Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush in Free Fall

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted July 25, 2007.


As Bush’s poll numbers plummet and public support to end the war continues to build, when Bush will finally turn on the neo-conservatives who betrayed his presidential legacy?
Robert Scheer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Robert Scheer

The Tortured Law on Torture
How has our government managed to justify one of the most egregious assaults on the rule of law?
May 14, 2008

Battle of the Hawks
Both McCain and Clinton have shown a dangerously cavalier attitude towards the option of a nuclear strike against Iran.
May 7, 2008

No Country for Old Men
McCain's age matters; especially if he picks his running mate from the crazy wing of the Republican Party.
Apr 30, 2008

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

At what point will President Bush finally grasp the enormous disaster that the neoconservatives, from Vice President Dick Cheney on down, have visited upon his presidency?

Or, to put it numerically, just how does a president descend from a 92 percent approval rating one month after 9/11 -- the highest of any president since modern polling began -- to the two-thirds disapproval score that has stalked him through the last year, thanks to the Iraq debacle, without getting the message?

Two major polls released this week show that the vast majority of Americans grasp the salient lesson of the Iraq misadventure: "Winning" this war has nothing to do with winning the war on terrorism. Thus, the public overwhelmingly supports the congressional Democratic leadership's demand that the administration begin concrete steps to extract U.S. troops from Iraq.

This week's New York Times/CBS poll found that two-thirds of those polled said that the war is "going badly" and that "the United States should reduce its forces in Iraq, or remove them altogether." Meanwhile, a Washington Post/ABC survey reported that, "by a large margin, Americans trust the Democrats rather than the president to find a solution to a conflict that remains enormously unpopular."

According to the Post poll, more than six in 10 Americans want Congress to make the final decision about when our troops come home. Even a majority of Republicans judge Bush to be too rigid to change course and, significantly, among those who either served in Iraq or had a close friend or relative who did, only 38 percent approve of Bush's handling of the war.

In an important rebuke to those Democrat "centrists" afraid to vigorously challenge Bush on the war, about half of those polled criticized the Democrats for doing "too little" to challenge Bush's war policy. How much courage will it take for wavering Democrats and Republicans to come out forthrightly in favor of ending a war that the majority of Americans believe is not worth fighting?

At first, the public, driven by false claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaida manufactured by the neocon cabal that dominated the administration, bought into Bush's claims that the Iraq war was an essential battle in the war on terrorism.

At a time when even respectable news organizations were spreading such falsehoods as unquestioned truths and most Democrats in Congress displayed the independence of mind of cheerleaders, it was no wonder that initial support for the Iraq war was nearly unanimous. Fully 90 percent of Americans backed Bush one week after the first bombs fell in a "shock and awe" campaign that neocon ideologues at the Pentagon were convinced would lead a terrorized population to embrace democracy and other purported Western values.

As Winston Churchill once observed, a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth puts its pants on. But the truth eventually does catch up, and that is the specter that now haunts our president. There is simply no plausible national security argument for the United States' ongoing occupation of Iraq.

That fact was driven home Tuesday when American and Iranian negotiators met for the second time in Baghdad at the insistence of Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who was quite clear that peace will not come without the Iranian government's cooperation.

The harsh reality that the United States must now enlist the support of Iran, the "rogue nation" that Bush claims threatens us with nukes, which this very week was once again accused by the U.S. ambassador of supplying arms to Iraq's anti-American Shiite militias, underscores the folly of this disastrous escapade. The regime change engineered by the neocons vastly extended the power of the regime housed in Tehran and will only intensify with each additional day of the U.S. occupation.

Yet, communication with Iran is a good thing, because Iranians at least have to live with the consequences of increased violence -- as opposed to American politicians, who feel required only to muddle through to the next election.

The Democrats and the few Republican dissidents are quite happy to make a show of their reservations about the war without actually ending it. The Democratic leadership in Congress is playing a risky game of pretending to be the party of peace without actually pursuing the budget-cutting measures that would force an end to the war.

While this opportunistic strategy may produce a temporary political advantage, it will be of slight comfort to the families of American soldiers killed and maimed in Iraq over the next 18 months, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of future Iraqi victims. Nor will it con a public that has turned solidly against this war and is determined to hold politicians responsible for ending it.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, polls, iraq

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's time to get out period. Nothing will improve until we do.
Posted by: rjs on Jul 25, 2007 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's time to get out at any cost and now. Nothing is going to change in Iraq until we do. The unfortunate truth however is that no one listens to the people in the US. Not even Congress. It's corruption at all levels with no one being held accountable.

How does the US pull out? Simple, pack your bags, and head out. Call it victory, call it loss, but leave. This should be able to happen in no more than 6 months. Forget the oil. But it won't happen.

President Bush is the worst US President in the history of the United States. Removing our rights, provoking FUD in the form of "Axis of Evils" and "Terrorism" while claiming "In God We Trust". What God on earth would put up with this nation of abominations? Let alone a creator that states the greatest of all gifts is the gift of "Love"? If they believed at all, they would concur that the "God of Money" is known to fail time and time again throughout all of history. Yet it appears it is still the deity of choice.

No one will Impeach, no one will do anything. Because it's all part of the plan. We just sit here and watch our rights being suspended and the US turn into a depressed / repressed nation. But we will Impeach a Democratic President for lying about his sex life. Do you understand
how stupid we look to the rest of the world?

Instead of following love and compassion, working with other nations on a broad basis, saving the option of war for an all out last ditch effort, and doing what we can to create stability and peace for all people, we follow war in the name of a single man and those tied to corruption.

People make mistakes, but this is no mistake. This was the plan and we had no clue. Nor were we truly informed.

We need to get out now at any cost. We should not even be there and most Americans believe the same. Most believe it to be a war of agression against another nation. Preemptive war is not the answer and not a solution to the growing issues world wide.

The next several presidents should be working towards building better relations with the rest of the world. Bringing the US closer to it's allies, creating or working to create a more compassionate way of co existence with all neighbors.

We cannot save face, nor should we try. We should put the blame where it should be on the shoulders of the US President who made these decisions and those whom supported the "Global war on Terrorism" in the first place, and move forward with a better and more realistic future for the generations to come.

Problem is, most of whom sit in the high places of our government supported this war. Again, not much of a group of 2008 candidates to choose from that isn't already tied up in the mess. They fell for the war hype and fever as well.

We keep hearing that if we "leave we lose". That we are staying until we win. Okay, what are we going to win? Are going to defeat Global Terrorism in Iraq? Is there such a thing as defeating what has existed since the beginning of time? No. And this rationale seems to be more borderline mental illness than anything else.

Defend our borders. Stay home. Quit policing the world. If we are attacked and we can "PROVE" whom did it, then go after just those people who committed the crime. If not, we should not rain hail and thunder on nations that had little to nothing to do with it. Nations that would be doing well to threaten us with no more than a sling shot and a rock.

"Perpetual War", "Perpetual Terrorism" FUD is not an option and should not be tolerated of any society as a definition of any kind.

I see little hope for change in 2008 in the slightest of form.
Appease the people with words and vote the opposite. That is what we currently operate under.

This is just an opinion. Just one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop the Insanity!
Posted by: bohdan on Jul 25, 2007 8:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a limit to rationality before it crosses over into irrationality,

Neither George Bush, nor Congress, realizes that our future has long since crossed over and into the world of irrationality. And it had started before the invasion into Iraq. That blunder only highlights our step into stupidity.

Forget about the initial cause of our "war on terror," 9/11. That was only a gateway for the inmates to plan a reaction. Instead, measure the worth of our leaders by what followed.

And what followed was a plan fashioned in the world of irrationality. At which point all that was around turned into insanity. Yes, insanity. And that is the real reason for the continuing deaths of our soldiers and innocent civilians.

So, for the sake of one man's (and his henchmen's) irrational steps, we are all taking part in his irrational policy for further destabilization. It's the Big Bully with his Gang of neoconservative Republican robots, along with the spineless Democrats who are afraid to even suggest the idea of impeachment, that are responsible for this insanity.

Unfortunately, this is the moral fiber of our current regime.

Yet being as we are, perhaps that is what we deserve, for we too have lost our spirit of Truth. Until we understand how to find and use our rational thought, all of us in this country will continue to be responsible for its demise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never
Posted by: bulbman on Jul 26, 2007 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dream on. Bush will never turn against the confederation that constitutes his "brain." The man has no intellectual appartus to substitute. Just as he demands absolute loyalty above all; just as he can never admit that he was wrong; he will never repudiate the failed, imperial policies of the "Project for the New American Century." There is only one remedy. Impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The silence of the sheep
Posted by: John Annis on Jul 26, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You people deserve nothing less than what you've got now, and what is inevitably coming. You're just about all bought and paid for, particularly your 'elected' representatives, and it seems all you are capable of is sitting on branches like chimps and indulging in self-abuse.

Too many have bought into the stupidities that have been sold to you over the past few decades about being the biggest and the best, the freest and the most generous.

You are none of these things; you are simply a third-world country with a vast stock of armaments and homicidal intentions towards the rest of the world. You deserve everything that's coming, and you won't have long to wait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The silence of the sheep Posted by: John Annis
» RE: The silence of the sheep Posted by: JSquercia
A childish solution?
Posted by: Beagle17 on Jul 26, 2007 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "war" in Iraq costs the American budget between 6 and 9 billion greenbacks per month by most estimates.

I suggest that the Iraqi government could spend that money better than the American military can. After all, Saddam ran a pretty secure little nation (free of terrorists, secular, lots of service economy, relatively high status of women) on a lot less.

I've always had qualms about the 'cut and run' option because it doesn't account for the huge debt America owes the people of Iraq for barging in and making a total mess of the place all in the name of getting rid of a demonized dictator.

America might still 'win' this thing if it recognizes the power of local solutions. Wind down the American military presence and give the Iraqi government the savings for the first two years or so. I'd bet with billions coming in monthly, the Iraqi government people could learn to get along despite their differences stemming from the unfairness of the Saddam era.

But this plan suffers from a flaw. It is too simple, and perhaps might work. So it will never be done this way. Some path of total failure will be found no matter what.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But what about the OIL
Posted by: james2021 on Jul 26, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cant leave until we have drained every drop of OIL from Iraq and IRAN. Corporate Masters say so, and Dubya the puppet will continue toi spout all kinds of fabrications, to keep us there as long as possible.

Beside, the Corporate Contracters are making money by the bushel. War is great for Business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But what about the OIL Posted by: Beagle17
» RE: But what about the OIL Posted by: Beagle17
If his poll numbers go any lower, he may be more loathed than...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jul 26, 2007 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Congress, as a whole.

Sigh...which leaves we the people with "a government of the people", abhorred by the people, that willfully acts against the will of the people.

May they (almost) all take a long bus ride on a short pier.

Hopefully someone has educated Lane Hudson regarding figurative language; I'm far too busy to entertain the results of breathless, loony shenanigans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never. He was hired as a lightning rod, and will end up as a lightning rod.
Posted by: xbj on Jul 26, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He was hired to fool as many people as possible for as long as possible, and he's managed to do it.

It's not going to change. To assume otherwise is to ignore reality and accept their reality, AS IF this were a real Presidency instead of the beginning of a very short and very terminal dictatorship put into place by an illegal judicial coup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The politicians are not actually running things
Posted by: american on Jul 26, 2007 4:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Money People Are.

How do politicians get elected?

Do you think if they got in to office by popularity alone things would be the same?

Would Bush be around without their support?

If Bush weren't priviledged, he would hardly be able to support himself.

The politician's opinions do not vary widely because their true base of support doesn't either.

This is why what the majority wants is not happening; what the minority wants is.

And they do not have term limits.

This is why things are not changing.

For all our efforts we are not addressing the root of the problem.

The root is safe, hidden. It protects itself underground.

The figureheads get chopped and the root nurtures another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ummm........
Posted by: mn on Jul 26, 2007 9:42 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shoot. To. Kill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shoot. To. Kill. Posted by: RedAaron
1
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 28, 2007 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another irresponsible, cookie-cutter "progressive" article, kissing up to the public and making excuses for them.

The 90% from 2003 need to be held responsible for their support of this mess. And the "progressive" intelligentsia who continue to make excuses for them and shift all the blame to the media, the President, the Neocons, etc. are just as bad...or worse, because they are enablers.

I don't envy any writer or public figure who has the courage to alienate the US public--and probably a large part of their audience--by calling them sheep. We've all got bills to pay.

I guess it goes to show how the system perpetuates itself. As an ordinary citizen, you can rally behind the next war all you want. And as soon as it gets messy, you can blame the media and the politicians for your herd mentality, mental laziness, and so on. And the "progressive" community will pat you on the head for backing the right horse at the 12th hour. It's as easy as being a two-year-old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MORE CRAP
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 28, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's popularity has taken a hit since he got elected, with a brief uptick for his 'heroism' on 9/11. I'm tired of reading and hearing about it. He should have been impeached at the first mention of war. But then he was elected to go to war. I forgot. Nobody has any serious intentions of doing anything about him. The phony handwringing is getting old. I doubt that George Bush was ever a guy who people really liked. He's used to being unpopular. Stop already. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About more than Bush and Cheny
Posted by: SJ on Jul 28, 2007 10:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrates and Republicans are for stronger military. If you think thats all that means ??? Taking the two lead men out will not stop the war. The billionairs want to control China and others by controling the oil and both parties are intenet to get the job done. The caos they provide helps to keep the troops their to illiminate any anti US voices or groups. A slow withdrawal helps to continue to keep unrest and figthing going to illiminate as many iraqi as they can. Cut the funding, because to many politicians are bought and sold to help this genocide for oil war going. Iraqi do not want us there. Pull out now and leave Bush and Cheny over there. Stop people from enlisting , support a 3rd party now. Denounce the democratic fascists , stop the war, cut the funding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is only the oil.
Posted by: Cargill1 on Jul 31, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"There is simply no plausible national security argument for the United States' ongoing occupation of Iraq." I would think controlling ME oil production, not just forcing the new oil laws on the Iraqi people, but including strategic management of supply from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, and ultimately Iran, is the conservative agenda, and energy security is national security (= profit).

I wonder how many Americans would condemn the war if it meant $6.00 gasoline a couple of years after a troop withdrawal? Or real shortfalls in supply as other forces increase influence in the ME? I don't support the conservative objective, but articles like this HAVE to discuss the total centrality of oil to be credible, it seems to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]