Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Keeps Israel Close, Saudi Arabia Closer

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted August 1, 2007.


George Bush wants to sell $20 billion in high-tech military equipment to Saudi Arabia -- the source of most of the financing, and 15 of the 19 hijackers, for the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks.
Robert Scheer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Robert Scheer

The Tortured Law on Torture
How has our government managed to justify one of the most egregious assaults on the rule of law?
May 14, 2008

Battle of the Hawks
Both McCain and Clinton have shown a dangerously cavalier attitude towards the option of a nuclear strike against Iran.
May 7, 2008

No Country for Old Men
McCain's age matters; especially if he picks his running mate from the crazy wing of the Republican Party.
Apr 30, 2008

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Go figure: From the White House comes the news that self-styled anti-terrorism crusader George Bush wants to sell $20 billion in high-tech military equipment to Saudi Arabia, the source of most of the financing, and 15 of the 19 hijackers, for the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks on the United States.

The justification can't be that this is yet another boondoggle for the military-industrial complex -- the big winner in the war on terror -- so we are told instead that the Sunni-dominated Saudi kingdom needs this weaponry to withstand a future challenge from those dastardly Shiite fellows in Iran.

Yes, the very same extremists whose surrogates are now, as a consequence of the U.S. invasion, pretending to be the indigenous government of Iraq. Recall that the Shiite militants who rule Tehran, along with the Sunni nuts around Osama bin Laden, were both the sworn enemy of Saddam Hussein.

Now both of those forces are the main players, according to the Bush administration, vying for power in "liberated" Iraq, and our president is in the inane position of playing one group of fanatics against the other in the name of securing Iraq as a democratic haven.

White House officials told The New York Times that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates intend to use the occasion of their joint visit to Saudi Arabia "to press the Saudis to do more to help Iraq's Shiite-dominated government." Huh? Why in the world would the Sunnis, who control Saudi Arabia and are frightened to their bones of Shiites throughout the Gulf, be party to consolidating Shiite power in Iraq?

To complete the circle of madness, White House officials tell reporters that the hope of the latest arms sale program is that the Saudis will be so thrilled with their new weapons that they will stop funding the Sunni insurgents who are currently killing Americans.

The absurdity of this position is that it makes the Saudis the big winners in the war on terror and yet expects them to cut out behavior that has played so effectively to the kingdom's advantage. The nation which was most directly responsible for spawning the original al-Qaida attacks on the U.S., and which has since helped finance the violence in Iraq, is now being rewarded with a long-sought weapons modernization package. Thus, a new generation of deadly toys finds its way into the volatile Mideast.

Embarrassing facts undermining Bush's insistence that Iraq is the key battleground in the war on terror are that al-Qaida, which was not allowed a presence in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, is now said by Bush to be behind the insurgency and that half of the foreign suicide bombers have been Saudi nationals.

Why would the Saudis now move to stem the flow of terrorists across their border when Bush is rewarding them so handsomely for their past support of terrorism? After all, this administration has never demanded an accounting from the Saudis for the kingdom's support of the Taliban government when it was coddling Saudi terrorist financer bin Laden. Nor has Bush's camp ordered any serious examination of just how 15 Saudi "soldiers" were recruited, and provided with legitimate Saudi passports and American visas, to commit the mayhem for which the Iraqi people have been so severely punished.

While the $20-billion weapons package will no doubt be supported vigorously by lobbyists for a defense industry that stands to make a financial killing from the deal, it is expected to meet opposition in Congress, particularly from those who fear the impact of this new weaponry on the security of Israel.

No problem -- "senior officials" in the White House assured The New York Times that the Saudi arms package would be balanced with a $30.4-billion military aid package for Israel. Then, of course, some large amount of military "aid," to the tune of $13 billion, will also have to be extended to Egypt to keep the dictator in Cairo on board.

What a deal! The Saudis pony up billions in cash, American taxpayers come up with an amount more than twice as high to keep the Israelis and Egyptians happy, and U.S. war profiteers, Bush's most reliable core constituency group, make out like bandits. Hey, it's only money, and the only real cost might be to folks who get caught in the line of fire of those weapons in wars to come for generations. But not to worry, most of them don't vote in U.S. elections anyway.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: saudi arabia, iran, iraq, weapons

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Am enhanced definition for "Friendly fire"?
Posted by: rg on Aug 1, 2007 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Hey, it's only money, and the only real cost might be to folks who get caught in the line of fire of those weapons in wars to come for generations. "............as in American military personnel, men & women; the very same ones that the spineless, traitor to the American people legislature in Washington - both democrat AND republican have not demonstrated the leadership to pull out of this debacle.
Has anyone complied a current list of the children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces of the members of congress who are at this moment serving in Iraq?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the Bush of confusion
Posted by: eosrk on Aug 1, 2007 8:17 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and the band played on. War everywhere, al-Qaida in Iraq, India and Pakistan with nukes fighting over a piece of Kasimir, stock market up, Americans out of work, outsourced to China whom sends us leaded kids' toys. They say the War on Terror, but they called the kaos Operation Iraqi Liberation, then changed the Liberation to Freedom, so that it didn't spell out, OIL.

Then came Katrina and Rita, and it just fucked BushCo all up
the Bush of confusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lowest Unemployment in Years Posted by: bestofthebest
don't forget these other issues:
Posted by: Artur Yvan on Aug 2, 2007 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a few years, all the people who were concerned about the "issues" of today (war on terror, al qaeda, iraq, iran, israel, gay marriage, immigration, etc, blah blah), will remember the better days, when we, as a country, failed to act on the issue that eclipses all others when it comes to the well-being of our country, the rising threat that is China.

We can't do anything about it, because they already own Bush, and all the presidential nominees...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

follow the money and listen to the soldiers
Posted by: wawa on Aug 2, 2007 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Olmert confirmed that the United States will increase foreign aid for Israeli defense by 25 percent to $3 billion over the next 10 years."-http://www.arabnews.com/ August 2, 2007


Since 1948, USA taxpayers have provided Israel with over 108 Billion.

Bishop and three time Nobel Peace Prize Nominee, Elias Chacour told this reporter:

"You Americans are still too young! You think money and weapons solve problems! Only love and respect can do that. You reach for the moon, but not your neighbor."-page 129, "KEEP HOPE ALIVE"

Excerpted from July 31, 2007 WAWA Blog quoting two former Israeli army soldiers Breaking The Silence:

"I am a practicing Jew and in two weeks we go into the month of repentance; which requires acknowledging our sins. We cannot change things until we acknowledge our culpability."


"There is a very clear and powerful connection between how much time you serve in the territories and how fucked in the head you get."


http://www.wearewideawake.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes 15 0f the 19 TERRORIST hijackers on 9-11 were Saudi
Posted by: bestofthebest on Aug 2, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That doesn't mean the Saudi government supported them at all. What an absurd comment. The author of this article has no credibilty whatsoever.

Keep in mind Osama bin-Laden lost his citizenship. They distanced themselves from him because of his extreme radicalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Johanna Moren
Posted by: Johanna Moren on Aug 2, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, same procedure as always. Finance both sides.
One to the Arabs, two to Isreal. We financed and armed the Taliban to get rid of the Russians; they ended up according to the CIA using the weapons against us....which one of these Arab coutries will end up using the weapons we are giving them against the USA, at a later date?????
Johanna Moren

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Johanna Moren Posted by: srsmn
Francis
Posted by: Francis on Aug 3, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our infrastructure is collapsing due to decades of neglect. The corporatists are blackmailing the politicians into the privatization of severely neglected public works for quick-fix pennies on the dollar. The money which would have upgraded the bridges and roadways, sewers, schools, et al. has found a far better home in Israel and Lockheed Martin. All of this in broad daylight, shaded only by news of Paris Hilton's home sale. Such a legacy we leave our children and grandchildren.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saudis rewarded for providing 9-11 patsies
Posted by: xbj on Aug 3, 2007 3:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somewhere in Hawaii, Mike "the Jews did 9-11" Rivero is choking on a ham sandwich....

That said and done, why else would the Sunni Saudis, with their tenouse grip on power via their tottering monarchy, fund Madrassas and back Shia fundamentalism which directly threatens their power, if not at the direct pay of the Bush Empire?

To supply an endless supply of patsies for Nazi Amerika's "war" "against" "global" "terror", obviously.

And because Bush's Nazi Amerika pays so very, very, very, well.

In any war, you must first identify the enemy correctly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A $30 billion aid package to Israel?
Posted by: american on Aug 4, 2007 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chutzpah indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]