Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Media Corrections We’d Like to See

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted July 24, 2007.


One aspect of news media that needs a different paradigm is the correction ritual. Newspapers are sometimes willing to acknowledge faulty reporting, but the "correction box" is routinely inadequate.
Normon Solomon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Norman Solomon

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity
Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
May 7, 2008

Let's Party Like It’s 1932
Obama has the potential to become as great a president as FDR, while activists have the potential to prompt change comparable to the New Deal.
Apr 21, 2008

NPR: National Pentagon Radio?
When even public radio parrots the military's official line on the war in Iraq, what hope is there for unbiased, quality reporting?
Mar 27, 2008

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Former readers of Mad Magazine can remember a regular feature called "Scenes We'd Like to See." It showed what might happen if candor replaced customary euphemisms and evasions. These days, what media scenes would we like to see?

One aspect of news media that needs a different paradigm is the correction ritual. Newspapers are sometimes willing to acknowledge faulty reporting, but the "correction box" is routinely inadequate -- the journalistic equivalent of self-flagellation for jaywalking in the course of serving as an accessory to deadly crimes.

Some daily papers are scrupulous about correcting the smallest factual errors that have made it into print. So, we learn that a first name was misspelled or a date was wrong or a person was misidentified in a photo caption. However, we rarely encounter a correction that addresses a fundamental flaw in what passes for ongoing journalism.

Here are some of the basic corrections that we'd really like to see:

  • "Yesterday's paper included a business section but failed to also include a labor section. Yet the vast majority of Americans work without investing for a living. They are employees rather than entrepreneurs. The failure to recognize such realities when using newsroom resources is not journalistically defensible. The Daily Bugle regrets the error."
  • "On Thursday, in a lengthy story about the economy, this newspaper quoted three corporate executives, two Wall Street business analysts and someone from a corporate-funded think task. But the article did not quote a single low-income person or a single advocate for those mired in poverty. The Daily Bugle regrets the error."
  • "On Sunday, in a front-page article about the mayor's proposals for a sweeping new urban-renewal program, The Daily Bugle devoted 27 paragraphs to the potential impacts on real estate interests, store owners and investors. Yet the story devoted scant attention to the foreseeable effects of the project on poor people, many of whom have been living in the affected neighborhoods for generations."
  • "Last week, The Daily Bugle reported on the history of human rights violations in Latin America without noting the pivotal roles played by the U.S. government in supporting despotic regimes during the 20th century. Such selective reporting had the effect of airbrushing significant aspects of the historical record."
  • "Yesterday, when The Daily Bugle printed a correction about an obituary, it supplied the proper spelling of the first name of the deceased's daughter. However, the correction failed to correct the obituary's evasive summary of his lethal Machiavellian activities as a top official of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Daily Bugle regrets the error."
  • "For nearly five years, The Daily Bugle has frequently printed the headline 'Deaths in Iraq' over the latest listing of confirmed American deaths in Iraq. This headline has been insidiously misleading because it propagates the attitude that the only 'deaths in Iraq' worth reporting by name are the deaths of Americans. Such tacit jingoism and nationalistic narcissism have no place in quality news reporting. The Daily Bugle regrets its participation in this repetition compulsion disorder of American journalism."
  • "The Daily Bugle's reporting has often referred to Senator Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) as 'a respected senator on foreign affairs.' In fact, while some observers greatly respect Senator Lugar, others view him as a chronic hand-wringer whose pathetic deference to presidential militarism has aided and abetted the latest war crimes ordered from the Oval Office."
  • "For more than five years, readers of this newspaper have encountered -- without attribution -- frequent references to 'the war on terrorism' and 'the war on terror.' While avidly used by architects and supporters of the U.S. government's military actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere, such phrases are based on assumptions that could be substantively and effectively refuted. The Daily Bugle regrets that its news pages have relentlessly promoted such official buzzwords as though they were objective realities instead of terms devised to manipulate the public for endless war."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, corrections

The new documentary film "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death," based on Norman Solomon's book of the same title, is now available on DVD. For information about the full-length movie, produced by the Media Education Foundation and and narrated by Sean Penn, go to: www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
as Chomsky has pointed out, newspapers are in the business of selling readers
Posted by: Suzon on Jul 25, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to advertisers. And who are those advertisers? Banks, insurance companies, car manufacturers--businesses with a stake in the status quo.

Yes, I would love to see corrections like those suggested and more besides. Rupert Murdoch, on the other hand, is probably not much bothered. People do bad things because they can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's another one for you
Posted by: hagwind on Jul 25, 2007 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For many years the Daily Bugle has devoted an entire section in each edition to men* who manipulate balls** for large sums of money. Sports has now been consolidated with Business, which covers men*** who manipulate money for large sums of money. Also in Business can be found the Section Formerly Known as News, which covers men**** who manipulate money, lethal weapons, human lives, and balls***** for large sums of money. The Arts, Living, Health, and Science sections have been dropped for insufficient manipulation. Significant developments in these areas will henceforth be covered in Business. For insignificant developments, please consult your neighbors.

*and a very few women
**and a few pucks
***and a very few women
****yeah, and some women too
*****not an inclusive list

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's another one for you Posted by: henderson
mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Jul 25, 2007 4:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Solomon made some good points, but I notice that the excising of the female voice in every instance has gone unremarked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LlanfairPG
Posted by: LlanfairPG on Jul 25, 2007 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a citizen of Indiana, I frequently hear of our Senior Senator, Sen. Richard Lugar. When he conducts himself like a Statesman, I am proud to be a constituent of his (What a thought; a Statesman- from Indiana?). However, I have often noticed that sometimes Sen. Lugar behaves little better than a political hack. It is gratifying to find that other people have noticed this tendecy of his, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nice
Posted by: viagra alternative on Jul 26, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]