message is being expounded and heard by non-traditional sources. America is fast approaching a critical juncture in its social history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» social history Posted by: Iconoclast421
Woodrow Wilson's Legacy
Posted by: Carson on Aug 14, 2007 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am proud to be an American when I see the way the Iowa straw poll seemed to cut through some of the hype created by the media that was in favor of the over financed candidates.

Back about 1915 or so we had a politician named Woodrow Wilson that accepted a bribe to create the Federal Reserve. They were a group of very powerful bankers and businessmen from around the world at the time. Through the monopoly of being the source of our money and by being outside of our government, or paying any taxes, they have built up a fortune that, I believe, includes owning most of the politicians of the world.

It is going to take a determined, We the People, to restore law and order in our government before we can restore law and order in our streets.



"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

-Woodrow Wilson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Woodrow Wilson's Legacy Posted by: kelt65
Some Good Points, But...
Posted by: danjkelly2 on Aug 14, 2007 10:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the author really interested in populism, or is this just another front for the Democratic machine, which is part of the larger political machine? I mean, to me, populism transcends political parties, affiliations, and the like. Yet he makes it clear that he is a Democrat:

Nonetheless, in a campaign setting where rhetoric is (unfortunately) everything, the real story about Huckabee's spurt is the story of populism's acendance and cross-party appeal. As a Democrat who wants to see Democrats win the White House in 2008, I shudder to think about a candidate like Huckabee using this posture to triangulate in a general election. You can, for example, pretty easily imagine him seizing the rhetorical mantle of populism against a candidate like Hillary Clinton - a candidate who brags about pocketing big cash from lobbyists, who surrounds herself with K Street mercenaries, who takes in more health industry money than any other lawmaker in Congress, and who appears on the cover of Fortune magazine as Big Money's handpicked candidate. And as I've stated so many times before, the only way to fight off a general election candidate like Huckabee - or any other Republican candidate - is for Democratic candidates to finally embrace populism for themselves, rather than shunning it in an effort to get approval from their Wall Street wing.

This reminds me of something I might have thought a few years ago when I was still wrapped up in Democrat vs. Republican nonsense - before I learned how the system really works. A true populist doesn't concern herself with keeping massive political machines - Democrat or Republican - together. Rather, a true populist elects whoever truly best represents the people's interests, regardless of party affiliation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i meant RuPaul, not ron paul Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
3.5
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 16, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comments:

1. Wing-nut radio and religion already have a monopoly on populism. Working folks might complain about the overpaid CEO, the crappy health plan, and the pile of bills they can't pay. But at the end of the day, they still think the real enemies are those snobby, Godless liberals up in New England, the gays, towel-heads, and baby-killing feminists. A few speeches about their real, day-to-day concerns isn't going to change their warm, comfy prejudices in the forseeable future, as much as many people would like to think.

2. The working class thinks they're middle class. Raised on a steady diet of supply-side crap and get-rich infomercials, they've been building a thick wall of denial since the Reagan era and before. A few comments from the Republican establishment about "class war", liberals, communism, the French, etc., and they'll fall in line like they usually do. They lack what I guess they used to call "class consciousness."

3. Interesting twist, though. In many primaries, they usually have one or two "troublemakers" on the Dems' side who talk about the real deal. Not so much on the GOP side. Weren't there two this time: Huckabee and some other dude?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» some other dude? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: 3.5 Posted by: teufelhunde
» RE: 3.5 Posted by: Jordonquits
Too Late for Economic Populism???
Posted by: CatDad on Aug 16, 2007 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to the "miracle" of conservative economic theory, the US economy has gone from creating high-quality manufactured goods to creating debt....debt which is largely held by nation's like China, Japan and Saudi Arabia. We've liquidated vast swaths of our manufacturing sector in the name of higher stock prices...which is the ultimate moral good in our corporate state.

How are we going re-negotiate trade agreements with China now that they have a gun to our head in the form of one trillion in US Treasury notes that they hold? Last week China openly boasted that they would wreak havoc with the US dollar if this nation dared to try to change the current economic trading status between our nations.

Why should anyone trust Mike Huckabee to change our "free trade" corporate state? The Democrats, [allegedly] the party of the common person, took the votes of so many of us in 2006 who were bitterly opposed to NAFTA/WTO "free trade" deals...What did we get? Secret deals with the White House for MORE free trade.

Our nation's ruling elite have vowed to themselves never to put themselves in a vulnerable position as existed during the Hoover administration and the 30s economic collapse. "Free trade" is their ace in the hole to pummel the American worker and unions into submission by making it impossible for workers to fight back due to so much of the economy being liquidated to foreign markets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Populism" ... a good thing????
Posted by: BenCaxton12 on Aug 16, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off: anything that divides and confuses the Republican Party has to be a good thing ... Let us hope it is true.

But whenever someone self-describes as 'populist' I am forcefully reminded of the "Inherit the Wind" movie: -- William Jennings Bryan and all the townfolk of Dover TN were authentic Populists. For them ignorance and intolerance were VIRTUES.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Populist economics and fundamentalist religion...
Posted by: truthteller on Aug 16, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Would be a powerfully attractive message in the South and West Republican strongholds. Even if he really doesn't mean what he's saying about helping working people, wrapping his economic message in with his Southern Baptist pastoral background makes him a formidable opponent for an economically progressive Democratic message that also includes the traditionally progressive and inclusive Democratic social agenda - gay rights, pro-choice, anti-war, etc. Lots of people understand their economic straits, but will not tolerate a progressive social agenda. Huckabee just might be their man, and a viable alternative for them to whatever Democratic nominee is trying to convince them that the Democratic economic message overrides a social agenda they find to be anathema.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

memory lane
Posted by: ekipnrut on Aug 16, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HL
HL2

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: memory lane Posted by: Lincoln fan
Funny how things change
Posted by: DrSuess on Aug 16, 2007 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The most important thing a president needs to do is to make it clear that we're not going to continue to see jobs shipped overseas, jobs that are lost by American workers, many in their 50s who for 20 and 30 years have worked to make a company rich, and then watch as a CEO takes a $100 million bonus to jettison those American jobs somewhere else. And the worker not only loses his job, but he loses his pension. That's criminal. It's wrong."

This statement is now taken as a “new message”- something really revolutionary. In fact- this was much more the norm a few years ago. The whole idea that American jobs should be sent away is not “revolutionary”- it is standard old fashion right and left wing American fare 30 years ago. Neither the business owners, nor the labor movement, wanted to move out of the States. When Ford made the statement that he was not going to build a factory for the “Communists” in Russia- he was considered a patriot. The whole idea that jobs should not leave this country was gospel Republican AND Democratic fare 30 years ago when we were fighting the “godless” communists. The Republicans had different reasons than the Democrats- but they both agreed- keep the jobs here.

Now the communists are “ok”- they have been transformed in the Medias eyes into fledgling capitalists’ who are wonderful people who have our best interests at heart. (I want to throw some cold water here- the same communists who shot businessmen in the Cultural Revolution ARE the heads of the government in China now.) These Chinese capitalists’ are our buddy pals.

Actually, I think the Chinese leaders are smarter than we are- and are using criminal capitalism to steal all our factories. We are the dumb ones who are buying the stupid media smoke screen. Every time the media has the opportunity to talk about something interesting and valuable- they put a silly starlet on the screen and cut away from all important topics to feed America trivia.

I am glad Huckabee is talking about something valuable. Let him keep up the good work. Maybe it will strengthen the Democratic spine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The GOP needs another Teddy Roosevelt
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 16, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allthough I am an Independent, I think the GOP needs another Teddy Roosevelt. And the times we are in now mirror strikingly what it was like when he became president: robber-baron industrialists and businessmen, monopolies, working class getting the shaft, huge economic disparities, etc.

Although some may argue that TR had a belligerent streak when it came to foreign policy, he did move the country forward in some undeniably positive ways. Regulation of industry, trust-busting, conservation measures were some of the things he championed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's a fundamental reason for Huckabee's showing in Iowa
Posted by: sausage on Aug 16, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let me quote from the weblog Independent Christian Patriot:

...Mike Huckabee coming in second, which was probably a shock to some people, but I'm not shocked, I think Mike Huckabee has a good platform, and he is a honest, right to the point sort of guy, not to mention he has a great sense of humor. As we all know, Mitt Romney is a Mormon, and Mike Huckabee is a former Baptist Minister, so who would you vote for?

...Mike Huckabee has the qualities that many Evangelical Christians could rally around.

... Mike Huckabee is Pro-Life, Pro-Family, and a Honest and intelligent person, with a great sense of humor.

I'm concerned about three things: The War on Terror, Pro-Life issues, and Pro-Family issues, my ideal Candidate is strong on all 3, but one thing my ideal Candidate is not, and that is a liberal Democrat.

Robert Bayn

Sure the guy who posted the above isn't a professional "pundit" but there are more out there like them.

For them talk of corporate responsibility is just that, talk. A fair and just economic system isn't high on their agenda. A decent paycheck would be nice, but their reward is in heaven so economic policy...eh? what's that?

Belive me, Huckabee coming in second in the GOP Iowa straw poll didn't surprise me.
The tall corn of Iowa hides all kinds of Christian fundamentalists, from Reformed LDSers to pentecostalists to a stray snake handler here and there. My union, for several years, was dominated by fundamentalists Christians. They even tried to name one of their group branch (local) chaplin!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arkansas is a surprisingly good place to live...
Posted by: phatkhat on Aug 16, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is the best kept secret in America.

How much Huckabee's two terms as governor had to do with that, I'm not sure. But he sure didn't hurt. He is very concerned with public health, health care for kids, and a fair shake at prosperity for the ordinary working schmuck.

Although Arkansas is home to the miserable Wal-Mart, we are not overall that economically well off, especially the Delta, which is downright poor. But we are working on it. There are many regional development NGOs, and people here are optimistic on the whole.

Yes, Huckabee is a Baptist minister. Yes, he's been involved with a shaky evangelist or two. But he never struck me as being particularly eager to turn Arkansas into a theocracy. He witnesses for his faith through his own life, but I would not say he is strident.

I'm sure he is pro-life and anti-gay marriage. But so are a lot of blue dog dems that have sold out to K Street. Huckabee isn't a wingnut. He is a conservative, yes, but more of an "old guard" conservative, not a neo-con dictator.

Had term limits not interfered, I've no doubt he'd still be Governor, and I - a liberal - would have voted for him. The man CARES, and that means a lot.

After Katrina, he welcomed "refugees" to Arkansas, and waived the paperwork for them to get aid. His view was that they needed food and shelter, and the details could be worked out after. He was responsible for ARKIDS First, a program of health care for poor children. He supported a higher minimum wage. He promoted healthy habits in adults, including the smoking ban.

He's honest, and he's real. That is a pretty interesting thing in today's jaded political climate. I don't care what party he is, he is basically a good person. And given the choice of him or Hillary, I'd vote for him in a heartbeat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a tradition - a bad one.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Aug 16, 2007 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has the system been in place too long? Why is it acceptable that one party is for corporate rights and one is (ostensibly)for human rights. Is it because this has been our mode of politics for generations that people consider it to be normal?

It's thought to be "strange" that a Republican can stand for the people. Actually, I think that both parties should represent the people and our elections should hinge on which candidates have the best plans to serve us. Or have I misinterpreted the meaning of "government of the people, by the people, and for the people"?
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Institute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's a tradition - a bad one. Posted by: ray burchard
Nice bitchslap of Grover Norquist,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Aug 16, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but this clown is an anti-science creationist of the worst kind.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One thing could happen if Mike Huckabee makes it to the White House albeit a long shot.
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 16, 2007 10:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps he could prove that not all GOP is pro-elite. As someone earlier pointed out, the DLC and BlueDog wing of the Democratic Party make Huckabee look like an economic liberal. Still, I'm weary that he'll imitate Reagan and Clinton in playing phony populism and then going elite once in office. If anyone in Arkansas could please shed some light on the governor's economic stands, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

again, the economy will dictate the election
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Aug 16, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice what's happening in the financial markets? No Republican is going to be elected in '08. I don't care how "populist" is guy is. Lil' Bush is going to be the Devil of the next 20 years.

Of course, some Dems will go out with them. Dodd sits on the Finance Committee and did nothing while his Wall Street buddies were robbing the public. President? Try early retirement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Notice the inverse relationship between honesty and campaign funding:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 16, 2007 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hop over to the OpenSecrets report on the 2008 election.

"After six months of fundraising, the candidates for president in 2008 have already raised more than $265 million. No presidential money chase has ever started so quickly. By some predictions, the eventual nominees will need to raise $500 million apiece to compete--a record sum."

I don't think the propaganda monkeys at the New York Times are going to be posting any links to opensecrets, however. They probably wish it didn't exist! For example, you can see that Huckabee, despite his miniscule campaign chest, still gets most of his cash from finance and business interests

More fun'n'juicy facts: guess who the top contributor to Obama's campaign is? Ah, that would be Bush pal, Goldman-Sachs!. JP Morgan is just a little lower down the list... They're both betting on Hillary, too, but to a lesser extent. I guess Obama spread his legs wider, what?

From www.corpwatch.org, Banking on Empire

On JP Morgan Chase's Board of Directors sits Riley P. Bechtel, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Bechtel Group, which has received over $2 billion.

Yes, Obama and Hillary will be staying in Iraq! And he seemed like such an 'impressive young man', according to that left-wing power worshipper, Alexander Cockburn.

This is why I'm voting for either Edwards or Kucinich - and certainly not for the Republican funded Green-washed Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice For Just Us
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Aug 16, 2007 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American "populists" support the rights of just one small social group, straight white males. Feminists, gays and non-whites need not apply. According to Wikipedia, Mike Huckabee is a fundamentalist Baptist minister who holds the following political postitions:

Huckabee opposes abortion, same-sex marriages, and civil unions
Huckabee supports the death penalty
Huckabee has expressed support for allowing Creationism and Intelligent Design in school science classes along side Evolution.
Huckabee supports the War in Iraq, the troop surge, the PATRIOT Act and the continued operation of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.[1]
Huckabee endorsed the use of foreign workers from Canada and Mexico for agricultural labor

Not exactly a social liberator, and he wouldn't take the Repugs far from their narrow-minded fundy "base".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huckabee, schmuckabee
Posted by: willymack on Aug 16, 2007 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that ANYONE who even thinks about voting for ANYBODY who calls himself or herself a republican is either a moron or has a screw loose. If we haven't learned our lesson by now, maybe we don't deserve to have a country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Populist? Huckabee?
Posted by: macdon1 on Aug 16, 2007 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I say monkey puckey to that. Populist comes from the word population, which I always took to mean the majority of the citizens. It's the same old kool-aid in a different flavor. When will the ordinary working person realize that the repugs are handing them the knife to cut their own throats?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Time for a Third Party
Posted by: EJW on Aug 17, 2007 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at:
http://www.unity08.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unity = Same corporate BS Posted by: antiapathy
Dixie's Dieting Demagogue is a Dunce
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 17, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think another reason why he might have won is because MSM is giving him more attention than he deserves (while doing its best to ignore Ron Paul.) Why is MSM paying attention to this slimmed down simpleton? Because he has turned his evangelism to weight loss which is good for pharma and big diet. (Just count how many pharma commercials are on your evening news!) It is also a great distraction to keep people obsessed with their own bodies and guilty when can't live up to the standards set for them. What did Naomi Wolf say about a guilty population being more easily manipulated? And because the public has been so brainwashed into believing that weight loss is THE answer to all their problems, it is obscuring what an extremist Huckabee really is. A lighter fundamentalist does not make a fundamentalist lite! He is a raging homophobe and proud NRA member. He has made ridiculous statements like dieting is akin to concentration camps. Since he had no way to intellectually counter Michael Moore, he attacked him by saying his weight was the reason for the current health care crisis. And he put weights on kids report cards creating an untold number of eating disorders! He is pro family values, yet one of his own sons is a flake who was recently charged with carrying a gun on an air plane. While young, the same son was dismissed from employment at a Boy Scout camp for a shooting incident involving a dog. The Huckster needs to take care of his own home before trying to fix anyone elses. We are facing very very serious issues ahead, and Huckabee doesn't even come close to possessing the intellectual sophistication to be able to see the complexities of the problems, yet alone having the solutions. We need a whole lot more to fix what is wrong with us than a low calorie craker!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Link To Gun on Plane Incident Posted by: Gravitas
» Another Link Posted by: Gravitas
The cross America must bear
Posted by: Julian on Aug 19, 2007 6:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True, Hackabee is an intolerant, superstitious, warmongering bigot, but he leaves his intolerant, superstitious, warmongering bigot rivals on the starting blocks when it comes to his economic stance. Decency is not an electable quality in the USA, because of the need to retain the intolerant, superstitious, warmongering bigot vote - that requirement being part of the legacy of keeping the Confederacy in the Union.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let it be Huckajoke
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Aug 21, 2007 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Populism shmopulism. This guy Hucksterbee is a total wingnut. While he's capable of sounding sane and tapping into something real in the population like economic outrage, out slips the nuttery all over the place. The guy's a baptist preacher, not the kind we used to know that was all upstanding, serious, and maybe even kind back in the day. No, the nuttery kind. You know, the kind that thinks that science is something preachers get to make up from their idea of the bible. Back in the day, preachers would respect science and say that somehow God guided the scientists to discover what God created. Not Hucksterbee and his ilk of overprivileged, pick pocketing evangelical perverts. Science is bad because it was created by secular humanists, and the only good science is the kind made by Republican approved corporations and preachers.

Please, Repubs, nominate this loser, and we will have a large landslide for the Dems. More likely, the Huckster is shooting for Romney's VP position, which he could qualify for for sure. That could mean a lot more years of listening to his nuttery. Lord, please spare us, our country isn't that bad that it deserves such hellfire and damnation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]